Editorial photograph of a CIO review session on the SAP RISE versus S4HANA on premise decision
SAP / RISE vs On Premise / Spoke

SAP RISE versus on premise. The decision framework.

RISE bundles the migration and the subscription. On premise keeps the control and the capex profile. The CIO call hinges on five variables, not on which deck SAP lands first.

Contact Us SAP Practice
500+Enterprise clients
$2B+Under advisory
Industry Recognized
500+ Enterprise Clients
$2B+ Under Advisory
11 Vendor Practices
100% Buyer Side Independent

SAP RISE bundles S/4HANA, the hyperscaler infrastructure, and the managed service into a per FUE subscription. S/4HANA on premise keeps the licences as capex, the hosting decision separate, and the upgrade calendar in the buyer's control. The right choice depends on five variables that the SAP account team rarely puts in writing.

Key takeaways

  • RISE is a multi year subscription. On premise is a perpetual licence plus annual support.
  • The five year RISE total is usually fifteen to thirty five percent higher than the on premise equivalent at large scale.
  • RISE moves operational control to SAP. On premise keeps it with the customer.
  • Indirect access exposure is calculated differently under RISE through the digital access document model.
  • RISE exit terms favour SAP. On premise exit is governed by perpetual rights that do not expire.
  • The decision is not technical. It is a commercial, audit, and control posture call.
  • Run the five year cost model before the migration scope is locked.

The RISE pitch is a clean migration plus subscription. The on premise model is a slower change with more buyer control. Both options run S/4HANA. The choice is not what to run. The choice is who controls the run.

This page maps the variables that drive the call. Five year cost, control posture, customisation friction, indirect access exposure, and exit rights. The buyer side calendar starts the model at 270 days out, not 60.

What is RISE with SAP and what is S/4HANA on premise?

RISE with SAP is a managed cloud subscription. On premise is a perpetual deployment the customer runs.

RISE with SAP

RISE is the SAP subscription that bundles S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, the underlying hyperscaler infrastructure, the SAP application managed service, and a small set of supporting capabilities into a single per FUE contract. The hyperscaler is selected at signing. SAP runs the upgrades on a fixed cadence.

S/4HANA on premise

S/4HANA on premise is the traditional perpetual licence model. The customer buys or migrates the licences, runs them on chosen infrastructure, and pays SAP annual support. The infrastructure choice can be on premise data centre, private cloud, or hyperscaler outside RISE.

Where GROW with SAP fits

GROW with SAP is the midmarket public cloud edition. It is not directly comparable to either option here. See the RISE versus GROW decision framework.

How does the five year total cost compare?

Modelling the five year total is the most important step.

RISE five year cost components

  • FUE subscription. Per FUE annual price across the term.
  • Annual escalator. Inflation indexed or fixed step up clause.
  • Hyperscaler pass through. Infrastructure cost embedded in the FUE.
  • Implementation partner fees. Outside the SAP contract.
  • Add on modules. Outside the base FUE in most contracts.

On premise five year cost components

  • Licence purchase. Capex or amortised over useful life.
  • Annual support. Twenty two percent of the licence base.
  • Infrastructure cost. On premise or hyperscaler outside RISE.
  • Implementation partner fees. Same as RISE.
  • Add on modules. Same as RISE.

RISE versus on premise. Five year total at 500 FUE indicative scale

Line item RISE On premise Notes
FUE subscription or licence baseHighMediumRISE bundles infra and managed service
Annual escalator2.5 to 5 percentSupport fee increase per renewalNegotiate cap on both
InfrastructureEmbeddedSeparateHyperscaler EDP applies on premise side
Managed serviceEmbeddedSeparatePartner or in house on premise side
Five year totalHigher in most large estatesLower at scale, higher at small scaleRun the model before scope lock

How does operational control compare?

Control posture is the second decision variable.

RISE control posture

SAP owns the upgrade calendar, the patch schedule, the operational SLAs, the change control process, and the third party tool envelope. Customers contract through SAP's managed service framework. Custom code is permitted within the SAP defined boundaries.

On premise control posture

The customer owns every operational decision. Upgrade timing, patch cadence, infrastructure design, third party integrations, custom code, and change control all sit inside the customer.

Trade off

RISE reduces the operational headcount the customer needs. On premise keeps the operational sovereignty. Highly regulated industries with bespoke S/4HANA customisation typically favour on premise. Lean IT operations with standard processes typically favour RISE.

How does the indirect access exposure compare?

Indirect access calculation differs materially between the two models.

RISE digital access model

RISE uses the digital access document model. Inbound documents from external systems create chargeable events. SAP RISE digital access sizing must be set at signing. Underestimating the document count creates a true up at year two or three.

On premise indirect access

On premise indirect access exposure is governed by the master agreement signed before the digital access model existed for older customers, or by the digital access document model for newer agreements. Both can be negotiated as part of the on premise renewal cycle.

Where the common advice on SAP RISE versus on premise is wrong

The standard SAP account team pitch is that RISE is the strategic direction and on premise is legacy. We disagree. In roughly two out of three large enterprise estates we have modeled in the last 24 months, the five year RISE total runs above the on premise equivalent and the operational risk profile is materially different. The buyer side move is to run both five year models in parallel, force a written confirmation of the migration path support window if on premise is chosen, and use the comparative number as the negotiation anchor.

Editorial photograph of a finance team running a five year SAP total cost model
The five year model is the single most leveraged artifact in a RISE versus on premise call. Run it in house before the SAP team brings their version.
60
SAP migration engagements 2023 to 2025
27%
Median RISE first quote reduction
2.8x
Median digital access document count gap

Source: Redress Compliance advisory engagement file, 2023 to 2025.

RISE is sold as a migration. It is a contractual rewrite. Read the master agreement before the migration deck.

What do the exit terms look like under each option?

Exit posture is the variable most procurement teams underweight.

RISE exit terms

RISE is a fixed term subscription. At end of term the customer must either renew, migrate to on premise, or migrate to another platform. SAP controls the transition window. Data extraction support is hourly billed beyond a small allowance.

On premise exit terms

On premise licences are perpetual. The customer can step off SAP support, run third party support, or migrate to a different platform on the customer's calendar. The perpetual right remains in place.

What to negotiate

  • RISE. Extended data extraction window, hourly capped transition support, step down early termination.
  • On premise. Right to step off support, third party support compatibility, audit gate clarity.

How should a CIO choose between RISE and on premise?

The decision tree turns on five variables.

Variable one. Five year total cost

Build the five year model with both options to the same scope. If RISE is more than fifteen percent above the on premise total, on premise is usually the right answer at scale.

Variable two. Operational control

If the estate carries heavy customisation, regulated workloads, or non standard integrations, on premise is usually the right answer. If the estate is standard and lean, RISE is workable.

Variable three. Internal SAP team capacity

If the customer cannot staff a Basis and security operations team, RISE removes the headcount problem. If the customer already has that team, RISE reduces the team's role without removing the cost.

Variable four. Audit and indirect access exposure

Model the digital access document count carefully under RISE. If the model is volatile, on premise digital access is easier to control.

Variable five. Exit posture

If the customer wants the perpetual right and the option to step off support, on premise is the answer. If the customer accepts subscription discipline, RISE is workable.

Suggested reading

What should a CIO do next?

  1. Build the five year cost model with both options to the same scope.
  2. Run the SAP RISE TCO calculator for the RISE side.
  3. Document the customisation register and map each item to the RISE envelope.
  4. Map the digital access document count from connected systems.
  5. Confirm the migration partner cost is held outside the SAP contract.
  6. Negotiate the exit posture early. Both options have moves to make.
  7. Set the buyer side calendar 270 days before the decision lock date.
  8. Engage independent SAP advisory to anchor the negotiation.

Frequently asked questions

Is RISE more expensive than on premise over five years?

Usually yes at large scale. The five year RISE total runs above the on premise equivalent in about three out of four large estates we have modeled. Always run the model with the same scope on both sides.

Does RISE include all S/4HANA modules?

No. The base RISE FUE covers the core S/4HANA functions. Many add on modules sit outside the FUE and carry their own subscription line. Read the SAP product list before scope lock.

Can we move from RISE to on premise mid term?

Not without a contract event. RISE is a multi year subscription. The move is treated as an early termination plus a new contract. Negotiate the step down right at signing.

Does on premise mean on the customer data centre?

Not necessarily. On premise here refers to the perpetual licence model. The deployment can sit on customer data centre, private cloud, or hyperscaler outside RISE. The licence type is what defines on premise.

How does indirect access work under RISE?

RISE uses the digital access document model. Inbound documents from external systems create chargeable events. Underestimating the document count creates a true up at year two or three. Always size carefully.

What is a realistic discount on the RISE first quote?

Twenty two to thirty eight percent below the SAP first quote is the workable range with a properly prepared buyer side. The lever is the FUE count, the tier price, and the term length.

Should we take third party support on the on premise option?

Third party support is a credible answer if the customer is not running new SAP innovation roadmap items and accepts the absence of new SAP feature releases. Model the support window before stepping off.

What does Redress recommend as the first move on this topic?

Open with the five year model on both sides before any SAP scoping deck lands. The model is the negotiation. The deck is the response.

SAP RISE Negotiation Guide

The full SAP negotiation framework across RISE, GROW, Ariba, SuccessFactors, and indirect access.

RISE versus on premise, GROW for midmarket, indirect access exposure, SuccessFactors HRIS commercial posture, Ariba module sequencing, and the audit defense framework across the SAP estate.

Used across more than five hundred enterprise engagements. Independent. Buyer side. Built for procurement leaders running the next SAP renewal cycle.

No spam. We will only email you about this download. Privacy.
Run the SAP RISE TCO calculator against your estate in under five minutes.
Open the Tool →
500+
Enterprise Clients
$2B+
Under Advisory
11
Vendor Practices
100%
Buyer Side

RISE is sold as a migration. It is a contractual rewrite. Read the master agreement before the migration deck.

Fredrik Filipsson
Co Founder and Group CEO, Redress Compliance