Redress Compliance provides independent software licensing consultants, led by former vendor insiders, across 11 vendor practices. We verify what you own and owe, defend audits and negotiate renewals, on a fixed fee or 25 percent of savings.
Redress Compliance is an independent firm of software licensing consultants led by former vendor insiders. We establish what enterprises own, deploy and owe across 11 vendor practices, then defend audits and negotiate renewals on that evidence. Fees are fixed, or 25 percent of savings on negotiation work, for a verified position and a lower bill.
Software licensing consultants answer the questions that decide seven figures. What does the estate actually own, what would an audit find, and what does a metric change or conversion offer really trade away?
We are 100 percent buyer side. There are no vendor affiliations, no reseller agreements and no referral fees behind the advice, across Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, Broadcom, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Workday, Cisco, AWS, Google Cloud and the GenAI vendors.
The work fits organizations without in house depth on a specific vendor. It also fits teams facing a decision where the licensing answer moves the number: an audit, a migration, a renewal or an M&A event.
You need one when a licensing question has a price attached and nobody inside can prove the answer. These are the five situations we see most often:
Each one is measurable and each one is negotiable. The engagement turns them from open risks into documented positions.
Every engagement is led by a partner, and the person who scopes the work is the person who runs it. Our partners come from inside the publishers we now advise against, so they know how license management teams build a claim and how account teams price a renewal.
Fredrik co founded Redress Compliance in 2018 and serves as Group CEO. His career began at Oracle, running audit and compliance engagements for Fortune 500 customers in license management services, followed by senior commercial roles at IBM and SAP. He leads the Oracle practice and the most complex multi vendor engagements.
Morten co founded Redress Compliance after senior commercial and licensing roles at IBM and Oracle. At IBM he ran enterprise licensing and audit engagements for some of the largest financial services and industrial accounts in EMEA. He leads the Vendor Shield subscription and partners on the largest IBM, Oracle, and cross publisher renewals.
Vendor practices are led by named specialists, including Ethan Mullins (Microsoft Practice Lead), Mietske van Ravesteijn (SAP Commercial Lead) and Piaras McDonnell (IBM Practice Lead). See the full Redress management team.
It runs in four workstreams: baseline, benchmark, strategy and execution, tuned to the vendors and decisions in scope. The baseline comes first, because every later argument stands on it.
| Deliverable | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Effective license position | Entitlements against deployment per vendor, with compliance gaps, shelfware and surplus rights quantified. |
| Benchmark and target sheet | Targets per element with walk away lines, measured against comparable agreements. |
| Strategy playbook | Sequencing, fiscal timing and anticipated vendor moves with prepared responses. |
| Written proposal and finding assessments | Every vendor proposal or audit finding assessed in writing, with recommended responses. |
| Final contract review | Pre signature confirmation that negotiated positions and license definitions are correctly reflected. |
Several major vendors changed metrics, tiers or prices in the last two years, and each change resets what an estate owes. These are the ones buyers ask us about most:
If your last entitlement review predates these changes, the position it describes is probably out of date.
Four published outcomes across four vendors, each documented on its own case study page:
Oracle opened a $20M Java claim against Kroger. It closed at zero cost.
✓ Published case studySamsung saved $23M on IBM licensing through entitlement reconstruction across 70 countries and ILMT remediation.
✓ Published case studyCostco Wholesale cut $4.2M from Oracle support by terminating unused licenses in the right order.
✓ Published case studyA Fortune 200 US retailer took its Microsoft EA renewal from $27.0M to $21.9M a year.
The main difference is who else pays the advisor. Here is a neutral view of the four routes enterprises usually weigh:
| Question | Independent advisor (Redress) | Big Four consultancy | Reseller or vendor partner | In house team |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independence | Zero vendor affiliations, no reseller agreements, no referral fees | Advisory sits alongside implementation practices and publisher alliance programs | Commercial partner of the vendor, paid through margin or partner programs | Fully yours |
| Conflicts of interest | None from vendor revenue; paid only by the client | Implementation and alliance revenue on the same products can pull against a hard position | Earns more when you buy more | None, though bandwidth is limited |
| Vendor specific experience | Led by former vendor insiders; 11 vendor practices | Broad coverage; depth varies by team and engagement | Deep product knowledge, seen from the selling side | Deep on your own estate; sees each vendor event once every few years |
| Market view for licensing | Benchmarks from comparable closed deals across 500+ enterprise clients | Varies by practice | Sees pricing from the vendor side | Your own history and last quote |
| How fees work | Fixed fee agreed up front, or 25 percent of savings on negotiation work; never hourly | Advisory fees, often alongside implementation work | Often no separate fee; paid through the transaction | Salary and opportunity cost |
Each route has a place. If you are still choosing, the buyer's guide to choosing a software licensing advisor and the independent versus Big Four comparison set out the questions to ask any firm, including us.
Licensing reviews and audit defense run on a fixed fee, scoped to the work and agreed up front. Negotiation engagements can instead run on a success fee: 25 percent of what we save you.
On a success fee you keep 75 percent of the savings, and if we save nothing you pay nothing. We never bill by the hour, so the fee never grows with the number of meetings the vendor asks for.
Engagements can also run inside a program: Vendor Shield for always on advisory, the Renewal Program for the full renewal calendar, and the Vendor Benchmark Program for the long tail.
Software licensing consultants establish what you own, what you deploy, and what the gap costs, then use that position to defend audits and negotiate renewals. The work covers entitlement reconciliation, metric and conversion math, migration licensing, and the licensing questions behind every major vendor decision.
Licensing reviews and audit defense run on a fixed fee, scoped to the work and agreed before we start. Negotiation engagements can instead run on a success fee of 25 percent of what we save you, so you keep 75 percent and pay nothing if we save nothing. We never bill by the hour.
We cover 11 vendor practices plus GenAI: Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, IBM, Broadcom VMware, AWS, Google Cloud, ServiceNow, Workday, and Cisco, along with OpenAI and Anthropic contracts. Each practice has its own service pages and named senior lead.
Hire one before the decision, not after it: ahead of an audit response, a migration, a metric conversion, a renewal, or an M&A event. The entitlement baseline built early is what every later negotiation and audit response stands on.
The first deliverable, a verified baseline, typically lands within 10 business days of complete data. Benchmarks and strategy follow in the next cycle, and execution tracks your renewal or audit calendar rather than a fixed project plan.
We need contracts and order forms, the entitlement records you hold, deployment or usage reports from your tooling, and any live vendor proposal or audit letter. It starts with a short scoping call and a written data request list.
Yes, completely: zero vendor affiliations, no reseller agreements, and no referral fees in any of the 11 vendor practices. We are paid only by the client, so no recommendation depends on what you buy.
Only if you choose to tell them, because your team keeps the chair and all vendor communications. We prepare every exchange behind the scenes: written assessments of each proposal, meeting preparation, and a final contract review before signature.
Baselines, benchmarks, and execution from the practice behind 500+ enterprise clients.
One letter a month. Negotiation moves, audit signals, and price book shifts.