The hosting program where the meter you pick and the report you file decide whether the model makes money or leaks it.
Microsoft SPLA lets hosting providers and service operators rent Microsoft software monthly, but the SAL math and the SPUR rules decide whether the model makes money or leaks it.
SPLA is the Services Provider License Agreement. It lets a provider rent Microsoft software monthly to deliver hosted services to customers who are not part of the provider organization.
Microsoft sets the program terms on its SPLA program page, and the usage rules sit in the Services Provider Use Rights inside the Microsoft Product Terms.
If you serve only your own employees, you do not need SPLA. Internal use stays under volume licensing, and using SPLA for it breaches the agreement.
SPLA meters two ways. The Subscriber Access License counts each unique user with access, and the per core option counts physical or virtual cores on the hosting hardware.
SPLA metering options
| Meter | Counts | Best fit | Audit risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAL | Unique users with access | Known, named user base | Undercounted dormant users |
| Per core | Cores on the host | Anonymous or large user base | Underreported core changes |
| SAL for SA | Existing SA users | Hybrid estates | Eligibility errors |
The SPLA Reseller route lets a smaller provider buy through an aggregator rather than hold a direct agreement. The boundary problems start when the reseller and the end provider blur reporting duties.
Microsoft documents the structure on the SPLA Reseller page. The reporting obligation still lands on whoever holds the agreement, and gaps surface in audit.
Every month the agreement holder reports actual use. Missed months and zero reports are a red flag that invites scrutiny.
SPLA audits are common because reporting is self declared. The frequent triggers are flat or falling reports against a growing business, and shared tenancy that crosses license boundaries.
Bring your own access records, your monthly reports, and your tenancy map. Industry bodies such as BSA shape how software audits run, so a clean evidence trail is your strongest position.
Treat the renewal as a chance to re baseline the meter, the editions, and the report accuracy before Microsoft does it for you.
The standard guidance is that SAL is always the cheapest meter for a hosting business. We disagree. Across the SPLA estates we reviewed, providers with large anonymous or fluctuating user bases paid more under SAL once dormant and test access was counted honestly, because every touch of the service became a reportable user. The buyer side move is to model per core against your real access pattern, not the headline rate. For anonymous web facing workloads, per core often caps exposure and removes the monthly undercount risk that drives audit findings. The cheapest meter is the one that matches your access shape, not the one the aggregator quotes first.
Source: Redress Compliance advisory engagement file, 2024 to 2025.
SPLA punishes the honest reporter only if the meter is wrong. Pick the meter that matches the access, and the model holds.
Microsoft SPLA is the Services Provider License Agreement, a monthly rental program that lets hosting providers and service operators deliver Microsoft software to third party customers. It is reported and paid each month based on actual use.
A SAL is a Subscriber Access License that counts each unique user with access to the hosted service. It is one of the two main SPLA meters, the other being the per core option.
Use per core when the user base is large, anonymous, or fluctuating, such as a web facing service. Per core caps exposure and avoids the dormant user undercount that drives SAL audit findings.
No, SPLA is only for delivering services to third parties. Internal employee use stays under volume licensing, and using SPLA for internal users breaches the agreement.
SPLA audits are triggered by underreporting, flat reports against a growing business, edition mismatches, license mobility errors, and months with zero reports. Self declared reporting makes the program audit prone.
SPLA Reseller lets a smaller provider buy through an aggregator rather than hold a direct agreement. The reporting obligation still rests with the agreement holder, and confusion over that duty causes compliance gaps.
You report every month based on actual use. Missed months and zero reports are a compliance red flag that invites Microsoft scrutiny.
Re baseline your access counts, validate editions, and align license mobility to the current use rights before the renewal. Negotiating from clean, reconciled data is far stronger than reacting to a Microsoft finding.
Microsoft renewal moves, the EA framework, the M365 SKU framework, the Copilot framework, and the buyer side moves across the full Microsoft estate.
Used across more than five hundred enterprise engagements. Independent. Buyer side. Built for procurement leaders running the next renewal cycle.
SPLA punishes the honest reporter only if the meter is wrong.
500+ enterprise clients. 11 vendor practices. Industry recognized. One conversation can change what you pay for the next three years.
One buyer side brief a week on Microsoft pricing, audit posture, and the levers that hold a discount. No vendor spin.