Enterprise Agreement
3-year fixed term. Volume discounts. Software Assurance included. 500+ users.
Cloud Solution Provider
No fixed term. Partner-managed. Monthly flexibility. No SA included.
Microsoft Customer Agreement
Evergreen. Pay-as-you-go. Direct with Microsoft. No minimum commitment.
Table of Contents
1 Enterprise Agreement (EA)
A three-year volume licensing contract for large organisations (typically 500+ users/devices). It mandates organisation-wide deployment of covered products and includes Software Assurance (SA). For a deep-dive on negotiating your EA, see the Microsoft EA Negotiation Guide.
Advantages
💰 Volume-Based Discounts
Pricing tiers deliver deeper discounts at higher licence counts. Large enterprises can achieve significant per-seat savings that CSP and MCA models cannot match.
🛡️ Software Assurance Included
SA includes version upgrades, training vouchers, 24/7 support, planning services, and deployment assistance throughout the term. These benefits alone can represent substantial value.
📊 Predictable Budgeting
Fixed pricing for the three-year term with an annual true-up to add new users or devices. No surprises from consumption spikes. Budget with confidence.
📦 Broad Coverage
Combines on-premises licences and cloud services (Azure, Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365) under one contract, simplifying procurement and administration.
Disadvantages
⚠️ High Commitment
Must licence all eligible users/devices (the "platform count"), even if not all actively use the products. This can lead to paying for shelfware.
🔒 Limited Mid-Term Flexibility
Cannot reduce core licence counts mid-term (except on EAS subscriptions). Must wait for renewal to renegotiate most terms. A three-year lock-in can trap outdated needs.
2 Cloud Solution Provider (CSP)
A subscription-based model sold through Microsoft partners. Licences and cloud services (Azure, Microsoft 365, etc.) are purchased as needed on a monthly or annual basis, with no fixed term.
Advantages
🔀 High Flexibility
Easily add or remove users and services, scaling month-to-month with business demands. No enterprise-wide mandate or minimum seat count.
🤝 Partner Support and Services
The CSP partner handles billing and provisioning and can bundle additional managed services, training, or migration assistance. Single point of contact for support.
⚡ Fast Deployment
Ideal for quick rollouts, pilot projects, or smaller departments that require agility. No lengthy procurement or contract negotiation required.
Disadvantages
💲 Pricing Variability
The CSP partner sets costs, so list prices can include partner margin. Discounts (if any) vary by partner. Smaller volume means less volume discount. Monthly model can cost more per user than EA pricing.
❌ No Software Assurance
SA must be purchased separately or covered under a different programme (like MPSA for on-premises). You lose upgrade rights, training vouchers, and planning services.
3 Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA)
An evergreen, consumption-based agreement directly with Microsoft. It governs cloud purchases (mainly Azure and online services) on a pay-as-you-go or commitment basis, without a fixed term.
Advantages
📊 No Minimum Commitment
Pay only for services consumed. Adjust usage at any time with no contractual penalty. Monthly or annual invoicing based on actual usage aligns with consumption budgeting.
🌐 Direct Global Relationship
Deal with Microsoft on enterprise terms, often with global currency and tax handling for multinational use. No intermediary partner required.
✅ Simplicity
No licensing tiers, minimum counts, or complex true-up processes. Ideal for straightforward cloud spend management. For more on navigating the transition, see From EA to CSP to MCA: What Every CIO Must Know.
Disadvantages
📈 Unpredictable Costs
Without fixed pricing, costs can spike unexpectedly. Requires diligent usage tracking and governance to avoid bill shock, especially for Azure consumption.
❌ No Software Assurance or Bundling
Like CSP, SA is not included. Separate Volume Licensing agreements needed for on-prem licences. Lacks some EA features (no annual true-up for on-prem, limited bundling).
Evaluating Which Microsoft Agreement Structure Fits Your Organisation?
Get independent guidance from our Microsoft licensing specialists.
4 Full Comparison Table: EA vs CSP vs MCA
| Feature | Enterprise Agreement (EA) | Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) | Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agreement Term | 3-year fixed term | No fixed term (evergreen) | No fixed term (evergreen) |
| Commitment Level | High (organisation-wide licensing) | Low (no minimum commitment) | None (pay-per-use model) |
| Licensing Flexibility | Moderate (annual true-ups, limited reductions) | High (add/remove subscriptions anytime) | High (scale usage without constraints) |
| Software Assurance | Included | Not included (available separately) | Not included |
| Pricing Structure | Set by Microsoft (volume tiers based on total seats) | Set by partner (flexible, varies) | Set by Microsoft (no volume tiers) |
| Discounts | Volume-based (deeper at higher tiers) | Variable (depends on partner pricing) | No negotiated discounts (except large Azure commits) |
| Support and Services | Must purchase separately (or via partner) | Included via CSP partner | Not included (depends on partner or Microsoft SLAs) |
| Cost Predictability | High (fixed for term, budgeted) | Medium (monthly billing with partner smoothing) | Low (fully usage-based) |
| Typical Use Case | Large enterprises needing stability and broad coverage | Flexible or project-based needs | Cloud-first, usage-driven scenarios |
5 Strategic Guidance: Which Model Fits You?
🎯 Match to Scale and Goals
Choose an EA if you are a large organisation with stable needs requiring enterprise-wide coverage and Software Assurance. Opt for CSP if you want subscription agility and a partner to manage billing. Use MCA if you are strictly cloud-based or need pure pay-as-you-go flexibility.
💰 Evaluate Total Cost vs Flexibility
Consider how each model affects budgeting, contract length, and admin overhead. An EA may lock in lower prices but less flexibility. CSP/MCA provides more flexibility at the expense of predictability. Model total cost of ownership across 3 years for each scenario.
🔀 Consider Hybrid Approaches
It is often advantageous to mix models. For example, use EA for core on-premises software and add CSP/MCA subscriptions for elastic cloud workloads. Align each part of your licence portfolio with the model that makes financial and operational sense. For Azure commitment strategies, see Negotiating Azure Commitments in Your EA.
👥 Involve Procurement and IT Together
The right choice impacts cost, management complexity, and vendor relationships. Engage both procurement and IT stakeholders. Tailor your licensing strategy to your organisation's size, financial model, and technical roadmap.
Scenario Quick Reference
| Scenario | Recommended Model | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Large enterprise, 500+ users, stable headcount | EA | Volume discounts, SA included, predictable budgeting |
| Mid-size company, fluctuating users | CSP | Monthly flexibility, partner support, no minimum seats |
| Cloud-first / Azure-heavy, variable consumption | MCA | Pay-as-you-go, no minimum commitment, direct Microsoft terms |
| Large enterprise + elastic Azure workloads | EA + MCA hybrid | EA for on-prem stability; MCA for cloud elasticity |
| Small department piloting Microsoft 365 | CSP | Fast deployment, no procurement overhead, cancel anytime |
| Global company needing currency/tax consistency | MCA or EA | MCA offers multi-currency; EA offers global consistency |
Approaching Your EA Renewal?
Our Microsoft specialists have saved enterprises millions on EA, CSP, and hybrid deals.
Frequently Asked Questions
Our Microsoft Advisory Services
EA Optimisation
Learn More →Contract Negotiation
Learn More →Audit Defence
Learn More →Optimisation
Learn More →All Microsoft Services
Learn More →Microsoft Licensing Case Studies
Microsoft Licensing Deep-Dives
Optimise Your Microsoft Licensing Strategy
Whether you are renewing an EA, evaluating CSP, transitioning to MCA, or building a hybrid approach, Redress Compliance delivers vendor-independent advisory that saves Fortune 500 enterprises millions on Microsoft deals.