White Paper · Microsoft

Microsoft Security Licensing Unbundled

The buyer side framework for unbundling Microsoft security licensing from M365 E5. Defender, Sentinel, Purview, Intune as separate decisions.

Portrait of Morten Andersen
Written byMorten AndersenCo Founder · ex IBM, ex Oracle
Read Time20 Minutes
Last UpdatedMay 2026

Now that you have the framework

Apply it to your Microsoft situation.

25 minute call with our Microsoft practice lead. We will walk through your specific renewal, audit, or contract and tell you what we would do next. No follow up sales pressure unless you ask for one.

HomeMicrosoft HubWhite PapersMicrosoft Security Licensing Unbundled
The Short Version

If you read nothing else

Bottom Line

Microsoft prices security capabilities through M365 E5 bundling, where the same capabilities are available standalone. The standalone licensing produces meaningful savings for customers who do not need the full E5 feature set. The unbundling decision saves 30 to 50 percent on security licensing for relevant populations.

Key Takeaways

Five conclusions

M365 E5 bundles security at premium. Defender, Sentinel, Purview, advanced Intune all sit in E5; the same capabilities exist standalone.
Defender suite is standalone licensable. Defender for Endpoint Plan 1, Plan 2, Defender for Identity, Defender for Cloud Apps all priced separately.
Sentinel pricing scales with ingestion. Outside E5, Sentinel prices on data ingestion volume; many enterprises produce material savings.
Purview tiers match actual requirements. Compliance Manager, eDiscovery, DLP capabilities are tiered; full E5 Purview rarely required.
BATNA exists at every security capability. CrowdStrike for endpoint, Splunk for SIEM, OneTrust for compliance all compete at relevant slices.
Recommendations by Role

What to do this quarter

CISO
  1. Audit security capability requirements at population level.
  2. Distinguish E5 bundle features from required security features.
  3. Architect for multi vendor security if total cost benefits.
CIO
  1. Decouple security licensing decision from M365 base.
  2. Treat E5 to E3 downgrade as security architecture decision.
  3. Build security FinOps cadence.
VP Procurement
  1. Demand standalone pricing for Defender, Sentinel, Purview.
  2. Compare E5 cost versus E3 plus standalone security.
  3. Negotiate multi year price hold.
CFO
  1. Model 3 year cost across E5 versus unbundled scenarios.
  2. Reserve hedging budget for transition.
  3. Track security licensing ROI quarterly.
The Framework

Eight ideas

M365 E5 bundles security

M365 E5 includes the full Microsoft security stack: Defender for Endpoint Plan 2, Defender for Identity, Defender for Cloud Apps, Defender for Office 365 Plan 2, Sentinel basic, Purview compliance, advanced Intune. The bundle prices roughly $30 above E3 per user per month; the standalone equivalent often prices below for relevant populations.

Defender suite standalone

Defender products are individually licensable. Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 covers basic EDR; Plan 2 adds advanced threat protection. Defender for Identity covers AD and Azure AD threat detection. Defender for Cloud Apps covers SaaS shadow IT and DLP. Customers requiring specific capabilities can license selectively.

Sentinel pricing structure

Sentinel prices on data ingestion volume (per GB ingested). E5 includes basic Sentinel allocation; data above the allocation prices at standard rates. Customers with low data volume can license Sentinel standalone below E5 inclusion cost.

Purview tier matching

Purview compliance capabilities are tiered: Compliance Manager basic, advanced. eDiscovery standard, premium. DLP basic, advanced. Customers requiring specific tiers can license selectively rather than full E5 Purview.

Intune P1 and P2

Intune Plan 1 covers basic mobile device management. Plan 2 (in E5) adds advanced features (endpoint privilege management, advanced analytics). Many enterprises license Intune Plan 1 standalone, downgrading from E5 Intune Plan 2 inclusion.

E5 to E3 downgrade analysis

The E5 to E3 downgrade decision requires analysis: which E5 features does the population genuinely use, which are unused, what is the standalone cost of the used features. Customers running the analysis frequently identify 30 to 50 percent of population that benefits from E3 plus selective security standalone.

BATNA at capability level

CrowdStrike for endpoint protection. Splunk for SIEM. OneTrust for compliance. Wiz for cloud security. Each constrains a slice of Microsoft security pricing. Customers with active multi vendor security architecture negotiate Microsoft security pricing more aggressively.

Multi vendor security architecture

Single vendor security simplifies operations; multi vendor security captures pricing leverage. The framework includes the analysis to balance the trade off based on operational maturity, threat landscape, and commercial requirements.

Reference

Acronyms

EDREndpoint Detection and Response.
SIEMSecurity Information and Event Management.
DLPData Loss Prevention.
CASBCloud Access Security Broker.
XDRExtended Detection and Response.
MDMMobile Device Management.
M365Microsoft 365.
CSPMCloud Security Posture Management.
SOCSecurity Operations Center.
BATNABest Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement.
Methodology & Sources

This white paper draws on Redress Compliance engagements, public vendor documentation, and the active Redress benchmark program.

Portrait of Morten Andersen
About the Author

Morten Andersen

Co Founder, Redress Compliance
Connect on LinkedIn →
Copilot proposal on the desk?
Get a Confidential Briefing
Related

Continue

Skyscraper
Ready?

Stop overpaying. Start negotiating.

Independent. Buyer side. The advisory firm enterprise software vendors do not want you to hire.

The Licensing Insider

Vendor intelligence, audit alerts, and negotiation insights once a month. No spam.