Redress Compliance provides software asset and spend management consulting that turns SAM data into license positions and banked savings. Independent former vendor insiders cover 11 vendors, on a fixed fee or 25 percent of negotiated savings.
Redress Compliance provides software asset and spend management consulting for enterprises whose SAM tools report everything but save little. Independent advisors, ex Oracle, IBM and SAP, turn inventories into license positions and banked savings across 11 vendors. Reviews run on a fixed fee and negotiation on 25 percent of savings, for fewer audit surprises and lower renewals.
Software asset and spend management consulting is engaged when the discipline exists but the value does not. Tools are deployed and inventories collected, yet audits still surprise and renewals still roll forward unchanged.
We point the program at money. That means an effective license position per vendor, a spend map with owners and renewal dates, and a pipeline of actions that ends in a signed contract.
They stop at measurement. The savings live in contracts, and most SAM and FinOps programs never reach the negotiating table. The common symptoms:
Tools find the waste. Contracts bank it. The engagement connects the two.
Each engagement is led by a partner, with vendor specialists brought in as the estate requires. Morten Andersen advises on software asset management and mainframe licensing, and Fredrik Filipsson on Oracle, SAP and Java positions, two of the largest lines in most estates.
Fredrik co founded Redress Compliance in 2018 and serves as Group CEO. His career began at Oracle, running audit and compliance engagements for Fortune 500 customers in license management services, followed by senior commercial roles at IBM and SAP. He leads the Oracle practice and the most complex multi vendor engagements.
Morten co founded Redress Compliance after senior commercial and licensing roles at IBM and Oracle. At IBM he ran enterprise licensing and audit engagements for some of the largest financial services and industrial accounts in EMEA. He leads the Vendor Shield subscription and partners on the largest IBM, Oracle, and cross publisher renewals.
Practice leads such as Piaras McDonnell (IBM Practice Lead) and Ethan Mullins (Microsoft Practice Lead) cover vendor specific metrics. See the Redress management team.
It runs from portfolio map to signed savings in four workstreams. The first baseline typically lands within 10 business days of complete data.
| Deliverable | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Portfolio and renewal map | Vendors, owners, spend and renewal dates, with the action each renewal needs. |
| Effective license positions | Entitlements against deployment per vendor, with compliance gaps and surplus rights quantified. |
| Savings inventory | A number against every contract line, ranked by size and by the date it can be banked. |
| Renewal evidence packs | Usage and entitlement evidence staged ahead of each renewal date. |
| Governance and reporting | Ownership and reporting the CFO can steer by, so the discipline continues after the engagement. |
Several vendors moved to metrics that install counts cannot measure. If your SAM tool still reports what it reported in 2023, these gaps are likely:
Each change needs a new measurement rule in the SAM program, not just a new report.
Four published outcomes where measurement turned into money, each on its case study page:
Samsung saved $23M on IBM licensing through entitlement reconstruction across 70 countries and ILMT remediation.
✓ Published case studyCostco Wholesale cut $4.2M from Oracle support by terminating support on unused licenses.
✓ Published case studyA Fortune 200 US retailer saved $5.1M a year on its Microsoft EA renewal, helped by M365 right sizing.
✓ Published case studyLowe's avoided $1.2M of OpenAI Enterprise cost by sizing seats to the people who actually use them.
The test is whether your advisor profits from tools, licenses or implementation work. A neutral comparison:
| Question | Independent advisor (Redress) | Big Four consultancy | Reseller or vendor partner | In house team |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independence | Zero vendor affiliations, no reseller agreements, no referral fees | Advisory sits alongside implementation practices and publisher alliance programs | Commercial partner of the vendor, paid through margin or partner programs | Fully yours |
| Conflicts of interest | None from vendor revenue; paid only by the client | Implementation and alliance revenue on the same products can pull against a hard position | Earns more when you buy more | None, though bandwidth is limited |
| Vendor specific experience | Founders ex Oracle, IBM and SAP; practice leads ex Microsoft and ex SAP; 11 vendor practices | Broad coverage; depth varies by team and engagement | Deep product knowledge, seen from the selling side | Deep on your own estate; sees each vendor event once every few years |
| Market view for spend and usage | Benchmarks from comparable closed deals across 500+ enterprise clients | Varies by practice | Sees pricing from the vendor side | Your own history and last quote |
| How fees work | Fixed fee agreed up front, or 25 percent of savings on negotiation work; never hourly | Advisory fees, often alongside implementation work | Often no separate fee; paid through the transaction | Salary and opportunity cost |
If you are deciding whether to bring in outside help at all, read when to hire a software licensing advisor.
Assessments and license reviews run on a fixed fee, scoped to the estate and agreed up front. The Software Spend Assessment is a fixed fee, six week engagement.
When findings go into a vendor negotiation, that work can run on a success fee of 25 percent of what we save you. You keep 75 percent and pay nothing if we save nothing, and we never bill by the hour.
It delivers effective license positions and banked savings, not just inventories. We turn the data your SAM program already holds into a position per vendor, stage evidence before each renewal, keep audit posture current, and carry findings into the contract.
The difference is duration: cost optimization is an engagement, and spend management is a standing discipline. We run both, and the programs keep spend management going after the first savings are banked.
No. We sell no tool and take no tool vendor referral fees, so the engagement works with whatever your estate already measures, and tooling changes only if the gaps demand it.
It usually comes from the gap between what is paid for and what is used. That means license right sizing, shelfware, support on unused licenses, oversized cloud commitments, and renewals negotiated instead of rolled forward.
Assessment and review work runs on a fixed fee agreed up front, including the six week Software Spend Assessment. Where findings go into a vendor negotiation, that work can run on a success fee of 25 percent of what we save you. We never bill by the hour.
The first baseline typically lands within 10 business days of complete data. The Software Spend Assessment returns a vendor by vendor savings inventory in six weeks, and structural savings are banked at the renewals the evidence was built for.
We need exports from your SAM and discovery tools, contracts and order forms, invoices or spend by vendor, and cloud billing where it applies. Gaps in the data are part of the finding, not a reason to wait.
Yes, on large estates. Samsung saved $23M on IBM licensing, and the largest part was entitlement it already owned but could not find.
Baselines, benchmarks, and execution from the practice behind 500+ enterprise clients.
One letter a month. Negotiation moves, audit signals, and price book shifts.