Oracle Verified SAM Program: Critical Insights and Costs

Oracle Verified SAM Program: Critical Insights and Costs

Oracle’s Verified Software Asset Management (SAM) Program is presented as a convenient, Oracle-endorsed method for managing license compliance.

However, this advisory reveals why the program’s high costs, conflicts of interest, and data-sharing requirements often end up favoring Oracle’s interests over those of the customer.

In short, enterprises should approach the Oracle Verified SAM Program with skepticism – hidden expenses and loss of control can outweigh any promised benefits.

Instead, ITAM professionals are encouraged to consider independent strategies that protect their organization’s interests while maintaining compliance.

Understanding the Oracle Verified SAM Program

The Oracle Verified SAM Program is an initiative that certifies select third-party SAM service providers to conduct Oracle license reviews on its behalf.

Oracle markets this program as a “customer-friendly” service to help enterprises track and optimize their usage of Oracle software with expert guidance.

In practice, participating means inviting an Oracle-approved partner to regularly audit your Oracle deployments under Oracle’s oversight.

• Oracle’s Pitch: The program promises regular compliance reviews, expert licensing advice, and even the possibility of audit waivers. It’s framed as a way to gain clarity and avoid surprises in managing Oracle licenses.
• Behind the Scenes: By design, the verified partner uses Oracle-provided scripts and tools and shares all findings directly with Oracle. This essentially makes it a vendor-supervised audit rather than an independent review. Oracle’s involvement is pervasive, ensuring that your compliance status is continuously visible to them.
• Goal Alignment: Ultimately, the program’s structure aligns more closely with Oracle’s goals (ensuring every deployment is licensed and monetized) than with the customer’s goal of achieving cost-effective compliance. It is essential to recognize that what appears to be a helpful service may serve as a revenue assurance mechanism for Oracle.

Read Oracle SAM Verified Program: 8 Situations to Avoid.

Significant Costs and Hidden Expenses

One of the first critical insights about the Oracle Verified SAM Program is its cost.

Joining the program is not a free service – enterprises must typically pay the Oracle-verified SAM partner for assessments and ongoing monitoring.

• Annual Assessment Fees: A cornerstone of the program is the yearly baseline license assessment. These in-depth reviews of your Oracle environment come at a significant price. For a large enterprise, the fees can accumulate to a substantial annual cost, effectively becoming another line item in your IT budget.
• Follow-On Purchases: The bigger financial impact often comes after the assessment. Verified SAM engagements commonly uncover license shortfalls or compliance gaps. The result is pressure to spend on remediation, such as:
  • Purchasing additional Oracle licenses (e.g., database or Java licenses) to cover any identified usage gaps.
  • Signing a costly Oracle Unlimited License Agreement (ULA) or extended support contracts to resolve compliance findings.
  • Incurring back-support fees or other penalties for past under-licensing.
• “Pay Twice” Scenario: Many organizations find they are paying twice – first by funding the partner’s assessment, and next by footing the bill for Oracle’s recommended fixes. For example, a SAM review might identify unlicensed Java installations, leading to an unplanned purchase of a Java subscription or ULA that dwarfs the assessment fee. The program’s hidden expenses can easily outstrip any notional savings from avoiding penalties, because the very process of finding compliance issues creates an obligation to spend.
• Internal Overhead: Additionally, there are soft costs. Your team will spend time collecting data, running Oracle’s scripts, and meeting with the SAM partner and Oracle. These efforts, while valuable for insight, divert resources from other ITAM activities and can feel like preparing for an audit.

In summary, the Oracle Verified SAM Program brings significant direct costs and tends to trigger further spending. Enterprises should weigh these expenses against the purported benefits, and ask whether a truly independent review might achieve compliance at a lower total cost.

Read Oracle Verified SAM Program Pros and Cons.

Audit Waivers: No Guaranteed Immunity

A key selling point Oracle often mentions is the possibility of an audit waiver for program participants.

The idea is that if you’re proactively engaging in Oracle’s official SAM program, Oracle might refrain from its standard license audits.

While this sounds reassuring, the reality is far less protective:

• Temporary Relief: In many cases, Oracle agrees not to initiate a formal audit during the SAM engagement period. However, this is typically a short-term pause, often lasting just for the duration of the assessment or a defined window (for example, 90 days with no audits). This “no-audit” grace period is not a permanent immunity. Once the engagement concludes, normal audit rights resume.
• No Guaranteed Waiver: There is no legally binding guarantee that Oracle won’t audit you after the program. Any waiver is conditional. Oracle often reserves the right to audit later, especially if you don’t remediate all findings or if new compliance issues emerge. Companies have found that even after participating in the Verified SAM Program, they were later subject to audits or compliance enforcement if Oracle saw opportunities.
• Audit by Another Name: In effect, the SAM review itself functions like an audit. Oracle gains a comprehensive view of your deployments, often uncovering the very issues their audit team would typically look for. If serious compliance gaps are identified, Oracle may consider the SAM engagement’s findings as grounds for an audit or immediate licensing action once any agreed-upon moratorium ends. The supposed waiver might simply delay the inevitable.
• False Sense of Security: Relying on the promise of an audit waiver can create a false sense of security. ITAM professionals should remain vigilant; being in the program does not mean you can ignore compliance issues. On the contrary, you must address them quickly, or you risk an audit with all your cards already on the table.

Bottom line: Don’t join the Verified SAM Program solely for an audit waiver.

If avoiding audits is the goal, there are better approaches (such as maintaining good internal compliance and only sharing necessary information) than counting on an Oracle promise that may be fleeting.

Read Avoid Oracle Verified SAM Program: Six Key Reasons.

Conflict of Interest: Biased Guidance

Oracle-verified SAM partners have inherent conflicts of interest that can skew their advice.

These third-party firms might present themselves as neutral advisors, but remember: they are approved and overseen by Oracle.

This arrangement introduces bias at multiple levels:

• Who They Serve: A verified partner must ultimately ensure that Oracle (the vendor) is satisfied. Their contract requires sharing your Effective License Position (ELP) and any “sales opportunities” with Oracle. In practice, this means if they find you’re under-licensed, they are obliged to report it and likely facilitate Oracle’s sales efforts to close that gap. Their role can quickly shift from advisor to salesperson for Oracle.
• Strict Oracle Interpretations: Oracle’s licensing rules are famously complex, and there are grey areas in usage (for example, ambiguous virtualization scenarios or partially used options). An independent consultant might interpret a grey area in the way most favorable to the client, or at least debate it. In contrast, an Oracle-aligned SAM partner will interpret every ambiguity in Oracle’s favor. If there’s any doubt about whether a certain deployment needs a license, the verified partner is likely to err on the side of “yes, purchase more licenses.” This conservative, Oracle-biased stance protects Oracle’s revenue but could force the customer into unnecessary costs.
• Recommendations or Upsell?: Be wary that the “optimization” insights from a verified engagement might include suggestions that conveniently lead to buying more Oracle products. For example, rather than recommending architecture changes to reduce license requirements, a biased reviewer might suggest licensing an entire server cluster or enabling Oracle’s cloud services. These recommendations can blur the line between consultation and upselling, as they may align with Oracle’s sales strategy.
• Lack of True Independence: Unlike a purely independent SAM advisor, a verified partner cannot be fully on the customer’s side. Even if individual consultants are well-meaning, the firm’s alliance with Oracle creates a subconscious (or explicit) incentive to prioritize Oracle’s interests. This conflict of interest means you might not hear about cost-saving alternatives that reduce Oracle spend – you’ll only get advice that fits within Oracle’s official policies and revenue goals.

For ITAM professionals, the lesson is clear: any advice from a vendor-aligned program should be taken with caution.

Consider double-checking critical findings or recommendations with an independent party, especially if they involve significant new purchases or investments.

Always ask, “Is this truly necessary, or is there an independent second opinion on this compliance issue?”

Data Sharing and Negotiation Risks

Participating in the Oracle Verified SAM Program requires a level of transparency with Oracle that can undermine your negotiation position.

A fundamental requirement is to share your Effective License Position (ELP) – a full account of your Oracle deployments versus entitlements – with both the SAM partner and Oracle.

This mandated data sharing has serious implications:

• Loss of Control Over Information: Once you hand over detailed usage data to Oracle, you effectively give up a strategic asset in any future negotiation or audit. Oracle gains a comprehensive “blueprint” of where your organization may be out of compliance or heavily dependent on specific software. This knowledge enables Oracle to target sales opportunities where you are weak. You cannot retract this information, and it will remain in Oracle’s records.
• Weakened Negotiation Leverage: In a typical contract renewal or audit defense scenario, customers can choose what information to disclose and when. By contrast, if Oracle already knows your exact license utilization and shortfalls, you have no levers left to pull. Oracle can approach a renewal or audit discussion with full confidence in what you need, leaving you little room to negotiate a discount or alternative. Essentially, you lose the element of surprise that sometimes helps in negotiating more favorable terms.
• Potential Audit Triggers: Ironically, sharing everything may invite stricter oversight. If Oracle’s review of your ELP uncovers something concerning (say, use of options or features without licenses, or deployment in cloud/virtual environments against policy), it could trigger a formal audit or compliance action sooner rather than later. By providing extensive data, you may be inadvertently accelerating the audit process you hoped to avoid.
• Continuous Oversight: The program’s ongoing reporting obligations ensure that Oracle will regularly have up-to-date data on your usage. This continuous oversight can feel like a perpetual audit. Whenever you make an environment change (such as new servers or cloud moves), Oracle will eventually reflect it in the next report, potentially raising questions or drawing compliance scrutiny. This limits your flexibility, for example, to trial new deployments or delay true-ups until you’re ready to negotiate, because Oracle is always watching.
• Best Practice vs. Oracle’s Needs: Good SAM practice dictates sharing only what is required by contract or law. By exceeding that and giving Oracle a full view voluntarily, you shift the balance in Oracle’s favor. Independent advisors often stress the importance of controlling the narrative and data during audits – the Verified program runs directly counter to that advice.

For global enterprises, protecting negotiation leverage is crucial to managing costs effectively.

Think carefully before sharing detailed license positions with any vendor. If you participate in the program, be aware that you are giving up your informational advantage. Ensure your management and procurement teams understand this impact when weighing the pros and cons.

Independent Alternatives and Best Practices

The good news is that enterprises have alternatives to the Oracle Verified SAM Program. You can achieve license compliance and optimization without handing the keys to Oracle.

Many organizations opt for a more independent approach:

• Independent SAM Advisors: Consider engaging a third-party SAM consultancy that is not tied to Oracle. Independent license experts offer similar services – baseline audits, compliance guidance, optimization strategies – but with no obligation to report you to Oracle. Their advice is geared toward minimizing your costs and risks, not generating sales for the vendor. Often, their fees are competitive (and can be offset by the savings they find that Oracle’s approach wouldn’t highlight).
• Internal License Management: Building a robust in-house Oracle license management practice is another route. Use your own SAM tools (or impartial tools approved by the ITAM community) to track usage. Train your IT asset managers on Oracle’s licensing policies. By regularly self-auditing, you can identify and address compliance issues on your terms. This reduces the need to ever invite Oracle (or an Oracle-sanctioned third party) to do it on your behalf.
• Targeted External Audits: If you lack internal bandwidth or expertise, you can still get outside help on your terms. For instance, hire an expert to perform a one-time Oracle license review without automatically sharing results with Oracle. You retain control of the findings and can decide how to address them before Oracle ever gets involved. Many enterprises do this pre-audit preparation to stay ahead of any official vendor audits.

To illustrate the differences clearly, consider the comparison below between engaging the Oracle Verified SAM Program and using an independent SAM approach:

As shown above, an independent strategy allows you to retain significantly more control over costs and risk.

To further strengthen your position, adopt some best practices in your Oracle license management:

• Conduct Regular Internal Audits: Schedule periodic self-audits of Oracle use (quarterly or biannually). This way, you catch compliance issues early without external pressure.
• Stay Educated on Oracle Policies: Oracle licensing rules (for databases, Java, virtualization, etc.) are constantly evolving. Keep your ITAM team up to date through training and by following industry publications. Awareness helps you avoid unintentional mistakes that Oracle could exploit.
• Optimize Continuously: Look for opportunities to reduce license footprint – e.g., consolidate servers, decommission unused instances, and reclaim licenses from retired projects. The less sprawl, the fewer chances for compliance gaps. Independent tools can help identify such optimization opportunities.
• Engage with Oracle Strategically: Of course, you will eventually need to engage with Oracle for renewals, true-ups, or support. Do so on your terms: only provide the required data, negotiate with knowledge of your actual needs (thanks to your own audits), and push back on onerous licensing interpretations. If Oracle offers a “free” review or a verified program engagement, remember that accepting it may ultimately cost you more.

By taking charge of your own Oracle license management and using neutral third parties when needed, you can achieve the same goals – compliance and cost optimization – without compromising your independence or budget.

Recommendations

• Favor Independence Over Vendor Programs: Build your Oracle license management strategy around independent resources. Use your in-house team or impartial consultants rather than Oracle’s verified partners for compliance assessments.
• Limit Data Disclosure: Share detailed usage data with Oracle only when necessary (e.g., during a formal audit and even then, only the scope required). Keeping control of information preserves your negotiating power.
• Conduct Proactive Internal Reviews: Don’t wait for Oracle to tell you about a compliance issue. Regularly audit your own Oracle deployments and usage. This allows you to fix problems on your terms before they escalate.
• Be Skeptical of “Free” Offers: Treat Oracle’s “free” license review or SAM engagement offers with healthy skepticism. Understand that such programs often have a sales motive behind them. Nothing Oracle offers is truly free of strings.
• Train and Educate Teams: Ensure your ITAM and procurement staff understand Oracle’s licensing rules and the implications of Oracle-led engagements. An informed team is less likely to inadvertently agree to something against your interests.
• Negotiate Audit Clauses: When possible, negotiate audit terms in your Oracle contracts (e.g., frequency or notice period) to give you more control. While Oracle’s standard audit rights can’t always be removed, you might secure commitments that make audits less disruptive – reducing the appeal of volunteering for a vendor-run SAM program.
• Validate Findings Independently: If you ever undergo an Oracle-verified assessment, consider obtaining a second opinion on the results. Independent experts can confirm whether a non-compliance finding is legitimate or if there are alternative solutions short of purchasing additional licenses.
• Keep Leadership Informed: Make sure CIOs and CFOs understand the pros and cons of the Oracle Verified SAM Program before sanctioning it. When leadership knows that the program could be “letting the fox guard the henhouse,” they are more likely to support investing in independent SAM efforts instead.

Checklist: 5 Actions to Take

1. Politely Decline Vendor-Led Reviews: If Oracle (or an Oracle-verified partner) offers to “help” by reviewing your licenses, maintain control by declining or postponing that engagement. Instead, initiate your review process.
2. Run an Internal License Audit: Gather your IT asset inventory and usage data for all Oracle products. Use internal tools or scripts to determine your Effective License Position and position yourself accordingly. Document any areas where usage might exceed entitlements.
3. Consult an Independent Expert: If your internal team lacks expertise in Oracle licensing, consider bringing in an unbiased SAM consultant to analyze the data. Ensure this expert has no obligation to report to Oracle. They can help interpret complex areas (like Java or virtualization licensing) and suggest fixes confidentially.
4. Remediate on Your Terms: Address any compliance gaps that have been identified. This might mean reconfiguring systems (to stay within license limits), reclaiming unused licenses, or purchasing additional licenses quietly through normal channels. By resolving issues proactively, you eliminate the need for Oracle’s involvement or avoid punitive audit scenarios.
5. Implement Ongoing Governance: Establish processes to continuously monitor Oracle usage and compliance. Update your software asset management policies to include periodic Oracle license checks, and keep a response plan ready in case Oracle initiates an audit in the future. This way, you’ll never feel pressured to invite Oracle’s SAM program as a preventive measure—you’ll already be on top of compliance independently.

FAQ

Q1: What is the Oracle Verified SAM Program?
A: It’s a program where Oracle authorizes certain SAM firms to review and monitor your Oracle software licenses. The promise is improved compliance and support by involving Oracle’s expertise, but it effectively means Oracle (via its partner) audits your usage on an ongoing basis.

Q2: Does joining the Oracle Verified program guarantee no Oracle audits?
A: No, there’s no guaranteed audit immunity. Oracle typically agrees not to audit during the engagement, but that pause is temporary. After the engagement (or if you don’t address all the findings), Oracle can still conduct a formal audit or enforce compliance using the collected data.

Q3: Why do experts call the program biased or not independent?
A: Because the SAM partners in this program work closely with Oracle. They must share your data with Oracle and follow Oracle’s rules. This creates a conflict of interest – instead of solely protecting the customer, their assessments may be biased towards Oracle’s financial interests (e.g., recommending the purchase of more Oracle products).

Q4: What costs should we expect with the Verified SAM Program?
A: Participants should budget for annual audit/assessment fees paid to the Oracle-verified partner. Beyond that, many companies incur significant costs purchasing licenses or subscriptions to remediate compliance gaps the program uncovers. In essence, you pay for the review and often pay again to resolve the findings. There’s also internal effort required to support frequent data collection and reporting.

Q5: How can our enterprise manage Oracle licenses without this program?
A: Enterprises can successfully manage Oracle licensing by conducting regular internal audits and using independent advisors or tools. By keeping the process in-house or with truly independent consultants, you maintain control. This way, you can fix compliance issues privately and optimize your licenses without automatically involving Oracle. It’s about being proactive: know your license position, stay compliant, and only engage Oracle on your terms (for example, during contract renewals or if an official audit notice arrives).

Read more about our Oracle License Management Services.

Do you want to know more about our Oracle Advisory Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit