Sales orders, purchase orders, invoices, manufacturing orders at full weight. Material documents, time sheets, and quality / service notifications at 0.2. ServiceNow, Salesforce, EDI gateways, supplier portals all create exposure. DAAP history, RISE entitlement carve outs, audit defense, eleven buyer moves.
SAP indirect access is the licensing exposure that arises when third party applications read, write, or trigger SAP data without going through a named SAP user license. Historically, SAP licensed indirect access against the same named user metric that covered direct human SAP users, which created enormous audit settlements (the Diageo and AB InBev cases in 2017 became the public examples). In April 2018, SAP introduced Digital Access as the replacement metric: indirect access is now billed per SAP document created by external systems, across nine defined document types (sales orders, purchase orders, invoice documents, manufacturing orders, financial documents, time sheet documents, quality notification documents, service notification documents, material documents). SAP simultaneously launched the Digital Access Adoption Program (DAAP) as the conversion path from legacy indirect named user exposure to Digital Access document pricing, with deep transition credits for customers willing to commit on a defined timeline. The DAAP window has closed in most regions, but the underlying tension remains: customers running heavy third party integration (ServiceNow ITSM, Salesforce CRM, custom apps, B2B EDI, supplier portals) face material document creation exposure that requires careful licensing and audit defense. This paper sets out the nine document type math, the DAAP versus current pricing decision, the audit posture, and the eleven move buyer side playbook. Read the related SAP services practice, the SAP knowledge hub, and the SAP Digital Access complete guide.
CIOs, VPs of IT Procurement, SAP Center of Excellence leaders, SAP licensing managers, Enterprise Architects, and IT Procurement leaders running SAP S/4HANA, SAP ECC, or SAP RISE with material third party application integrations. Particularly useful for customers facing an SAP audit, customers approaching a RISE renewal with Digital Access entitlement carve out, and customers preparing to deploy new third party applications that will create SAP documents.
The full paper covers the nine Digital Access document types with weighting math, the DAAP transition history and what it means for non adopters, RISE with SAP Digital Access entitlement carve outs, the third party application integration map, the audit measurement queries SAP runs, settlement negotiation, architecture changes that reduce document creation, and the eleven move buyer side playbook.
Used across more than five hundred enterprise software engagements. Independent. Buyer side. Built for SAP customers running third party applications integrated with SAP.
No download. The paper opens in your browser. Corporate email only (we reject Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, Outlook, AOL, and similar free providers).
SAP raised an indirect access finding tied to our ServiceNow and Salesforce integrations and proposed a settlement at fourteen million dollars. Redress mapped actual document creation by type, separated the 0.2 weighted documents from full weight, and renegotiated against measured exposure rather than the LMS estimate. Twenty seven percent of the proposed settlement, with the Digital Access entitlement carved out properly going forward.
We have run 500+ enterprise clients across 11 publishers. Every engagement starts with one conversation.
SAP indirect access framework signals, Digital Access framework signals, document creation framework signals, audit framework signals, and the broader SAP licensing leverage signals.