Siebel CRM Licensing

Oracle Siebel CRM Licensing Guide

Oracle Siebel CRM Licensing

Oracle Siebel CRM Licensing Guide

Oracle Siebel CRM licensing is complex, but it can be managed effectively with the right insights. This guide provides IT asset managers and CIOs a clear overview of Oracle Siebel CRMโ€™s on-premises licensing model, focusing on core modules and practical strategies.

By understanding the base-plus-module licensing structure, user vs. processor metrics, and common contract pitfalls, enterprises can optimize costs and stay compliant in their Siebel CRM environments.

Understanding Siebelโ€™s On-Premises Licensing Model

Oracle Siebel CRM is primarily licensed on a traditional on-premises perpetual model. This means you pay a one-time license fee for each entitlement and can use the software indefinitely (with optional annual support).

Every Siebel deployment starts with the Siebel CRM Base license โ€“ essentially an โ€œentry ticketโ€ that each user must have. The Base license grants access to core CRM functionality (like accounts, contacts, basic navigation).

Additionally, Siebel offers numerous functional modules (such as Sales and Service), each of whichย requires a license per user.

In other words, Siebel licensing follows a base-plus-modules approach: every user needs a Base CRM license, and then additional licenses for each module that the user will use.

This modular structure allows you to tailor licenses to user roles. Still, it also requires careful tracking to ensure each active user has all the required licenses (and no unnecessary ones).

Insight: Siebelโ€™s on-prem licensing is part of Oracleโ€™s โ€œApplications Unlimitedโ€ pledge, meaning Oracle will continue to support Siebel on-premises indefinitely.

There is no forced migration to cloud licensing, allowing existing customers to maximize their investment โ€“ but itโ€™s up to you to manage licenses efficiently under this perpetual model.

Core Modules and Industry Verticals

Core Siebel CRM modules cover the main business functions of a CRM and are licensed separately (in addition to the Base license).

Key modules include Siebel Sales (sales force automation for managing leads, opportunities, quotes, forecasts), Siebel Service (customer service and support ticket management, often used in call centers), Siebel Marketing (campaign management and marketing resource management), Siebel Field Service (managing field technicians and on-site service orders), and Siebel Loyalty (loyalty program management for customer rewards).

If your organization uses any of these functions, each user accessing that moduleโ€™s features must have the corresponding module license plus the Siebel Base license.

For example, a sales representative would typically require a Siebel CRM Base license and a Siebel Sales module license, while a support agent would need a Base license and a Service license.

Siebel also provides industry-specific vertical solutions.

These are tailored versions of modules for specific industries such as Financial Services, Telecommunications (often bundled as Communications, Media & Energy), Public Sector, Manufacturing, and Life Sciences.

Industry vertical modules typically require anย industry-specific base license optionย in addition to the standard Siebel CRM Base.

For instance, a bank using Siebel might license the Siebel Financial Services Base for each user (in addition to the core Base license) and then utilize industry-specific modules, such as Financial Services Sales or Financial Services Service.

The rule is that if you deploy an industry flavor, all users must have the industry base add-on (you canโ€™t mix some users on generic Base and others on an industry Base โ€“ itโ€™s usually all or nothing for consistency).

The cost for industry-based options is lower than the main Base license; however, it requires an additional step in licensing.

Itโ€™s important to note that most Siebel modules require the Base license as a prerequisite.

Only a handful of niche add-ons (typically certain connectors, integration modules, or self-service portals) are exempt from requiring a base license โ€“ these are listed in Oracleโ€™s price list supplement under โ€œApplications Not Requiring CRM Base.โ€

For the majority of use cases, plan that every Siebel user will need one Base license plus each core module license relevant to their role.

Actionable takeaway: Identify which Siebel modules your enterprise uses (or plans to use). Ensure you license each user for only the modules they need, and consider removing access to modules that are not licensed or not essential.

This not only saves money but also simplifies compliance by narrowing the scope of what needs to be tracked.

License Metrics: User vs. Processor Licensing

Oracle Siebel CRM provides multiple license metrics to accommodate different usage scenarios. Selecting the appropriate metric for each component is crucial for cost optimization.

The table below summarizes the primary Siebel licensing models and when to use them:

License MetricWhat It MeansWhen to Use
Application UserPer named internal user (employee) authorized to use Siebel. Each person with a login needs a license. Not a concurrent/shared license โ€“ one license per named user, per module.Default for most core modules (Sales, Service, etc.) when you know how many employees will use each module. Use when internal user counts are manageable. Make sure to disable inactive users, since every named account consumes a license.
Registered UserPer named external user (non-employee, e.g. partner or customer) with Siebel access (usually via a portal or self-service interface). Only counts external parties.Use for partner portals or customer self-service modules (Siebel PRM, customer support portal). Allows licensing external users at a different rate. Important: Do not use internal user licenses for external users โ€“ always use the proper external metric to stay compliant with contract terms.
Named User PlusOracleโ€™s variant of named user that counts both human users and any non-human access (like system accounts or scripts). Similar to Application User, but โ€œPlusโ€ means you must include any service accounts or automated usage in the count. Oracle also imposes minimum counts per server for NUP.Occasionally used for technical components or older Siebel add-ons. Not very common for core Siebel CRM modules, but might apply to underlying technology (e.g. Oracle Application Management Pack for Siebel). Use if contract specifies NUP, ensuring you count all users and bots. Typically comes into play if you have any form of multiplexing access.
ProcessorLicensing per processor/core on the servers running Siebel, instead of per user. You purchase a number of processor licenses based on Oracleโ€™s core factor table (taking into account CPU cores). Each processor license allows unlimited users on that server.Best for scenarios with a large or unpredictable user base (e.g. a public-facing customer portal where user count is very high or varies). Also useful if tracking named users is impractical. Expensive per server, but can be cost-effective if you would otherwise need thousands of user licenses. Note: All processors where the software is installed (including production and applicable non-prod environments) must be licensed.
Concurrent UserLegacy model from pre-Oracle days allowing a pool of users with a limit on simultaneous logins. No longer sold by Oracle for Siebel (phased out after acquisition). If you have old concurrent licenses, youโ€™re limited to X users at the same time.Only applicable if grandfathered from older contracts. Monitor concurrent usage carefully โ€“ if you exceed the licensed concurrent count even once, Oracle may deem it a breach and require conversion to named user licenses. New Siebel deployments must use named user or processor metrics instead.
Usage-BasedAtypical metrics tied to usage volume (transactions, records, etc.) rather than users or CPUs. For example, Siebel Loyalty can be licensed per number of loyalty program members, or certain order management functions by number of order lines processed.Used for specific modules where pricing by user doesnโ€™t align with business value. For instance, if a moduleโ€™s cost scales with the number of customer records or transactions, a usage metric might apply. Only choose this if it matches your usage profile (and ensure you can track the consumption, e.g. number of records, to stay within purchased limits).

As seen above, Application User (per named user) is the prevalent metric for core Siebel CRM modules used by employees. Processor licensing is available as an alternative mainly for high-volume scenarios (common in B2C contexts or large partner communities).

You can even mix metrics in one environment โ€“ for example, license your internal users with Application User licenses, but use a Processor license for an external-facing Siebel portal.

This kind of mix-and-match can optimize costs, but must be carefully architected and documented to avoid overlap or gaps.

Always consult Oracleโ€™s formal definitions. For instance, when mixing user and processor metrics, Oracle typically requires maintaining a minimum number of user licenses per processor to prevent abuse.

The Registered User metric underscores a crucial point: you must license external users differently from employees.

Oracle contracts prohibit using cheaper internal-user licenses to cover partners or customers, so plan separate licensing for external user access.

Finally, note that Oracle sometimes offers Enterprise licenses or Unlimited License Agreements (ULAs) for Siebel as part of large deals. These allow for broad use of Siebel (and possibly related Oracle applications) for a fixed fee, often with a time-bound duration.

While a ULA can simplify licensing on paper (essentially removing the per-user counting for the term of the agreement), it requires careful negotiation on scope (which Siebel modules are included) and an understanding of the end-of-term certification (to avoid a costly surprise when the ULA expires).

Enterprise agreements can be beneficial if you anticipate significant growth in Siebel usage; however, they are complex instruments that should be reviewed with licensing experts.

Pricing Structure and Cost Drivers

Oracle Siebel CRMโ€™s pricing model is driven by the number of licenses and their types. Each module license has a list price per user or processor, detailed in Oracleโ€™s price list.

For example, the Siebel CRM Base license list price is on the order of a few thousand dollars per user, and most add-on modules (Sales, Service, etc.) also have significant per-user costs (often in the high hundreds or thousands each).

In practice, enterprises usually negotiate discounts off these list prices, especially for larger volumes or enterprise agreements.

However, even with discounts, the primary cost drivers remain:

  • Number of Users โ€“ Each named user license adds cost. The more employees that need Siebel access, the higher the total licensing cost. This makes user management critical; eliminating unused accounts can yield direct savings by lowering necessary license counts.
  • Number of Modules Per User โ€“ Every additional module a user needs (beyond the Base) multiplies the cost. A user who only needs the Base license is significantly cheaper to license than one who needs Base, Sales, Service, and Marketing, for example. Identify โ€œlicense heavyโ€ user roles and see if every module is truly required for those usersโ€™ jobs.
  • License Metric Choice โ€“ The metric affects pricing. For instance, a single Processor license has a very high cost (often tens of thousands of dollars) but could cover unlimited users, which might be cheaper than 5,000 named user licenses. Conversely, if you have only 50 users, per-user licensing will be significantly cheaper than licensing an entire server by processor. Choosing the appropriate metric for each scenario (as discussed above) is crucial for cost efficiency.
  • Support & Maintenance Fees โ€“ In addition to the upfront license fees, Oracle charges annual support (typically ~22% of the license purchase price each year). This is essentially a yearly maintenance tax that grants you access to software updates and Oracle support resources. Over a typical 5-year period, support fees can equal or exceed the initial license cost. Support costs rise as you purchase more licenses, and Oracle tends to increase support fees annually by a few percent. This means that long-term ownership has ongoing costs that must be factored into the budget.
  • Environments and Clustering โ€“ If using the Processor metric, the number of servers and cores running Siebel will drive costs (all processors must be licensed). More powerful hardware or additional environments (e.g., a separate test instance) can increase the number of required processor licenses. For named user metrics, you generally donโ€™t pay extra for non-production environments as long as access is limited to licensed users, but be cautious. If test or dev environments have generic accounts or extra users, those also require licenses.
  • Geography and Organizational Structure โ€“ Oracle licensing is sold on a per-legal-entity basis. If your enterprise has multiple subsidiaries or uses Siebel in different countries, ensure the licenses cover all entities or regions needed (sometimes contracts tie usage to a specific entity or region unless an enterprise agreement is in place). Consolidating licensing under a single master agreement can enhance discount leverage.
  • Contract Terms and Bundles โ€“ Oracle may offer bundle pricing if you license certain combinations of modules together or if you commit to larger deals (like including Siebel as part of a broader Oracle suite purchase). These bundles can reduce unit pricing, but be cautious of shelfware (paying for modules you donโ€™t end up using). Also, be mindful of minimum purchase requirements. Some Siebel modules have minimum license quantities (for example, a minimum number of users for a particular module) which can become a cost floor even if your actual usage is smaller.

When negotiating Siebel CRM pricing, enterprise buyers should carefully analyze their usage patterns.

A total cost of ownership (TCO) view that includes license fees, support fees, and potential future expansion will help determine the best metric and modules to license.

For instance, if you foresee rapid growth in user counts, locking in a larger volume deal now or a processor-based license might save money in the long run.

On the other hand, if your Siebel usage will remain limited to a specific team or function, stick to user-based licensing targeted to that group and avoid broad bundle deals that license more functionality than you need.

Contract Pitfall to Avoid:

Donโ€™t automatically purchase โ€œall the modulesโ€ just because they exist. Oracle sales might pitch comprehensive bundles, but only license the Siebel components that align with your business requirements.

Remember that every module you own incurs annual support costs and potential compliance oversight. Itโ€™s often better to start with the core modules (e.g., Base, Sales, Service) and add others as a true need arises, rather than buying a bundle of 10 modules and using only 5 of them.

Common Compliance Pitfalls and Audit Risks

Managing Oracle Siebel CRM licenses isnโ€™t just about budgeting โ€“ compliance is a critical aspect.

Oracle license audits (typically conducted by Oracleโ€™s License Management Services team or third-party auditors on Oracleโ€™s behalf) often focus on Siebel in large enterprises because of its complex usage.

Here are common pitfalls that can lead to compliance issues:

  • Inactive Users Not Removed: Under the Application User model, every individual with an active Siebel login is considered a licensed user, whether they use the system or not. A common mistake is failing to end-date or deactivate accounts for employees who have left the company or no longer need access. Over time, this inflates the count of โ€œusersโ€ that Oracle could deem licensable. In a compliance audit, if you have 500 active user accounts but only 400 current employees using Siebel, Oracle will still see 500 required licenses. The responsibility lies with you to regularly clean up user lists.
  • Unlicensed Module Access: Technically, Siebel does not enforce module licensing in the software โ€“ there are no license keys to prevent an admin from granting someone access to a moduleโ€™s functionality that wasnโ€™t purchased. For example, if your contract covers only the Base and Sales modules, an administrator might inadvertently assign a user a responsibility or screen from the Service module. The user would be able to use it, and youโ€™d be out of compliance. This โ€œopen accessโ€ design means all modules are accessible by default. Itโ€™s up to the organization to restrict usage to only those modules licensed. Oracle audits often include reviewing the modules in use (via log files, user roles, or configuration settings) and verifying them against the purchased modules. To stay safe, configure role-based access controls that limit module access strictly to licensed modules.
  • Misclassifying External Users: Sometimes companies attempt to save money by allowing external partners or customers to use the system under internal licenses (e.g., creating partner logins as if they were regular employees). This violates licensing rules โ€“ external users must be covered by the appropriate external metrics (Registered User or processor). If Oracle finds, say, 200 customer portal users in your Siebel database but you only licensed 50 Registered Users, thatโ€™s a compliance gap. Always separate external user licensing and maintain a clear record of the number of active external users.
  • Customizations and โ€œHiddenโ€ Usage: Siebel is highly customizable. Enterprises often build custom applets, views, or integrations within Siebel. The risk is that some customizations might indirectly enable features from unlicensed modules. For example, a custom view that pulls data from the Siebel Analytics (Business Intelligence) module or a script that uses a Siebel API designed for a specific module may technically require a license for that module. These situations are nuanced, but Oracle could take the position that the functionality used by a customization is part of a certain Siebel product that wasnโ€™t licensed. To mitigate this, always map custom functionalities to Siebelโ€™s module structure. If you create a custom object or report, ask: Does it leverage any components of Siebel we havenโ€™t licensed? Keep documentation of customizations and consider doing an internal licensing impact review whenever new custom features are added.
  • Legacy Concurrent User Contracts: If your organization has been using Siebel since the early 2000s, you might have a legacy contract with Concurrent User licenses. While you can still use those, remember that if you ever exceed the concurrent usage limit even briefly, Oracleโ€™s stance is that you should convert entirely to named user licensing in the future (which can be much more costly). Concurrent usage is difficult to monitor precisely, so companies with these licenses should implement strict controls (such as hard technical limits on simultaneous logins, if possible) and strongly consider migrating to Named User Plus or another modern metric via a negotiated exchange, to avoid accidentally triggering a compliance violation.
  • Lack of Proof of Licenses: In an audit, youโ€™ll need to show proof of entitlement (contracts, ordering documents) for all your Siebel licenses. Large enterprises often lose track of what was purchased years ago, particularly after mergers or changes in their procurement systems. Not having your documentation organized doesnโ€™t change your legal rights, but it can slow down audit responses and weaken your position. Maintain a centralized repository of Oracle Siebel licensing documents and keep an up-to-date license entitlement summary.

Audit preparedness:

Oracle typically gives written notice when initiating an audit. When it comes, you should be ready to provide data on user counts (often by querying Siebelโ€™s user tables), modules enabled, and server deployments.

A best practice is to self-audit at least annually.

Simulate an audit by checking: How many active named users do we have compared to the licenses? What modules are people using? Are all environments properly licensed?

By catching issues internally, you can correct them (e.g., purchase additional licenses proactively or remove access) before Oracle ever knocks on the door.

Optimizing Siebel Licensing and Reducing Costs

Even as you manage compliance, you also want to optimize costs in your Oracle Siebel CRM licensing.

Here are strategies and considerations to get the most value for your spend:

  • Regular License True-Ups (Internal): Donโ€™t wait for Oracle to tell you about a shortfall or surplus. Conduct your own true-up exercises. Suppose you find youโ€™re under-licensed for a module that is widely used. In that case, itโ€™s better to approach Oracle for additional licenses before an audit (when you have negotiating leverage, possibly bundling it with other needs). Conversely, if youโ€™re over-licensed (paying for more users or modules than you use), note that while you generally canโ€™t get refunds on perpetual licenses, you can sometimes drop unused products from support at next renewal to save on maintenance fees.
  • Leverage Bundles and Suites Carefully: Oracle sales can bundle Siebel modules or even include Siebel in broader enterprise license agreements. If you anticipate expanding Siebel usage (by introducing new modules or significantly more users in the future), negotiating a bundle or suite license may lower your per-unit costs. For example, Oracle might offer a custom CRM suite that allows a certain number of users to access Sales, Service, and Marketing together for a flat price. This can simplify licensing management and potentially provide a volume discount. However, ensure the bundle covers exactly what you need โ€“ unwanted components in a bundle still incur support costs and audit scope. Get clarity on any bundleโ€™s terms (often they still list each included module and how it can be used).
  • Optimize License Metric per Use Case:ย Reevaluate whether all your licenses are under the optimal metric. Perhaps your internal workforce is fine with named user licensing (Application User). Still, your customer-facing portal might be more cost-effective to license via Processor metric instead of thousands of Registered Users. Or, if you have a moderate number of external users, consider whether the Registered User metric is more cost-effective than a full processor license โ€“ do the math regularly as your user counts change. Oracleโ€™s rules permit mixing metrics by module or user type, so tailor the approach (with Oracleโ€™s written agreement in the contract) to strike a balance between cost and compliance.
  • Negotiating Support Costs: The standard 22% annual support fee can be negotiated down in some cases, particularly for large deals or long-time customers. You might secure a capped increase, a reduced percentage, or extra years at a fixed rate. Keep in mind Oracle rarely reduces support fees on existing licenses without a trade-off (like buying more licenses or committing to cloud services). If your Siebel environment is stable and you donโ€™t urgently need Oracleโ€™s updates or support, you have leverage, which leads to the next point.
  • Third-Party Support Alternatives: Some enterprises choose to switch to third-party support providers (such as Rimini Street or others) for Siebel. These providers typically charge about 50% of Oracleโ€™s support fee and will provide break-fix support, tax and regulatory updates, and general assistance on your current Siebel version. The trade-off is you wonโ€™t receive new patches or upgrades from Oracle (and Oracle wonโ€™t support you if youโ€™re not on their support). This approach makes sense if Siebel is a steady-state system for you and cost savings are a priority over new features. Even if you donโ€™t switch, mentioning this option in negotiations can pressure Oracle to offer concessions to keep you on their support. Before switching, ensure youโ€™re comfortable running on your current version long-term and that youโ€™ve downloaded all recent patches. Note that once off Oracle support, returning later may require catching up on fees or re-licensing, so itโ€™s usually a long-term decision.
  • Governance and Training: The best way to optimize costs is to prevent unforeseen expenses. Establish governance to ensure that any new deployment of Siebel, new module enablement, or significant increase in user count triggers a licensing review. Train your IT admins, project managers, and procurement teams on the basics of Siebel licensing. For instance, if the sales department wants to start using a Siebel module that wasnโ€™t previously licensed, there should be a process check to acquire licenses or verify entitlement first. This governance avoids โ€œaccidentalโ€ usage that could result in a backdated bill.
  • Future Roadmap Considerations: Keep an eye on Oracleโ€™s product roadmap for Siebel. While Oracle has committed to on-prem Siebel, they also offer Oracle Fusion Cloud CX (a separate SaaS CRM) and might provide incentives to transition. If you ever consider moving off Siebel (to Oracleโ€™s cloud or another CRM), factor the remaining Siebel license asset value into your decision โ€“ you own those perpetual licenses. Hence, a shift away from Siebel means abandoning that investment (unless a migration deal is negotiated). In the meantime, maximize the value of what you have by using Siebel to its fullest within the bounds of your licenses.

By taking a proactive, informed approach, you can turn the complexity of Oracle Siebel CRM licensing into an advantage โ€“ optimizing spend while avoiding compliance traps. The key is to treat license management as an ongoing discipline, not a one-time procurement task.

Recommendations

1. Conduct Quarterly License Audits:

Regularly review your Siebel user list and module usage. Remove or deactivate users who no longer need access, and verify that active users are licensed for all (and only) the modules they use. This ongoing hygiene prevents compliance issues and can uncover opportunities to reduce licenses or reallocate them.

2. Align Licenses with Roles:

Map Siebel modules to user roles in your organization. For each role (sales rep, service agent, field technician, etc.), define which modules are truly necessary. This prevents over-licensing users for modules that arenโ€™t relevant to their job. For example, if only 10 users in marketing need the Marketing module, donโ€™t license it for all 100 sales users. Granular role-based licensing saves money.

3. Educate Administrators and Stakeholders:

Ensure your Siebel administrators and ITAM team understand the licensing model. They should know that granting access to a new module or creating a generic user account has licensing implications. Consider brief training sessions or cheat sheets on Oracle Siebel CRM licensing guidelines. A well-informed admin is your first line of defense against inadvertent compliance slips.

4. Leverage Oracle and Vendor Resources:

Keep Oracleโ€™s official Siebel Price List and Licensing Guide handy (updated regularly). When in doubt, reach out to your Oracle account manager or an independent licensing expert to clarify any ambiguities. Itโ€™s better to obtain clarity before deploying a new module or agreeing to contract terms. Vendors can also sometimes provide license management tools or scripts (for example, utilities to report active user counts) โ€“ use them to stay informed.

5. Negotiate Smartly at Renewal:

When your support renewal or license true-up comes due, use that timing to negotiate. If youโ€™ve identified unused licenses or modules, discuss removing them from support to save cost. If you foresee new needs, bundling them into a renewal negotiation can yield better discounts. Also consider asking for concessions, such as a multi-year support fee cap or flexible swapping of licenses (e.g., trading unused module licenses for ones you need more). Oracle is often more flexible if they see you are knowledgeable and considering all options (including third-party support or alternative products).

6. Consider a License Management Tool:

If not already in place, implement an ITAM or software asset management tool capable of tracking Siebel usage. While Siebel doesnโ€™t have a license key mechanism, usage data (logins, module access) can be monitored. A tool can alert you if, say, a new module starts being used or if user counts spike beyond a threshold, giving you a chance to react quickly.

7. Plan for Audits Proactively:

Assume that Oracle will audit your Siebel deployment at some point. Maintain an audit response kit, including up-to-date lists of users, a list of enabled modules in use, and all relevant license documents. When youโ€™re prepared, audits become less daunting and you wonโ€™t be scrambling for data or paperwork.

8. Evaluate Third-Party Support Tactically:

Continuously assess if Oracleโ€™s annual support is delivering value for the cost. If your Siebel system is stable and meeting needs without frequent updates, you could save substantially with third-party support. Even if you donโ€™t switch, having this option on the table can be a bargaining chip with Oracle (as long as you communicate your willingness to consider it during negotiations). Always weigh the pros and cons: cost savings vs. losing official update privileges.

9. Stay Informed on Changes:

Oracleโ€™s licensing policies and Siebelโ€™s product features can evolve. Subscribe to Oracleโ€™s announcements or industry newsletters. For example, if Oracle were to introduce a new module or change a metric, youโ€™d want to know ASAP. Similarly, keep an eye on the broader CRM market trends โ€“ if youโ€™re considering future migration, knowing the state of Oracle Siebelโ€™s roadmap and alternatives will inform your long-term license strategy.

10. Engage in Peer Networks:

Connect with other Oracle Siebel customers (through ITAM professional forums or user groups). Sharing experiences about audits, licensing tricks, and cost management can provide insights beyond official documentation. Sometimes other enterprises have negotiated creative agreements or faced pitfalls that you can learn from. This informal intelligence can complement your formal strategy for managing Siebel CRM licenses.

Checklist: 5 Actions to Take

For a practical game plan, hereโ€™s a simple five-step checklist to strengthen your Oracle Siebel CRM licensing position:

1. Inventory Your Siebel Deployment:

Gather all data on your current Siebel usage. This includes the number of active user accounts, the modules/features enabled, and the servers/environments where Siebel is installed. Also collect your license entitlements (what youโ€™ve purchased) in one place. This inventory is your baseline.

2. Reconcile Usage vs. Licenses:

Compare your inventory to your entitlements. Are there more active users than you have licenses for (potential under-licensing)? Or do you have modules licensed that no one is using (over-licensing/shelfware)? Identify any mismatch.

For each Siebel module you own, map whether itโ€™s actively in use and by how many users. This step will highlight immediate areas to address โ€“ either by procuring additional licenses or adjusting usage.

3. Clean Up and Optimize:

Based on the reconciliation, take action. Disable or remove access for users who shouldnโ€™t be active (e.g., retirees, transfers, contractors who have left). Remove any experimental or accidental usage of modules you arenโ€™t licensed for โ€“ communicate to those teams that they either need to stop using that functionality or officially license it.

If you found youโ€™re under-licensed for a critical module (e.g., more users using Siebel Sales than you have licenses), strategize how to true-up: can you redistribute some licenses, or do you need to purchase more? This cleanup phase is about tightening compliance and eliminating waste.

4. Engage with Oracle (or Reseller):

Open a dialogue with Oracle or your license reseller armed with your findings. If you need to purchase additional licenses, now is the time to negotiate terms (perhaps bundling a needed module with your upcoming support renewal for a better price).

If you have identified unused licenses, discuss options such as dropping them from support or converting them to something more useful through a contract amendment. Be transparent about your optimization โ€“ Oracle often prefers to work with customers proactively adjusting licenses rather than fighting an audit dispute later.

5. Implement Ongoing Governance:

Donโ€™t treat the above steps as one-off. Set up a governance calendar โ€“ for example, quarterly user audits, biannual license reconciliations, and an annual strategy review before budget season. Document procedures: When a new project wants to enable a Siebel module, it must undergo an ITAM review.

When someone leaves HR, they must notify IT to deactivate their Siebel account, etc. By institutionalizing these practices, you ensure continuous compliance and cost control. Consider assigning a โ€œSiebel license ownerโ€ in the ITAM team who is responsible for monitoring these aspects on a year-round basis.

By following this checklist, your enterprise will be in a strong position โ€“ with a clear understanding of Oracle Siebel CRM licensing status and a proactive plan to manage it going forward.

FAQ

  • Q: Do we need a Siebel CRM Base license for every user, and why?
    A: Yes. Every individual user of Siebel (including employees and internal users) must have the core Siebel CRM Base license. Think of it as the foundational license that grants general access. Oracle mandates this as a prerequisite for any other module. Without a Base license, a user isnโ€™t legally authorized to use even the basic Siebel system. It ensures a baseline revenue for Oracle and provides the customer with core CRM capabilities (accounts, contacts, etc.) for that user.
  • Q: How are Siebel modules licensed โ€“ can one user license cover multiple people?
    A: Siebel modules are almost always licensed per named user. This means each person who uses a module needs their license for that module (licenses are not shareable or concurrent among multiple individuals). For example, if 50 employees need Siebel Marketing functionality, you must have 50 Siebel Marketing licenses (and 50 Base licenses). The licenses are tied to users, not devices or workstations, and you cannot float a single license among multiple users. The only exception is if you have an older concurrent user license (a legacy arrangement), but those are rare and come with strict simultaneous use limits.
  • Q: Whatโ€™s the best way to license external users like partners or customers on Siebel?
    A: Oracle provides specific metrics for external (non-employee) users. The two main approaches are Registered User licenses (a named user license for each external person, often used for partner portals or customer self-service sites) or Processor licenses (licensing the server cores to allow unlimited external users). The choice depends on the scale: for a small, known number of partners, a Registered User license might be cost-effective; for a large or public user base, a Processor license avoids counting users individually. Important: Do not use regular internal user licenses for external parties โ€“ it violates contract terms and can be flagged in an audit. Always segregate external user licensing with the proper metric.
  • Q: Our organization has thousands of occasional Siebel users โ€“ should we consider processor licensing?
    A: If you truly have a very large user count (or the user base fluctuates widely), processor licensing is worth evaluating. Processor licenses allow unlimited users on a given server, so you donโ€™t have to track each individual. This can simplify compliance and potentially reduce cost when user numbers are in the high hundreds or thousands. However, run the numbers: Oracleโ€™s processor license fees are substantial, and they factor in the performance of hardware (more CPU cores require more licenses). If you have a highly scalable environment or a large number of servers, per-processor costs can quickly add up. Also consider user activity โ€“ if those โ€œoccasionalโ€ users have very infrequent usage, you might negotiate a limited-use license or find that a combination of some named user licenses plus a smaller processor license for a portal is optimal. Itโ€™s not one-size-fits-all, but generally above a certain scale, processors become attractive.
  • Q: What ongoing costs should we expect after purchasing Siebel licenses?
    A: The major ongoing cost is annual support and maintenance from Oracle, which is roughly 22% of your license purchase price each year. This fee entitles you to product updates (patches, new versions) and access to Oracleโ€™s support services. Over time, support costs can exceed the original license costs if you retain the system for an extended period. Additionally, if you expand usage (more users or modules), youโ€™ll have costs for those new licenses (plus their support). Indirectly, you should also budget for compliance management, including resources or tools to manage licenses. If you opt for third-party support after a while, youโ€™d pay that providerโ€™s fees instead of Oracleโ€™s. But in summary, expect an annual expense for support, and plan for periodic true-ups if your user count grows.

Do you want to know more about our Oracle License Management Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizationsโ€”including numerous Fortune 500 companiesโ€”optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts

Redress Compliance