Microsoft SPLA Audit – How To Avoid Penalty Fees

A Microsoft SPLA audit is:

• Microsoft initiated a review to verify a service provider’s compliance with SPLA terms.
• Conducted by an independent auditor to scrutinize the service provider’s hosting services and licensing adherence.
• Focused on ensuring accurate monthly licensing compliance.
• This can lead to penalties or termination of the agreement for failing to comply.
• Involves multiple stages, including data collection, reviewing the draft report, and commercial negotiations with Microsoft.

Microsoft SPLA Audit

Microsoft’s Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA) allows cloud service providers and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to use Microsoft software for hosting services.

With this privilege comes the potential for a Microsoft SPLA audit, where Microsoft (often through a third-party auditor, such as a Big Four firm) reviews your licensing compliance.

This guide offers independent, third-party advice on navigating SPLA audits from a service provider’s perspective, focusing on what to expect, key risks, and how to defend your organization.

In This Guide:

• What an SPLA audit is and why it happens
• A step-by-step overview of the SPLA audit process
• Common risks and financial exposures of SPLA audits
• How to prepare for and defend against an SPLA audit
• Practical recommendations and best practices for SPLA partners and MSPs

(No need to panic – with the right knowledge and preparation, you can handle an SPLA audit confidently and protect your business.)

What Is a Microsoft SPLA Audit?

A Microsoft SPLA audit is a formal review of your organization’s license compliance under the Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA). In simpler terms, Microsoft wants to verify that you are correctly reporting and paying for the Microsoft software you provide to customers each month under SPLA.

Typically, these audits occur about every three years for SPLA partners, although the timing can vary.

Key points about SPLA audits:

• Purpose: Microsoft aims to ensure you’ve accurately reported usage and paid for all the licenses you should have. It’s also (candidly) a revenue protection mechanism for Microsoft – underreported licenses represent lost income for them.
• Who Conducts It: Microsoft usually assigns a third-party auditor, often one of the “Big Four” accounting firms—EY, PwC, KPMG, or Deloitte—to perform the technical audit and gather the data. Microsoft’s compliance team then reviews the findings and handles any financial settlement.
• Trigger Reasons: An audit can be routine or triggered by red flags. Common triggers include missing monthly SPLA reports, unusually low reported usage, or inconsistencies that suggest under-reporting. Microsoft might also initiate audits in waves, often informally referred to as an “audit tour,” targeting multiple providers simultaneously.
• Self-Assessments vs. Formal Audits: Sometimes, Microsoft starts with an SPLA Self-Assessment, asking you to check your compliance and certify the results. This is often preferable to a full audit – it’s less invasive and, importantly, often avoids the 25% penalty surcharge that a formal audit could impose on under-reported licenses. Always respond to self-assessment requests cooperatively and thoroughly; it’s your chance to catch and correct issues internally first.

Why should you care? Non-compliance can lead to hefty back payments, penalties (often 125% of the license fees for any shortfalls, as specified in the contract terms), potential legal action, or even termination of your SPLA agreement. For example, some audited SPLA partners have faced compliance bills that exceeded their annual Microsoft resale profits, illustrating how high the stakes can be. On the positive side, a “clean” audit confirms you are in good standing and builds trust with Microsoft.

(Remember: An SPLA audit isn’t personal – it’s business. Microsoft is protecting its IP and revenue. Your job is to protect your business by being prepared and compliant.)

The SPLA Audit Process

Microsoft’s SPLA audit process follows a structured path. Knowing each step can remove the mystery and help you prepare appropriate responses at each phase. Below is a typical SPLA audit timeline, along with what to expect in each phase, from initial notice to final resolution.

Audit timeline for a Microsoft SPLA audit, showing phases from Initiation to Data Gathering, Draft Report, Clarification, Final Report, and commercial negotiation. The independent auditor handles the technical steps, while Microsoft handles the negotiation.

Notification and Initial Steps (Initiation Phase)

1. Formal Notification: The process kicks off when you receive an audit notice from Microsoft’s License Compliance team. This is usually an official letter or email stating that you have been selected for an SPLA audit. It will mention:

• The scope of the audit (which legal entity is being audited, and which SPLA agreement or MBSA it falls under).
• The audit period (start month of the review – the end is often “to present,” meaning until data collection is done).
• The appointed auditor (the firm that will conduct the audit on Microsoft’s behalf).
• A 30-day window to start cooperating (standard in SPLA contracts; you agreed to this notice period when signing the SPLA).

Example: “We selected [Your Company] for a formal license compliance review under MBSA #XXXXX. Deloitte will conduct the review covering usage from January 2022 onward. Please acknowledge and prepare for a kick-off within 30 days.”

Your immediate steps upon notification:

• Stay Calm and don’t ignore it: an audit notice is serious, but manageable. Avoid the temptation to delay or dismiss it – non-cooperation can lead to contract termination. Instead, inform internal stakeholders (leadership, legal, IT, finance) quickly so you can align on a response plan.
• Review Your Contracts: Locate your SPLA agreement and related contracts. Confirm that the legal entity and MBSA number on the notice match the information in your records. Understand your rights and obligations (e.g,. that 30-day kickoff requirement, what data you must provide, etc.).
• Engage Legal Counsel (If Needed): If you have access to legal counsel experienced in software licensing, loop them in early. They can interpret any legal language in the notice and help you assert your contractual rights, such as requesting a confidentiality agreement with the auditor.
• Announce a Single Point of Contact: It helps to designate one person to communicate with the auditor and Microsoft. This keeps messaging consistent and avoids confusion. Typically, someone from your compliance or legal team, or a senior manager, would fill this role.

2. Auditor Introduction & NDA: Shortly after the notice, the assigned auditors will reach out (often by email) to introduce themselves and schedule a kick-off meeting. You can (and should) request an NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) between your company and the auditor if one isn’t already provided. Microsoft allows this, ensuring that any sensitive data you share won’t be misused. When arranging the NDA:

• Ensure it doesn’t limit the auditor’s ability to do the audit (that could breach SPLA terms).
• If you’re concerned, explicitly include clauses that audit data won’t be shared with Microsoft beyond the final report. (While auditors typically only share summary findings, you can seek clarity for peace of mind.)

Kick-Off Meeting: This is the official start of audit activities. In this meeting (usually remote):

• Attendees: The auditor’s team, your team (key stakeholders like IT managers, compliance officers, etc.), and sometimes a Microsoft representative (though you can often choose to keep it just between you and the auditors at this stage).
• Agenda: The auditors will present the audit plan, including:
  • An overview of steps and a tentative timeline.
  • Data requirements: what information, logs, or tools will be needed?
  • Scope confirmation: clarifying what’s in-scope (which environments, which customers, which timeframes).
  • Q&A: an opportunity to ask questions.
• Deliverables: Expect to receive things like:
  • A data request list or questionnaire about your environment.
  • Scripts or tooling guidelines (auditors often provide scripts to run on your servers to collect data).
  • Instructions on how to securely transfer data to the auditors.
• Your approach:
  • Take detailed notes, especially on scope – knowing precisely what is in or out can save you from sharing unnecessary data.
  • Don’t agree to anything unclear. Ask questions if unsure (“We have an unrelated environment not used for SPLA – should that be included? What do you consider ‘non-production’ usage?” etc.).
  • If you have internal tools that inventory your environment, mention them. Auditors might allow you to use your data outputs instead of their scripts if your data covers what’s needed. (They’ll likely verify the data integrity later, but it can make your job easier.)

Data Gathering and Reporting (Data Collection Phase)

This is typically the most labor-intensive phase for you, the service provider. Your goal here is to collect and provide accurate data that shows your Microsoft software usage and license assignments during the audit period.

What data is usually requested? Expect a comprehensive dig into your hosting environment. Common data and evidence requests include:

• Hardware & VM Inventory: Lists of all physical servers and virtual machines, including where they are hosted and specs (especially for products licensed per core).
• Software Inventory: All Microsoft software installed on those servers/VMs (Windows Server, SQL Server, Remote Desktop Services, etc.).
• Usage Logs: Data showing which users or devices accessed particular services (for SAL licenses that are per user or device).
• Active Directory (AD) Exports: Lists of user accounts, groups, and possibly group memberships, to see who could access systems. (Auditors pay special attention to AD – if 500 users are in a group that technically has rights to use a service, they might say all 500 need licenses, even if only 50 actively use it. Be ready to explain how you control access.)
• Customer Lists & Contracts: They may request lists of your end customers, especially those who pay you $ 1,000 or more per month in SPLA services, as SPLA rules require reporting these to Microsoft. They might also ask for excerpts from contracts that show who is responsible for licensing – e.g., if some customers bring their licenses (BYOL), you want to prove those instances so you’re not charged SPLA for them.
• Historical Reports: This one’s important – your monthly SPLA usage reports and invoices from your SPLA reseller for the audit period. This is what the auditors will compare against the usage they find. Having organized records here is crucial for defense.
• Change Records: Documentation like change tickets or deployment logs that can prove when a server was deployed or decommissioned. (Why? Because if a VM exists now, but was only created 6 months ago, you want to show it wasn’t around for the full 3-year audit period; otherwise, the auditor might assume it existed and needed licensing the whole time.)
• Licensing Verification Forms: If applicable, any License Mobility forms or confirmations (for customers bringing licenses to your data center, which is now superseded by the Flexible Virtualization Benefit rules). These help show which licenses were covered by customers instead of your SPLA.
• Miscellaneous: Possibly screenshots or secondary sources like antivirus device lists (auditors sometimes cross-check to see if your inventory misses any VMs, since an antivirus console might list devices too).

Key Do’s and Don’ts during data collection:

• DO verify scope: Only collect data for in-scope environments. For example, do not send data about your internal corporate IT or a separate non-hosting business unit that isn’t under SPLA. Oversharing can widen the audit accidentally. (True story: A provider once included their internal dev environment in the data; auditors counted it as SPLA usage, and later refused to remove it, creating a huge headache. Don’t let that be you.)
• Do a thorough review of the data before sending: Double-check the outputs for red flags (e.g., an account that appears to have access to a system it shouldn’t, or a server that is not properly licensed). Suppose you spot something wrong in your environment, such as a misconfigured user permission. In that case, you can sometimes fix it now or prepare an explanation rather than letting the auditors draw their own, possibly harsh, conclusion.
• DON’T alter or falsify data: It should go without saying, but provide real data. Don’t delete logs or remove users just to look compliant – that’s unethical and, if discovered, far worse than an unintentional licensing miss. Instead, focus on context and explanation for any discovered gaps.
• DON’T do it all alone if unsure: If you have access to a licensing consultant or SPLA expert, this is a good time to use them. They can advise on what data is needed vs. what might be out of scope, help interpret confusing requirements, and review your data for completeness. Essentially, they act as your advocate, ensuring the auditor doesn’t take missteps that disadvantage you.
• DO keep evidence of everything: Keep copies of all data you provide. Also, log when and how you provided it (e.g., via secure upload on X date). This is useful later if there’s any dispute about “we never got X” or timing issues.

Expect an Iterative Process: The auditors might come back with follow-up requests or clarifications. Treat it as a collaborative (though guarded) process – answer questions, but remember you can push back or ask “why” if something seems off.

For example, if they suddenly ask for all admin passwords (unlikely, but just as an extreme example), you would question the necessity and escalate the issue with legal if needed. More commonly, they might ask for “screenshots to verify X” – if it’s too burdensome, know that eventually they will likely do on-site verifications anyway, so you might negotiate what’s needed now vs. later.

Auditor Review and Findings (Analysis & Draft Report Phase)

Once the auditors have what they deem sufficient data, they retreat to analyze it and compile their findings. This culminates in a draft audit report, which they’ll present to you for review.

What auditors do with your data:

• Reconstruct Your Usage: They calculate how many of each license you should have been reporting each month. Often, they’ll build an Effective License Position (ELP) spreadsheet. For each month in the audit period and each product, they’ll list:
  • Calculated usage (based on data) vs. Reported usage (from your monthly SPLA reports).
  • Any shortfall (where calculated > reported, meaning potential under-reporting).
  • They usually ignore over-reporting (if you overpaid in some month, that won’t offset a shortfall in another – frustrating, but it’s how Microsoft’s terms work).
• Assume the Worst (Unless Proven Otherwise): Auditors are generally conservative, from Microsoft’s perspective. If something is unclear in the data, the default is to assume a scenario that maximizes the licensing requirement:
  • If a script can’t identify the edition of SQL Server on a VM, it’ll assume it’s SQL Server Enterprise (the most expensive) until you prove it might be Standard.
  • If a user account could access a system, they’ll assume it needs a license, even if you have no evidence the user ever logged in that month.
  • If a VM exists but you didn’t show when it was created, they might assume it was live since the beginning of the audit period.
  • This is why your historical evidence and meticulous data are vital – to counter these assumptions.
• Check Contractual Obligations: They’ll also verify if you followed specific SPLA contractual rules, such as:
  • Did you properly list the end-customer names for those who spend over $ 1,000 per month?
  • Do you have End User License Terms (EULTs) in place with all customers? (Auditors might ask to see blank or sample agreements where you have customers sign that they’ll abide by Microsoft’s terms.)
• Identify “Findings”: The draft report will highlight areas of non-compliance – essentially, where they believe you under-reported or mislicensed. Common findings:
  • Under-reported SALs (Subscriber Access Licenses) – by far the #1 issue; e.g., they think you needed 300 user CALs for RDS, but you only reported 200.
  • Server licenses not reported (possibly because you set up new VMs but forgot to add them to the report).
  • Misuse of dev/test or internal use – using production licenses for internal systems without proper coverage.
  • Overstepping use rights – e.g., providing services outside what SPLA allows, like letting a customer use your SPLA license on their site without License Mobility (if done without following the rules, that’s a compliance issue).

Draft Audit Report Presentation:

• The auditors typically share the draft report in a meeting or via email, often as an Excel file and a slide or document summary.
• They will walk you through the findings, one product at a time.
• No money figure yet: Importantly, auditors usually do not include dollar amounts or a final bill – their role is to identify the license delta, not to negotiate costs; Microsoft will apply pricing and any penalties later based on the results.
• This is your chance to ask clarifying questions. Don’t agree or concede on the spot – just gather information.

Responding to the Draft (Review & Defense Phase): This is arguably the most critical phase for you, where you can challenge and clarify the findings before they become final.

Here’s how to approach it:

• Examine Every Detail: Scrutinize the draft report line by line. Verify the formulas in any spreadsheets (yes, check their math!). Auditors can make mistakes in complex Excel sheets. Ensure that the numbers for each product align with the data you provided.
• Identify Wrong Assumptions: Look for places where they assumed something adverse due to missing information. If you see, for example, a VM that was counted from January 2019 but was only live from 2021, provide evidence of the actual deployment date to limit the exposure.
• Scope Check: Confirm they didn’t accidentally include out-of-scope items. If something appears that you think wasn’t part of SPLA (e.g., a certain environment or customer), raise it and provide reasoning to remove it.
• Provide Additional Data: You may need to provide more information to refute the findings. This could include:
  • Access logs to see if a specific user has never logged in (so they may not need a SAL every month).
  • Proof that certain servers were retired or repurposed at some point.
  • Copies of contracts or customer attestations (like “Customer X provided their own SQL license for that server – here’s their attestation letter from that time”).
• Leverage Surprises: If you find you over-reported somewhere (paid for licenses you didn’t use), bring it up – while auditors might not adjust the report, it’s useful ammunition for the negotiation phase with Microsoft to say, “Look, we overpaid in these areas, which offsets some underpayments.”
• Documentation & Professionalism: Submit your challenges in writing, and request that they incorporate or attach your responses to the final report. You want a paper trail showing you didn’t agree with certain findings. Be professional and factual in your rebuttals – this document may later be seen by Microsoft’s negotiation team or even its legal team, so it should be clear and reasoned.

Remember, the draft report is not the final verdict. You have every right to contest and correct it. Auditors expect pushback; in fact, many initial SPLA audit reports are known to contain errors or overestimates. It’s better to hash those out now than to fight them during financial negotiations.

If needed, involve your SPLA-savvy consultant or legal advisor in drafting responses – their experience can be invaluable in phrasing a compelling argument that auditors will accept.

Negotiation and Resolution (Final Report & Settlement Phase)

After a few rounds of review and clarification, the auditors will eventually issue a final audit report. This is the report they send to Microsoft, marking the end of the auditors’ involvement. It will list the final agreed-upon (or disagreed-upon) license shortfalls.

Now, you move into the final phase, dealing directly with Microsoft to resolve the issue.

Key aspects of the final report phase:

• Final Report Sign-Off: Ideally, you’ll sign off that the audit process is complete, not that you agree with every finding, but that the auditors did their job. When signing any acknowledgment:
  • Make sure it’s clear you aren’t admitting liability beyond what you agree. If there are points of disagreement, note them in the report or send an email. (E.g., “We acknowledge receipt of the final report but maintain that the SQL Server Enterprise usage in 2019 is overstated due to… etc.”)
  • Do not sign anything that says “we accept these findings and will pay” unless and until you truly intend to settle on those terms.
• Auditor Steps Out: The independent auditor’s role comes to an end here. They typically will not discuss money or penalties – Microsoft’s licensing and sales teams handle that. The auditor might give you a courtesy heads-up of next steps (like “Microsoft will be in touch”). They also might ask if you want a closing meeting with a Microsoft representative. You can decide if that’s useful or if you prefer to talk to Microsoft separately.

Commercial Negotiation with Microsoft:

The tone may shift a bit now. A representative from Microsoft, often from their compliance team, a licensing specialist, or a salesperson assigned to your account, will discuss how to remediate the compliance gaps. Essentially, this is where a settlement is reached.

Possible outcomes and tips for negotiation:

• Paying for Shortfalls: In most cases, you will be asked to purchase the unreported licenses for the past period. The default per the SPLA contract is:
  • You buy the licenses for each unreported month (often calculated at list price).
  • You pay a 25% “penalty” on top, so effectively 125% of what the licenses would have cost at the time.
  • If the audit found that you were more than 5% out of compliance, Microsoft can, under the contract, also ask you to pay the audit’s costs (the fees it paid the auditor). This can be significant (tens of thousands of dollars), so one goal is to stay under the 5% threshold or negotiate it away if it’s just barely over.
• Negotiation Is Expected: Rarely do companies just get a bill and pay it outright. Microsoft is usually open to discussion, especially if you’re a valued partner. Some negotiation angles:
  • Future Commitments: Microsoft cares about ongoing revenue. They may be willing to reduce a back payment if you commit to a stronger business relationship in the future. For example, you might agree to higher Azure usage or transition certain workloads to Azure, as Microsoft prefers this approach. This could be framed as a win-win – you avoid a lump-sum hit, and Microsoft gains future business.
  • Current Purchases: Alternatively, you might negotiate signing a new agreement, such as committing to CSP or a new 3-year SPLA with higher minimums, as part of resolving the audit.
  • Penalty Waivers: Ask if the 25% uplift can be waived or reduced. Especially if you cooperated fully and any under-reporting was inadvertent and promptly corrected, Microsoft might show leniency on the penalty portion.
  • Audit Forbearance: You can request a clause that prevents Microsoft from auditing you again for a certain period (commonly 2-3 years) after settlement, giving you breathing room. This is often granted if you ask for it.
  • Payment Plans: If there is a substantial amount to pay, you don’t necessarily have to pay it in one go. Many companies negotiate installment plans (e.g., spread over 6-12 months or longer).
  • Release of Liability: Ensure that the settlement agreement includes a release stating that by paying (or doing) whatever is agreed, Microsoft confirms you’re in compliance for the audited period and won’t pursue further claims for that period. Essentially, closing the chapter.
  • Confidentiality: You’ll likely want a confidentiality clause so neither side discloses the audit results publicly. Microsoft generally doesn’t broadcast audits, but having it in writing is good.
• Worst Case – No Agreement: If negotiations stall and you truly believe the audit is fundamentally flawed or Microsoft’s demands are unreasonable, you face a tough choice:
  • Escalate via legal channels, which is rare – litigation against Microsoft is costly and usually a last resort.
  • Or consider the nuclear option: if the amount is unpayable and Microsoft won’t budge, some service providers have had to consider terminating their SPLA and finding alternative solutions, such as open source options or other vendors, to continue their business without Microsoft. This is extremely disruptive and usually undesirable, but it underscores why negotiating an acceptable outcome is crucial.

Microsoft’s Perspective: It’s worth remembering that Microsoft often says the goal is not to “punish” but to correct and bring you into compliance. They want you as a long-term partner selling Microsoft-based services, not to put you out of business. Use that in your favor – show your value as a partner and your commitment to compliance going forward. They may prefer a solution like “pay X now and grow Y moving forward” rather than extracting a one-time high penalty that weakens your company and its ability to sell Microsoft in the future.

Aftermath – Lessons and Changes: Once you settle, the audit formally closes. Take this time to reflect on what went wrong and how to avoid a repeat:

• Immediately correct any internal processes that led to underreporting. For example, if you weren’t tracking AD users properly, implement a more accurate tracking method. If a particular product’s usage was consistently inaccurate, fix the reporting process.
• If new tools or personnel are needed, it’s probably cheaper than another giant payout in a few years.
• Some companies conduct regular internal audits or hire SAM (Software Asset Management) experts on an annual basis to stay honest and prepared.
• Update training: Ensure those who handle provisioning, licensing, and reporting fully understand SPLA rules (for example, that every user with access needs a license, not just active users, etc. – these little nuances matter).

(Settlement reached? Breathe a sigh of relief, but don’t lose the urgency – carry those improvements forward so next time, if an audit happens again, you’re ready and perhaps even one step ahead.)

Common Risks and Financial Exposures

SPLA audits can expose several risks and lead to a significant financial impact if you’re not careful. Knowing these common pitfalls can help SPLA partners avoid them or at least mitigate the damage if they occur:

• Under-Reported Licenses: The #1 risk. If you’re not accurately counting usage (especially user SALs or processor-based licenses), you may be reporting less than you use. Each unreported unit for each month can become a charge in an audit. Example: If you consistently missed 50 users on SQL Server access for 24 months, and each user’s SAL was $10/month, that’s 50×$10×24 = $12,000, plus a 25% penalty = $15,000. And that’s just one product.
• User Access Miscounts: Under SPLA, Subscriber Access Licenses (SALs) require that any user authorized to use the service must have a license, even if they don’t log in. Many MSPs mistakenly license only active users. Auditors will check AD groups and could say, “You had 500 users in this group last year, you only ever reported 300 SALs – you’re 200 short every month.” Given that SALs often form 50-80% of audit findings, this is a critical area.
• Server Sprawl/Shadow IT: Over time, new virtual machines (VMs) or deployments may not always be captured in reporting, especially when multiple teams can spin up servers. This leads to “forgotten” VMs with missing licenses. Each is a liability. Untracked test or development environments can also be incorrectly counted as production if they are not separated.
• Licensing Rules Misunderstood: SPLA has specific rules – such as license mobility, outsourcer restrictions, and end-customer reporting – that, if not followed, can be considered non-compliance. Example: If you moved some workloads to AWS or a third-party data center, did you know you generally cannot use SPLA licenses there unless it’s an Authorized License Mobility partner or under certain outsourcing provisions? If auditors find a Windows Server running under SPLA on non-authorized infrastructure, they might flag it.
• Missing Reports or Late Reporting: Failing to submit your monthly SPLA report even once can trigger scrutiny. Microsoft might assume you didn’t report it deliberately because something was off. If you have any gaps, you’ll need a good explanation.
• Contractual Non-Compliance: Failing to have all customers sign the required terms (such as End User License Terms) or not reporting required information to Microsoft (like customer names above revenue thresholds) may not always result in a financial penalty, but it is a compliance issue that Microsoft will insist you address – possibly immediately. In worst-case scenarios, a serious contractual breach could threaten your ability to continue using SPLA.
• Penalties and Interest: As noted, SPLA contracts require a 25% uplift for any underlicensed use. This can essentially turn a $100,000 shortfall into a $125,000 bill. Additionally, if you are way out of compliance (>5%), Microsoft may charge you for audit costs, which could be tens of thousands of dollars more.
• Opportunity Cost of Distraction: Indirectly, consider the “cost” of having staff diverted for months to work on the audit. This can impact business and projects. It’s hard to quantify, but it’s a risk, especially if you’re a smaller provider with lean teams.
• Reputational Impact: While audits are generally private, if word gets out or you need to disclose them (for example, to an investor or major customer), non-compliance can damage your reputation as a service provider. Customers trust you to handle licensing correctly in a hosted model – an audit issue might make them nervous.
• Extreme Case – Agreement Termination: If Microsoft finds egregious misuse or feels you’re not cooperative, they could terminate your SPLA. This is rare and usually a last resort, but that risk is existential: it means you’d have to scramble to license all customer-facing software through another means (likely impossible quickly) or face downtime for those services.

Financial Exposure Example: Let’s illustrate how costs can snowball: Suppose over 3 years, you missed reporting 20 Windows Server Datacenter licenses and 100 RDS User SALs on average. Rough ballpark:

• Windows Datacenter (list ~$200/month SPLA): 20 licenses * $200 * 36 months = $144,000.
• RDS SAL (list ~$5/user/month): 100 * $5 * 36 = $18,000. Total under-reported value = $162,000. Add 25% = $202,500. If audit costs apply, maybe an additional $50,000, making the total around $ 302,500 owed. Even for a mid-sized MSP, that’s a large unplanned expense. Now, imagine that multiple products are out of stock – it can climb even higher.

Key message: Small monthly misses, multiplied over time and products, equal big audit bills. Prevention and vigilance are far cheaper than a cure here.

(Knowing these risks is half the battle. Next, we’ll cover how to defend and mitigate them – ideally, preventing them outright, or dealing with them smartly if you’re already in an audit.)

How to Defend Against an SPLA Audit

The best defense is a good offense – in SPLA terms, that means being proactive and prepared before an audit ever happens. But if you do find yourself in an active audit, there are also smart tactics to employ during and after the audit.

We’ll break this into three parts: Before, During, and After an audit.

Before the Audit: Proactive Measures

Staying ready for an SPLA audit not only makes any audit easier, it also improves your day-to-day operations.

Here’s how to fortify your defenses in advance:

• Know Your Licensing (Education and Training): Ensure that anyone involved in deploying services, assigning licenses, or reporting usage is familiar with SPLA rules. Hold internal workshops or training. For example, clarify “every user with access needs a SAL, even if they don’t use the service,” so your ops team doesn’t mistakenly think removing a user from a report is fine just because they were on vacation.
• Maintain Detailed Records: Treat your monthly SPLA report as an audit waiting to happen:
  • Keep archives of each month’s inventory and usage data that fed into the report. If you have a tool that scans for Microsoft installs and user counts, save those outputs.
  • Store copies of every SPLA usage report you filed and the invoice you paid. Over 3 years, that’s only 36 reports – make a folder and keep them. Auditors love it when you can pull out exactly what you reported when, because it saves them guesswork (and potentially overestimation).
  • Document changes: e.g., if in June 2024, you decommissioned a large host server, keep a record (change ticket or note) – it might explain a drop in license needs, which might otherwise look suspicious.
• Regular Self-Audits (SAM Practices): Consider implementing a Software Asset Management (SAM) program. This could be:
  • Using tools to continuously monitor your environment for new VMs, new software installations, etc., and flagging if something isn’t on the report.
  • Quarterly internal audits where you sample a product or two and double-check the reported numbers vs actual usage.
  • Engaging a third-party SPLA expert annually to do a mock audit – they’ll find gaps so you can fix them quietly.
• License Optimization: Sometimes, you might be over-allocating licenses. E.g., using the Datacenter edition when a Standard edition would suffice, or keeping accounts active that don’t need access. Regularly review if you can reclaim or right-size licenses. While over-reporting doesn’t hurt directly (except your wallet), finding optimizations saves costs and complexity – just do it carefully to remain compliant.
• Contracts and Customer Clarity: Ensure your customer agreements clearly outline licensing responsibilities. If you allow Bring Your Own License (BYOL) scenarios (now more possible with certain Flexible Virtualization rules), have that in writing with the customer. If you have customers who require dedicated environments or other special cases, ensure you follow SPLA rules or exceptions for those.
• Security and Access Controls: Enforce the principle of least privilege. If only 50 users need access, don’t create an open AD group with 500 members and grant access. Use technical controls to limit who can connect to what. This is not only good for security, but it also means that in an audit, you have a tighter, smaller list of authorized users, which in turn results in smaller SAL requirements.
• Stay informed about SPLA Changes: SPLA program terms are subject to change. For instance, in 2022/2023, Microsoft made changes around outsourcing and BYOL (e.g., “Flexible Virtualization Benefit” allowing customers with Software Assurance to use their licenses on their cloud under certain conditions). If you remain unaware of these changes, you may miss opportunities to reduce your SPLA costs or accidentally violate the terms. Follow Microsoft’s SPLA partner communications or licensing blogs to keep up to date.

In short, treat compliance as an ongoing project, not a one-time scramble. The goal is that if an audit notice comes, you don’t have to start from scratch; you should largely know your position and have the evidence ready to support it.

(It might help to imagine an auditor looking over your shoulder once in a while – what would they question? If you address those now, your future self will thank you.)

During the Audit: Smart Tactics

Once the audit is underway, it’s all about managing the process effectively and protecting your interests without being obstructive.

Here’s how:

• Be Cooperative but Cautious: Maintain a professional and helpful tone with auditors. Meet deadlines (or request extensions in advance if necessary), provide the agreed-upon data, and be responsive. At the same time, avoid volunteering extra information beyond what’s asked. Answer questions truthfully, but don’t speculate or overshare. Think of it like a legal deposition: answer what’s asked, stop there.
• Control the Communication: If you’ve designated a single point of contact for audits, funnel all auditor queries through them. This prevents a well-meaning IT admin from casually saying something that could be misconstrued (e.g., “Oh yeah, we sometimes spin up test VMs and don’t license them, haha,” – not a good look in an audit context!). The coordinator can gather the info and respond in a measured way.
• Take Advantage of the kick-off grace period.” Often, auditors allow some flexibility in scheduling data extracts. Use that initial period (between notice and actual data submission) to tidy up:
  • If you spot straightforward compliance fixes (e.g., allocating extra licenses in your next report for something you missed or removing orphaned users from groups), you can make those changes quietly. While it won’t erase past under-reporting, it can prevent the audit from getting worse during the process if it drags on and covers current months.
  • DO NOT destroy evidence or anything unethical. But fixing a configuration that’s easily fixed (like access rights) in that window can be okay. Some advisors even suggest delaying the data gathering slightly (within reason) to implement cleanup so that when the snapshot is taken, it’s as favorable as possible. Just be transparent on your current usage in reports – you still have to admit past usage if asked.
• Use Your Data Collection if Possible: As mentioned, if you have scripts or inventory tools, consider using them. This keeps you in control of the data collection process, and you’ll understand the outputs better. If you use auditors’ scripts, run them in a test environment first or on a smaller sample to see what they gather. If they seem to be collecting more than the agreed-upon scope, bring it up.
• Document Everything: Keep a log of interactions:
  • When did auditors request X? When did you deliver Y?
  • What did they say in meetings? (Save meeting minutes or notes, especially any verbal agreements about scope or methodology.)
  • If there’s a dispute later (“we never got data for Server123”), your records can show you did provide it.
• Mind the Gaps: If you know certain data is impossible to get (e.g., an old log was overwritten, or you don’t have historical snapshots beyond a certain point), tell the auditors early and see how to best address it. It’s better to discuss how to estimate that piece together than to have them assume in a vacuum. They might say, “Okay, we’ll assume X for that period.” At least you had a say or knew what assumption they would use.
• Don’t be intimidated into Rushing: Auditors may push for tight timelines. Remember, aside from the initial 30-day kickoff clause, there is no explicit rule that requires you to complete the audit within X days. It often serves everyone to proceed efficiently, but if you need an extra week to gather quality data, ask for it. It’s better to do it right than fast. You can say, “We want to ensure accuracy.”
• Involve Experts in Meetings: If you’ve hired a third-party SPLA consultant or have internal licensing experts, have them join key meetings (at least in listen-only mode or to speak on complex points). They can catch nuances you might miss and help you respond appropriately on the spot.
• Stay Organized: Audits can involve dozens of files and emails. Maintain a dedicated and secure folder structure for all audit materials. It will help during the review phase, especially.

A special note on auditor scripts vs. existing tools: If you say “we prefer to use our tool X,” be prepared to show that tool’s results align with expectations. Auditors may still conduct validation, such as on-site verification, or request a subset of data through their script for comparison. It’s fair: they need to trust but verify. If your tool shows fewer VMs than their script, they’ll use the higher count. So, only stick to your guns if you’re confident in your data gathering.

(The audit is a marathon, not a sprint. By managing each leg of that race thoughtfully, you improve your odds of a tolerable outcome.)

After the Audit: Negotiation and Settlement Strategies

When you reach the negotiation phase (after the technical audit findings are in), it’s about shaping a settlement that you can live with.

Here’s how to handle this delicate stage:

• Prepare Your “Story”: Go into negotiations with a narrative of why any non-compliance happened and why you’re a valued partner to Microsoft. Perhaps your business grew faster than your license tracking, or technical complexity led to unintentional gaps. Emphasize your intent to comply and the steps you’ve already taken to address them. Also highlight any areas where you over-complied or added value (e.g., “we’ve been transitioning customers to Azure,” or “we’ve been a loyal SPLA partner for 10 years”).
• Know Your Financial Limits: Before talks, internally decide what is a tolerable outcome:
  • How much can you afford as a one-time payment?
  • Would you prefer to pay more over time than a lump sum?
  • Is committing to a future spend (like Azure) feasible for you, and how much?
  • What terms (like no audit for X years, confidentiality) are must-haves vs. nice-to-haves?
• Leverage Positives: If the audit report had any silver linings (e.g., your overall compliance was high, you over-reported some things, or you proactively addressed issues during the audit), highlight them. Microsoft might not be aware of them unless you explain. For instance, “The auditor noted we actually oversubscribed our Windows licenses by 10% in 2023, so we feel a bit of credit is due to offset the shortfalls.”
• Engage a Negotiation Expert if Needed: If the exposure is very large (say, the report suggests millions in licenses), consider hiring professional negotiators or seeking legal counsel who specializes in dealing with Microsoft. They know Microsoft’s tactics and flexibility. (However, be mindful of cost – if it’s a smaller case, you might handle it with your team to save on those fees.)
• Explore Alternatives to Cash Penalties: Microsoft, at the end, wants compliance and a continuing relationship.
  • They might accept you signing a new 3-year contract with higher commitment instead of some back fees.
  • If you’re not using Azure, perhaps committing to Microsoft 365 or adopting other Microsoft services could be a carrot.
  • Sometimes, offering to be a reference or case study (if the situation wasn’t too bad) can get them to reduce terms (though this is more anecdotal).
• Aim for a Win-Win: Frame suggestions as mutually beneficial. “If Microsoft can help us through this bump, we can focus on onboarding more customers to Microsoft cloud services – our growth is your growth.” It might sound a bit like fluff, but it’s true in the SPLA model: you’re effectively a reseller of Microsoft via your services.
• Read the Settlement Agreement Carefully: Microsoft will draft a settlement or amendment document if you agree on the terms. Read it thoroughly:
  • Check that it indeed releases you from any past liability for the period in question.
  • Ensure that any promises made (such as payment plans) are documented.
  • Check that there’s nothing sneaky, like an NDA, that prevents you from consulting an attorney or something (unlikely, but read all the clauses).
• Fulfill Your Side: If the settlement requires you to place an order for 500 licenses or pay $X by a certain date, do so promptly. A settlement is usually conditional on your performing your part. Missing a payment on an agreed plan could put you in breach again, often with worse consequences.
• Internal Post-Mortem: Finally, gather your team and do a lessons-learned meeting. Identify root causes: was it a tooling issue, a process issue, a knowledge gap? Then set concrete action items to prevent recurrence.
  • It could be as straightforward as “implement a monthly checklist to verify AD group license counts vs. the report” or as big as “invest in SPLA management software for continuous compliance.”
  • Update your risk register (if you keep one) to include audit risk, and consider setting aside a reserve in your finances for future audit contingencies.

It’s worth noting that many SPLA partners, after going through one audit, emerge much stronger in their compliance discipline. The first audit is usually the worst (and hopefully only) surprise. If you apply what you learn, subsequent audits (if they happen) tend to be non-events because you’ve cleaned house.

(Negotiation isn’t about “beating” Microsoft – it’s about reaching an understanding that keeps the partnership healthy without destroying your business. Stand firm where you need to, compromise where you can, and aim for respect on both sides.)

Recommendations

Bringing it all together, here are the top practical recommendations and best practices for SPLA partners and MSPs regarding audits:

1. Embed Compliance in Everyday Operations: Don’t treat SPLA compliance as an afterthought. Make it part of your operational checklist:

• When deploying a new server or service, immediately account for its licensing.
• When provisioning a user, ensure you have a process to assign (or at least track for the next report) any needed SAL.
• Keep a runbook for the team that details SPLA dos and don’ts.

2. Use Tools Wisely: Leverage automation where possible. Many MSPs use scripts or systems management tools to:

• Inventory all running VMs and software monthly.
• Cross-check AD user lists with reported SALs.
• Detect changes (like a new SQL Server installation) and flag it for licensing review. Consider tools specifically designed for SPLA management, but even basic PowerShell scripts and spreadsheets can work if maintained diligently.

3. Keep Audit Readiness Documentation: Create an “audit readiness” binder or digital folder. Contents might include:

• Copies of the SPLA contract and the MBSA.
• Last 1-2 years of SPLA monthly reports and proof of payments.
• Network diagrams or architecture documents (useful for showing auditors the scope of the environment).
• Admin guides or notes (such as how you segregate customers and ensure that SPLA and customer-owned licenses are not mixed, etc.).
• Key contacts (who in your organization would speak with auditors and who has the relevant information). This can significantly reduce scramble time if an audit hits.

4. Educate and Limit Your Sales Promises: Sometimes, sales or business development personnel can inadvertently cause license headaches by structuring deals that violate SPLA terms, such as offering a customer a special setup that isn’t allowed. Ensure client-facing teams know the boundaries of what you can and cannot do under SPLA. If a customer asks for something unusual (e.g., taking licenses to their premises), consult your licensing expert before agreeing.

5. Monitor Microsoft Communications: Stay alert to any notifications Microsoft sends to SPLA partners, such as program updates, pricing changes, and audit trends. Knowledge is power. If you hear that Microsoft is pushing audits in your region this quarter, double-check your compliance before they knock.

6. Plan for the Worst (Financially): It’s wise to have a financial contingency plan for compliance issues. Even if it’s a small reserve, it can lessen the blow. Also, check if your business insurance covers software compliance disputes or if you can add a rider for it. Some insurers offer “intellectual property infringement” coverage that may apply, although audits are typically not included.

7. Engage with the Community: Other SPLA partners aren’t your enemies – many are willing to share experiences. Consider joining MSP forums or user groups (some are available online, such as MSP subreddit threads) to learn from others’ audit stories. Just be mindful of confidentiality; share abstract lessons, not specific names or numbers.

8. If Audited, Don’t Go It Alone: Should you get an audit notice and you feel out of depth, don’t hesitate to get outside help. There are law firms and consultants specializing in software audits who can save you money in the long run by guiding your response. Even just a quick consultation can clarify your approach.

9. Fix Issues as You Find Them: If you find a compliance gap during any internal review or the audit itself, fix it as soon as possible. Not just because it might reduce the audit hit, but to stop ongoing bleeding. Every month that passes with an unresolved issue could be part of a future audit period. Think of compliance as patching security vulnerabilities – you wouldn’t leave a system unpatched, so don’t leave a licensing gap open.

10. Learn from Real-World Examples: It helps to study anonymized cases:

• One MSP learned the hard way that their employee access to systems was also in scope (admins logging in to maintain customer servers still need SALs!). After incurring a large audit bill, they changed the policy so that only specific admin accounts were allowed, and each was reported in SPLA.
• Another hosting provider had a habit of cloning VMs for customer testing and forgot to delete them. Auditors found these “ghost” VMs in old backups and assumed they ran perpetually. The provider now tracks every VM, even ones off, with a CMDB (Configuration Management Database).
• A positive example: A provider that adopted SAM practices not only sailed through an audit with minimal findings but also discovered they were overbuying some licenses, ultimately saving money in the long run. Their audit turned into a small true-up that was easily handled.

Conclusion: An SPLA audit can indeed be a daunting experience – it’s like a tax audit for your licensing, with potential big bills at the end. But by understanding the process, preparing in advance, and handling the audit with a level head and informed strategy, you can greatly reduce the pain. Be proactive, stay organized, and don’t hesitate to seek expert help. That way, instead of fearing the inevitable audit, you’ll manage it as just another business process.

SPLA Audits and How to Defend Yourself: FAQ

What is an SPLA audit? An SPLA audit is a review process initiated by Microsoft to ensure that service providers comply with the licensing terms specified under the Services Provider License Agreement (SPLA).

How does Microsoft decide to initiate an SPLA audit? Microsoft initiates SPLA audits based on various factors, including irregularities in monthly reporting, delays in data submission, and significant deviations from expected software usage.

What should I expect during an SPLA audit? You should expect requests for detailed data on software usage, licensing compliance, and customer agreements. The audit typically includes data collection, reviewing the draft report, and negotiations.

How long does an SPLA audit take? The length of an SPLA audit can vary depending on the complexity of the service provider’s environment and how promptly they provide the requested information. However, it typically lasts several weeks to a few months.

Who conducts the SPLA audit? Microsoft appoints an independent auditor, often from one of the “Big Four” firms (PwC, KPMG, EY, Deloitte). These auditors analyze data, verify compliance, and present their findings to Microsoft.

What kind of data will the auditor request? Auditors generally request detailed data, including Active Directory machine and user listings, information from virtual environments, software inventory, customer agreements, billing records, and evidence supporting SPLA usage reports.

What are the common reasons for non-compliance in an SPLA audit? Common reasons for non-compliance include underreporting of software usage, incorrect Subscriber Access License (SAL) counts, and insufficient documentation to support the reported figures. Misconfigured virtual environments can also lead to discrepancies.

How can I prepare for an SPLA audit? To prepare for an SPLA audit, maintain accurate monthly reporting, organize all license documentation, ensure your legal team understands SPLA terms, and designate personnel to respond promptly to audit requests. Proactively conduct internal audits to identify any compliance issues.

What happens if the auditor finds discrepancies? If discrepancies are found, the auditor will present a draft report outlining areas of non-compliance. You can review and challenge these findings by providing additional evidence or explaining your usage.

How do I defend my position if discrepancies are found? Defend your position by reviewing the draft report thoroughly, providing any missing evidence, and correcting misunderstandings. Present a detailed business case to explain discrepancies or justify software usage that may appear incorrect.

Who determines the financial impact of the SPLA audit? Microsoft, not the independent auditor, determines the financial impact of the SPLA audit. Microsoft uses the auditor’s findings to calculate any penalties, additional licensing fees, or required adjustments.

What are the potential consequences of non-compliance? Consequences of non-compliance may include significant financial penalties, increased licensing fees, or even termination of the SPLA agreement. Non-compliance can also damage your business relationship with Microsoft.

Can I negotiate the outcome of an SPLA audit? Yes, after the technical phase of the audit concludes, you can negotiate with Microsoft regarding penalties or required fees. Presenting a well-supported business case during these negotiations can help reduce the financial burden.

How can I reduce the risk of an SPLA audit? To reduce the risk of an SPLA audit, maintain accurate and timely monthly reporting, document all software usage, and proactively address discrepancies through internal reviews. Consistent compliance can minimize audit triggers.

Is the auditor’s report final? No, it is not final. It is a draft that you can respond to, challenge, and defend before Microsoft makes any final decisions regarding compliance and financial penalties.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft SPLA Audit Defense Service?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit