Case Study - Java Licensing

Case Study – Java Advisory Services – Manufacturer – $4M Claim Resolved at Zero Cost

Case Study – Java Advisory Services – Manufacturer – $4M Claim Resolved at Zero Cost

Background

A a leading global manufacturer of material handling equipment with approximately 20,000 employees worldwide. The company’s IT landscape includes a mix of enterprise applications and manufacturing control systems, many of which rely on Oracle’s Java technology.

Java is used in internally developed software as well as embedded systems across factories and warehouses. In this industry, uninterrupted operations are critical, and Java plays a key role in daily workflows – from managing forklift fleets to running supply chain applications.

Challenges

In mid-2023, the company received notice of a Java licensing review, effectively an Oracle Java audit of its software environment.

Oracle claimed that manufacturers widespread installations of Java SE across development environments, production servers, and even shop-floor devices were unlicensed under Oracle’s updated policies.

Oracle’s 2019 Java licensing changes caught the company, like many organizations, off guard, requiring paid Java SE subscriptions. The initial demand was alarming: a projected $4 million in license fees and back support.

This was a staggering figure for software that the company previously considered “free.” Oracle’s tactics added pressure, implying that every instance of Oracle Java on the company virtualized servers and employee workstations required a paid subscription, retroactively and moving forward.

Ambiguous contract terms and evolving Java licensing rules left IT team uncertain about their true compliance position.

Facing aggressive timelines and the threat of escalation, Client engaged Redress Compliance to defend against the claim and avoid an enormous unbudgeted cost.

How Redress Compliance Helped

Redress Compliance deployed its Java audit defense and licensing advisory expertise to tackle the client situation.

The team followed a systematic approach:

  1. Comprehensive Java Assessment: Redress conducted a detailed review of the company IT infrastructure to identify every Oracle Java installation. They pinpointed which deployments truly required a license under Oracle’s rules and which did not.
  2. Deployment Optimization: Working closely with IT staff, Redress helped trim the scope of Java use. Redundant or non-essential Java installations were removed or replaced with open-source alternatives, immediately shrinking the compliance gap.
  3. Entitlement & Contract Review: The team analyzed the company existing Oracle agreements and purchase history for any entitlements covering Java. They found that some Java components bundled with Oracle software were already covered by licenses—a fact that Oracle’s auditors had overlooked.
  4. Negotiation Strategy & Support: Armed with data and contract insights, Redress crafted a strategy to challenge Oracle’s $4M claim. They demonstrated that the company actual usage was largely compliant or easily remediated without additional cost. Redress coached company executives on how to respond to Oracle’s assertions and participated behind the scenes in discussions, turning a high-pressure sales push into a fact-based negotiation.

Outcome and Impact

After several weeks of analysis and dialogue, Oracle ultimately withdrew its $4 million claim. The company did not have to purchase any new Java licenses or subscriptions – the issue was resolved at zero cost.

This outcome resulted in an immediate savings of $4 million and significant future cost avoidance from subscriptions that were never purchased. Equally important, the company leadership regained confidence in its Java licensing position.

The company emerged from this episode with a clear understanding of its Java deployments and a plan to govern Java use, preventing future compliance issues.

By avoiding a forced subscription, company maintained flexibility in its IT strategy and protected its budget for more critical initiatives rather than unplanned licensing bills.

Client Testimonial

“Redress Compliance turned a potential $4 million nightmare into a non-issue. Their expertise in Oracle Java licensing and audit defense was evident from day one. With Redress guiding us, we achieved full compliance without paying Oracle a cent. We not only saved millions but also learned how to manage our Java usage strategically to avoid future risks.”

– CIO, Global Manufacturing Company

Call-to-Action

Facing an Oracle Java audit or unclear about Java licensing compliance? Don’t navigate it alone. Contact Redress Compliance for an expert Java licensing assessment and audit defense consultation. We help enterprises reduce Java license costs, mitigate compliance risks, and take back control of their Java investment.

Read about our Oracle Java License Compliance, Java Advisory, and Java Audit Defense Service.

Read about other Java Licensing and Audit Case Studies.

Do you want to know more about our Java Licensing Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizations—including numerous Fortune 500 companies—optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts

Redress Compliance