The Enterprise Guide to IBM License Audits

IBM software license audits are a fact of life for global enterprises. They often arrive without warning and can put millions of dollars at stake.

This guide delivers a straight-shooting playbook for CIOs, CFOs, procurement heads, and IT asset managers to take control of IBM audits.

We’ll cover why audits happen, how to prepare an Effective License Position (ELP) in advance, negotiation tactics to contain scope and cost, and how to turn audits from emergencies into managed events.

Why IBM License Audits Matter to Global Enterprises

IBM’s vast software portfolio underpins critical systems in banking, insurance, healthcare, and beyond. With that footprint comes license compliance risk.

An IBM audit can expose gaps between what you’ve deployed and what you’ve paid for. If unmanaged, this leads to hefty true-up bills, back-dated support fees, and fire-drill scrambling by IT and procurement.

What triggers an IBM audit?

Several enterprise activities raise red flags for IBM’s compliance teams: rapid growth in IBM product usage, major infrastructure changes or virtualization projects, migration of IBM workloads to cloud or containers, mergers and acquisitions, upcoming license agreement renewals, or a history of prior compliance issues.

Even gaps in ILMT coverage (IBM’s License Metric Tool) can trigger an audit notice. IBM monitors these triggers as signals that your license position may have drifted out of compliance.

The cost impact and risk exposure of non-compliance are significant. In audits, any shortfall in licenses typically means an immediate purchase at list price. Companies also face back-support fees—paying maintenance retroactively for periods when software was used without support.

A surprise compliance gap can run into the millions of dollars once license fees and back-support are tallied. Audits also consume countless hours of staff time for data gathering and meetings, and they attract scrutiny from executive risk committees and auditors. The reputational impact inside the company can be serious – nobody wants to explain to the board why a license lapse went unnoticed.

Yet an audit doesn’t have to spell disaster. When well-prepared, enterprises can treat audits as leverage events rather than crises. If you’ve built a solid ELP and governance framework, an audit becomes a structured dialogue in which you can reshape the scope, timing, and even the commercial outcome.

In short, preparation and a defensive strategy turn an audit into just another commercial negotiation, not a panicked scramble.

Understanding the IBM Audit Process

When IBM decides to audit, the process follows a predictable arc from notification to resolution. Knowing the stages in advance helps you stay in control.

From audit notification to data collection to settlement

It starts with a formal audit notification letter invoking the audit clause in your IBM contract. This letter usually comes to a senior executive, announcing IBM’s intent to verify license compliance.

Do not panic—and do not rush to provide data. Acknowledge receipt of the notice, and then set ground rules with IBM for the audit engagement. (Pro Tip: Silence first, facts second, data last. Acknowledge receipt, set rules, build your ELP before sending exports.)

IBM will assign a licensing auditor – sometimes an internal IBM team member, other times a third-party firm (e.g. KPMG or Deloitte) acting on IBM’s behalf.

A kick-off call or meeting will be scheduled, during which the auditor outlines the scope of products and entities under review and the initial data requests. Typically, they will ask for deployment data, proof of entitlements (licenses you own), and often require running IBM’s data collection tools if not already in place.

Following data collection, the auditor will compile findings and draft an Effective License Position (ELP). This draft ELP compares your entitlements vs. deployments for each product to identify any shortfalls or over-deployments.

You should expect an iterative process here: IBM presents a draft findings report, and you have the opportunity (and right) to review and challenge it.

It’s common to have multiple discussion rounds to clarify data, correct misunderstandings, and provide additional evidence. (Remember: Draft ≠ debt. Treat draft ELPs as hypotheses to test, not invoices to pay.)

Finally comes the settlement phase. Once the ELP is agreed (or at least understood by both sides), negotiations turn to commercial resolution. If compliance gaps remain, this could mean purchasing additional licenses, paying back support, or negotiating a new license agreement that absorbs the findings.

The audit officially concludes when both parties sign off on a resolution (often a purchase order or agreement addendum) and IBM issues a formal closure of the audit.

Throughout this process, maintaining control over scope, timeline, and communication is vital. Do not allow “audit creep.” Insist that IBM sticks to the agreed scope of products and period. If new issues are raised outside that scope, push back firmly.

Manage the timeline by setting reasonable deadlines for each phase and holding IBM to them as well. And centralize all communications through a single point of contact on your side to avoid confusion or accidental admissions by unwary staff.

Key tools & concepts: ILMT, IBM License Service, and ELP fundamentals

A few IBM-specific tools and concepts play an outsized role in audits:

• IBM License Metric Tool (ILMT) – This is IBM’s mandated tool for sub-capacity licensing. If you run IBM software on virtualized servers (VMware, etc.) or in cloud environments, IBM requires ILMT (or an approved alternative) to measure the actual CPU usage. ILMT automatically scans and reports Processor Value Unit (PVU) usage across your environment. Without ILMT, IBM assumes full-capacity licensing, which can dramatically increase the number of licenses you need. Ensuring ILMT is deployed, updated, and working correctly on all relevant systems is your best defense for accurate metrics. (Pro Tip: Tools are evidence, not gospel. Validate ILMT/License Service coverage and always reconcile tool data to entitlements manually.)
• IBM License Service (for Containers) – As enterprises adopt containers and Kubernetes (e.g., Red Hat OpenShift) to run IBM software, IBM provides the IBM License Service to track containerized product usage. This tool measures license consumption (e.g,. Virtual Processor Cores for Cloud Paks) in container environments. If you move IBM software into containers without deploying the IBM License Service, you’ll likely over-count usage or be unable to prove compliance. Think of it as ILMT for the container world. Containers need their own meter. Without the IBM License Service, findings inflate. Make sure this service is installed on all clusters running IBM workloads and configured to monitor the correct namespaces.
• Effective License Position (ELP) – The ELP is a cornerstone of audit defense. It’s essentially your internal report card of license compliance: a reconciliation of entitlements vs. deployments for every IBM product in scope. A robust ELP accounts for all licenses you’ve purchased (entitlements), all deployments or installations of IBM software, and the applicable license metrics and usage calculations. It also factors in any special terms (like DR cold backups, or test/development use rights) so that you don’t count what you don’t need to. Building an accurate ELP (with evidence to back every line item) is how you know your position before IBM comes back with theirs.

In essence, ILMT and IBM License Service feed you the raw usage data, but it’s the ELP where you interpret that data against your contracts.

Mastering these tools and concepts enables you to engage with IBM from a position of knowledge rather than scrambling for answers.

IBM Audit Triggers & Risk Indicators

Large enterprises should treat certain events as early warning signs of an IBM audit. Procurement and IT leaders must know these triggers and mitigate the risk before IBM knocks on the door.

Common IBM audit triggers and why they flag risk include:

• Mergers, Acquisitions, or Divestitures: When companies merge or split, IBM sees potential licensing confusion. Entitlements might not cover new entities, or software might be transferred without formal IBM approval. Why it flags risk: The boundaries of license use (by entity or geography) become blurry, increasing the risk of inadvertent misuse. Procurement must map all IBM entitlements to the new org structure and carve out any divested parts from your license pool.
• Virtualization & Infrastructure Changes: Major changes in data center setup – like moving to a new virtualization platform, adding hosts to VMware clusters, or shifting workloads to cloud VMs – draw IBM’s attention. Why: IBM’s sub-capacity licensing relies on stable, monitored environments. New hosts or moves might not be covered by ILMT initially, leading to untracked usage. Action: Immediately update your ILMT coverage and validate that all new servers or clusters with IBM software are under monitoring.
• Cloud and Container Adoption: Deploying IBM products in public cloud or containerized environments (e.g., AWS, Azure, or OpenShift) without clear licensing controls is high-risk. Why: These dynamic environments can spawn new instances quickly, and IBM’s traditional licensing models may not directly translate. If IBM suspects you moved to cloud or containers and haven’t adjusted your compliance approach, they’ll want a closer look. Action: Ensure the IBM License Service is active for containerized deployments and review cloud instances for proper licensing (consider IBM’s Cloud Pak licensing model, designed for such scenarios).
• ILMT or Tool Gaps: If you have not installed ILMT, installed it late, or it’s not reporting completely, IBM will almost certainly audit. Why: No ILMT means IBM can claim you owe licenses for 100% of the physical capacity, often a huge number. Even partial coverage or broken reports are red flags—they suggest you might be undercounting usage. Action: Conduct a 90-day ILMT remediation sprint – fix any agent issues, deploy to missing servers, and gather interim evidence (manual screenshots, capacity docs) for periods ILMT missed. You should find and fix tool gaps before IBM does.
• Enterprise Agreement (EA) Renewal or Big Contract Negotiations: When a large IBM license or support agreement is up for renewal, the sales team has an incentive to use compliance as pressure. Why: An audit finding can force a customer’s hand to sign a new deal or buy more. Even in the absence of malice, IBM often aligns audits with renewal cycles “to ensure compliance” going into a new term. Action: Preemptively perform an ELP review 3-6 months before a renewal. Walk into negotiations with a position paper on your entitlements and usage – this flips the script and may ward off a formal audit.
• Prior Audit Findings or Exceptions: If a previous audit resulted in unresolved issues, or IBM gave you a pass on certain shortfalls (with an expectation you’d fix them), you’re on a watch list. Why: IBM knows where there was smoke, there’s likely fire (or at least some embers). They may check if you truly implemented the promised changes. Action: Document every remediation you did after the last audit. Close any lingering compliance gaps for those past findings and gather proof (screenshots, configs) that you addressed the issues. Being able to show IBM “we fixed it” might prevent them from re-opening that case.

To summarize these triggers and the immediate control actions, use the following quick reference:

IBM audit triggers are predictable. By recognizing these indicators, you can take proactive steps to control the narrative. It’s far better to tighten up compliance on your own terms than to be caught off guard.

As a rule, whenever your organization undergoes a major change involving IBM software, assume an audit could follow and act accordingly.

Preparing Your Defence: Effective Licence Position (ELP) Strategy

The best time to prepare for an IBM audit is before you’re in one. At the heart of preparation is building an Effective Licence Position (ELP) – essentially a comprehensive internal audit.

This effort should be a cross-functional project (IT, asset management, procurement, maybe external experts) aimed at knowing exactly where you stand. Build the ELP first, before responding substantively to IBM’s audit requests.

Here’s how to construct a solid ELP strategy:

• Discover Your Deployment Inventory: Identify every server, VM, cluster, and container where IBM software is installed. This involves scanning data centers, clouds, and even developer environments for IBM product installations. Accuracy here is key – you can’t defend what you don’t know exists.
• Assess Tool Posture (ILMT and Alternatives): Map out which systems are covered by ILMT or another IBM-approved license tracking tool. Verify the tool’s health: are the agents running and up to date? Are all VMware clusters properly defined? For containers, ensure IBM License Service is harvesting data. Document any gaps (unmonitored systems) as high-priority areas for remediation.
• Reconstruct Entitlements: Pull together every proof of license ownership. This means purchase records, IBM Passport Advantage reports, license certificates, support renewal quotes – any documentation of your entitlements. Don’t forget special terms from contracts: bundled products, migrations, or waivers. It’s like assembling a jigsaw puzzle of what you’re legally allowed to use.
• Align Metrics and Usage: For each IBM product found in your environment, determine its licensing metric (Processor Value Unit, Virtual Processor Core, number of users, install counts, etc.). Then calculate your usage according to those metrics. For example, if PVU licenses WebSphere, translate the server CPU info from ILMT into PVUs consumed. If an analytics product is user-based, count named users. This step requires a deep understanding of IBM’s metric definitions and conversion tables.
• Log Exceptions and Usage Policies: Identify installations that might not require licensing due to valid exceptions. Common ones include disaster recovery machines in cold standby (unused except in emergencies), test/development environments covered by special non-production licenses, or backup instances. Document these with evidence (e.g., a DR server’s configuration showing it’s passive). During an audit, you’ll need to prove why these shouldn’t count toward license usage.
• Compile the ELP Report and Evidence Pack: Bring it all together in a clear report. The ELP should list each product, the licenses owned, the deployments discovered, and any delta (over- or under-license). It should reference evidence for each data point—for instance, by attaching ILMT screenshots, purchase record excerpts, etc. Essentially, you’re creating an audit dossier on yourself. If discrepancies emerge (say you have more usage than licenses for a product), outline potential remediation (could you uninstall some instances? move to a different product? purchase additional licenses preemptively?).

Your goal is a verifiable ELP that you can confidently share or discuss with IBM, one that flags any issues you’re already addressing.

By doing this homework, you transform from being on the back foot to driving the conversation. If IBM’s data differs from yours, you’ll be ready to pinpoint why (maybe they scanned an old server you already decommissioned, etc.).

To ensure nothing is missed in building your ELP, follow this 15-Point Audit-Readiness Playbook – a checklist of preparatory items every IBM client should have in place:

Checklist: 15-Point Audit-Readiness (ELP) Playbook

1. Tool Coverage Map – Document which sub-capacity environments are covered by ILMT or other IBM-approved tools (and which are not).
2. Agent/Scan Health Dashboard – Set up monitoring to verify all ILMT agents or scanner jobs are running successfully on schedule.
3. Host Boundary Catalog – Keep an inventory of all physical hosts, VM clusters, and their IBM software allocations (to prevent scope creep across clusters).
4. Container Inventory & Labels – Maintain a list of container platforms (e.g. OpenShift clusters) running IBM software, with consistent labels/namespaces to track usage.
5. DR/Test/Dev Registry – List all designated Disaster Recovery, testing, and development instances of IBM products, with documentation of their non-production status.
6. Entitlement Archive – Compile a repository of all IBM license purchase records, contracts, and key license terms (so you can quickly retrieve proof during audit).
7. Product Metric Dictionary – Create a guide that defines the license metric for each IBM product in use (so everyone understands how each is counted).
8. Deployment vs. Rights Reconciliation Workbook – Maintain a spreadsheet or system that matches each discovered deployment to an entitlement, highlighting any shortfall or surplus.
9. Evidence Pack Templates – Prepare standard templates for capturing evidence (e.g., scripts to obtain PVU counts, screenshots of ILMT reports, etc.) to streamline data gathering.
10. Secure Data Room – Set up a controlled-access repository (SharePoint, folder, etc.) to store all audit-related data and documents; limit access to the core response team.
11. Negotiation Roles & Comms Plan – Define who will interface with IBM auditors, who will handle technical questions, and who will approve any data release or settlement – and ensure all communication with IBM goes through a unified channel.
12. Timeline with Gates – Establish an internal timeline with key milestones (ELP ready, data submission dates, review periods) and include stop-clock rules (e.g., if IBM delays its response, the timeline extends) to avoid getting squeezed.
13. Finding-Dispute Workflow – Plan how you will internally review any auditor findings: who analyzes technical details, how to escalate challenges to IBM, and the approval process for any concession.
14. Settlement Modeling – Before negotiations, model different settlement scenarios (e.g., purchasing licenses à la carte vs. signing an Enterprise License Agreement vs. migrating to a SaaS alternative), including cost projections.
15. Executive Briefing Deck – Prepare a high-level presentation for the CIO/CFO that can be used at any time to update on audit status, outline options, and help make decisions quickly.

By executing this playbook, your team will be audit-ready. Instead of chaos, you’ll have an orderly repository of facts. IBM audits are won or lost on data – and if you hold the higher ground on data quality, you hold the power.

(Pro Tip: “Normalize now, negotiate later.” While preparing your ELP, if you uncover compliance issues (e.g., unlicensed deployments, missing ILMT coverage), start fixing them immediately in your environment. Don’t wait for IBM to find and call them out – reduce your exposure proactively while the audit process unfolds.)

Negotiating With IBM During an Audit

An IBM audit is as much a negotiation as it is a verification exercise. How you engage with IBM’s audit team can drastically alter the outcome.

This section lays out key negotiation levers and tactics to ensure you steer the audit, rather than the other way around:

• Define and Contain the Scope: At the very outset, formally agree on what is in scope for the audit – the specific IBM products, the business units or legal entities, the environment segments (production only? all environments?), and the time period under review. This is your shield against fishing expeditions. If the auditors later stray into areas not agreed upon (e.g., asking about a product not on the list), you have the documented scope to push back. Pro Tip: Scope is your shield. Define products, entities, and dates—then stick to them. Insist on a written scope document or email confirmation from IBM.
• Negotiate Reasonable Timelines: Don’t accept an aggressive two-week data turnaround if you realistically need 6 weeks to compile information. Propose a timeline that includes reasonable milestones for data submission, interim reviews, and management escalation. If the audit identifies issues on IBM’s side (such as a tool glitch or incorrect data), request a “stop the clock” until they’re resolved. This prevents running down the clock to a forced settlement. You’re entitled to sufficient time to investigate and respond to findings – demand it.
• Control Data Delivery & Format: Manage the data you share with IBM carefully. Where possible, provide information in IBM’s preferred formats (like ILMT reports or official CSV exports) and nothing more. Avoid informal data dumps or giving raw access to systems. Every piece of data you hand over should be deliberate and documented. Also, ensure an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) is in place if using third-party auditors, to protect sensitive information. By controlling format and flow, you minimize misinterpretation and overreach.
• Limit Onsite Interaction & Interviews: IBM auditors may request on-site visits or direct speaking with engineers. It’s fine to accommodate a structured visit, but set boundaries. Host any on-site auditor in a single conference room with pre-arranged data access – do not let them wander in your data center or have unfettered interactions. If they request interviews, channel those through your license manager or audit coordinator. No ad-hoc hallway chats. The goal is to keep communications single-threaded: one voice from your side to avoid any inconsistent statements.
• Enforce a Findings Review Cycle: When auditors believe they have completed data collection, require them to deliver a draft findings report or a preliminary ELP for your review before anything is finalized. Then challenge every discrepancy or assumption line by line. For example, if the draft shows 100 PVUs used for a product but you believe it’s 80 due to a DR exclusion, present that evidence and request an adjustment. This review-and-challenge cycle may go a few rounds. Stay factual and calm: your job is to eliminate errors and negotiate interpretations. Remember the earlier tip: Draft findings are not a debt – they’re a starting position. Treat it as collaborative problem-solving to reach accurate figures.
• Leverage Settlement Options Strategically: If, at the end of the analysis, you do owe IBM something, there are often multiple ways to settle. Don’t assume you must simply cut a check for list-price licenses. Consider alternatives:License Purchase: Buy the required licenses to cover the shortfall (often with some discount if negotiated).Support Reinstatement: If the issue was using software without active support, IBM might allow you to pay back-support fees to legitimize that period.Conversion or Cloud Programs: IBM frequently offers trade-up programs – e.g. moving to a Cloud Pak bundle or a subscription model might satisfy compliance and align with future needs. These can sometimes be cost-effective and give you more value. Enterprise Agreement Renewal: You could roll the compliance gap into a new broader deal (for instance, an Enterprise License Agreement or ELA) which might spread the cost over a multi-year contract and come with better terms. Weigh these options. Model the costs and benefits of each (refer back to your settlement modeling from the playbook). Use the one that best fits your company’s strategy as a negotiating ask. IBM is often open to creative settlements because it wants to preserve the customer relationship while still closing the compliance issue.
• Communication Phrases – Dos and Don’ts: Maintain a professional but guarded tone throughout. Avoid phrases that admit guilt or legal liability, like “We were out of compliance” or “We underestimated our usage.” Instead, use neutral language: “We acknowledge a variance in the data,” or “We are working to reconcile the differences.” Emphasize your commitment to accurate resolution without agreeing to any breach until all facts are confirmed. Conversely, assert your rights: you can say “Our understanding is this falls under disaster recovery policy, so it shouldn’t require a license – here is the documentation.” It’s firm yet cooperative. Every communication should reinforce that you are in control, following the contract, and expect IBM to do the same.

In summary, treat the audit like a business negotiation project. Be cordial but never forget IBM (and their auditors) are ultimately there representing a vendor interest. Your job is to protect the enterprise’s interests.

If you manage scope, time, data, and dialogue deliberately, you steer the outcome.

Many companies even designate a “bad cop” (often an external consultant or lawyer) to push back hard on contentious points, allowing the company’s employees to stay on good terms with IBM – consider this approach if negotiations get heated. The key is to keep IBM working on your terms as much as possible.

(Pro Tip: “Normalize now, negotiate later.” Don’t wait for the audit to end before fixing issues. If you discover unlicensed deployments or process failures during the audit, start remediation immediately (e.g., deploy ILMT to that missing cluster, purchase a small number of licenses for an urgent fix, etc.). This improves your position in negotiations – you can show IBM you’ve already mitigated future risk, which strengthens your case for leniency on past usage.)

IBM Audit Defense Services: When & How to Engage

Considering the complexity and stakes of IBM audits, many enterprises seek outside help. Specialist audit defense services (often provided by IT asset management consultancies or IBM licensing experts) can tilt the odds in your favor.

But when should you bring them in, and what should you look for?

When to engage external help: If your internal team is inexperienced with IBM’s labyrinthine licensing rules, or if initial findings suggest a large financial exposure, it’s wise to get expert help early. Ideally, engage them as soon as an audit notice arrives (or even proactively during the ELP build phase).

They can lead the process, allowing your staff to focus on daily work while the experts handle the heavy audit lifting. Also, if relationships with IBM have become strained, a third party can act as a buffer and negotiator.

What to look for in an IBM audit defense provider:

• Deep IBM Licensing Expertise: The firm should demonstrate mastery of IBM’s licensing models – from older PVU/RVU metrics to newer VPC (Virtual Processor Core) and user-based schemes. They should know the ins and outs of sub-capacity licensing, including how ILMT works and common pitfalls. Essentially, they need to know IBM’s license rules better than IBM does.
• Container and Cloud Knowledge: Ensure they have experience with IBM License Service for containers and managing compliance in cloud/hybrid environments. Many traditional license consultants lack container expertise – but IBM audits now often cover Kubernetes/OpenShift deployments. Your provider should be fluent in Cloud Paks, container licensing metrics, and how to properly evidence them.
• Entitlement Forensics Skill: A good defense advisor will help reconstruct entitlements and find missing proof of purchases. They often have techniques to retrieve old Passport Advantage records, interpret contract language for loopholes, and identify entitlements you didn’t know you had (e.g. from acquisitions or bundle deals). This can significantly reduce apparent gaps.
• ELP Automation & Data Crunching: Time is of the essence in audits. Providers with proprietary tools or automated scripts to rapidly compile an ELP have an edge. They might use specialized software to scan your network for IBM installations, cross-reference them to purchase data, and output a quick initial license position. Ask if they have any accelerators or tools to speed up analysis.
• Negotiation Track Record: The ideal partner has undergone numerous IBM audits and can cite examples of reducing a client’s exposure or achieving favorable settlements. They likely employ ex-IBM licensing professionals or attorneys who know IBM’s playbook. This experience helps counter auditor arguments and find creative settlement solutions (they might know, for instance, that IBM, at a certain spend level, can approve a 50% discount – something you wouldn’t get if you negotiated blindly).
• Executive-Level Reporting: Audit defense isn’t just in the weeds of licenses; it’s also about communicating with your leadership. The provider should produce clear, executive-friendly summaries of the situation, options, and recommendations. They might even participate in briefing your CIO/CFO or board committee if needed. That polish and clarity is important to maintain internal confidence during a high-pressure audit.

On the commercial side, discuss engagement models with potential providers. Some work on a fixed-fee basis for defined services (e.g. they’ll manage the audit for $X fee). Others operate on contingency or outcome-based fees, where their payment is a percentage of the savings they achieve (be cautious with this model: it can motivate the consultant to settle quickly for a “win” rather than fight for every inch).

Make sure the contract aligns their incentives with yours – ideally, a mix of a manageable fixed fee plus a bonus for excellent results might work.

Finally, establish governance and escalation paths with the provider. You want regular status updates and checkpoints. Clarify how decisions will be made (your company should always have final say on strategy and any settlement).

Also, agree on how communications with IBM will be handled – often the external advisor will speak on your behalf in technical meetings or even negotiation sessions.

This can be valuable, as they might take a tougher stance with IBM while you preserve the business relationship. But you should always be in the loop and able to pull the plug or change approach if needed.

In short, don’t hesitate to get help if the situation warrants it. IBM audits are specialized affairs; having veterans on your side can turn a hefty bill into a manageable outcome.

Related articles

• IBM Audit Defense FAQs Updated For 2025
• CIO Playbook for IBM Software License Audits and Defense
• Our IBM Audit Defense Case Studies.
• Negotiating IBM Audit Settlements: CIO Strategies to Minimize License Costs
• How To Prepare for IBM Audit

Checklist: Key Questions for CIOs & Procurement Leads Facing an IBM License Audit

For executives leading the response to an IBM audit, asking the right questions upfront can ensure the team is focused and prepared.

Use this checklist of questions to guide your audit readiness and response strategy:

• Do we have full ILMT (or an IBM-approved alternative) coverage for all sub-capacity environments? (If not, where are the gaps and what’s the plan to fix this fast?)
• Are our containerized IBM workloads being measured by IBM License Service? (If we run IBM in Kubernetes or OpenShift, is the License Service deployed and reporting?)
• Can we readily produce a complete inventory of IBM deployments and match them to entitlements? (In other words, can we reconstruct proof of all licenses we own and link them to actual installs or usage?)
• Is our internally prepared ELP reconciled to the correct entities, host boundaries, and usage exceptions (like DR or test environments)? (Have we scoped our own analysis to match what we’ll present to IBM, including any carve-outs we intend to claim?)
• Have we formally defined the audit’s scope, timeline, and data format protocol with IBM (in writing) before sharing any data? (Scope definition and data rules should precede any substantive data handover.)
• Who is our single point of contact managing all communications with IBM, and what is the internal escalation path for disputes? (Identify the owner of the IBM relationship during the audit and ensure they have executive backing to push back when needed.)
• What are our potential commercial options if the audit finds compliance gaps? (Do we have a plan for whether to buy licenses, negotiate a new agreement, use cloud conversions, or other strategies – and do we know our walk-away positions for each?)

By getting clear answers to these questions, CIOs and procurement leaders can quickly identify where to fortify their defense and how to steer the audit engagement from day one. It’s essentially a governance checklist to make sure nothing important slips through the cracks in the heat of an audit battle.

Read about our IBM Audit Defense Service.

Do you want to know more about our IBM Audit Defense Service?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit