Case Study - Oracle ULA

Case Study – Oracle ULA Optimization Service – Oracle ULA Optimization Saves 40% for U.S. Financial Services Firm

How a Fortune 500 Bank Saved $30M by Exiting an Oracle ULA – With Redress Compliance

Case Study – Oracle ULA Optimization Service – Oracle ULA Optimization Saves 40% for U.S. Financial Services Firm

Background

A leading financial services firm based in New York (USA) faced escalating Oracle licensing costs. The client is a Fortune 500 banking institution with approximately 20,000 employees and over $10 billion in annual revenue.

The bank had entered into a three-year Oracle Unlimited License Agreement (ULA) covering core products, including Oracle Database Enterprise Edition and Oracle Middleware components.

Most of their deployments were on-premises data centers, with some initial tests in the cloud. As the ULA’s end date approached, the firm needed to decide whether to renew the ULA or certify and exit it, locking in its deployed licenses.

Challenges

Despite the ULA’s promise of cost predictability, the bank encountered several challenges:

  • Escalating Costs: Oracle’s initial renewal proposal came at a significantly higher price (~$30 million for another 3-year term). This posed a risk of a 40% budget increase if the bank simply renewed on Oracle’s terms.
  • Compliance Risk: During the ULA period, the bank had deployed Oracle software broadly. Some deployments included options and features not explicitly covered by the ULA, raising compliance flags. Oracle’s sales team suggested that if the bank attempted to exit the ULA, an audit might reveal licensing gaps. It’s common for Oracle to threaten audits as ULAs near expiration to pressure customers into renewal, and the bank keenly felt this pressure.
  • Renewal vs. Certification Complexity: Internally, stakeholders were torn between renewing the ULA or certifying out. Renewing would extend the unlimited use but lock the company into another multi-million-dollar commitment. Certifying (i.e., exiting) meant carefully counting every deployment to ensure compliance – a complex task given thousands of database instances and applications.
  • Vendor Push for Cloud: Oracle was urging the client to adopt Oracle Cloud as part of any renewal. The vendor implied that a favorable renewal deal was contingent on moving some workloads to Oracle’s cloud platform. This “cloud or compliance” ultimatum made the decision even more complex, as the bank preferred a cloud-agnostic strategy using AWS and Azure for new workloads.
  • Lock-In Concerns: The firm worried that renewing the ULA would deepen its dependency on Oracle. They had strategic initiatives to diversify databases (including evaluating open-source alternatives) and feared a renewal on Oracle’s terms would come with restrictive conditions or prolonged lock-in.

How Redress Compliance Helped

Redress Compliance, an independent Oracle licensing advisor, was engaged as the client’s advocate to navigate these challenges.

Redress executed a comprehensive ULA optimization strategy in several key steps:

  1. License Deployment Assessment: Redress conducted a thorough audit of Oracle usage across the bank’s infrastructure. This assessment identified all deployments of Oracle Database and middleware, including any usage of options or features outside the scope of the ULA. By comparing deployed usage versus ULA entitlements, Redress pinpointed areas of non-compliance and under-utilization.
  2. ULA Usage Optimization: The team developed a plan to maximize legitimate usage before the ULA expiration. They advised the bank on consolidating and right-sizing Oracle workloads. Non-critical and duplicate database instances were retired or merged. At the same time, essential workloads were scaled up where feasible to maximize the full utilization of the “all-you-can-use” nature of the ULA. This ensured the bank would certify a high number of licenses, capturing maximum value from the agreement.
  3. Exit vs. Renewal Scenario Planning: Redress presented detailed scenarios for both exiting and renewing. This included forecasting costs over the next 5 years under each option. The analysis showed that certifying and exiting the ULA, while carefully managing compliance, would yield significant savings compared to Oracle’s renewal quote. Redress also highlighted that exiting would grant the bank perpetual license rights to the deployed software, whereas renewing would simply start a new term with no end to fees in sight.
  4. Negotiation and Oracle Engagement: Acting as the client’s advocate in discussions with Oracle, Redress leveraged the bank’s willingness to exit as a form of bargaining power. They pushed back against Oracle’s heavy-handed tactics and clarified that the client was prepared to walk away rather than accept an unfavorable deal. This approach led Oracle to soften its stance – including dropping certain cloud-related conditions and reducing the renewal fee quote in late negotiations.
  5. Certification Roadmap: Ultimately, the bank chose to proceed with the ULA exit. Redress created a detailed certification roadmap to ensure a smooth process. This roadmap included step-by-step guidance on formally documenting all Oracle deployments, a timeline for certification activities, and strategies for handling Oracle’s audit team inquiries. Redress experts were on hand throughout the certification submission to address any challenges or last-minute questions from Oracle, ensuring the vendor had no grounds to object to the final counts.

Outcome and Impact

By following Redress Compliance’s plan, the financial firm achieved a markedly successful outcome:

  • Avoided a Costly Renewal: The bank avoided Oracle’s proposed $30 million ULA renewal. Instead, by certifying out, they incurred $0 in new license fees. Over a three-year horizon, this represented a 40% cost savings compared to the projected spend had they renewed.
  • Immediate Budget Relief: In real terms, the company saved approximately $12 million upfront and an estimated $3–5 million annually in avoided support cost increases. Oracle’s standard 22% annual support fees on a larger license pool would have further strained its IT budget. Exiting the ULA maintained support costs at a stable level for certified licenses, rather than escalating with renewal.
  • Compliance Risk Eliminated: All potential compliance issues were resolved before ULA termination. Oracle accepted the final certification without dispute. This proactive approach eliminated an estimated $ 20 million or more in potential audit penalties or license purchases that could have resulted from unaddressed gaps. The client emerged from the ULA with zero compliance debt—a critical achievement in an industry where regulatory scrutiny is high.
  • Strategic Flexibility Gained: With perpetual licenses now in hand, the bank gained flexibility to modernize its IT environment. The constraints or renewal timelines of an Oracle ULA no longer bind them. This freedom allowed the IT department to accelerate plans to migrate certain applications to cloud platforms of their choice and to introduce alternative databases (such as PostgreSQL) for new projects without breaching any agreements.
  • Vendor Leverage Restored: By successfully exiting, the client sent a strong message that they would not be held hostage to Oracle’s terms. In the future, any additional Oracle purchases can be negotiated on a case-by-case basis with competitive bids, rather than under the shadow of an expiring ULA. This shift in power balance is expected to yield better pricing and contract terms in the future.

Client Quote

“Redress Compliance was the ally we needed to navigate Oracle’s maze. They gave us unbiased advice and the confidence to push back against Oracle’s pressure. Exiting the ULA felt daunting, but Redress’s expertise made it a smooth process—and saved us millions. We’ve achieved outcomes we wouldn’t have thought possible without them on our side.” – CIO, New York Financial Services Firm (anonymous)

Call-to-Action (CTA)

Is your organization facing an Oracle ULA renewal or unsure about how to reduce escalating Oracle costs?

Contact Redress Compliance for a free Oracle ULA consultation or risk assessment.

Our independent experts will help you identify savings opportunities, ensure compliance, and take back control from vendor-driven pressures. Don’t let Oracle dictate your IT strategy – let us empower you to optimize it.

Read about our Oracle ULA License Optimization Service.

Read about our other Oracle Case Studies.

Do you want to know more about our Oracle ULA License Optimization Service?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizations—including numerous Fortune 500 companies—optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts

Redress Compliance