Case Study - Java Licensing

Case Study – Java Advisory Services – Mercy Health – $4M Claim Resolved at Zero Cost

Case Study – Java Advisory Services – Mercy Health – $4M Claim Resolved at Zero Cost

Case Study – Java Advisory Services – Mercy Health – $4M Claim Resolved at Zero Cost

Background

Mercy Health is a large healthcare organization with numerous hospitals and clinics. Its IT environment spans clinical systems, administrative applications, and patient-facing portals – many of which incorporate Java technology.

From electronic health record (EHR) systems and laboratory management software to internal scheduling tools, Java plays a crucial role in keeping day-to-day healthcare operations running smoothly.

In such a highly regulated industry, system stability and compliance are critical, and any unexpected software licensing issues can pose both financial and operational risks.

Challenges

Mercy Health was notified of an Oracle audit focused on its Java usage. Oracle alleged that Mercy’s widespread Java deployments were unlicensed under Oracle’s new policies and initially demanded approximately $4 million in fees.

This was a substantial sum for a healthcare budget, and Oracle pressed for immediate subscription purchases, warning that any delay could result in penalties or loss of support. Caught between protecting patient-critical systems and Oracle’s pressure, Mercy Health sought Redress Compliance’s assistance.

How Redress Compliance Helped

Redress Compliance stepped in as Mercy Health’s advocate and advisor to navigate the Java licensing challenge. The team executed a multi-faceted plan:

  1. Java Usage Audit: Redress conducted a thorough audit of Mercy Health’s Java deployments. They cataloged every instance of Oracle Java running in the environment, from hospital servers and virtual machines to individual PCs. This audit provided a clear baseline for discussions with Oracle.
  2. Entitlement & Policy Analysis: The team reviewed Mercy Health’s existing Oracle agreements and the specific Java versions in use. They identified several Java installations as older releases (pre-2019) that did not require subscriptions under Oracle’s rules. Redress also found that some Java was embedded in third-party software (such as certain healthcare applications), meaning those instances were likely covered by the vendor’s licensing rather than requiring a separate Oracle license.
  3. Risk Mitigation Strategy: Redress formulated a plan to mitigate the compliance risk without endangering any clinical operations. They recommended isolating or limiting Java on certain servers to reduce the licensing scope, while ensuring these changes did not impact patient care applications. Redress also guided Mercy’s IT team on how to communicate these proactive steps to Oracle, which helped buy time and goodwill during negotiations.
  4. Negotiation & Resolution: Armed with data and a pragmatic plan, Redress entered negotiations with Oracle on Mercy Health’s behalf. They presented evidence that Oracle’s $4M claim was overstated once legacy versions and vendor-covered instances were taken into account. Redress negotiated firmly, pushing back against Oracle’s pressure while highlighting Mercy Health’s proactive compliance efforts. Ultimately, Oracle agreed to withdraw its claim entirely. Mercy Health did not need to purchase any new Java licenses or subscriptions, and the audit concluded with no penalties.

Outcome and Impact

Mercy Health achieved a complete win in the Java licensing audit – a $4 million claim was resolved at no cost. This outcome saved the healthcare network from a $4 million unplanned expense and prevented any disruption to clinical systems.

With Redress Compliance’s guidance, Mercy Health not only avoided immediate costs but also gained clarity in managing Java moving forward.

The organization implemented stricter tracking of Java usage and began transitioning certain systems to open-source Java, reducing its reliance on Oracle. Mercy Health’s leadership now recognizes the importance of expert licensing support going forward.

Client Testimonial

“As a healthcare provider, we can’t afford surprises or downtime in our systems. Oracle’s audit felt like an emergency, but Redress Compliance turned it into a non-event. They broke down the technical licensing issues and negotiated a solution that cost us nothing. We avoided a $4 million expense and kept our focus on patient care. Redress gave us the insight and confidence to handle Java licensing without compromising our operations.”

– Director of IT

Call-to-Action

If your organization is facing an Oracle Java audit or compliance crisis, don’t panic – get expert help. Redress Compliance specializes in Java licensing reviews, audit defense, and risk mitigation strategies. Contact us for a consultation to protect your organization’s budget and keep your IT systems compliant.

We’ll help you navigate Oracle’s licensing maze, reduce unnecessary costs, and ensure your operations stay uninterrupted.

Read about our Oracle Java License Compliance, Java Advisory, and Java Audit Defense Service.

Read about other Java Licensing and Audit Case Studies.

Do you want to know more about our Java Licensing Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizations—including numerous Fortune 500 companies—optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts

Redress Compliance