LocationsResourcesContact
๐Ÿ“… Book a Meeting
Oracle Cloud Licensing โ€” Cost Comparison Guide

Oracle BYOL vs Licence Included on OCI & Exadata Cloud@Customer

When moving Oracle databases to the cloud, IT leaders must choose between Bring Your Own Licence (BYOL) and Licence Included models. This guide focuses exclusively on the cost considerations of these two models on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Exadata Cloud@Customer โ€” comparing licensing cost structures, total cost of ownership (TCO) over 1, 3, and 5 years, core count factors, and scenarios favouring each model.

๐Ÿ“… February 2026โฑ Cost Comparison Guideโœ๏ธ Fredrik Filipsson

๐Ÿ“– Related: Comprehensive guide to Oracle BYOL licensing

Read the BYOL Guide โ†’

Licensing Cost Structures: BYOL vs Licence Included

Licence Included means you pay for Oracle database usage in the cloud with the software licence bundled in. You simply pay a higher hourly/monthly rate for the cloud service โ€” all required Oracle Database licences (and support) are included in that price. There is no separate on-premises licence needed, which is ideal if you don't already own Oracle licences. For example, Exadata Cloud@Customer's licence-included pricing includes Oracle Database Enterprise Edition and all options/packs in the subscription.

BYOL (Bring Your Own Licence) means you apply your existing Oracle database licences to the cloud deployment. The cloud service cost is reduced to reflect that you are providing the licence. You continue paying separate annual support for your Oracle licences. This model leverages licences you've already purchased (or plan to purchase) to lower cloud subscription fees. Oracle notes that BYOL "enables customers to use existing licences and lower subscription costs." However, you must ensure you use only the database edition and options your licences entitle you to.

BYOL

Bring Your Own Licence

  • Lower cloud service rate (50โ€“80% less)
  • Requires existing licence investment
  • Separate annual support (~22% of licence)
  • Use only features you've licensed
  • Support Rewards offset support costs
Licence Included

Licence Included

  • Higher hourly rate includes all licensing
  • No upfront licence purchase required
  • Support bundled in โ€” no separate bill
  • All database options/packs included
  • Pure pay-as-you-go flexibility

Key Differences in Cost Components

Upfront Licence Cost
BYOL: ~$47,500 per processor (EE list price)
Included: $0 โ€” bundled in cloud rate
Annual Support Fees
BYOL: ~22% of licence price/year (~$10,450)
Included: Built into cloud rate โ€” no separate bill
Cloud Service Rate (OCI EE)
BYOL: ~$0.1935 / OCPU / hour
Included: ~$0.4301 / OCPU / hour
Exadata Cloud@Customer Rate
BYOL: ~$0.0807 / CPU hour
Included: ~$0.336 / CPU hour
Included Features
BYOL: Only features you have licences for
Included: All EE options & packs bundled
Support Rewards
BYOL: $0.25 per $1 spent on OCI (25%)
Included: Not applicable
In Autonomous Database scenarios, Oracle notes that BYOL can lower database compute costs by approximately 76%. On Exadata Cloud@Customer, the BYOL rate is roughly one-quarter the licence-included cost at list prices. However, you must factor in the ongoing support obligation โ€” only active, supported licences qualify for BYOL.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over 1, 3, and 5 Years

When evaluating BYOL vs Licence Included, it's critical to analyse TCO over several years, not just monthly costs. Below is a comparison for an example deployment on OCI.

Example Scenario: A production database requiring 4 OCPUs (2 physical processor licences) running 24ร—7. Oracle Database Enterprise Edition licences at $47,500 per processor, 22%/year support, and OCI list prices of ~$0.4301/OCPU-hour for licence-included EE and ~$0.1935/OCPU-hour for BYOL. Discounts not included โ€” actual costs may be lower with enterprise discounting.

1-Year, 3-Year, 5-Year Cost Comparison

Cost ComponentBYOL (Year 1)BYOL (3-Year)BYOL (5-Year)Licence Included (Annual)Licence Included (3-Year)Licence Included (5-Year)
Licence Purchase$95,000$95,000$95,000$0$0$0
Annual Support$20,900$62,700$104,500$0$0$0
OCI Cloud Costs$6,780$20,340$33,900$15,070$45,210$75,350
Total TCO$122,680$178,040$233,400$15,070$45,210$75,350
These are illustrative list-price examples with no discounts. In practice, a company might get significant discounts on licence purchases (reducing BYOL upfront cost) or commit to cloud usage for lower rates. With a typical enterprise discount of 50% off licences, the BYOL TCO would drop substantially โ€” narrowing the gap or making BYOL cheaper over 5+ years. Always do the math with your actual pricing.

The key insight: if you already own the licences (sunk cost), Year 1 BYOL cost excludes the $95k purchase entirely, making BYOL dramatically cheaper. In that case, BYOL cost would be support + cloud usage (~$27,680/year) versus $15,070/year licence-included โ€” a closer comparison where the breakeven depends on your specific discount levels and usage patterns.

BYOL TCO formula: Licence cost + (annual support ร— years) + (cloud BYOL rate ร— usage ร— years).
Licence Included TCO formula: Cloud full rate ร— usage ร— years.

Oracle's pricing structure encourages BYOL mainly when you already own licences or have a long-term use horizon. If starting from scratch (no existing licences), Licence Included often has lower short-term TCO in the 1โ€“3 year range.

Workload Type Impact on Costs (Dev/Test vs Production)

The cost-effectiveness of BYOL vs Licence Included shifts significantly depending on workload type and usage patterns.

๐Ÿญ Steady 24/7 Production

Always-on workloads that utilise resources continuously. BYOL is attractive if you already own licences โ€” the lower cloud rate yields significant savings over time. For mission-critical databases expected to run for many years, buying licences once and paying the reduced BYOL rate can be more cost-effective after a certain breakeven point.

โœ“ Favours BYOL (if licences owned)

๐Ÿงช Development / Test Environments

Intermittent or part-time usage. Pay-as-you-go flexibility of Licence Included is very cost-efficient here โ€” turn off or scale down when not in use, and you're not paying for an underutilised licence. BYOL requires owning a licence that sits idle most of the time with support costs continuing year-round.

โœ“ Favours Licence Included

๐Ÿ“Š Bursty / Seasonal Workloads

Licence Included offers cost agility for fluctuating demand. Oracle allows mixing and switching models โ€” run base capacity on BYOL and burst on licence-included. You can switch between models without downtime, paying a premium only during bursts rather than maintaining extra licences year-round.

โœ“ Hybrid approach optimal

โ“ Uncertain Lifespan Projects

If a project might be short-lived or you're trialling a new workload, Licence Included avoids locking in a licence investment. You pay purely for what you use. BYOL only makes sense if you can repurpose existing licences or are certain the workload will persist long enough to justify the purchase.

โœ“ Favours Licence Included
Example โ€” Dev/Test Cost Comparison: A QA environment needing 4 OCPUs for 2 months/year. Under Licence Included at $0.4301/OCPU-hour: 4 OCPUs ร— 1,460 hours = ~$2,510. With BYOL: cloud cost is ~$1,130 but you'd need two processor licences ($95k) plus ~$10k/year support regardless. For transient use, renting the licence for $2.5k is far more economical.

Core Factors, Minimums, and Licence Portability

Oracle's licensing policies impose technical factors and minimums that affect cost calculations in BYOL scenarios.

Core Factors and OCPU Licensing

On-premises Oracle licences use physical processor cores with a core factor depending on CPU type. In OCI and Exadata Cloud, Oracle simplifies this via OCPUs/ECPUs. Generally, 1 Oracle Processor licence covers 2 OCPUs (vCPUs) in OCI for Enterprise Edition โ€” reflecting the common core factor of 0.5 for Intel cores. For example, 4 OCPUs allocated in OCI requires 2 processor licences for Enterprise Edition. For Named User Plus (NUP) licences, you must meet user minimums (usually 25 NUP per processor for Enterprise Edition).

Minimum OCPU Commitments

On Exadata Cloud@Customer, VM clusters require at least 8 OCPUs (ECPUs) to be enabled, and there's a minimum 48-hour charge for any DB instance you bring online. This means even very small workloads may not size down as much due to platform minimums โ€” potentially favouring licence-included if you don't want to buy licences for capacity you won't fully use.

Licence Portability and Transition Periods

Portability AspectDetailsCost Impact
Concurrent Use Overlap (OCI)Up to 100 days of concurrent on-prem + OCI use during migrationAvoids buying duplicate licences for migration period
Concurrent Use (Exadata C@C)Often up to ~180 days overlap in certain programsExtended transition reduces cost pressure during migration
Post-MigrationLicence is "deployed" in cloud โ€” cannot be used on-prem simultaneouslyNo double-licensing cost but reduces flexibility
Cross-Cloud PortabilityBYOL also works on AWS/Azure โ€” 2 vCPUs = 1 licence in authorised environmentsOCI BYOL typically offers best cost optimisation for Oracle
BYOL EligibilityOnly active, supported licences qualify โ€” lapsed support forfeits BYOL rightsSupport renewal is mandatory cost component of BYOL
Only active, supported licences qualify for BYOL. Lapsed support or certain restricted licence types (free developer licences, embedded application licences) cannot be used for BYOL. Dropping support forfeits your BYOL rights โ€” and non-compliance can lead to audits and unexpected fees. This makes the support cost a non-negotiable part of BYOL TCO.

When BYOL Is More Cost-Effective

๐Ÿ“‹

You Already Own Sufficient Licences

BYOL maximises the value of sunk costs. Your ongoing expense is support (which you're likely paying anyway) and a much lower cloud rate. Existing workloads with consistent usage are ideal โ€” e.g., moving an on-prem Oracle database that runs 24/7 into OCI. The cloud bill drops dramatically (50โ€“80% lower unit cost).

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Long Project Lifespan / Stable Growth

If you anticipate running the database for many years at steady capacity, investing in licences can yield lower TCO over the long term โ€” especially with a good discount upfront. Over 5+ years, the upfront licence cost is amortised and BYOL will usually come out ahead versus paying the premium rate indefinitely.

๐Ÿ“

ULA or Surplus Licence Pool

If your company has an Oracle ULA (Unlimited Licence Agreement) or pool of excess licences, BYOL is essentially "free" from a licensing perspective. The marginal cost of another server is negligible since you're covered by the ULA. Under a ULA, using OCI also generates Support Rewards at 33%, further offsetting support costs.

๐Ÿ”„

Need for Full Licence Control

BYOL lets you leverage existing investments and move workloads between on-prem and cloud. Owning the licence provides a perpetual asset that can be used in different environments as needed. A licence-included subscription doesn't give you a transferable asset if you later move back on-prem or to another cloud.

When Licence Included Is More Cost-Effective

๐Ÿ’ฐ

No Existing Licences / High Upfront Barrier

Purchasing licences outright (potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars for multi-core deployment) may not be feasible. The OPEX model of Licence Included is far more accessible โ€” pay as you use, with no big upfront spend. Especially true for smaller organisations or new workloads.

โณ

Short-Term or Uncertain Duration Projects

For projects expected to last a year or two, buying perpetual licences doesn't make financial sense. Included pricing is akin to "renting" the licence for as long as needed. A 6-month analytics project costs far less at the higher hourly rate than purchasing licences you might not use afterward.

๐Ÿ“Š

Variable or Seasonal Workloads

Resource needs that swing up and down benefit from cost flexibility. BYOL requires owning enough licences to cover peak, paying support year-round even when used seasonally. Licence Included lets you pay a premium only on demand โ€” often cheaper overall than maintaining a larger licence pool for rare peaks.

๐Ÿ”“

Access to All Features Without Buying Options

Licence Included service tiers include all database options by default (Partitioning, Advanced Security, In-Memory, RAC, etc.). Instead of buying each option licence at tens of thousands per processor, use an "Extreme Performance" licence-included cloud service. Much cheaper for feature-rich use cases you haven't already licensed.

๐Ÿงช

Dev/Test Agility

Spinning up many short-lived instances for CI/CD or testing โ€” tracking licence assignments for each under BYOL is a headache. Licence Included lets teams self-service without worrying about licence counts. The cost is directly tied to actual usage time, giving fine-grained cost control.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Simplified Compliance & Risk Reduction

Licence Included greatly reduces the risk of unexpected licensing costs from miscounted cores or unauthorised feature usage. Oracle handles the licensing. The cost of a potential licence compliance issue or true-up can be huge โ€” licence-included may be "cheaper" in the big picture if predictability and risk avoidance have monetary value.

Many enterprises use a combination to optimise costs: BYOL for stable production workloads (exploiting lower rates for constant loads) and Licence Included for everything else (burst capacity, test environments, new projects). There is no one-size-fits-all answer.

Budgeting and Cost Predictability

The choice between BYOL and Licence Included also impacts how you plan and predict IT budgets.

Budget DimensionBYOLLicence Included
CapEx vs OpExCapital expenditure for licence procurement (large upfront), then lower ongoing OpEx for cloud infrastructurePure operational expense (OpEx) โ€” monthly cloud bill only, aligns with subscription-based spending
Recurring CostsFixed annual support (~22%, rising ~4%/year) + variable cloud usage at lower rate. Two separate budget linesAll costs variable with usage in a single cloud bill. If you run more hours/OCPUs, bill increases proportionally
PredictabilityHigher predictability if sized correctly โ€” known support fees, stable BYOL rates. Risk: unexpected growth requires new licences (CapEx)Flexible but can be hard to forecast โ€” monthly bill swings with usage. Committed spend deals add predictability
Growth ScenariosCapacity growth beyond licence count requires unplanned licence purchase or temporary switch to Licence IncludedScales seamlessly up and down โ€” costs follow usage automatically with no procurement delays
Multi-Year ContractsAfter initial purchase, somewhat insulated from cloud price increases. Licence is a perpetual assetPricing could change at renewal. No transferable licence asset if you move off Oracle Cloud
IT Finance StructureSupport from software maintenance budget, cloud from cloud ops budget โ€” split across teamsEverything in cloud ops budget โ€” single budget owner, simpler cost allocation
Budget Planning Example: With BYOL, you might budget $100k fixed annual support + estimated $50k cloud infrastructure = ~$150k/year with two budget lines. With Licence Included, you'd budget ~$200k for cloud usage for the year (single line). If usage is less, you save; if more, you need additional funds. BYOL trades flexibility for known fixed costs, whereas Licence Included is pure variable cost โ€” which can be optimised but requires vigilance.
Support Rewards are a key differentiator. For every $1 spent on OCI services, BYOL customers accrue $0.25 (25%) in rewards โ€” or $0.33 for ULA customers โ€” that can be used to pay down on-premises support bills. This effectively reduces the net cost of support when using OCI heavily, making the BYOL model even more attractive for organisations with significant OCI consumption. Factor this into your TCO calculation.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

BYOL

Best When...

  • You already own Oracle licences (with active support)
  • Workloads are long-term, steady, and always-on
  • You have a ULA or surplus licence pool
  • You want a perpetual, transferable licence asset
  • You can commit to multi-year cloud usage
  • Support Rewards will offset significant support costs
Licence Included

Best When...

  • You don't already own Oracle licences
  • Workloads are short-term, variable, or uncertain
  • You need dev/test agility and self-service
  • You want all database options without buying each
  • OpEx-only model aligns with financial strategy
  • Compliance simplicity has value to your organisation

IT leaders should evaluate their inventory of licences, workload patterns, and financial preferences. Often, a hybrid approach maximises savings โ€” use BYOL where you can (to exploit lower rates for constant loads) and use Licence Included for everything else (burst, test, new projects).

Perform a detailed TCO analysis for your specific project lifespan, including licence purchase, support, cloud costs, and potential discounts. The examples in this guide illustrate the importance of timeline: BYOL may look expensive in Year 1 but can win out in later years, whereas Licence Included is "pay little now, keep paying more later." Align the model with your organisation's financial strategy (CapEx vs OpEx) and risk tolerance.

How Redress Compliance Helps with Oracle Cloud Licensing

๐Ÿ“‹ Oracle Licence Management ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Oracle Audit Defence ๐Ÿค Oracle Contract Negotiation ๐Ÿ“Š Oracle ULA Optimisation

Need Help Choosing BYOL vs Licence Included?

The decision between BYOL and Licence Included can mean hundreds of thousands โ€” or even millions โ€” of dollars in difference over a multi-year contract. Our Oracle licensing specialists help enterprises model TCO scenarios with actual pricing, optimise licence positions before cloud migration, negotiate BYOL terms and cloud commit discounts, and ensure compliance across OCI, Exadata Cloud@Customer, and hybrid deployments. With 20+ years of Oracle insider expertise, we bring the analysis and negotiation leverage you need.

FF

Fredrik Filipsson

Co-Founder, Redress Compliance

Fredrik Filipsson brings over 20 years of experience in enterprise software licensing, including senior roles at IBM, SAP, and Oracle. For the past 11 years, he has advised Fortune 500 companies and large enterprises on complex licensing challenges, contract negotiations, and vendor management โ€” consistently delivering outcomes that save clients millions across Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, Salesforce, and Broadcom engagements.

View all articles by Fredrik โ†’