SAP License Audit – How It Works, How to Defend Yourself, and How to Beat It by Paying Zero

SAP License Audit – How It Works, How to Defend Yourself, and How to Beat It by Paying Zero

SAP license audits are routine compliance checks by SAP to ensure customers aren’t using more software or users than they’ve paid for. These audits can lead to unexpected bills if you’re unprepared.

This guide explains the SAP license audit process and provides strategies for CIOs, CFOs, and procurement leaders to defend their organizations and navigate an audit without incurring unplanned fees.

What Is an SAP License Audit?

An SAP license audit is a formal review by SAP to verify that your organization’s usage of SAP software matches the licenses you’ve purchased.

In plain terms, SAP checks if you’re using more SAP users or functionality than you paid for – and if so, they will expect you to buy additional licenses to cover the shortfall (often accompanied by back-maintenance fees).

Audits are inevitable for most large SAP customers. Typically, SAP has the contractual right to audit your deployment annually (or at least periodically). It’s not a question of if but when you’ll be audited, so preparation is key.

Audit triggers: Some audits are scheduled as part of routine compliance, while others may be triggered by events such as a sudden increase in usage, a major purchase of new SAP products, or simply the passage of time since the last audit.

New SAP customers typically face an audit within a year or two of signing their first contract, and high-risk indicators (e.g., past compliance issues) can lead to more frequent audits.

Remember, you generally cannot refuse an SAP audit – attempting to do so would violate contract terms. At best, you may be able to negotiate the timing, but you will still need to comply with the audit process.

Audit process overview:

When an audit commences, SAP will send a formal notice and work with your team on data collection. Expect a kickoff call to define the scope (which systems and modules will be checked) and timelines. Your SAP Basis/technical team will then be asked to run SAP’s standard measurement programs.

For ECC systems, this includes USMM (User Measurement) to gather user counts and license types, and LAW (License Administration Workbench) to consolidate the results across systems.

SAP may also request additional data exports or evidence, such as user lists with their license classifications, reports on specific software engines (modules with usage metrics, including the number of employees, orders, or revenue), and logs of interfaces to detect external (indirect) usage.

SAP’s audit team will analyze this information to identify any compliance gaps, such as more users active than you have licenses for, or use of features you haven’t purchased.

After analysis, SAP will present findings: ideally, a clean bill of health, but if not, a list of shortfalls with a proposal for remediation (i.e., purchasing additional licenses or services). This is when the negotiation phase begins – and where you want to be in a strong position to avoid any cost.

Basic vs. Enhanced Audits: 

Not All SAP Audits Are Equal. A basic audit is largely a self-service process – SAP asks for standard system measurements and trusts the customer to self-report usage data. It focuses on easily measurable metrics (such as user counts) with guidance provided by SAP.

An enhanced audit, on the other hand, is a more in-depth examination. SAP’s auditors will scrutinize license assignments, possibly request more detailed proof of usage, and even conduct interviews or on-site reviews. Enhanced audits often occur when SAP suspects significant compliance issues or for very large and complex customers.

In an enhanced audit, SAP may cross-check data from multiple sources and investigate how your business processes utilize SAP.

For example, they may perform a thorough role analysis to ensure each user’s activities align with their assigned license type, or examine specific engines and indirect access in detail.

Knowing the type of audit you’re facing helps you calibrate your preparation – a basic audit is more mechanical, whereas an enhanced audit means SAP is taking a close look under the hood.

The SAP Audit Playbook: Tactics and Common Pitfalls

SAP’s audit teams know where to look for compliance issues.

Understanding their “playbook” helps you defend against it.

Here are some common audit pitfalls and tactics SAP uses – these are the areas where many companies get caught:

• Misclassified Users: SAP licenses are sold in categories (e.g., Professional User, Limited Professional, Employee), with Professional being the most powerful and expensive. A frequent issue is assigning a user a license type that is cheaper than their actual usage requires. For instance, if someone with an “Employee” license performs tasks reserved for a Professional user (such as running advanced reports or configurations), SAP’s tools will flag it. Auditors will reclassify that user as Professional in the audit results and charge you the difference in cost. This can add up quickly – each misclassified user might carry a price difference of thousands of dollars. Multiply that by dozens or hundreds of users, and the exposure can be massive. In audits, SAP tends to default to the higher license tier whenever there’s doubt. It’s up to you to prove whether a user’s activities truly warrant a lower-cost license.
• Duplicate and Inactive Accounts: SAP counts each active user ID as a licensed user. If the same employee has multiple accounts (which is not uncommon for technical reasons) and they aren’t properly consolidated, the audit may count them twice. SAP’s LAW tool attempts to merge duplicates, but it relies on matching criteria (like username or email) that aren’t foolproof. If your records are inconsistent (e.g., “J.Smith” vs. “John Smith”), duplicates may slip through, and SAP will assume you have more users than licenses. Similarly, inactive accounts that haven’t been used in years but remain unlocked in the system will be treated as active users. It’s not SAP’s job to exclude them – if they appear in the user list, they count. Many audits reveal that 10% or more “ghost” users are consuming licenses, simply because the customer hasn’t cleaned up old accounts. These issues lead to SAP claiming that you’ve exceeded your entitlements, forcing you to purchase additional licenses for individuals who are not using SAP.
• License Classification Gaps: A subtle yet costly pitfall is the presence of unclassified users. Every SAP user account should be assigned a license type in the system. If an account has a blank or “undefined” license type, SAP’s default assumption is to count it as a Professional User (the most expensive category). In other words, any user without a classification becomes a worst-case scenario in the audit report. This often catches customers by surprise – it might be a new user someone forgot to classify, or a generic system account. The audit will treat these as full Professional users, inflating your usage count. Always ensure every user ID has a valid license type assigned to avoid gifting SAP an easy win.
• Engine and Package Overuse: In addition to user licenses, SAP software includes engines or packages licensed based on metrics (such as the number of employees, orders, revenue, or CPUs). An audit will also verify these metrics. If your contract allows, say, up to 1,000 employees on SAP Payroll and you now have 1,200 employees in the system, you’re 200 over the licensed limit – SAP will require you to license the excess. Any SAP module or add-on with a metric cap is a target in audits. Similarly, if you activate a functionality or component without purchasing its license, the audit will identify it through usage logs. These findings mean you’d have to purchase the additional rights retroactively. The auditors will also calculate back-maintenance – if you’ve been using something unlicensed for two years, they might add ~20% of the license price per year as maintenance fees you “should have” been paying. This backdated support cost can significantly compound your audit bill.
• Indirect Access (Digital Use): Perhaps the biggest hidden risk (deserving its own section below) is indirect access. In brief, if third-party systems or external users interact with SAP data without a valid license, SAP will flag the interaction. For example, suppose an e-commerce platform or CRM system is creating sales orders or retrieving data from SAP ECC. In that case, those actions might require licensing either via named users or SAP’s Digital Access document model. Many companies have integrations and interfaces that feed data into SAP, assuming it’s free. In reality, SAP’s audit teams actively hunt for this. They will review technical users or interface accounts with high activity and inquire about their source. If you haven’t accounted for indirect use, SAP could calculate a hefty fee (either by counting the external users or, more commonly now, by counting the documents created in SAP via those interfaces). Indirect access findings have led to multi-million dollar compliance claims, catching executives off guard.

In short, SAP auditors are trained to find what you missed. They exploit the lack of housekeeping (old accounts, duplicates), optimistic licensing (under-assigning license types), and any vague areas of your contract (such as undefined indirect usage).

Being aware of these common pitfalls is the first step in defending against them.

Below is an example of how user misclassification can translate into hard dollars during an audit:

Illustrative example: A total of 30 users were assigned lower-tier licenses than their activity required, leading to an exposure of ~$65,000 in license fees, plus maintenance on those licenses for past years.

This is a scenario you want to catch internally before it occurs with SAP. It’s much cheaper to correct licensing proactively (or true-up on your terms) than to be billed for it in an audit at list prices and with back-charges.

Indirect Access and “Digital Access”: The Hidden Audit Risk

Indirect access is often referred to as the “silent killer” in SAP audits. It refers to any use of SAP’s functionality without a human directly logging into SAP, typically via third-party applications, interfaces, or automated systems.

Common examples include a CRM system (such as Salesforce) reading or writing customer data in SAP, an e-commerce website creating orders in SAP, a supply chain or IoT system feeding data into SAP, or employees accessing SAP data through a third-party analytics tool.

From SAP’s perspective, all these interactions are considered use of SAP software and require a license.

Historically, SAP’s stance was that any indirect use required a named user license for the individuals or devices involved. This was murky and hard to enforce, so many customers ignored it – until a few years ago, when SAP started cracking down.

A notable case in 2017 saw a company face a £54 million demand in court for unlicensed indirect access. That got every CIO’s attention. To bring clarity (and new revenue), SAP introduced the Digital Access licensing model around 2018.

Instead of trying to license every external user, Digital Access charges for the documents created in SAP by external systems. SAP identified common document types (sales orders, invoices, purchase orders, etc.) and assigns a price per document (often in bundles of 1,000 documents).

Why this matters:

If you haven’t formally licensed your indirect usage, an audit can spring a nasty surprise. SAP now has tools (like an Indirect Usage Estimator) that scan your SAP system for documents created via technical interfaces. They might say, “We found 5 million documents created by external systems last year – here’s the bill.”

Even at a seemingly modest rate (for example, list price might be on the order of $100 per 1,000 documents, or $0.10 each, before any discounts), the costs explode with volume.

It’s not uncommon for a large enterprise to generate tens of millions of SAP documents annually via integrations.

One industry analysis found that an average SAP customer produced over 100 million such documents per year, which at the list price could equal approximately $20 million in licensing fees.

SAP has offered promotional discounts (even 90% off in some programs) to encourage customers to adopt Digital Access voluntarily – but even 10% of a huge number is still significant.

The bottom line is that indirect access can easily result in a seven-figure liability if left unmanaged.

If your company hasn’t addressed this, you have two licensing approaches:

• Stick with the old model (cover indirect use by naming all external users/devices in your SAP license count, which is often impractical), or
• Adopt SAP’s Digital Access licenses to cover document creation.

Many chose the latter via programs like SAP’s Digital Access Adoption Program (DAAP), which offered steep discounts and even amnesty for past indirect usage if you signed up to the new model. Regardless of the approach, you must be on top of your indirect usage. Proactively inventory all third-party systems connected to SAP and estimate the documents or transactions they generate.

If you already have Digital Access licenses, regularly measure your document counts to track your consumption. If you don’t, seriously consider negotiating a digital access license package – ideally before an audit forces you to do so.

And always review the wording in your SAP contract: older contracts might not mention “indirect use” explicitly, but they usually define software “Use” broadly enough that SAP can claim these scenarios are covered.

Never assume that because a third-party system is querying SAP data, it falls outside of license requirements.

Many CFOs have learned the hard way that indirect usage was previously flying under the radar until an audit revealed millions in fees. Forewarned is forearmed here.

Preparing Your Defense: Ongoing License Management Practices

The best way to “beat” an SAP audit is to not give SAP anything to find.

That means instituting strong license management practices long before an audit notice arrives.

Think of it as maintaining compliance hygiene so you’re always audit-ready. Key practices include:

• Regular Internal Audits: Don’t wait for SAP’s official audit. Conduct your license audits at least annually (some organizations do it quarterly). Run the same SAP measurement tools to see your license position. Look at the results with a critical eye as if you were SAP. This way, you can identify and correct discrepancies in your schedule. If you discover you have 50 more Professional users than you thought, you can take action – maybe by reassigning some licenses, cleaning up users, or if necessary, purchasing additional licenses under better terms than the pressure of an audit. An internal review lets you remediate quietly, rather than scrambling under SAP’s deadline.
• Clean House (User Management): Establish a policy to proactively manage user accounts and license assignments. When employees leave or change roles, have IT disable or delete their SAP accounts immediately (or at least lock them from login). Perform routine clean-ups of any obsolete or duplicate user IDs. Ensure each person has only one SAP user account (per SAP’s licensing rule of “one named user = one human”). Also, keep each user’s license classification up to date with their role. If someone’s job expands to utilize more SAP functionality, proactively provide them with the appropriate higher license (and remove lower-level licenses if they are no longer needed elsewhere). It’s far cheaper to adjust licenses proactively than to be charged penalties for it later. Conversely, suppose someone with a pricey license is now assigned to a less critical role. In that case, you might consider downgrading them (do this carefully and with documentation to avoid suspicion). The goal is to maintain a tight ship: no unnecessary accounts, no mislabeled users, and no unaccounted usage.
• Monitor Usage Metrics: Assign responsibility to track each SAP engine and metric-based license you have. If you own packages that are limited by something (such as financial postings, the number of products, or database size), keep an eye on those metrics. Have system owners report usage vs. entitlement regularly. This proactive monitoring will alert you if, for example, your HR module’s licensed employee count is nearing the limit, as the company has hired additional staff or acquired a new team. You want to spot that trend and address it (maybe by archiving old data, optimizing usage, or planning a license extension) before an audit flags it. Also, never enable a new module or component without checking if it requires additional licensing – ask SAP in writing if you are unsure. Surprises often occur when IT enables a feature “for testing” that ends up in production use without proper licensing.
• Know Your Contracts: Review your SAP license agreements carefully to understand the terms and conditions. Pay attention to definitions of user types, the audit clause itself (e.g., how much notice SAP must give, how the process works), terms about indirect use, and any special arrangements or bundles you negotiated. Many compliance disputes boil down to contract interpretation. If your contract language is vague or one-sided, SAP will use its standard definitions to its advantage. It’s wise to involve your legal team or a licensing expert to identify any contractual “gotchas” that could be problematic. For instance, if your contract doesn’t explicitly address a scenario (like an affiliate company using your SAP system, or external API usage), be aware that SAP will likely enforce its default policy (which is usually that any use of SAP by any affiliate or third party needs licensing). Knowing what you agreed to (and didn’t) equips you to push back if auditors overreach beyond the contract, or to negotiate amendments in advance if something is ambiguous.
• Engage Experts if Needed: SAP licensing and audits are specialized domains. Consider bringing in an independent SAP license management consultant for a pre-audit assessment, especially if you suspect a significant exposure. Yes, it’s an added expense, but these experts can identify hidden compliance issues and help you fix them or prepare a defense. They are familiar with SAP’s tactics and the typical negotiation levers. If an audit is already underway and escalating, having experienced negotiators on your side can be invaluable. They can validate (or refute) SAP’s findings with their analysis and ensure you’re not overcharged. Think of it as hiring a tax advisor when you get audited by the IRS – it helps level the playing field when you’re dealing with a highly practiced audit team from SAP.
• Leverage Purchase and Renewal Time: One of the best defenses is a good offense – use your buying power proactively. When you’re about to make a significant purchase from SAP or renew a major contract, negotiate protections into that deal. Examples: add language to clarify or cap indirect usage fees, secure additional license capacity for anticipated growth, or negotiate swap rights (the ability to convert some unused licenses to other types). You could also negotiate the audit clause itself – for instance, ensuring a reasonable notice period and that audits occur at most once per year. If SAP has presented you with an audit finding alongside a new purchase proposal (a common scenario: “You owe $X in licenses, but if you purchase our new cloud product, we’ll make that problem go away”), evaluate if bundling compliance resolution into a larger deal yields a better discount. The key is to address audit exposures when you have leverage (during a sale cycle), rather than when you’re on the back foot during an audit.
• Establish an Audit Response Plan: Just as companies have incident response plans for cybersecurity, you should have a playbook for when an audit notice arrives. This involves assigning a cross-functional team: IT knows how to collect the data, procurement/licensing specialists are familiar with entitlements, finance/legal personnel understand the contract and its implications, and an executive sponsor (typically a CIO or CFO) oversees the strategy. Plan out who will interface with SAP’s auditors, who will double-check the data before it’s submitted, and how you’ll handle any disputes. Never send raw data to SAP without first conducting an internal review. Run the measurement reports and have your team review them for anomalies – e.g., identify duplicate users or blank license types before SAP does, and resolve them or be prepared to explain them. Ensure the data you provide is accurate and defensible. This isn’t about hiding information; it’s about presenting your usage in the best possible light, with accurate classifications and without easily avoidable errors. Having a formal audit response plan means you won’t be scrambling under stress – you’ll execute a prepared strategy.

By embedding these practices into your IT and asset management processes, you significantly reduce the chances that an SAP audit finds something significant – or if they do, you’ll likely already know about it and have a plan.

Many enterprises that sail through audits with zero additional cost are the ones that treat license compliance as an ongoing discipline, not a once-a-year fire drill.

Facing an SAP Audit: How to Respond and Win

What if you’re reading this and you’re already under the audit microscope? Don’t panic. Even if SAP’s audit is active, a well-coordinated response can significantly alter the outcome.

Here’s how to manage an ongoing audit and maximize your chances of paying nothing in the end:

• Stay Organized and Control the Scope: As soon as the audit notice arrives, activate your audit response team (or assemble one quickly). Ensure that all communications with SAP are channeled through a designated point person or a small, coordinated group. Clarify the scope in writing – specifically, which systems and license types are being audited – and adhere to it. Don’t volunteer information about systems or usage that aren’t asked for; it’s not about being dishonest, but about not inadvertently widening the scope. If SAP’s auditors ask for something that seems beyond the agreed scope or not required by the contract, push back (politely) and ask why it’s needed. Sometimes auditors go on fishing expeditions; you’re within your rights to question unnecessary requests.
• Verify Everything Before Submission: Treat the data submission as a critical milestone. Before sending any measurement results or reports to SAP, double-check them internally. Look for the common issues we discussed: Are all users classified properly? Are there obvious duplicates we need to explain? Did we exclude test systems if they’re not in scope? By catching and correcting mistakes proactively, you remove easy ammunition from SAP’s side. For example, if you find 50 users with no assigned license type, classify them correctly (or remove them if they are not needed) before delivering the user list. If you discover that a metric (such as orders processed) exceeds the licensed amount, discuss internally how you will address it – perhaps you have already planned an upgrade or unused rights elsewhere that could cover it. Accuracy and consistency in the data you provide will make the audit go more smoothly and demonstrate to SAP that you’re on top of things.
• Engage in the Dialogue: Once SAP reviews the data, they’ll come back with findings. This is where you switch to negotiation mode. Don’t accept their findings at face value, especially if something looks off. Ask for clarification and proof. If they say, “You have 50 more Professional users than licensed,” obtain the list of those specific users. You might identify that 10 of them are duplicates or inactive – provide evidence and get those removed from the count. If they claim an indirect usage gap, understand exactly how they calculated it. Perhaps they assumed every interface user needed a license, but if you move to Digital Access, that could change the conversation. The key is to challenge politely and factually. Auditors can make mistakes or assumptions; it’s your job to identify them. Maintain a professional tone – you want to keep SAP at the table to potentially waive or reduce charges, not alienate them – but be firm in defending your position.
• Negotiate the Outcome: Suppose, after back-and-forth, SAP identifies a genuine compliance shortfall – perhaps you truly had more users active than purchased, or you used an engine beyond the licensed limit. You should never pay the initial quote without careful consideration. Treat the audit resolution like a procurement negotiation. First, see if you can resolve it without any purchase: can you reallocate existing licenses from a part of the business that isn’t using them to cover the deficit? (For example, maybe another region has 100 extra licenses sitting idle that could be reassigned.) Can you remediate usage quickly? (For instance, delete those inactive users or stop using the unlicensed feature – and argue that the usage was inadvertent and has ceased.) SAP might be open to dropping a charge if the usage is immediately corrected and wasn’t giving you a significant benefit.

If you do need to purchase licenses, negotiate the commercial terms. In many cases, SAP will present an invoice at the list price for any shortfall (and may also add backdated maintenance).

However, if you have a good relationship or future spending plans, you can ask for the same discount you’d receive if you were making a normal purchase.

It’s common to bundle the audit true-up with a new purchase or renewal. For example, you agree to extend your SAP maintenance for three years or buy additional SAP cloud products, and in return, SAP might waive the back-maintenance fees or apply a heavy discount to the licenses you need to buy.

The ultimate goal is to avoid writing a big check solely for an audit penalty. Ideally, any money that does change hands goes towards something of value for your business (new licenses you need, or subscription credits, etc.), not a “penalty fee” for past usage.

In some cases, customers have been able to eliminate their audit compliance gap by committing to strategic initiatives that SAP values.

For instance, one company facing a multi-million-dollar compliance bill successfully argued against every line item by demonstrating that many were incorrect or had minimal impact, and then agreed to a modest expansion of their SAP footprint (which they had planned to do eventually anyway).

The result: no immediate penalty payment – the audit was closed with no check cut to SAP, and the customer proceeded with a pre-planned purchase on their timeline.

• Use Your Escalation Paths: If negotiations at the auditor level stall or feel unfair, involve your SAP account executive or higher management at SAP. Sales teams have an interest in maintaining the relationship, and they might be more flexible, especially if there’s a prospect of future business. Please be aware that you’re willing to consider upgrades or new SAP solutions instead of simply providing funds for an audit finding. Also, if you believe SAP is interpreting something incorrectly relative to your contract, bring in your legal team to reinforce your stance. Knowing your rights (as mentioned earlier) is crucial here – if the contract is on your side, politely remind SAP of the exact terms. For example, if your contract allowed a third party to have read access without licenses, point that out. Or if SAP’s audit process didn’t allow you the necessary time to respond, mention it and request that they honor the terms. You might not get an apology, but it can soften their position.
• Document and Close: As you resolve, document all agreed-upon details. If SAP concludes that you are compliant (lucky you!), obtain written confirmation – a closure email stating that no further action is required. If you must purchase something, ensure you get formal quotes with any discounts or waivers clearly stated, and ideally link it as “audit resolution – no further fees due for this issue.” Once settled, conduct an internal post-mortem. Identify what went wrong that led to any compliance issue and fix it for the future. Also, celebrate your team’s efforts if you managed to come out with zero cost – that’s a big win in the enterprise software world!

Real-world example: One organization under audit was informed by SAP that it was under-licensed in a specific module (e.g., HR payroll users) and required the purchase of additional licenses, as well as a fine. The company knew, however, that its usage hadn’t increased and suspected an error.

They engaged a third-party licensing advisor to help formulate a response. By examining the details, they found that the discrepancy was caused by a misunderstanding in how the self-reported data had been submitted the previous year.

The contract allowed the customer to correct errors in their submission if they were not using SAP’s automated tool. Armed with this knowledge, they pushed back on SAP, showing that no new usage had occurred and that per the contract, they could correct the record. After intense discussions, SAP dropped the compliance claim.

The customer ended up paying $0 – no purchase, no penalty – and the audit was closed. The key to this outcome was the customer’s understanding of their contractual rights and willingness to challenge SAP’s findings with factual evidence.

The lesson: even in an active audit, if you are confident in your position and present a solid case, you can emerge without writing a check.

Recommendations

To wrap up, here are expert tips and best practices to minimize your SAP audit risks and strengthen your negotiating position:

• Audit Yourself First: Schedule regular internal SAP license audits. Proactively find and fix compliance gaps on your terms, rather than discovering them under SAP’s audit deadlines.
• Maintain License Hygiene: Implement strict user management – remove unused accounts promptly, avoid duplicate user IDs, and keep everyone’s license classification accurate. This housekeeping cuts off many common audit findings.
• Align Licenses with Usage: Continuously review which license type each user needs. Don’t over-provision expensive licenses where not needed, but never under-license a heavy user. Aim for the right license for the right role, and adjust as roles change.
• Monitor Indirect Usage: Inventory all external systems interfacing with SAP. Measure or estimate the documents and transactions they generate. If you haven’t adopted SAP’s Digital Access, assess the financial impact if SAP were to audit those interfaces – and consider negotiating a proper license solution before it becomes an issue.
• Track Metrics & Engines: Assign owners to each metric-based license (e.g., HR headcount, order volumes) to monitor consumption versus entitlement. Early warning of exceeding a metric gives you time to either reduce usage or budget for an expansion, rather than being caught off guard.
• Know Your Contractual Rights: Thoroughly understand the audit clause and usage definitions in your SAP contract to ensure you are fully aware of your rights. For example, know how much notice SAP must give, what data you’re obligated to provide, and any carve-outs you negotiated. This knowledge enables you to ensure SAP adheres to the contract and helps you counter unfounded claims.
• Leverage Renewal and Purchase Negotiations: Use upcoming contract renewals or planned purchases as opportunities to strengthen your license position. Negotiate favorable terms, such as swapping unused licenses, securing discounts for any future true-up, or clarifying gray areas (e.g., indirect usage, test system use) in writing.
• Have an Audit Playbook: Establish an internal response plan for audits to ensure a consistent approach. Define roles (IT, procurement, legal, executive) and steps to take once an audit notice arrives. Preparation means you won’t scramble – you’ll execute a strategy.
• Consider External Support: Don’t hesitate to bring in third-party licensing experts or legal advisors for high-stakes audits. Their expertise can often pay for itself by reducing the audit claims. They also add weight in negotiations, as SAP knows these advisors can spot inaccuracies in the audit.
• Stay Informed: Keep up with SAP’s licensing updates and policies. SAP occasionally revises license models or offers programs (like the Digital Access adoption initiative) that could benefit you. Being aware of these changes means you can take advantage of them proactively (for example, opting into a favorable new model or securing an amnesty offer) rather than being surprised later.

By following these recommendations, you build a strong defense long before any audit and put your team in a confident position.

The overarching theme is control and visibility: take control of your SAP licensing and maintain visibility into your usage. That way, when SAP comes knocking, there are no easy targets for them to exploit.

Checklist: 5 Actions to Take

Use this simple checklist as a starting point to fortify your organization against SAP audits:

1. Baseline Your License Usage: Immediately gather your current SAP license status. Run SAP’s user measurement reports and list all your procured licenses. Identify any obvious gaps (e.g., more active users than licenses, or unassigned license types). This baseline shows where you stand.
2. Clean Up Low-Hanging Issues: Address the quick fixes first. Lock or delete any inactive user accounts. Merge or flag duplicate user IDs belonging to the same person. Correct any users with missing or incorrect license classification. These actions can often eliminate the most common audit findings in one sweep.
3. Review Indirect Access Exposure: List all third-party systems, interfaces, or APIs connected to SAP. For each, determine if it creates SAP documents or transactions. If yes, estimate the volume. Determine your approach (named users vs. digital access license) for each interface. If you haven’t already, consider running SAP’s Digital Access estimation tool to quantify this. This step prevents a nasty surprise later.
4. Revisit Your SAP Contract: Pull out your SAP license agreements and audit clause. Together with your legal/procurement teams, review key terms, including audit notice period, scope limitations, and the definition of indirect use, among others. If anything is unclear or unfavorable, note it down. If you’re in a position to amend the contract (for instance, at an upcoming renewal), plan to negotiate better terms. Knowing your rights during an audit is critical – for now, make sure you at least adhere to what the contract expects from you.
5. Assemble Your Audit Response Team: Don’t Wait for the Audit Letter. Identify the people who will be involved in an audit response. Typically, this includes: a licensing or SAM manager to lead, an IT representative (to run reports and provide data), a procurement or finance person (to understand entitlements and handle negotiations), and a legal advisor (to interpret the contract and advise on responses). Have a kickoff meeting to review this checklist and ensure everyone understands their role. Being ready means an audit won’t catch you off-guard – you’ll respond as a coordinated unit.

By executing these five actions, you create a solid foundation for audit defense. Think of it as an insurance policy: a bit of effort now can save your company from a multimillion-dollar compliance bill down the road.

Further Reading

• How to Negotiate a SAP License Audit
• Negotiating SAP License Audit Settlements
• SAP Audit Defense Strategy
• Building an SAP Audit Defense Strategy
• How to Prepare for a SAP License Audit
• SAP License Audit Tools
• SAP License Audit Readiness & Compliance – Preparing for SAP License Audits
• SAP License Audit Triggers
• SAP Audit Defense FAQ
• SAP License Audit Process
• SAP Audit Trends In 2025

FAQ

Q1: How often can SAP audit us?
A1: In most contracts, SAP reserves the right to audit annually. In practice, not every customer is audited annually – SAP selects targets based on factors such as size, compliance history, and new license activity. However, you should assume an audit at least every few years. Always being prepared is wise, since audit frequency can change and you may not get much warning beyond the notice letter.

Q2: What happens if we fail an SAP audit?
A2: “Failing” an SAP audit means the auditors found you’re using more software or users than you’ve licensed. The immediate result is that SAP will demand you purchase the necessary licenses to cover the shortfall, often at list price. They may also require back-dated maintenance fees for the period you were under-licensed. In extreme cases (such as willful non-compliance or refusal to address it), SAP may terminate the software agreement, but this is very rare. More commonly, it becomes a negotiation – how and how much you’ll pay to become compliant. It’s better to never reach that point by managing compliance proactively, but if you do, engage in negotiation to mitigate the costs.

Q3: Can we refuse or delay an SAP audit?
A3: You generally cannot refuse an audit – your SAP contract almost certainly gives SAP the right to audit and requires your cooperation. Trying to block an audit could put you in breach of contract. However, you might be able to negotiate timing. If the requested audit period is particularly busy for your team, politely ask SAP for a short extension or a more suitable time of year – they may accommodate reasonable requests. Always get any postponement in writing. But ultimately, the audit will happen, so use any extra time granted to better prepare.

Q4: Why is indirect access such a big concern in SAP audits?
A4: Indirect access is when non-SAP systems or users interact with SAP data/functionality. It’s a significant concern because it’s easy for companies to overlook, but it can result in substantial license liabilities. For example, if an e-commerce site or a third-party app creates thousands of sales orders in SAP, SAP considers that licensed activity. Audits now specifically probe for this, and SAP’s “Digital Access” model monetizes those document creations. Indirect usage can involve high volumes (millions of transactions), which, multiplied by a per-document cost, can dwarf your regular user license costs. It has been the centerpiece of some high-profile compliance cases and is often the single largest unexpected cost in audits. Being aware of and managing it (either via proper licenses or technical controls) is crucial to avoid a surprise bill.

Q5: How can we get through an SAP audit without paying extra?
A5: It is possible – many savvy enterprises emerge from audits with a zero-cost outcome. The keys are preparation and negotiation. Preparation means you’ve already audited yourself, fixed easy compliance issues, and documented your license assignments. When SAP audits, they typically find little to no gaps. If they do find something, negotiation means you don’t just accept the initial bill. You validate the findings, correct any errors, and leverage your relationship with SAP to ensure accuracy. Often, suppose you’re a valuable customer or plan to invest in new SAP solutions. In that case, you can negotiate to have compliance issues resolved as part of that future investment (rather than a standalone penalty). The combination of having your house in order and being willing to push back (professionally) on audit results is the formula for paying nothing in an SAP audit.

Read about our SAP Audit Defense Service.

Do you want to know more about our SAP Audit Defense Service?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit