LocationsResourcesContact
๐Ÿ“… Book a Meeting
IBM Middleware โ€” WebSphere ยท MQ ยท Notes/Domino

Optimizing IBM Middleware Licensing: A CIO's Playbook

IBM's middleware portfolio โ€” WebSphere Application Server, IBM MQ, and Notes/Domino โ€” forms the backbone of many enterprise applications. This playbook covers licensing models (PVU, VPC, Authorised User), common compliance pitfalls, hybrid deployment scenarios, audit risks and defence strategies, cost optimisation tactics, and strategic CIO recommendations for controlling middleware costs while maintaining compliance.

๐Ÿ“… July 2025โฑ CIO Strategic Playbookโœ๏ธ Fredrik Filipsson

1. Licensing Models Overview

WebSphere Application Server (WAS)

๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ WebSphere Editions & Licensing

Editions: Base (core Java EE, standalone/simple), Network Deployment (ND) (enterprise clustering, Deployment Manager, HA failover, intelligent management), Liberty (lightweight, cloud-native, modular runtime). ND is required for federated clustering and advanced scaling features.

PVU Licensing: Traditional model โ€” Processor Value Units tied to CPU cores and type. Each core has a PVU rating; you procure enough PVUs to cover all cores running WebSphere.

VPC Licensing: Cloud-era metric via Cloud Paks and WebSphere Hybrid Edition โ€” Virtual Processor Cores measuring virtual CPU in containerised/Kubernetes environments.

Cloud Pak Bundles: Cloud Pak for Applications / WebSphere Hybrid Edition provide a VPC pool that can be flexibly allocated across Traditional WAS ND, Base, Liberty, and related tools โ€” simplifying edition mixing and container modernisation without separate purchases.

IBM MQ

๐Ÿ“จ IBM MQ Editions & Licensing

Editions: Standard (core messaging โ€” queues, topics) and Advanced (adds AMS encryption, Managed File Transfer, telemetry/IoT). Advanced requires separate, higher-cost PVU entitlement.

PVU Licensing: Dominant model โ€” each server/VM running an MQ queue manager must be covered by PVUs based on core count and type. Not licensed per message, transaction, or connection.

Sub-Capacity: IBM allows virtual-only core counting provided ILMT is deployed and reporting โ€” without it, IBM can assess full physical capacity.

Free Developer Edition: MQ Advanced for Developers is full-featured and free for dev/test โ€” an essential cost-avoidance tool for non-production environments.

Cloud Pak for Integration: Bundles MQ with App Connect, DataPower, and API Connect under a shared VPC pool โ€” ideal for containerised/OpenShift deployments.

IBM Notes/Domino

๐Ÿ“ง Notes/Domino Licensing (IBM & HCL)

Ownership: HCL acquired Domino from IBM in 2019. Many organisations still hold legacy IBM licences or are in transition. Both IBM and HCL licensing paradigms remain relevant.

IBM Traditional Model: Primarily Authorised User โ€” each named individual with a Notes ID/mailbox requires a licence. Variants included Messaging-only, Enterprise, and Express editions. Also offered Domino Utility Server licensing by PVU for unlimited unnamed users accessing applications (not email).

HCL CCB Model: Unified user-based โ€” Domino Complete Collaboration (CCB) licensing. Each internal user requires a CCB licence covering all features (mail, apps, Traveler mobile). HCL is phasing out legacy IBM PVU-based Utility Server SKUs.

Key Implication: Domino is now fundamentally user-centric. Accurately tracking active users โ€” and promptly retiring departed employee accounts โ€” directly ties to licence requirements and costs.

Common Licensing Metrics โ€” Summary Table

MetricDescriptionProductsUsage Context
PVUProcessor Value Unit โ€” capacity-based, tied to processor cores weighted by typeWebSphere (Base/ND), IBM MQ, Domino Utility Server (legacy)Classic model for on-prem server software. Sub-capacity requires ILMT.
VPCVirtual Processor Core โ€” virtual cores in container/cloud environmentsWebSphere (Cloud Pak/Hybrid Ed.), MQ (Cloud Pak for Integration)Modern alternative for Kubernetes/VM deployments. Tracked by IBM License Service.
Authorised UserNamed individual authorised to use the softwareDomino (IBM & HCL models)Dominant Domino model โ€” each person with mailbox/access needs a licence.
Concurrent UserSimultaneous users (pool-based)Rare โ€” some Domino external user scenariosLess common; IBM has moved toward Authorised User.
Install/DevicePer installation or client deviceMQ Telemetry (per device), MQ MFT Agent (per install)Niche use cases only โ€” not for core WAS or MQ server licensing.
SubscriptionTerm-based (monthly/annual) rather than perpetualAll products (Cloud Paks are subscription VPC; HCL CCB is annual user)Growing model โ€” replaces perpetual in many new engagements.

Need help understanding which IBM licensing metrics apply to your middleware environment?

IBM Licensing Assessment โ†’

2. Common Compliance Challenges and Pitfalls

Compliance issues typically arise not from malicious intent but from lack of oversight and communication. Infrastructure teams expand capacity, dev teams enable features, and accounts accumulate โ€” all without licence governance involvement.

๐Ÿ”ด WebSphere ND Features on a Base Licence

Deploying WebSphere with Network Deployment features (clustering, Deployment Manager, HA failover) without purchasing ND licences. Often occurs when an admin installs ND binaries even though only Base entitlements are owned, or when teams enable clustering assuming it's just a configuration. IBM auditors detect ND binaries or active Deployment Manager profiles โ€” the financial exposure is significant (backdated ND licences plus support).

๐Ÿ”ด Over-Provisioning PVU Licences (ILMT Gaps)

Using more PVUs than purchased โ€” often from new VMs spun up without notifying licence management, or additional vCPUs assigned over time. The biggest risk: not deploying ILMT in virtualised environments. Without ILMT, IBM can assess full physical hardware capacity, often resulting in massive compliance gaps (e.g. 100 PVUs sub-capacity vs 400 PVUs full capacity).

๐Ÿ”ด Undercounting Domino Users (Dormant Accounts)

More active user accounts than licences โ€” typically from employees who left but whose accounts were never disabled in the Domino Directory, test accounts never cleaned up, or service accounts. Each account is a licensable "Authorised User." Also common: failing to reconcile with HR records when new employees join.

๐Ÿ”ด Misconfigured MQ High Availability

HA/DR setups creating licensing blind spots. IBM's standby MQ instances require Idle Standby licences (typically 20% of full price) โ€” they're not free. Active-active clusters require full licensing on both nodes. Organisations either fail to licence standbys (audit risk) or fully licence them unnecessarily when cheaper standby options exist.

๐Ÿ”ด Mixing Licence Types Without Controls

Running parallel licensing models (Cloud Pak VPCs alongside traditional PVUs, or IBM and HCL Domino terms simultaneously) without clear tracking. Organisations mistakenly think buying a Cloud Pak automatically covers all existing deployments โ€” it doesn't, unless formally converted through IBM's agreement.

๐Ÿ”ด Non-Production Environments Not Licensed

Running full WebSphere or MQ in lab/staging/test environments without licences, assuming "it's not production, so it doesn't count." IBM's view: if it's the full product and not a free edition, it counts. Many audit reports surprise customers with unlicensed development installations.

Compliance issues are almost inevitable without automated tracking over a long enough period. CIOs should treat licence compliance as an ongoing operational process, not a one-time true-up. The infrastructure team expanding capacity, the dev team enabling a feature, or accounts accumulating โ€” all without licence governance being involved โ€” are the most common root causes.

๐Ÿ“Š IBM Licensing Assessment Case Studies

See how enterprises identified compliance gaps and optimisation opportunities worth millions through independent IBM middleware assessments.

View IBM Case Studies โ†’

3. Licensing Scenarios in Hybrid Environments

๐Ÿ“ก Scenario 1: IBM MQ On-Premises and in the Cloud

Organisation runs MQ in an on-premises data centre for core integration plus MQ on a public cloud (AWS/Azure VMs or containerised MQ in Kubernetes) to connect with cloud-native applications, with an MQ instance in a DR site.

Licensing Approach

On-prem MQ: PVU licences via Passport Advantage. Cloud VMs: Bring Your Licence counting vCPUs with IBM's PVU ratings for cloud instance types. Containers on OpenShift: Cloud Pak for Integration VPCs. DR instance: Idle Standby licence (used only during actual failover).

Key Considerations

Two metrics concurrently: ILMT tracks PVU on-prem; IBM License Service tracks VPC in containers. These are not interchangeable. Shifting workloads to containers may free PVUs but consume VPCs โ€” optimise once the transition stabilises. Keep a register mapping every MQ instance to its licence pool and entitlement type.

๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Scenario 2: WebSphere Base in One Cluster, ND in Another

One team uses WebSphere Base on two standalone servers behind a load balancer. Another team runs ND with a Deployment Manager and four cluster members across two physical nodes. Both exist within the same organisation.

Key Considerations

No mixing: Never federate a Base server into an ND cell โ€” it would require an ND licence. Don't install ND features (Intelligent Management, On Demand Router) on Base servers. Physically separate environments. Maintain documentation showing which servers are allocated to which edition with architecture diagrams and installation logs.

Cost Optimisation

Evaluate whether standardising on ND (eliminating confusion risk) or maintaining both (saving ND costs where unneeded) is better. Consider an ELA that covers all WebSphere usage. Explore moving Base workloads to WebSphere Liberty for potential cost reduction.

๐Ÿ“ง Scenario 3: Domino in a Mixed Environment

500 users still use Domino for applications on-premises. 200 former users have migrated to Office 365 for email โ€” their Domino accounts are idle but still exist in the Directory.

Licensing Approach

Reduce entitlements at next renewal to 500 (or peak active count). Clean up Domino Directory: remove or formally inactivate the 200 former users so they no longer count toward the licence tally. If both IBM and HCL licences are in effect during transition, clarify which model applies and avoid double-licensing.

Audit Defence

Maintain DLAU tool output showing active authenticated users over the last 30 days. Map de-provisioned users to HR exit lists with timestamps. Explain any ambiguous accounts (service accounts, forwarding IDs). The goal: auditors see user count = licence count, with clear evidence of governance.

โ˜๏ธ Scenario 4: Cloud Pak Integration of WebSphere & MQ

Enterprise containerises middleware on OpenShift using Cloud Pak for Integration (MQ) and Cloud Pak for Applications / Hybrid Edition (WebSphere). Some traditional PVU deployments continue alongside.

Key Considerations

Two compliance toolsets simultaneously: IBM License Service for container VPC usage; ILMT for traditional VM PVU usage. Ensure decommissioned VMs don't continue consuming PVUs in ILMT while the same workload now consumes VPCs in containers. Treat Cloud Pak VPCs as a shared resource across teams โ€” govern allocation centrally to prevent one team's usage starving another.

Cost Optimisation

Cloud Paks consolidate many capabilities โ€” if you fully utilise the Pak across multiple products, cost savings vs ร  la carte PVUs are significant. Right-size VPC entitlement after one year of actual usage. Negotiate conversion of separate PVU licences into a bundled Cloud Pak at a discount. Watch support cost overlap: avoid paying support on both PVU licences and Cloud Pak for the same workload.

Managing a hybrid IBM middleware environment? Get an independent assessment of your licence position.

IBM Licensing Assessment โ†’

4. Audit Risks and Defence Strategies

IBM aggressively protects its intellectual property revenue and regularly audits customers. An audit can be triggered randomly or by specific risk factors: significant usage changes, lapses in licence tracking, or contract renewals approaching.

Top Audit Risk Areas

๐Ÿ” Untracked Deployments

Undiscovered WebSphere or MQ instances set up by departments outside central IT. Domino user counts cross-checked against HR/email records. Any IBM software running without ILMT deployed is especially high-risk โ€” IBM can consider your entire server capacity as needing licences.

๐Ÿ“Š Sub-Capacity Non-Compliance

ILMT not installed, not functioning correctly, or not producing quarterly audit reports. IBM may claim full-capacity licensing โ€” the delta between sub-capacity (e.g. 100 PVUs) and full capacity (e.g. 400 PVUs) is typically the single most expensive audit finding for middleware.

โš™๏ธ Edition Misuse

Using WebSphere ND features on Base licences. MQ Advanced features (AMS encryption, MFT) on Standard entitlements. Domino Enterprise/clustering features on Express licences. IBM can demand backdated purchase of the correct edition plus support.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Excess Users

Domino user count exceeding entitlements โ€” dormant accounts, duplicate entries, and departed employees still in the Directory. Auditors typically bill for the difference plus backdated support.

๐Ÿงช Non-Production Environments

Development and test servers running full product binaries without licences. Unless it's a free developer edition, a licence is needed. Many audit reports catch 10+ unlicensed lab installations.

Audit Defence Strategies

1. Maintain an Internal Licence Audit Trail

Conduct full reconciliation of IBM middleware at least annually. Use ILMT sub-capacity reports, Domino active user counts matched to licences. Identify and correct discrepancies before IBM does. Document these internal reviews โ€” demonstrating active compliance management shows good faith.

2. Ensure ILMT and Licence Tools Are Running Properly

Deploy ILMT on all virtualised servers with PVU software. Update to the latest version. Produce and store quarterly ILMT reports. In container environments, verify IBM License Service is configured and retaining data. If ILMT was accidentally off on a server, fix immediately and prepare an explanation.

3. Train Technical Teams on Licence Policies

Publish guidelines for middleware administrators: which features correspond to which licences. Any changes (new clusters, feature packs, additional vCPUs) must trigger a licence check. When teams know compliance is monitored at the CIO level, they pause before spinning up instances without asking.

4. Centralise Licence Tracking and Procurement

Maintain a single source of truth for IBM licences owned vs used. Tie procurement to deployment โ€” no new WebSphere server without confirming licence availability. Use SAM tools or at minimum a maintained spreadsheet updated on every change. Review IBM support renewal quotes for reconciliation opportunities.

5. Simulate an Audit with External Experts

Have a third-party licensing expert (former IBM auditors or licensing specialists) conduct a mock audit. They identify compliance issues you might miss and prepare you for IBM's interpretation of ambiguous cases. Firms like Redress Compliance find problems before IBM does.

6. During an Audit โ€” Be Organised, Transparent, Cautious

Involve legal and contract management immediately. Respond within required timeframes. Provide exactly what's requested โ€” nothing more. Designate a single point of contact (IT asset manager) for all responses. Demonstrate preparedness: "Here are the last four quarters of ILMT reports, as requested."

7. Challenge and Negotiate Findings

Auditors' initial findings commonly contain errors or overcounts. Challenge misinterpreted data, wrong licensing metrics, or counts including decommissioned systems. For remaining gaps, negotiate: IBM often waives penalties if you agree to a purchase quickly. Have an expert review the final settlement figures to ensure you're not overpaying.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ IBM Audit Defence Case Studies

See how enterprises have defended against IBM audits, reduced compliance findings by millions, and negotiated favourable settlement outcomes.

View Audit Defence Cases โ†’

5. Optimisation Tactics for Cost and Compliance

๐Ÿ“ Rightsize PVU Allocations

Treat CPU capacity as a controlled resource. Use performance monitoring to identify actual utilisation โ€” if a middleware server never exceeds 1 core, running it on 4 cores wastes PVUs. Reduce VMs to minimal needed vCPUs. In cloud environments, choose instance sizes wisely. Consolidate multiple instances onto fewer servers. Document intentional vCPU limitations for audit evidence. Cumulative effect of rightsizing can significantly lower total PVU requirements.

๐Ÿ†“ Leverage Non-Production Entitlements

Use MQ Advanced for Developers (free) for all dev/test. Use WebSphere Developer Edition or Liberty in developer mode. If Enterprise Licence Agreement covers dev/test, ensure everyone deploys under that umbrella. Tag non-production systems in ILMT. Strictly separating production licences from non-production prevents licence "leakage" into test environments.

โ™ป๏ธ Reclaim and Reuse Licences

Audit for shelfware: decommissioned servers with PVUs still counted, Domino users who left but weren't removed. Establish a licence reclaim process โ€” when HR reports a termination, release the licence. Flag users inactive for 90+ days. Identify redundant middleware (running both MQ and another messaging system) and standardise. At renewal, reduce support counts to match actual deployment.

๐Ÿ“ฆ Consolidate and Simplify Domino Footprint

Many Domino environments have grown organically with underutilised servers. Consolidate servers โ€” fewer servers = less operational overhead. With HCL's user-based model, server count doesn't directly affect licence cost, but reducing hardware/admin effort saves money. If most Domino usage is just email and you've migrated elsewhere, consider full decommission or limited archive server with minimal licences.

โ˜๏ธ Evaluate Cloud Paks for Cost Efficiency

If using multiple IBM products (WebSphere, MQ, Integration Bus), a Cloud Pak bundle may be cheaper than separate PVUs. Propose conversion of separate licences into a bundled Cloud Pak at a discount. Analyse the numbers โ€” don't buy a bundle that includes unused components. Utilise all bundled features (e.g. Transformation Advisor) to maximise ROI.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Use Special IBM Pricing Programs

Idle Standby licences for DR systems โ€” 80% cost savings vs full licensing. Sub-capacity licensing via ILMT. For large customers, negotiate bundled discounts or volume credits. Consider third-party support for stable environments where you don't need upgrades โ€” lower maintenance fees (especially for Domino). Always weigh trade-offs.

๐Ÿ“ˆ Monitor and Govern Usage Continuously

Create a monthly CIO dashboard showing current licence utilisation vs entitlement for each IBM product. Spot trends (MQ usage creeping up? Plan budget for more licences or optimise existing capacity). On the Domino side, watch user trend lines โ€” if declining, drop licences at renewal. Treat licensing as capacity planning: don't deploy software without considering licence costs.

๐Ÿ”„ Keep Software Updated

Newer versions of WebSphere and MQ often have better performance, meaning fewer cores needed (= fewer PVUs). Latest ILMT versions ensure accurate recognition. HCL Domino v12/v14 have simpler, potentially more cost-effective licensing models. Upgrading can qualify you for new models and optimise compliance tooling.

Optimisation is not a one-time project. Implement ongoing governance with monthly licence utilisation reports. Encourage a mindset that licensing is part of capacity planning for every system โ€” just as you wouldn't deploy servers without considering hardware costs, don't deploy software without considering licence costs.

6. CIO Recommendations

1

Establish a Centralised Middleware Licence Governance Function

Whether through a dedicated SAM team or an IT asset management function, ensure there is a single team with visibility into all IBM middleware entitlements, deployments, and usage. This function should have authority to approve or reject new installations based on licence availability. Without centralised governance, licence drift is inevitable.

2

Deploy and Maintain ILMT as a Non-Negotiable

ILMT is the foundation of IBM middleware compliance. Deploy it on every virtualised server running IBM PVU-licensed software. Produce quarterly reports. Update to the latest version. Archive all historical reports. In container environments, deploy IBM License Service. ILMT gaps are the single most expensive audit finding โ€” prevention is simple compared to the cost of failure.

3

Conduct Annual Internal Licence Reconciliation

At least once a year (quarterly is better), run a full reconciliation: ILMT sub-capacity reports vs PVU entitlements, active Domino users vs user licences, all Cloud Pak VPC consumption vs purchased VPCs. Identify and correct discrepancies proactively. Document the review process โ€” this demonstrates good faith in an audit and catches problems before they compound.

4

Align Editions with Actual Feature Usage

Audit which WebSphere features each application actually uses. If teams don't need ND capabilities, ensure they're on Base or Liberty. If MQ deployments don't use AMS/MFT, ensure they're on Standard not Advanced. Eliminate edition misuse risk through clear documentation of which servers run which edition and why. This avoids both audit exposure and unnecessary spend.

5

Optimise Before Renewing or Purchasing

Before every IBM renewal cycle, right-size your middleware footprint. Reclaim unused licences, consolidate underutilised servers, reduce Domino user counts, rightsize VM vCPUs. Enter negotiations with accurate usage data โ€” this gives you leverage to reduce spend rather than auto-renewing at previous levels. Consider whether Cloud Pak conversion would yield savings.

6

Plan for Hybrid and Cloud Transitions Carefully

When migrating middleware to containers or cloud, track both old (PVU) and new (VPC) licence consumption simultaneously. Don't pay for the same capacity twice. Decommission old instances promptly. Size Cloud Pak entitlements based on realistic projections, then right-size after one year. Communicate architecture changes to your licence governance team before implementation.

7

Engage Independent IBM Licensing Experts

IBM middleware licensing is complex enough that even experienced IT teams benefit from external perspective. Engage an independent IBM licensing advisor like Redress Compliance for periodic licence health checks, pre-audit assessments, renewal negotiation support, and Cloud Pak conversion analysis. Most engagements identify savings and risk reduction worth multiples of the advisory investment.

8

Prepare for Audits Before They Arrive

Have an internal audit response plan ready. Maintain an up-to-date register of all IBM middleware installations. Pre-identify your "audit team" and have a retainer or contact with a licensing consultancy. When a formal audit notice arrives, you won't be scrambling โ€” you'll be ready, confident, and in control. Time is of the essence in audit response, and preparation reduces both stress and financial exposure.

IBM middleware โ€” WebSphere, MQ, and Domino โ€” can continue to serve as a reliable enterprise backbone with the right licensing strategy. The key: proactive licence management, accurate tracking through ILMT and licence tools, clear alignment of editions with features, and periodic optimisation before renewal cycles. With good governance, these products remain financially sustainable while delivering the reliability enterprises depend on.
An independent IBM middleware licensing review pays for itself. Our IBM Licensing Assessment Service provides a comprehensive audit of your WebSphere, MQ, and Domino licence positions โ€” identifying compliance gaps, ILMT configuration issues, edition misuse, PVU optimisation opportunities, user count discrepancies, and Cloud Pak conversion savings. Most engagements identify six- to seven-figure savings or risk reduction opportunities.

๐Ÿ“‚ IBM Case Studies

๐Ÿ“Š Licensing Assessments ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Audit Defence ๐Ÿ“‹ ELA Renewals ๐Ÿข All IBM Cases

๐Ÿ”ง IBM Advisory Services

๐Ÿ“Š Licensing Assessment ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Audit Defence ๐Ÿค Negotiations ๐Ÿ“‹ ELA Renewal ๐Ÿ’ผ Licence Consulting ๐Ÿ”ง All IBM Services

๐Ÿ“„ White Papers & Resources

๐Ÿ“š IBM Knowledge Hub ๐Ÿ“‘ All White Papers โœ๏ธ Blog & Insights

Need Help Optimising IBM Middleware Licensing?

Whether you need a comprehensive licence assessment across WebSphere, MQ, and Domino, ILMT compliance verification, Cloud Pak conversion analysis, audit defence support, or renewal negotiation strategy โ€” our IBM licensing specialists deliver measurable savings and protect your interests as a fully independent advisor.

๐Ÿ’ก Download our IBM licensing white papers for actionable optimisation strategies

View White Papers โ†’
FF

Fredrik Filipsson

Co-Founder, Redress Compliance

Fredrik Filipsson brings over 20 years of experience in enterprise software licensing, including senior roles at IBM, SAP, and Oracle. For the past 11 years, he has advised Fortune 500 companies and large enterprises on complex licensing challenges, contract negotiations, and vendor management โ€” consistently delivering outcomes that save clients millions across Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, Salesforce, and Broadcom engagements.

View all articles by Fredrik โ†’