OCI vs AWS for Oracle Workloads (Licensing)

OCI vs AWS for Oracle Workloads (Licensing)

Oracle licensing differs significantly between Oracle’s own cloud and AWS. OCI offers more favorable licensing models, whereas AWS requires stricter vCPU counting. OCI uses a unique CPU metric (OCPUs) that can reduce license needs.

AWS, by contrast, often demands licensing for more virtual cores. This guide compares both platforms on licensing rules, partitioning policies, BYOL behavior, and total cost to help you make an informed cloud choice.

For more information, read our ultimate guide, Oracle OCI (Cloud Infrastructure) Licensing.

Step 1: Understanding Core Licensing Differences

Oracle’s licensing treatment varies depending on the cloud platform. On Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Oracle provides more lenient terms, whereas on Amazon Web Services (AWS), you must follow standard (and often stricter) license counting rules. These core differences set the stage for cost disparities between OCI and AWS.

Checklist: Core Differences

• ✔ OCI uses OCPU counting: OCI measures CPU usage in OCPUs (Oracle CPUs).
• ✔ AWS requires vCPU counting: AWS deployments count each virtual CPU for licensing.
• ✔ OCI supports soft partitioning: Oracle allows limiting licenses to allocated cores on OCI.
• ✔ AWS is treated as full-capacity: Oracle doesn’t recognize partial use on AWS – you generally must license all vCPUs of an instance.
• ✔ BYOL behaves differently: Bring-Your-Own-License rules are more favorable on OCI than on AWS.

Table: Core Licensing Comparison

In short, Oracle’s own cloud (OCI) has built-in advantages that can drive significant cost gaps between OCI and AWS for the same Oracle workload.

Step 2: CPU Counting Rules in Both Clouds

How Oracle counts compute resources for licensing differs in OCI vs AWS. The crux is how many virtual CPUs equate to an Oracle license in each environment.

Checklist: CPU Rules

• ✔ Two vCPUs equal one OCPU: In OCI’s model, each OCPU corresponds to a physical core (with two vCPU threads).
• ✔ OCI bills by OCPU: OCI charges and licenses based on OCPUs, simplifying core counting.
• ✔ AWS licenses all vCPUs: On AWS, every vCPU must be accounted for under Oracle’s rules (usually two vCPUs = 1 license when hyper-threading is on).
• ✔ Higher license needs on AWS: The same workload often ends up needing more licenses on AWS due to this vCPU counting.
• ✔ Compute shape matters: The instance size (number of vCPUs/OCPUs) directly influences how many licenses you must allocate on each cloud.

Table: CPU Count Mapping

Because OCI’s OCPU model is efficient, CPU counting alone can lead to a big difference in license requirements — AWS tends to consume more licenses for the same compute power.

Step 3: Partitioning and Why It Matters

Partitioning refers to limiting the number of CPUs Oracle software uses so you don’t pay for every core on a machine. Oracle’s partitioning policy differs sharply between OCI and AWS, with a significant impact on costs.

Checklist: Partitioning Differences

• ✔ OCI supports soft partitioning: You can license Oracle on OCI based on the cores you configure. Oracle lets you treat OCI VM shapes as confined to a certain number of OCPUs, effectively a soft partitioning approach.
• ✔ AWS disallows soft partitioning: Oracle does not recognize most virtualization on AWS as a valid way to reduce licensing. You can’t just license a portion of an AWS server – you must cover the full instance’s vCPUs.
• ✔ OCI allows configured-core licensing: If you run an Oracle DB on 4 OCPUs in OCI, you only need licenses for those 4 cores (even if the physical host has more capacity).
• ✔ AWS requires licensing the full shape: On AWS, if you choose an eight vCPU instance, you need to license all eight vCPUs for Oracle, even if your workload doesn’t use them 100% of the time.
• ✔ Cost impact for large deployments: This difference makes big instances far cheaper on OCI from a license perspective. With AWS, large VM sizes can quickly inflate your license count and costs.

Table: Partitioning Rules

Partitioning policy is often the largest licensing variable. OCI’s allowance for soft partitioning can dramatically lower costs, while AWS’s hardline approach often means paying for more than you might actually use.

How to use Oracle support rewards to lower OCI costs, Oracle Support Rewards and OCI.

Step 4: BYOL Behavior on OCI vs AWS

“Bring Your Own License” (BYOL) lets you use existing Oracle licenses on the cloud. OCI and AWS both support BYOL, but how those licenses are applied — and how far they stretch — differ.

Checklist: BYOL Variations

• ✔ OCI aligns with standard metrics: OCI’s BYOL model lets you apply your Oracle processor licenses in a one-to-one way with OCPUs, closely following Oracle’s usual licensing metrics (including core factors). This makes BYOL on OCI very straightforward.
• ✔ AWS often needs more licenses: When bringing licenses to AWS, you may find you need more licenses for the same workload. Oracle’s cloud policy for AWS can expand the count (for example, by ignoring core-factor discounts and counting every vCPU pair as a license).
• ✔ OCI BYOL is efficient: Using your licenses on OCI often yields higher utilization. You get full value from each license because OCI was designed to honor Oracle license entitlements without hidden penalties.
• ✔ AWS BYOL has policy limits: AWS is subject to Oracle’s authorized cloud rules. BYOL on AWS must obey those strict policies (vCPU counting, no partial licensing beyond an instance, etc.), which can limit how efficiently you use your licenses.
• ✔ More mileage on OCI: In practice, a given pool of Oracle licenses will cover more compute on OCI than on AWS. OCI’s environment allows more Oracle workloads per license, resulting in cost savings if you BYOL.

Table: BYOL Comparison

Bottom line: BYOL saves you more on OCI. You can reuse your Oracle licenses more effectively on Oracle’s cloud, whereas on AWS, you might burn through licenses faster due to rigid policies.

Step 5: Database Cloud Options Across Both Clouds

Beyond just raw compute, each cloud offers different ways to run Oracle databases as managed services. Licensing implications can also depend on these service options.

Checklist: DB Options

• ✔ OCI Database Cloud Service: Oracle Cloud offers a managed Database service that lets you run Oracle Database on VMs or Exadata, with either license-included pricing or BYOL. All editions (including Enterprise Edition with all features) are supported.
• ✔ OCI Autonomous Database: OCI’s flagship Autonomous Database service provides a fully managed, tuned Oracle database environment (available for data warehousing or transaction processing), with options for BYOL or paying per use. Oracle handles all licensing if you choose the included model.
• ✔ AWS on EC2 (BYOL): On AWS, the primary way to run Oracle Database with full control is on EC2 virtual machines, using your own licenses. This is essentially self-managed in the cloud.
• ✔ AWS RDS limitations: Amazon RDS offers Oracle as a managed service, but only certain editions. Notably, RDS does not offer Oracle Enterprise Edition under AWS’s license-included model – if you need Enterprise Edition on RDS, you must bring your own license. (Standard Edition is available in RDS with a license included.)
• ✔ Strict licensing on AWS: Whether on EC2 or RDS, AWS follows Oracle’s strict licensing rules. For example, on EC2, you have to license all vCPUs of the instance (no exceptions), and on RDS, you must adhere to Oracle’s feature licensing (certain Enterprise features might not be allowed unless you have those licenses).

Table: Database Deployment Comparison

OCI provides more native Oracle database services (including advanced options like RAC and Autonomous DB) with flexible licensing models. AWS offers Oracle mainly in a BYOL fashion (especially for Enterprise Edition), and its managed service has notable limitations for Oracle-heavy use cases.

How to manage Oracle licenses in OCI, Managing Licenses in OCI Environments.

Step 6: Total Cost of Ownership Comparison

When choosing a cloud for Oracle workloads, you must consider total cost of ownership (TCO) – a combination of cloud infrastructure costs and Oracle licensing costs.

The platform you choose can cause big shifts in both components.

Checklist: Cost Drivers

• ✔ License count differences: The number of Oracle licenses you need can differ on OCI vs AWS (typically fewer on OCI, more on AWS for the same work). This directly impacts your license purchase and support costs.
• ✔ Compute cost differences: OCI and AWS pricing for compute instances (per OCPU vs per vCPU hour) may differ. OCI often has competitive pricing for database-optimized shapes, whereas AWS charges standard rates for EC2 or RDS instances.
• ✔ Storage and extras: Both clouds charge for storage and networking. Oracle workloads often need fast I/O; OCI’s storage options and costs might differ from AWS’s (consider this, though it’s not a licensing cost per se).
• ✔ Support costs on BYOL: If you bring your own licenses, you continue paying Oracle’s annual support for those licenses. More licenses on AWS mean higher ongoing support fees to Oracle. (OCI users get a perk here: Oracle’s Support Rewards program can reduce support costs when you spend on OCI, effectively giving you credits back.)
• ✔ Managed service premiums: Using high-level services (Autonomous DB on OCI or RDS on AWS) includes a premium in the hourly cost because licensing (for Oracle or the service’s value-add) is baked in. This can simplify management, but should be weighed against BYOL cost if you already own licenses.

Table: TCO Overview

Overall, organizations find that database-heavy workloads typically achieve lower TCO on OCI once licensing efficiencies are factored in. In many cases, the reduction in required licenses (and their support costs), plus OCI’s incentives (like support credits), outweighs any savings from other sources on AWS.

Step 7: Example Scenario – Oracle DB Enterprise Edition

To make this concrete, let’s compare a simple scenario: running an Oracle Database Enterprise Edition workload on OCI vs. AWS. We’ll use the same workload profile and equivalent instance sizes on each.

Checklist: DB Scenario Inputs

• ✔ Same workload profile: An Oracle database with a given transaction load and performance requirement.
• ✔ Same performance target: Both clouds need to deliver, say, the same CPU throughput (for example, roughly four physical cores worth of processing).
• ✔ Equivalent compute shapes: On OCI, that might be 4 OCPUs; on AWS, perhaps an instance with eight vCPUs (since AWS vCPUs are half-core threads).
• ✔ Same edition and options: Oracle Database Enterprise Edition with the same feature usage on both.
• ✔ BYOL applied to both: We’ll bring our own Oracle licenses to both platforms to isolate the license-count effect.

Now, how many Oracle licenses would this deployment require on each cloud?

Table: DB EE Example

In this scenario, AWS needed twice as many Oracle licenses to run the same database workload. For instance, an 8-vCPU Oracle DB instance on AWS counts as four cores and would require four processor licenses. The equivalent OCI setup (8 vCPUs, each with 4 OCPUs) could require only two licenses due to OCI’s 2-for-1 efficiency. The result: Oracle licensing costs on AWS were about twice as high.

As the scale of deployment grows, this gap often widens further. Real-world deployments have shown that choosing OCI for Oracle databases can dramatically reduce license requirements (and costs) compared to AWS.

Step 8: Architectural Flexibility Differences

Beyond pure licensing counts, the choice of OCI vs AWS affects how freely you can architect Oracle solutions. “Architectural flexibility” here means what features and designs you can implement for Oracle workloads on each platform.

Checklist: Architecture Factors

• ✔ OCI supports the full Oracle stack: Oracle Cloud is built to run Oracle products optimally. You can use advanced database features like Real Application Clusters (RAC) on OCI, as well as Oracle’s specialized hardware (Exadata) as a service.
• ✔ AWS has limits on Oracle setups: AWS cannot offer certain Oracle architectures. For example, AWS’s managed service doesn’t support RAC, and some Oracle features might not be officially certified on AWS. You might need to forego or simulate certain capabilities when on AWS.
• ✔ Optimized for big Oracle DBs: OCI offers high-memory, high-IO shapes and even engineered systems (Exadata Cloud Service) specifically for Oracle Database, which can handle very large workloads efficiently. This means if you have a giant Oracle DB footprint, OCI can accommodate it in a single ecosystem with full support.
• ✔ AWS shines in broader services: While AWS has limitations with Oracle-specific features, it offers a vast array of general cloud services and integrations. If your environment is mixed (Oracle plus lots of other app stacks), AWS provides a wide toolkit (though not Oracle-specific).
• ✔ Native RAC and clustering: OCI natively allows Oracle RAC for high availability on its cloud. AWS has no native RAC service – running a clustered Oracle DB on AWS is not supported in a straightforward way, which could restrict high-availability architecture choices for Oracle on AWS.

Table: Architecture Comparison

In summary, an Oracle-centric architecture offers greater flexibility on OCI. You can leverage Oracle’s full tech stack with fewer restrictions. AWS is a great all-purpose cloud, but for Oracle-heavy environments, it may force some compromises (and careful license compliance workarounds). Companies with predominantly Oracle workloads often find OCI a more natural fit, whereas those with diverse technology stacks might accept AWS’s Oracle limits in exchange for its broader ecosystem.

Step 9: Compliance Risks Across Clouds

Oracle licensing is not just about cost – it’s also about staying compliant to avoid audits and penalties. The cloud you choose can influence how easy or hard it is to remain in compliance with Oracle’s rules.

Checklist: Risk Areas

• ✔ Miscounting vCPUs on AWS: A common risk is underestimating how many licenses you need on AWS. If someone mistakenly counts an AWS instance’s cores incorrectly (for example, thinking 4 vCPUs = 1 license when hyper-threading is off, which would be wrong), you could end up out of compliance.
• ✔ Ignoring partitioning rules: Some teams try to use cloud or virtualization settings to limit Oracle usage without realizing Oracle doesn’t accept that on AWS. For instance, running Oracle on a portion of a VMware cluster or assuming a small AWS instance can float on a larger host can lead to licensing all the underlying hardware – a costly compliance surprise.
• ✔ Accidental “license-included” usage: On OCI, if you don’t mark a database instance as BYOL, you might accidentally be charged for a new license as part of the service. On AWS, if you use an Oracle service or an AWS Marketplace appliance that bundles an Oracle license, you might be paying for licenses you already own. These missteps can inflate costs or violate agreements.
• ✔ Not tracking DB options: Oracle databases include additional features (such as Partitioning, Advanced Security, and Diagnostics Pack) that require separate licenses. In the cloud, it’s easy to enable an option (especially on self-managed EC2 or OCI VMs) and forget that it triggers a license need. AWS and OCI users alike must watch this, but AWS self-managed scenarios might slip through cracks without Oracle’s oversight.
• ✔ Lack of regular audits: Without quarterly or frequent internal reviews, your cloud environment can drift. On AWS, Oracle won’t have insight into your usage until an audit, so it’s on you to self-audit. OCI provides some tools to track license usage (and Oracle has visibility on their end), but you should still validate that your usage aligns with your entitlements. Neglecting this can turn into a compliance issue over time.

Table: Risk Overview

Overall, the compliance risk tends to be higher on AWS because the onus is entirely on you to follow Oracle’s complex rules. OCI’s environment is more Oracle-aware – it can help prevent certain mistakes – but you still need good governance. Be particularly cautious on AWS to avoid costly licensing errors.

Step 10: Choosing the Right Cloud-Based on Licensing

Finally, how do you decide between OCI and AWS for your Oracle workloads? It comes down to evaluating your specific needs and how much the licensing differences matter in your case.

Checklist: Decision Factors

• ✔ Workload size: If you run very large Oracle databases or many Oracle servers, the license savings on OCI can be substantial. Smaller Oracle workloads might not see as huge a cost difference and could fit anywhere.
• ✔ License inventory: Consider how many Oracle licenses you already own. If you have many licenses (or an Unlimited License Agreement) and want to maximize their use, OCI lets you stretch them further. If you have minimal licenses or plan to use license-included services, you might compare overall cloud costs more closely.
• ✔ Need for RAC or special features: Any requirement for Oracle RAC, Active Data Guard, or other Oracle-exclusive features might push you toward OCI, since Oracle supports them natively there. If you don’t need those and just run a single-instance database, this might be less of a factor.
• ✔ Need for Autonomous DB: If an autonomous, self-tuning database service is appealing or part of your strategy, only OCI offers that for Oracle Database. AWS has nothing similar for Oracle.
• ✔ Compliance risk tolerance: If your organization is uncomfortable with the risk of a licensing misstep, OCI offers peace of mind because it’s Oracle’s turf (fewer grey areas, and Oracle is less likely to audit their own cloud customers aggressively). If you do go AWS, ensure you have strong license management practices to stay in compliance.

Table: Decision Guide

In essence, if Oracle databases and related software are a big part of your IT environment, OCI often makes more sense financially and operationally due to the licensing advantages.

Suppose your Oracle usage is small or you prioritize AWS’s extensive services and global infrastructure. In that case, you might accept the higher Oracle licensing cost on AWS as part of the trade-off. The key is to weigh cloud features against the license impact to avoid surprises later.

5 Expert Takeaways

• ✔ OCI offers more favorable licensing rules for Oracle workloads than AWS.
• ✔ AWS typically requires licensing more vCPUs, which increases Oracle software costs.
• ✔ OCI’s allowance for soft partitioning (licensing only what you use) is a major advantage.
• ✔ OCI supports more native Oracle database services (and features like RAC) that AWS cannot offer.
• ✔ The overall TCO for Oracle-heavy environments usually favors OCI, often by a wide margin, once licensing is factored in.

Read about our Oracle Advisory Services

Do you want to know more about our Oracle Advisory Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit