CIO Playbook for SAP License Types

SAP license types include:

• Professional User: Full access to SAP functionalities.
• Limited Professional User: Restricted access, suitable for occasional users.
• Employee User: Basic access for self-service tasks.
• SAP Business One Professional: For small to midsize businesses, comprehensive ERP functionalities.
• Developer User: This is for users performing development tasks.
• SAP Business One Limited: Limited access, targeted at smaller businesses.
• SAP S/4HANA Professional and Functional User: Advanced access for the S/4HANA environment.

Introduction to SAP License Types

SAP’s software landscape underpins mission-critical operations for many enterprises, but navigating its licensing can be daunting for CIOs.

Licensing spans traditional on-premises ERP systems and a growing portfolio of cloud services.

Without a clear strategy, organizations risk overspending on unused licenses (“shelfware”) or facing compliance penalties from audits.

This playbook provides a comprehensive, Gartner-style guide to SAP licensing, covering all major license types and models.

It offers an independent perspective (vendor-neutral) and actionable recommendations to help CIOs optimize costs and mitigate risks.

Use this playbook to understand your options—from classic Named User and Packaged licenses in SAP ECC/S/4HANA to cloud subscription models for solutions like Ariba and SuccessFactors, and the new RISE with SAP bundle.

Each section breaks down the license model, highlights key challenges, and ends with clear recommendations for CIOs.

Read Managing SAP Package and Engine Licenses: Metrics and Cost Optimization.

1. SAP’s Licensing Landscape

SAP offers various licensing models to accommodate different products and deployment strategies.

Broadly, these fall into two categories:

• On-Premises Licensing: Perpetual licenses (one-time purchase with annual support fees) are common for SAP ECC and SAP S/4HANA (on-premise edition). These include Named User licenses for every individual accessing the system and Package/Engine licenses for specific functional components measured by usage metrics. Customers manage their infrastructure, and compliance is verified through periodic audits.
• Cloud Subscription Licensing: Subscription-based licenses (recurring fees) are used for SAP’s cloud offerings – e.g., SuccessFactors (HR), Ariba (procurement), Concur (travel), SAP S/4HANA Cloud, and others. These typically bundle software and support (and for SaaS, hosting) into one price. Metrics can be per user (named subscriber), per transaction, or consumption-based. The vendor (SAP) manages the infrastructure for SaaS, and usage is monitored continuously.
• Hybrid & Evolving Models: Many enterprises operate a hybrid landscape, using both on-prem and cloud. SAP has also introduced hybrid models like Digital Access (to license indirect use via document counts) and RISE with SAP (a comprehensive subscription bundle for S/4HANA and related services). These new models aim to simplify licensing but come with their complexities and implications.

Key Point: Each licensing model has different cost drivers and compliance considerations. CIOs must understand how these models apply across SAP’s portfolio (ERP, HCM, procurement, analytics, etc.) to effectively govern license usage and negotiate agreements.

(The following sections break down major SAP license types and models. Each section concludes with a “CIO Recommendations” subsection, providing actionable guidance.)

Read SAP Named User License Types: A Guide for CIOs.

2. Named User Licensing (On-Premises Access Licenses)

What it is: Named User licenses are the foundation of SAP’s traditional on-premise model. Anyone directly accessing SAP software (such as SAP ECC or S/4HANA on-prem) must be assigned a named user license.

These licenses are tied to a person (not shared among multiple people) and entitle that user to certain system permissions based on the license category.

SAP offers dozens of user categories with specific usage rights and price points. Common examples include:

• Professional User: Full operational access to SAP modules – typically the most powerful (and expensive) user type. Meant for power users, administrators, or any user performing a wide range of tasks.
• Limited Professional/User: A lower-tier license for users with restricted scope or read/write access limited to certain modules or transactions. (For instance, an “Employee” user might view payslips or enter time sheets but not perform configuration).
• Developer User: Grants access to development and customization tools within SAP.
• Employee Self-Service (ESS): Very limited role for end users to perform self-service tasks (e.g., entering personal HR data, travel requests).
• (There are many other specialized types, such as Worker, Logistics, Management Self-Service, Read-Only, etc., each defined by SAP’s price list.)

How it works: Each user license type is usually priced as a one-time fee (perpetual) plus annual maintenance (~20% of license cost). The organization must purchase enough licenses for each type to cover its users.

During an SAP audit, a user’s highest level of access will determine what license type SAP expects for them. If a user isn’t assigned a specific license type in your records, SAP may default them to the most expensive category (Professional) in an audit.

This makes proactive user classification and tracking essential.

Challenges: Managing named user licenses is complex due to unclear definitions and user management issues.

• Lack of clear definitions: SAP contracts often do not explicitly define what each user type can and cannot do. For example, distinguishing between a “Professional” and a “Limited Professional” user may be open to interpretation. Companies must map internal roles to SAP’s categories without much guidance, which can lead to misclassification.
• Over- or under-licensing: Without clarity, organizations might err on the side of caution and over-purchase expensive licenses for all, resulting in wasted spending. Alternatively, they might assume cheaper licenses suffice, only to discover at audit time that certain users should have been licensed at a higher level—a compliance gap that can trigger hefty back-charges.
• Redundant users across systems: In large SAP landscapes, the same person may have user IDs in multiple systems (ERP, BW, CRM, etc.). If not managed properly, this could lead to assigning multiple licenses to one individual. For example, an employee with two accounts (perhaps slightly different usernames) could be counted twice. SAP provides tools like License Administration Workbench (LAW) to consolidate and deduplicate user counts, but these require disciplined user management.
• Role changes and churn: Users frequently change jobs, join, or leave the company. Without regular cleanup, you may continue holding licenses for departed employees or fail to upgrade a user’s license when their job responsibilities grow. Both situations create inefficiency or compliance risk.
• Cost impact: Named user licenses often account for a large portion of an SAP contract (commonly 40–70% of initial license cost). This is a significant recurring cost when considering annual maintenance. Thus, optimizing these licenses can yield substantial savings.

Real-World Example: One multinational firm found during an internal review that over 30% of their SAP named users were assigned higher license types than necessary – e.g., users doing only basic data entry had Professional licenses.

The company saved millions in support costs annually by reassigning many of them to a less costly category.

Conversely, another company was caught in an audit with hundreds of unclassified users; SAP reclassified them as Professional users by default, resulting in an unexpected true-up bill in the tens of millions.

These examples underscore the importance of vigilant user license management.

Read SAP Cloud Licensing Models (SuccessFactors, Ariba, Concur).

CIO Recommendations – Managing Named User Licenses:

• Map Roles to License Types: Develop an internal license schema that maps business roles to appropriate SAP user license categories. For example, define which job titles or responsibilities qualify for an SAP Professional license vs. a Limited license. Document these mappings and use them during user provisioning.
• Implement Strict User Provisioning Processes: When onboarding new SAP users, assign the correct license type. Avoid giving “Professional” by default; use the least permissive (and least costly) license that covers their needs. If their role expands, you can always upgrade the license. Likewise, promptly remove or reassign licenses when users leave or change roles.
• Deduplicate and Centralize User IDs: Leverage SAP’s LAW tool or a software asset management (SAM) solution to identify duplicate users across systems. Establish a unified identity, if possible (e.g., Single Sign-On), so each employee corresponds to one SAP user ID. This prevents double-counting the same person. Regularly audit and reconcile user lists in all SAP systems.
• Regular License Audits (Internal): Don’t wait for SAP’s official audit. Conduct your own quarterly or semi-annual reviews of user license assignments. Look for misclassified users (e.g., someone with a Professional license who only runs reports could perhaps be downgraded) and unused accounts. Reclaim licenses from inactive users to create a buffer for new hires.
• Educate and Govern: Train the SAP security/admin team on the importance of correct license assignment. Integrate license checks into user access request workflows, e.g., require approval if someone requests access, which would bump them into a higher license category. This governance prevents “scope creep” of user privileges, which can lead to non-compliance.
• Leverage Expertise: Consult independent SAP licensing experts if you are unsure about interpreting SAP’s user definitions. They can analyze your usage and suggest an optimal distribution of license types. External experts (like Redress Compliance and other SAP licensing consultancies) can often find significant optimization opportunities that align license spending with actual needs. Their guidance is especially valuable before an SAP audit or a contract renewal.

---

3. Package and Engine Licensing (Modular Functionality Licenses)

What it is: Besides user licenses, SAP sells package-based (or “engine”) licenses for specific software components and modules. These are essentially licenses for using particular functionality or technical engines of SAP software.

Unlike named users, which are tied to individuals, package/engine licenses are tied to usage metrics. Each package comes with a defined metric (or sometimes multiple metrics) that measures consumption of that software.

Based on these metrics, organizations must purchase sufficient capacity upfront to comply.

Examples of Engine Metrics:

• SAP ERP Modules: The main ERP license covers many core modules (Financials, Materials Management, Sales and Distribution, etc.), but certain add-ons or extended modules require separate licenses. For instance, SAP Human Capital Management (HCM) or Payroll might be licensed based on the number of employees or payroll transactions processed.
• Line-of-Business Solutions: Products like SAP CRM or SAP Supply Chain Management (SCM) have package licenses measured by metrics such as the number of business partners, sales orders per year, or production throughput. For example, a CRM sales module could be licensed by the number of sales order line items or active customer records.
• Technical Engines: The SAP HANA database is a common example of an engine license, often licensed by memory size (e.g., 256 GB of HANA RAM). Another example is SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence, which might be licensed by the number of concurrent sessions or named users, separate from the ERP named users. Similarly, SAP Process Orchestration (integration middleware) could be licensed by the number of system connections or CPU cores.
• Industry Solutions: SAP offers industry-specific engines (for utilities, retail, etc.) often measured by industry metrics—e.g., utility billing engines might be licensed per meter or customer account, and retail POS integration engines by store count or transactions.

In practice, there are hundreds of engines, each with metric definitions. These licenses are typically perpetual as well (with maintenance fees annually).

You buy a certain quantity of the metric (e.g., a license for up to 10,000 employees in SAP HCM). If your usage exceeds the licensed metric, you must true-up and purchase additional capacity.

Challenges: Managing engine licenses is a significant challenge due to the complexity and variability of metrics:

• Metric Complexity: Each engine has a unique metric, and the definitions can be nuanced. For example, a metric like “number of employees” might seem straightforward, but the contract should clarify whether it counts only active employees, includes part-time/seasonal workers, etc. Some metrics have tiers or thresholds—e.g., a license might cover up to X units and then require the next license band. Keeping track of these details is labor-intensive.
• Growth and Usage Creep: Businesses evolve—employee counts rise, transaction volumes grow with sales, and databases accumulate data. Over time, it’s easy to unintentionally exceed a metric. If a company grows 20% and doesn’t adjust its SAP licenses, it could be out of compliance on various engines (a risk that might only surface at an audit). For instance, exceeding licensed sales order volume or customer count in CRM could trigger significant fees.
• Under-utilization (Shelfware): Companies often purchase packages based on projected usage that never fully materializes. It’s common to find you licensed an engine for 1000 users or a certain throughput. Still, only a fraction is used in reality, especially if projects get delayed or business needs change. You end up paying maintenance on this unused capacity. Identifying and retiring or repurposing such shelfware is often overlooked.
• Tracking and Measurement: Unlike named users, which SAP systems can list out, measuring engine metrics can be technically challenging. Some metrics (like database size or user counts) are easier to extract. Others (like several API calls or specific document counts) may require running SAP measurement programs or pulling custom reports. SAP provides the USMM tool (User Measurement), which covers some engines, but companies must self-report figures during audits for many metrics. This opens the risk of error or misinterpretation.
• License Combinations: Some engines come bundled with others or have prerequisites. For example, using an industry solution might require licensing both a base package and an add-on engine. Understanding these dependencies in your contract is important to avoid accidentally using unlicensed features.
• Cost impact: Engine licenses can be expensive, especially for enterprise metrics like revenue or large user bases. They can also inflate maintenance costs. Many SAP customers find that a handful of engines (like HANA or specific modules) constitute a major share of their annual SAP spend.

Real-World Example: A large retailer had licensed the SAP Point-of-Sale engine for up to 500 stores. Over a few years, acquisitions and new store openings pushed their actual store count to 600, but licenses were never adjusted.

In a routine audit, SAP noted the excess 100 stores being serviced, resulting in a steep compliance invoice. On the flip side, the same retailer had an unused license for SAP Transportation Management (metric: number of shipments) that was barely utilized because the project using it was shelved; they paid maintenance on this engine for years with no ROI.

These scenarios illustrate both overuse and underuse problems that CIOs need to address.

CIO Recommendations – Managing Package/Engine Licenses:

• Maintain a License Inventory Workbook: Create a centralized inventory of your organization’s SAP engine licenses. For each, document the metric definition, the licensed quantity, current usage levels, and the owner (business or IT unit) responsible for that metric. For example, HR should own the “employee count” metric for HCM, Sales Ops owns “orders processed” for CRM, etc. This way, accountability for tracking usage is assigned.
• Implement Regular Metric Monitoring: Treat key license metrics as KPIs to monitor. Establish a schedule (quarterly or biannually) where responsible teams report the current usage of each metric vs. the entitlement. Many metrics (employees, revenue, number of users) can be obtained from normal business reports. Others might require running SAP measurement reports or scripts. By routinely checking, you can spot when you’re nearing a licensed limit before an official audit does.
• Plan for Growth and Spikes: If your business is growing or undergoing changes (mergers, new product lines, expansions), forecast how that will impact SAP usage metrics. Proactively negotiate additional licenses if you foresee surpassing limits, instead of waiting for an audit that forces a purchase under less favorable terms. Consider negotiating tiered pricing in advance – for example, an agreed price per additional block of users or transactions when you exceed current entitlement – to avoid surprises.
• Optimize and Retire Shelfware: Review the inventory for consistently low or no usage engines. Each of these is a candidate to optimize:
  • If an engine isn’t used at all, consider cancelling its maintenance (you’d lose support/upgrades for it, but if it’s truly unused, this can save cost). You retain the right to use it perpetually at the version you have, which might be acceptable if you don’t plan to use it shortly.
  • If usage is low because of a delayed project, consider negotiating with SAP to exchange or credit that license towards something more needed (SAP may be open to swapping licenses as part of a larger contract negotiation or migration deal).
• Ensure Clear Contract Definitions: When purchasing new SAP packages, insist that the metric is precisely defined in the contract. Ambiguity can lead to disputes later. For instance, if licensing “number of employees,” specify if that means full-time equivalents at peak year, average annual headcount, etc. If licensing “revenue,” clarify which revenue (gross, net, from which entities). Iron out these details upfront with SAP (and get it in writing) to prevent auditors from using a broader interpretation than you intended.
• Use Independent License Measurement Tools: Some third-party tools can help monitor SAP engine usage (for example, specialty SAM tools that connect to SAP to pull metrics). These tools can automate usage tracking and even alert when thresholds are near. While SAP’s tools have limitations, independent software or services can fill gaps. Evaluate if such tools are worth the investment for your environment’s complexity.
• Consult Licensing Experts for Complex Engines: For particularly complex licenses (e.g., SAP engines tied to indirect use, or those with multi-metric formulas), get an independent expert to audit your usage. These experts have experience with how SAP measures and can tell you if your “SAP Manufacturing Execution” engine is being counted correctly. They can also assist in negotiations to adjust licenses or migrate to alternative models if an engine is cost-prohibitive.

---

4. Indirect Access & Digital Access (Licensing Third-Party Use)

What it is: Indirect access refers to any scenario where people or systems use SAP’s data or functions without directly logging into SAP. Classic examples include a third-party application (like a CRM system, webshop, or IoT device) that queries or updates the SAP ERP in the background, or a human user who accesses SAP data through a non-SAP interface.

Traditionally, SAP has argued that indirect usage requires a license. This became one of the most notorious and confusing aspects of SAP licensing, as customers realized integrations could unknowingly put them out of compliance.

The only way to license indirect use for years was to license external users or the external system. Many SAP customers were caught off guard by this.

They might have had, say, a customer portal pulling order data from SAP and thought only the named internal users needed licenses, when in fact SAP would argue that each customer or each use via the portal also needed a license.

SAP’s Digital Access model:

In 2018, responding to customer outcry, SAP introduced “Digital Access” licensing as a new approach to indirect use.

Instead of requiring a named user license for each indirect user (which was impractical for large numbers of external users or devices), Digital Access uses a document-based metric:

• SAP identified nine document types (Sales Order, Invoice, Purchase Order, etc.) frequently created or accessed in SAP by external systems. Under Digital Access, you purchase several documents that cover these types of indirect creation/access. For example, you might license 100,000 sales documents annually for external use.
• Suppose a third-party system creates or triggers a document in SAP (say, a Salesforce system creating a sales order in SAP via API). In that case, it counts against your licensed document quota instead of requiring each Salesforce user to have a SAP user license.

This model aimed to simplify and bring some predictability: companies could measure documents rather than attempt to count all external users.

SAP even offered a Digital Access Adoption Program (DAAP) for a few years, giving significant discounts and license credits to encourage customers to transition to document-based licensing for indirect access.

By 2025, this program’s initial deep discounts will have largely phased out, but the Digital Access model will have become a standard option in SAP contracts.

Challenges:

• Detection of Indirect Use: The first challenge is identifying where indirect access occurs. Modern IT landscapes are highly integrated. You may have dozens of interfaces in SAP, e.g., middleware, web portals, mobile apps, robotic process automation (RPA) scripts, reporting tools pulling data, etc. Often, these were built without explicit consideration of licensing. Mapping out every non-SAP system that reads/writes SAP data is non-trivial, usually requiring cross-departmental collaboration.
• Compliance Risk & Notable Cases: Indirect access compliance became headline news with cases like SAP vs. Diageo (2017), where a UK court ruled Diageo had to pay around £54 million in license fees because their Salesforce applications were indirectly accessing SAP data without proper licenses. This and other cases (e.g., AB InBev’s dispute with SAP) sent shockwaves through the SAP user community, highlighting that SAP was willing to enforce and even litigate over indirect usage. The risk is real: companies have faced multi-million dollar penalties for unknowingly violating this rule.
• Transition to Digital Access: While the Digital Access model is conceptually cleaner, it introduced new complexity – now customers must understand what constitutes a “document” and how to count them. SAP’s nine document types cover most common business objects, but interpreting them can be tricky (for instance, if an external system updates an existing SAP order, does that count as creating a “document”? What about read-only access?). SAP provided tools like the Digital Access Evaluation Service – scripts to scan SAP systems and estimate how many documents would fall under indirect usage. Many customers ran these to decide if switching to Digital Access made sense financially.
• Old vs. New Contracts: Customers with older contracts may not have adopted Digital Access and might still technically be required to license indirect use via named users or special “Indirect access user” licenses. Meanwhile, new S/4HANA contracts strongly favor Digital Access (SAP encourages, if not mandates, it for new sales). This means companies migrating to S/4HANA often face a decision point to embrace document licensing. Not doing so could leave them with an outdated model and significant audit exposure.
• Ongoing Audit Focus: Indirect access remains a top audit focus for SAP’s License Compliance team. With better tools and the Digital Access model in place, SAP can more easily identify unlicensed document creation. SAP has “weaponized” its approach: hiding indirect usage under technical integrations is now harder. They expect customers to either license those scenarios via digital documents or ensure each external user has an appropriate license (for example, SAP has special user types for certain indirect scenarios, like a “SAP Application (Limited) Professional” for external party use via a portal – but these can be expensive in large numbers).
• Financial Impact: If not proactively managed, indirect use fees can be extremely expensive because they often involve high volumes. For example, connecting a website to SAP could generate thousands of transactions daily, far more than your internal users would manually create. If each is counted, costs can balloon. Companies must carefully consider whether Digital Access (charged per block of documents) is more cost-effective than trying to license users/devices.

Real-World Example:

Besides the famous Diageo case, consider a manufacturer implementing IoT sensors on its factory floor equipment. These sensors send data to SAP to automatically create maintenance orders.

Initially, the company didn’t consider SAP licensing for this. During an audit, SAP flagged these IoT devices as indirect usage, creating SAP documents (maintenance orders count as one of the document types).

The company faced a choice: back-pay for thousands of “users” (clearly nonsensical for devices) or adopt Digital Access and buy document licenses for the past usage.

They opted for Digital Access, but since they hadn’t enrolled in the earlier discount program, it cost significantly more than if they had proactively licensed it.

The lesson learned was to identify indirect use cases upfront and take advantage of licensing models on your terms, not during an audit under duress.

CIO Recommendations – Managing Indirect/Digital Access:

• Inventory All Integration Points: Conduct a thorough assessment of all systems, applications, and interfaces that interact with your SAP environment. This includes obvious ones (like known third-party software connected via API or middleware) and less obvious ones (, Excel macros pulling data or a data warehouse that extracts SAP data nightly). Document each interface and determine whether it reads or writes SAP data, and what kind of data is involved (e.g., does it create any of the 9 document types SAP cares about?). This cross-functional effort likely involves IT architecture teams, integration specialists, and business system owners.
• Evaluate Licensing Options for Each Scenario: For each identified indirect use case, decide the most suitable licensing approach:
  • If it involves external people (like customers or suppliers accessing an SAP-backed portal), consider whether a special external user license or a blanket “SAP platform user” license is available and costed out rather than licensing their actions via Digital Access documents.
  • Digital Access documents are usually the appropriate model if they are system-to-system (machine integration with no named users). Estimate the annual document count. SAP’s Digital Access Evaluation tools can help simulate document counts based on logs—use these tools in a non-audit setting so you know your approximate consumption.
  • Sometimes, it might be cheaper to cover indirect activity by assigning a few named user licenses to a proxy user (for example, all API calls funnel through a single technical user account). Note: SAP’s rules typically disallow using a single named user to cover multiple individuals. However, for purely technical integrations, one might license a “Communication User” or “Service User” for that purpose. Get clarity from a licensing expert on what is permitted.
• Adopt Digital Access Proactively (If Beneficial): If your analysis shows significant document volumes from indirect use, engage SAP (via your procurement team, ideally with an independent advisor) about adding Digital Access licenses to your agreement. Try to negotiate this before an audit forces it. Although the initial adoption program discounts may no longer be as generous, SAP often still negotiates on digital access if it means closing a compliance gap amicably. Ensure you right-size the number of documents – perhaps start with a conservative count and have the option to buy more as needed.
• Contractual Safeguards: When signing new contracts (especially for S/4HANA), address the indirect usage terms. If you go with Digital Access, ensure your contract states that indirect use is covered by the document licenses purchased, so there’s no ambiguity later. If you decide not to adopt Digital Access (e.g., because your indirect usage is minimal or you cover it via user licenses), add language that defines how indirect access will be handled to avoid open-ended risk. Some companies negotiate clauses to cap indirect usage fees or agree on specific license types for certain interfaces.
• Monitor and Revisit: Indirect usage is not a set-and-forget item. New integrations can appear as business needs evolve. Institute a policy that no new interface to SAP goes live without a licensing impact check. Architectural review boards or integration teams should include a checkpoint: “Does this integration introduce indirect SAP access? If yes, have we accounted for licensing it?” This prevents surprises. Additionally, periodically re-run SAP’s document count tools (or your monitoring) to see if your indirect document creation rate is growing, so you can purchase additional capacity in advance.
• Use Third-Party Assessments for Assurance: Given the complexity and high stakes, consider hiring a third-party licensing specialist to perform an “Indirect Access audit” of your SAP environment. They can often identify indirect use that your internal teams might miss (e.g., unusual technical paths or usage patterns) and ensure you’re correctly counting under SAP’s rules. Their report can guide you on whether your current licenses sufficiently cover these scenarios or if you should negotiate an amendment. This independent review can be invaluable evidence if later SAP audits dispute your compliance – you can show you did due diligence.
• Case-by-Case Decision Making: Recognize that indirect licensing has no one-size-fits-all solution. Some organizations might heavily embrace Digital Access to cover everything, while others might limit external integrations and prefer named user licenses for specific partners. The CIO should weigh the cost vs. risk for each approach. What’s important is having a documented strategy so that if SAP inquires, you can demonstrate exactly how each type of indirect access is accounted for under your licenses. This level of preparedness often deters auditors from aggressive claims.

---

5. SAP Cloud Subscription Models (SaaS Licensing Across the SAP Portfolio)

SAP’s cloud offerings have rapidly expanded, and they come with licensing models distinct from the on-premise world. Instead of perpetual licenses, you generally sign subscription contracts for a term (1-year, 3-year, or 5-year deals are common).

These subscriptions cover the right to use the software, associated support,t and cloud infrastructure (for true SaaS).

Below, we outline some major SAP cloud products and their licensing approaches, and then discuss common challenges and best practices for CIOs managing SAP in the cloud.

Key SAP Cloud Services & License Metrics:

• SAP S/4HANA Cloud (Public Edition): This is SAP’s SaaS version of its flagship ERP. Licensing is typically per user, often categorized by user types (similar to on-premise, roles like Professional vs. Self-Service user). SAP has introduced the concept of Full Usage Equivalents (FUE) for cloud ERP – an aggregated metric where different user types count as fractions or multiples of a base unit. For example, 1 “Advanced” user might equal 1.0 FUE, while 1 “Self-Service” user equals 0.1 FUE. A customer might purchase 100 FUEs and allocate various user types under that. This provides flexibility to mix roles, and notably, the FUE model tends to include indirect use rights by default (so separate digital access fees aren’t needed for those users).
• RISE with SAP S/4HANA Cloud (Private Edition): Covered in the next section in detail, but note that RISE is a bundle that also uses a subscription model (also often based on FUEs or resource-based metrics for the private cloud environment).
• SAP SuccessFactors (HCM Cloud): Typically licensed per employee or user. Core HR (Employee Central) is often priced per employee record managed annually. Talent modules (like Performance & Goals, Learning, Recruiting) might be per named user (employee or even admin user) with access to that module. For instance, you might pay an annual fee for each employee in the system for core HR, and additional fees for each employee or recruiter using the recruiting module. This is usually tied to workforce size (bigger companies get lower per-user rates).
• SAP Ariba (Procurement & Supply Chain Network): Ariba has several modules (Sourcing, Procurement, Supplier Management, etc.) and a network that connects buyers and suppliers. Licensing can be subscription + transaction-based: for example, Ariba Buying and Invoicing might be priced based on the total spend or number of invoices processed through the platform annually (e.g., a tier that covers up to $100 million in spend). There are also fees related to the Ariba Network – suppliers may be charged, and buyers might have licenses based on the number of documents (POs, invoices) transacted. The model is often a mix of a base subscription plus overage if you exceed certain transaction volumes.
• SAP Concur (Travel & Expense): Concur is usually licensed per active user (per month or year) or per transaction (e.g., per expense report or travel booking). A common approach is a fee for each employee who uses the system to file expenses or for each trip processed. Some Concur modules (like Request, Travel, Expense, Invoice) might have separate pricing. In Concur’s case, the system enforces user counts through its cloud service (if you have 1000 employees loaded, you need licenses for 1000, etc.).
• SAP Customer Experience (CRM/CX, including Sales Cloud, Service Cloud): These are often licensed per named user (like per sales agent using Sales Cloud). Different user types may exist (full sales vs. read-only or partner users). Also, some components can be usage-based (e.g., number of API calls if you use their API heavily, or number of contacts in marketing systems).
• SAP Analytics Cloud (SAC): Usually, there is a subscription per user, with different editions (standard user, planning professional, etc.) depending on functionality (planning capabilities cost more). It could also have capacity-based licensing if you use it embedded or on a large scale (like per tenant size).
• SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP): This is SAP’s PaaS offering (formerly SAP Cloud Platform). BTP can be licensed in two main ways: (1) Subscription bundles – you subscribe to specific services or packages (e.g., an Integration Suite package for a set number of connections, or a Hana DBaaS of X GB); or (2) Consumption-based – SAP offers a Cloud Platform Enterprise Agreement (CPEA) where you buy credits and consume them as you use various services (pay-as-you-go style). Under CPEA, each service (database, AI, integration flows, etc.) has a rate that draws down your credits. This is more akin to hyperscaler cloud models. The key for CIOs is that consumption gives flexibility but requires active monitoring to avoid overage, whereas subscription gives predictability but might result in unused capacity.

(Table: Examples of SAP Cloud Licensing Models)

SAP Cloud Service	Primary License Metric	Example
S/4HANA Cloud (Public SaaS)	Per user (often via FUE aggregation)	50 FUEs covering 30 full users, 100 self-service users, etc.
SuccessFactors (Employee Central)	Per employee per year	$X per employee annually for core HR management.
SuccessFactors (Talent modules)	Per user (employee or internal admin)	$Y per user for Performance & Goals module, etc.
Ariba (Procurement)	Spend or document count tiers	e.g. up to $200M spend/year via Ariba = $Z subscription; extra if exceeded.
Concur (Travel & Expense)	Per active user or per transaction	e.g. $X per expense report processed, or $Y per user per month.
SAP Analytics Cloud	Per user (by role)	e.g. 100 planning users, 500 read-only users, priced at different rates.
SAP BTP (Cloud Platform)	Consumption credits or package subscription	e.g. purchase 10,000 credits/year and consume on services; or subscribe to Integration Suite for $N per month.

Challenges:

• Subscription Commitment and Flexibility: When you sign a cloud contract, you commit to several users or a certain volume for the term. Unlike on-prem, where licenses are perpetual and can sit unused (which is wasteful but at least you own them), in cloud, if you over-commit, you pay for unused capacity and cannot usually get that money back. Conversely, if you under-commit and need more mid-term, you’ll have to extend the contract (often at potentially higher marginal rates or at least additional negotiation). The inability to easily scale down during a contract is a pain point. For example, if you signed for 10,000 SuccessFactors users for 3 years but now have only 9,000 employees due to layoffs, you still pay for 10,000 until renewal.
• Decentralized Purchases: Cloud services are often bought by line-of-business leaders (HR might buy SuccessFactors, the procurement team buys Ariba, etc.), sometimes without central IT fully involved. This can lead to inconsistent terms, overlapping functionality, and missed opportunities for economies of scale. CIOs must often rein in disparate SaaS contracts to form a cohesive strategy.
• Integration and Overlapping Licenses: Many companies in transition run a hybrid environment, for instance, using SuccessFactors for HR but still running SAP Payroll on-prem or Ariba for procurement, while SAP ECC MM is also in use. In such cases, there can be overlap – e.g., an employee in SuccessFactors is also an SAP named user for Payroll processing. Does that duplicate licensing? Generally, yes: you’d need the SuccessFactors subscription and the appropriate SAP ERP user license for the person processing payroll in the on-prem system. There is no automatic credit between cloud and on-prem licenses; they’re separate. SAP does have some programs (like the cloud extension policy) that allow swapping some on-prem maintenance spend towards cloud subscriptions, but you must negotiate that. The challenge is to avoid paying twice for the same users on different systems by smartly planning who uses what and possibly leveraging SAP’s conversion offers.
• Usage Monitoring: Cloud applications provide dashboards or reports of your usage (e.g., number of active users, transactions, storage used, etc.). It’s crucial to monitor these because exceeding contracted amounts can either be prevented (the user cannot log in if no license is available) or result in overage charges. For instance, Ariba might bill you more if your spend exceeds your tier. BTP consumption will be charged automatically once you surpass the included credits. Without careful watch, costs can spike unexpectedly – a notorious issue in cloud services.
• Renewal Time Leverage: SAP (like most SaaS providers) often gives its best discounts upfront to win business or during a big migration (say, moving to S/4HANA Cloud). But at renewal time (after 3 years, for example), you might find list prices have increased or initial incentives are gone. CIOs risk being locked in; switching away after investing in a cloud product is difficult. This can lead to significant price hikes if not negotiated skillfully. Preparing well before renewals is essential to avoid surprise cost jumps.
• Contract Terms: Cloud contracts come with their terms to watch: data ownership and extraction rights (important if you leave the service), SLA and uptime commitments (for critical systems like S/4HANA or SuccessFactors, ensure you have service credits for downtime), and data residency or compliance clauses. While not licensing per se, these factors are part of the “package” you’re paying for and should influence your satisfaction with the licensing cost.
• Multiple Cloud Services Coordination: If you use multiple SAP cloud products (which is increasingly common, e.g., SuccessFactors + Concur + Ariba + S/4HANA Cloud), coordinating them can be complex. SAP might offer an enterprise agreement that bundles several cloud services under one committed spend (similar to Microsoft or Oracle enterprise cloud agreements). This can simplify management but potentially create a larger commitment than needed for any service, meaning more shelfware risk if one area doesn’t use its allocation.

Real-World Example:

A global manufacturing firm adopted several SAP cloud solutions in parallel – SuccessFactors for HR, Ariba for procurement, and SAP Analytics Cloud for reporting – each through separate deals.

Over time, they realized they had over-provisioned users in SuccessFactors (only 70% of purchased licenses were being utilized), while Ariba usage had exceeded their tier and incurred overage fees.

Additionally, some of their employees appeared in both systems, paying twice (once as an SF user, once as an indirect SAP user feeding data to ECC).

By consolidating the contracts at renewal into a single agreement, they negotiated better discounts and aligned the user counts with reality, saving an estimated 15% of the combined costs.

However, they also learned to stagger their implementation waves: they ramp up subscription counts gradually as adoption increases, rather than committing to the full anticipated number from day one.

CIO Recommendations – Optimizing SAP Cloud Licensing:

• Centralized Cloud Procurement: Establish governance where IT (or a strategic sourcing function) can access all SAP cloud contracts. While business units should drive functional requirements, licensing terms should be negotiated by a team that sees the big picture. This prevents scenarios where you have overlapping or inconsistent agreements. Aim to co-term contracts where possible so you can negotiate as a larger customer rather than many small ones.
• Rightsize Subscriptions: Take a phased approach to subscription counts. If deploying a new cloud service, consider negotiating a ramp-up: e.g., 50% of users in Year 1, 75% in Year 2, 100% in Year 3, aligning with deployment roll-out. This way, you pay only for what you use as you implement. Avoid the trap of purchasing for the end-state on day one. Most vendors (SAP included) will accommodate phased ramp-ups if you discuss it. If you already find yourself over-licensed (usage below what you’re paying for), use that data at renewal to adjust and push for a reduction or additional value-added services to compensate.
• Monitor Usage Continuously: Treat cloud usage like a utility meter. Assign someone the task of monthly monitoring: number of active users vs. contracted, transaction volumes vs. limits, etc. Many SAP cloud products have admin dashboards; use them. Set up alerts for BTP or other consumption services for when you consume beyond certain thresholds (SAP tools or third-party cloud management tools can often send notifications). By catching a trend early, you can either rein in usage (if it’s something like excessive API calls due to a bug) or be prepared to negotiate an increase. No one likes a surprise bill – proactive monitoring prevents that.
• Negotiate Flexibility: When crafting cloud contracts, see if SAP is willing to include some flexibility clauses:
  • Adjustment windows: e.g., the right to reduce or increase users by a certain percentage mid-term without penalty, or a one-time downward adjustment at renewal with minimal notice.
  • Pool of Funds: Instead of fixing each service’s quantity in some enterprise agreements, you commit to an overall spend that can be allocated dynamically. For instance, $X million can be used across any SAP cloud products. This can be useful if you’re unsure which service will grow the most.
  • Carry-over or Refund for Non-Use: It’s tough to get refunds in SaaS, but you might negotiate that unused consumption credits (for BTP, say) roll over to the next year, or that if adoption is lower, you can apply part of the fee towards consulting services or training rather than waste it.
• Align On-Prem and Cloud Strategies: If you move from on-prem to cloud, leverage SAP’s conversion programs. SAP has offered things like a “cloud extension” policy or conversion ratios where you can terminate on-prem licenses/maintenance and get credit towards cloud subscriptions. Make sure to evaluate these: they can prevent double spending. However, scrutinize the fine print – sometimes the credit is much less than the value of your on-prem licenses. Negotiate for a fair conversion value and preserve rights to revert if the cloud transition doesn’t pan out (e.g., a clause that you can re-activate your on-prem licenses if you decide not to renew the cloud, though SAP may not readily grant this).
• Plan Renewals Early: Start renewal negotiations for major contracts at least 12 months in advance. This gives you time to benchmark alternatives (even if you likely won’t switch off SAP, having competitive quotes or internal cost analyses strengthens your position). Engage independent licensing advisors to analyze your usage vs. contract – they can often find leverage, such as “we only used 60% of SF licenses, so we want a 40% reduction or price drop.” Use that data when talking to SAP. Also, be prepared for the end-of-term price increase attempts; lock in multi-term caps on price increases if possible.
• Data Exit Strategy: Ensure that you have the right to extract your data from any SAP cloud service and that the process and cost (if any) are clear. This isn’t directly about license cost, but if you ever needed to leave the service, being unable to get your data easily could force you to stay (a form of vendor lock-in). As a CIO, negotiating these terms (data export, transition assistance) is part of a smart licensing strategy – it indirectly pressures the vendor to keep pricing reasonable if they know you have an exit path.
• Leverage Bundling Carefully: SAP may offer bundled deals if you adopt multiple cloud products (for example, an enterprise discount if you buy SuccessFactors, Ariba, and Concur together). This can simplify contracting and potentially bring volume discounts. However, be cautious: ensure each product in the bundle is needed and will be utilized. Sometimes bundles tempt you into shelfware (“We’ll give you a great price if you also take our Analytics Cloud, even if you don’t fully need it”). It’s only a good deal if those products align with your strategy. If not, à la carte with a deeper focus on the ones you truly use might yield better ROI.
• Independent Spend Reviews: Like on-prem license experts, SaaS subscription optimization firms exist. Consider periodic reviews by such experts or a cloud economics analyst to find inefficiencies – maybe you have too many test tenants you’re paying for, or you could downgrade some user licenses (SAP often has tiers of users in cloud products too). Optimizing can reduce cost without affecting operations. Every percentage saved on recurring subscriptions compounds over the years, so it’s a high-impact activity.

---

6. RISE with SAP Licensing (S/4HANA Transformation as a Service)

RISE with SAP is a relatively new commercial offering (launched in 2021) that represents a shift in how SAP packages its core ERP and related services.

SAP often describes it as “Business Transformation as a Service.”

The idea is to simplify a customer’s move to SAP S/4HANA in the cloud by offering an all-in-one bundle: software licenses, cloud infrastructure, and certain technical services in one subscription contract.

What RISE Includes: At its core, RISE with SAP includes:

• SAP S/4HANA Cloud (Private Edition or Public Edition): The digital core ERP. In RISE, many customers opt for a private cloud edition (essentially your instance of S/4HANA managed by SAP on a hyperscaler of your choice). A public multi-tenant version is also possible for smaller footprints.
• Infrastructure & Technical Management: SAP (and its hyperscaler partners like AWS, Azure, and Google) provide the underlying infrastructure. The cost of infrastructure and basic operations is bundled into the RISE subscription. In traditional setups, you’d separately pay AWS or your data center; with RISE, SAP is your single vendor for software and infrastructure (they, in turn, handle the cloud provider contract).
• SAP Business Technology Platform Credits: RISE often comes with a starter package of SAP BTP (for extensions and integrations). For example, you might get some BTP resources or credits as part of the deal, enabling you to build Fiori apps, use integration services, etc., that connect with S/4HANA.
• SAP Business Network Starter Pack: SAP sometimes includes access to parts of its Business Network (Ariba Network, Asset Intelligence Network, Logistics Business Network, etc.) with RISE. This might be limited in scope (e.g., transacting with a few suppliers or basic functionality), but it is intended to add value around the ERP.
• Transformation/Analytical Tools (SAP Signavio): Recognizing that moving to S/4HANA is as much about process improvement as technology, SAP acquired Signavio (process mining and modeling tools) and bundles some of those capabilities in RISE. This lets customers analyze and optimize their processes as part of the migration.
• Technical Services: RISE includes services like initial onboarding, cloud edition upgrades, and perhaps limited support for custom code migration via SAP’s tools. It is not a full consulting engagement, but some technical guidance is bundled.
• Support: RISE comes with SAP’s built-in support (often at the Enterprise Support level). You don’t pay separate maintenance; support is part of the subscription.

Licensing Metrics in RISE:

As mentioned earlier, the primary metric for RISE’s S/4HANA component is typically the Full Usage Equivalent (FUE).

Instead of 500 Professional and 1000 Employee licenses, customers might purchase 600 FUEs, which can cover various user types.

SAP provides a conversion rate for different user types to FUEs. For instance, 1 Professional user might equal 1 FUE, one occasional user might equal 0.2 FUE, etc. You size this based on your known user population and their roles.

This model is supposed to provide more flexibility over time (e.g., you could reallocate FUEs to different mixes as your usage changes without having to re-contract for different license types).

Additionally, if you have heavy indirect use, one benefit of RISE is that the S/4HANA license generally includes indirect usage (SAP isn’t going to charge separately for digital access documents under RISE in most cases—it’s part of the package, though it’s always good to confirm this in the contract).

One potential headache (indirect access) might be alleviated under RISE for the S/4 system.

Benefits of RISE (from a licensing/IT perspective):

• Single Throat to Choke: You deal only with SAP for issues, whether it’s a software bug or an infrastructure outage. This unified accountability is a selling point for those who don’t want to manage multiple vendors.
• Simplified Commercial Model: Instead of multiple line items (DB license, user licenses, hardware, support, etc.), you have one subscription fee. This can simplify internal cost allocation and budgeting – the OpEx vs CapEx model. It can also ease the move from a big upfront capital purchase (traditional licenses) to a more predictable annual expense.
• Included Elements: As described, RISE tosses in various extras (BTP, Signavio, etc.). These could jumpstart modernization efforts that might not have been budgeted separately. Essentially, SAP bundles things to encourage customers to use more of their ecosystem (and arguably to sweeten the deal value).
• Technical Currency and Updates: With SAP managing the environment, they will ensure you’re on a supported version, apply patches, and upgrade (for cloud editions). This can reduce the burden on your internal IT for basis and hosting tasks. Some CIOs see this as a way to mitigate the challenge of keeping up with SAP’s rapid innovation—SAP takes care of it.
• Faster Time to Value: SAP markets that with RISE, you can move to S/4HANA quicker since you don’t have to negotiate infrastructure separately or worry about how to set up servers—it’s provisioned for you. This is attractive for a company that doesn’t have a robust IT infrastructure team or wants to avoid a lengthy internal build-out.

Drawbacks and Risks of RISE:

• Cost vs. DIY: The convenience and bundling in RISE are priced. SAP, of course, adds a margin for managing infrastructure and providing extras. Some analyses have found that RISE can be more expensive over a multi-year period than when the company buys S/4HANA licenses and hosts them independently (or via a chosen cloud provider) with a systems integrator managing it. If a company has scale and expertise, they might negotiate better infrastructure rates directly with hyperscalers or optimize their environment to lower cost–flexibility you give up in RISE. Essentially, you’re paying a premium for SAP to handle many tasks. It’s worth comparing the TCO of RISE vs. traditional routes.
• Loss of Some Control: In a RISE private cloud, you have more control than in a pure SaaS environment, but less control over managing SAP on-prem or your cloud subscription. SAP imposes certain standards (e.g., you might be restricted in how much you can tailor the environment or how quickly you can implement changes that affect the infrastructure). If SAP schedules an upgrade or maintenance window, you must abide by their timelines to some extent. Customization that requires special access to the host or OS might not be allowed. For heavily customized environments, this could be an issue.
• Opaque Cost Breakdown: SAP provides one bundled price. As a CIO, you might want to know the breakdown (software vs. infrastructure vs. services) to benchmark efficiency, but SAP may not disclose this. That opaqueness can make it hard to do cost optimization – you can’t easily say “the infra component is overpriced, I’ll shift that to another provider” because it’s not separable. You’re effectively locked into SAP’s chosen pricing structure.
• Long-Term Commitment and Lock-in: RISE contracts often span 3-5 years (and SAP of course hopes you’ll extend far beyond that). Once you’re in, switching out is non-trivial. If, after 5 years, you decide to exit RISE and host S/4HANA yourself, you’d need to procure new S/4HANA licenses (unless contractually there’s a conversion, which currently SAP doesn’t advertise – RISE is subscription, so when it ends, you don’t automatically get perpetual rights). If you leave RISE, you might start from scratch on licensing S/4, which is a huge switching cost. SAP counts on this to retain customers. CIOs need to be aware of this lock-in effect – it’s stronger than traditional perpetual licensing, where at least you owned the license and could take it anywhere.
• Not All-Encompassing: RISE covers S/4HANA and some surrounding pieces, but many other SAP products remain outside RISE. If you use SuccessFactors, Concur, or Ariba, those are separate subscriptions (though SAP might align the contracts). So you might still have multiple contracts. RISE doesn’t magically turn everything into one license – it just bundles a portion. You will still need to coordinate with other licensing agreements. For example, if you move your ERP to RISE but keep an SAP BW on-prem or use SAP Analytics Cloud, those are additional. Integration between RISE S/4 and these other products still needs to be managed (with their licenses possibly needed for connectors or user access).
• Shared Responsibility Blind Spots: It’s easy to think RISE solves all problems, but customers must understand what SAP handles vs. what the customer handles. For instance, SAP might handle infrastructure security up to the OS, but application-level security and user administration are still your job. You could face finger-pointing if something goes wrong and it’s not clearly in SAP’s domain per contract. Ensuring the RISE service description is fully understood by your team is important.

Real-World Example:

A large automotive enterprise chose RISE with SAP for a rapid S/4HANA move, enticed by the single contract and SAP’s promise to “take them to the cloud quickly.” They benefited from a streamlined project start and didn’t have to hire a big basis team or negotiate with cloud vendors.

However, a year in, they found some challenges: performance tuning needed more collaboration with SAP since they couldn’t just tweak the AWS instance sizes themselves; also, costs were higher than expected when they tried to increase the user count (the rate for extra FUEs under RISE was higher than what they estimated on their license + cloud model).

Another company, a mid-sized tech firm, analyzed RISE but decided against it – they negotiated a deal to buy S/4HANA licenses.

They used an MSP (managed service provider) to host on Azure, claiming a 20% lower 5-year TCO than the RISE quote, albeit with more internal oversight needed. These examples show that the decision can swing either way depending on priorities.

CIO Recommendations – Evaluating and Using RISE with SAP:

• Perform a Detailed Cost-Benefit Analysis: Conduct a thorough business case before signing up for RISE. Price out the alternative (buying S/4HANA licenses and running them on your own or with a partner) and compare it to SAP’s RISE proposal. Include all factors: license costs (including ongoing maintenance for on-prem vs. all-inclusive in RISE), infrastructure (your negotiated cloud rates vs. SAP’s), personnel (internal basis/administration vs. SAP doing that in RISE), and intangibles like project risk. Quantify the premium you might be paying for RISE’s convenience. If that premium is acceptable for the benefits, great – but if it’s too high, you may negotiate or consider other paths. Engage independent advisors who have seen RISE deals; they can tell you if SAP’s offer is competitive and where there’s wiggle room.
• Negotiate Service and Exit Terms: The contractual terms around RISE are just as important as price. Key points to negotiate/clarify:
  • Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Ensure the contract has clear uptime commitments for your private cloud, performance metrics, and remedies (like service credits) if SAP fails to meet them. You’re entrusting critical systems to SAP; hold them accountable as you would any outsourcer.
  • Scope of Services: Get a detailed list of what SAP covers (monitoring, basis support, disaster recovery, etc.) and what they don’t. For anything not covered, plan how you’ll handle it. If application archiving or certain basic tasks aren’t included, you might need internal or partner help.
  • Exit Clause: This is crucial. Seek to include terms for what happens if you decide not to renew RISE at the end of the term. Ideally, negotiate an option to convert to a traditional license. For example, some customers try to agree that if they leave, they can get a perpetual S/4HANA license for a fee or some credit for what they paid. SAP doesn’t officially advertise this, but you might secure a commitment that protects you from being left with nothing in negotiations. At the very least, ensure data portability – you should be able to get a full export of your S/4HANA data and configurations.
  • Future Flexibility: If you anticipate growth or acquisitions, negotiate how those scenarios are handled under RISE. Will adding a new subsidiary’s users be at the same per-FUE rate? Can you temporarily increase resources? A well-structured RISE contract should have provisions or at least guidelines for expansion.
• Utilize the Bundled Tools: Use SAP’s extras if you go with RISE. Customers underutilize things like Signavio or include BTP credits simply because they aren’t the primary focus. Assign teams to explore these tools, as they can accelerate your transformation (for example, use Signavio to optimize processes pre-go-live, use BTP to build needed extensions rather than customizing S/4 directly). Since you’re paying for them in the bundle, extract that value.
• Manage the Relationship Closely: Treat SAP as a partner in this model. Have regular operational governance meetings with SAP’s RISE team. Review performance, issues, and upcoming changes. With one vendor handling so much, you want strong transparency. If something isn’t working (like system performance or support responsiveness), escalate within SAP. Part of what you pay for is premium engagement, so ensure you get it.
• Continue License Hygiene: Don’t assume RISE means you can ignore license counts. True, SAP is less likely to audit you in the traditional sense when you’re in RISE (since usage is more controlled), but you still should manage your users and scopes to avoid needing unexpected increases. Keep an eye on FUE consumption. Also, remember to manage licensing for anything outside of RISE (e.g., if you still have some legacy SAP systems not in the RISE scope, those remain subject to the old rules).
• Check Compatibility of Other Products: If you have other SAP products (SuccessFactors, etc.), coordinate with SAP to possibly align those with RISE. While they won’t be in the same contract, you might negotiate co-termination or certain discounts due to the larger relationship. Ensure integration licensing is sorted out – for instance, connecting SuccessFactors (cloud) to RISE S/4HANA might still require certain middleware or BTP services; see if those are included or need separate licenses.
• Keep an Independent Eye: Even in RISE, having an independent advisor occasionally review the situation can pay off. For example, they might review your FUE usage and see if you’re grossly over-licensed (maybe you bought too many FUEs initially). They could advise you to negotiate a reduction in the next term, or if SAP is adding new services to RISE, they’ll alert you to any licensing implications. Don’t become complacent under the “all-in-one” umbrella – complexity can still creep in, and independent experts can provide a check-and-balance to SAP’s account team.

---

7. Key Challenges and Risks in SAP License Management

Managing SAP licenses is an ongoing effort that goes beyond understanding individual license types.

CIOs must grapple with systemic challenges and risks that can impact their organization’s financial health and compliance standing.

Below are some of the most prominent challenges and risks, along with considerations for each:

• Complexity & Constant Change: SAP’s licensing policies are notoriously complex and evolve. What you negotiated years ago might be superseded by new rules or metrics (for instance, the shift from traditional indirect use to Digital Access, or new user definitions in S/4HANA vs. ECC). Keeping up with SAP’s changes (through official updates, user group sessions, or expert advisors) is necessary. SAP today could view a license compliant under an older agreement differently if not contractually locked in. This complexity means organizations sometimes operate under false assumptions – e.g., believing something is covered when it’s not under current rules. Staying educated is itself a challenge.
• Audit Risk and SAP Tactics: SAP has a dedicated Global License Compliance organization and regularly audits customers (often every 2-3 years, though they can do it annually). Audits are high-stakes: SAP will push for remediation if any shortfall is found, which could mean a hefty purchase under time pressure. Furthermore, audits are sometimes strategically timed – for example, if SAP knows you haven’t moved to S/4HANA yet, an audit could uncover compliance issues that SAP then offers to forgive if you instead invest in a S/4HANA or RISE migration. CIOs must be aware of this dynamic; SAP can leverage compliance findings in broader negotiations. Indirect access remains a common audit finding. Also, misclassified users and overused engines are frequently flagged. The risk isn’t just financial; it can sour the vendor relationship and divert much IT effort into true-up activities.
• Shelfware and Wasted Spend: Enterprises often have more SAP licenses than they need at a given time, due to growth projections, bundle purchases, or divestitures that reduced needs. On-prem, this means paying maintenance on idle licenses. In the cloud, it means paying subscription fees for unused users or capacity. Shelfware is essentially sunk cost that delivers no value. It often persists because organizations lack visibility or are afraid to cut licenses (what if we need them later?). But the opportunity cost is huge. Periodically harvesting and right-sizing licenses can free up the budget for innovation. This is a challenge because it requires continuously cross-checking deployment vs. entitlement and negotiating adjustments with SAP (who isn’t eager to reduce spending, though you might get flexibility by trading shelfware value into new products).
• Siloed License Management: SAP licensing is not managed holistically in many companies. Different teams might handle different parts (the BASIS team submits user counts for audit, procurement handles contracts, finance pays the maintenance bills, etc.) without a unifying strategy. This siloed approach can result in errors and missed opportunities:
  • The technical team might be unaware of contract nuances and inadvertently deploy features they aren’t licensed for.
  • The procurement team might negotiate a deal without fully understanding technical usage patterns, leading to mismatches.
  • If separate groups handle cloud and on-prem SAP, you might miss the chance to optimize across them (for example, trading some on-prem licenses for cloud credits during migration).
• Integration of Acquisitions or Divestitures: When companies merge or acquire others, they inherit SAP contracts and license pools that need rationalizing. SAP’s contracts usually forbid transferring licenses to a third party without consent. If you spin off a division, that new entity often cannot just take a portion of your SAP licenses – they have to strike their own deal. This can create unexpected costs in M&A transactions. On the flip side, when acquiring a company that also uses SAP, you might end up with overlapping licenses or different contract terms. Harmonizing them often requires SAP’s involvement to consolidate contracts, which may or may not be cost-neutral. CIOs involved in M&A must include license considerations in due diligence.
• Emerging Technology Use: New ways of using SAP (like robotic process automation bots, AI/ML tools accessing SAP data, IoT integrations) introduce licensing questions that may not have clear answers in the contract. SAP has started addressing bots (e.g., requiring a license for bots that act as users), but grey areas remain. If you deploy these technologies, you must proactively seek guidance on licensing them to avoid later disputes. Often, this is a negotiation because the standard contracts might not anticipate certain scenarios.
• Vendor Lock-In & Limited Leverage: As companies invest more in SAP modules and cloud services, moving away becomes harder, which in turn can reduce leverage in negotiations (SAP knows you’re unlikely to switch off). This can lead to harder stances on pricing. The challenge for CIOs is maintaining credible leverage, whether through competitive bids or at least the possibility of alternative solutions for certain components, to keep SAP motivated to offer fair deals. You also want to avoid “all eggs in one basket” if that basket doesn’t remain the best value; diversifying some functions to other solutions (where appropriate) can provide negotiating power.
• Data for Decision-Making: Many organizations lack a single source of truth for their SAP license entitlements and usage. Gathering audit or renewal negotiation data can be a fire drill. Without good data, you’re negotiating or managing blindly. Implementing a robust internal system or process for license management is challenging given SAP’s complexities, but it’s increasingly essential. There’s also risk in relying solely on SAP-provided measurement – you want your validated numbers.

CIO Recommendations – SAP License Management Best Practices:

• Establish a Governance Team or License Center of Excellence: Treat SAP license management as an ongoing program, not a once-a-year task. Form a cross-functional team – including IT asset management, SAP functional leads, procurement, and finance – that meets regularly to review SAP licensing. This team should own the license inventory, track usage, plan for changes, and prepare for audits. Such a governance body means issues are caught early and strategies (like moving to new models or optimizing use) are discussed holistically.
• Maintain Detailed Records and Documentation: Keep copies of all SAP contracts, order forms, and amendments in an accessible repository, and ensure key stakeholders understand the entitlements. Document any special terms or concessions. When staff changes occur, ensure a handover of this knowledge. Knowing exactly what you are entitled to (and not) is half the battle in avoiding compliance issues or in pushing back on incorrect audit findings.
• Invest in Tools: If your SAP landscape is large, manual tracking may not suffice. Consider investing in a Software Asset Management (SAM) tool that supports SAP or SAP’s own License Management tools (like SAP Cloud ALM for cloud metrics, or Solution Manager license management). Some SAM tools (e.g., Snow, Flexera, ServiceNow SAM) have specific capabilities for SAP license optimization, such as automatically suggesting better user license allocations or consolidating LAW results. These tools can pay for themselves by uncovering optimization points and ensuring continuous compliance. However, they need to be properly configured to your contract metrics.
• Regular Internal Audits and Mock True-ups: Conduct your own “mock audit” annually. Treat it seriously: gather user counts, measure engine metrics, evaluate indirect usage, and see if you have any shortfall or excess against your entitlements. This exercise will highlight issues while there’s still time to address them quietly. If possible, have an independent firm or consultant lead the mock audit to give it an external perspective. By the time the official SAP audit comes, you’ll either be confident of a clean bill or have already rectified problems (or at least planned how to rectify them on your terms).
• Stay Proactive with SAP’s Audit Process: When you know an audit is due, prepare thoroughly. Respond accurately and promptly with the data SAP asks for (often a snapshot from LAW and USMM). If the audit report comes back with compliance gaps, engage experts to validate those findings – don’t accept everything at face value. There is often room to discuss or negotiate findings, especially if terms are ambiguous or if you are changing your licensing model (e.g., moving to S/4 or cloud might give leverage to waive certain findings). Remember, an audit is also a sales opportunity for SAP – keep the conversation tied to contractual facts and don’t be pressured into buying something unnecessary.
• Budget for Growth and Changes: Anticipate that you might need to spend on additional licenses as your business grows or changes. Setting aside a budget or reserve for “SAP contingency” can soften the blow if you suddenly need to license an acquisition’s users or an uptick in transactions. This also helps CIOs avoid going to the CFO with an unplanned ask due to an audit – instead, you have a provisional amount earmarked. If a year passes without such need, that budget can be used for an optimization project or carried forward.
• Leverage User Groups and Benchmarks: Participate in SAP user groups (like ASUG or DSAG) and network with peers about licensing experiences. These forums can provide early warning on policy changes and share creative solutions. Also, use benchmarking services to compare your SAP spending with your industry peers. Are you overpaying relative to company size? This info can be potent in negotiations if you’re above market.
• Independent Advisory Support: Engage independent SAP licensing advisors (such as Redress Compliance or others) at key junctures: before a big S/4HANA migration, before a contract renewal or a move to RISE, or when facing an audit with significant exposure. These experts bring outside knowledge of SAP’s playbook and can help a CIO’s team craft the right strategy. For example, they can provide a negotiation strategy that turns an audit into a renewal discussion favorable to you, or ensure you’re not leaving value on the table when converting licenses. Their impartial, vendor-agnostic perspective ensures you get advice purely in your interest, balancing the vendor’s strong influence.
• Educate Stakeholders & Communicate: Licensing should be a consideration in project planning. Educate your project managers and architects that they must factor in licensing when they plan new implementations or integrations involving SAP. A simple checklist item, “Have we consulted the license team on SAP impacts?” can save a lot of pain. Similarly, keep upper management apprised of your SAP license position – no CFO likes last-minute surprises. Regularly report metrics like license utilization and compliance risk to the CIO staff or IT steering committee. When decision-makers understand licensing constraints, they will support initiatives to optimize and invest appropriately.
• Continuous Improvement: SAP licensing is not static. Revisit your license strategy periodically. For instance, evaluate if your current approach is optimal as SAP’s offerings change (new bundles, new licensing options like Rise or “Grow with SAP” for midmarket). Maybe three years ago, staying on ECC made sense, but now the economics tilt towards S/4HANA with a conversion deal—or vice versa. Being open to adjusting your strategy—and timing those changes advantageously—is part of savvy license management.

FAQ on SAP Licensing

What are the different types of SAP user licenses?
SAP offers several user licenses, including Professional User, Limited Professional User, Employee User, Developer User, SAP Business One (Professional and Limited), and S/4HANA (Professional and Functional User). Each license type is tailored to different levels of access and business needs.

Who should opt for the SAP Professional User License?
The SAP Professional User License is for users needing comprehensive access to all SAP functionalities, such as project managers, finance managers, and business analysts.

What is the Limited Professional User License best suited for?
The Limited Professional User License is ideal for team members who need restricted access, such as to approve purchase orders or view specific data, but do not require full access to all SAP capabilities.

Who needs an SAP Employee User License?
The Employee User License is designed for employees who need basic, self-service access to SAP, such as submitting timesheets, travel requests, or viewing personal information.

What is SAP Business One, and how does its licensing work?
SAP Business One is a comprehensive ERP system for small to midsize businesses. It offers two licenses: a professional License for complete ERP functionalities and a Limited License for restricted access to certain business areas, such as finance or logistics.

Who should use the SAP Business One Limited License?
The SAP Business One Limited License is suited for users who need access only to specific ERP functionalities, such as accountants who specialize in bookkeeping or supply chain managers who specialize in inventory.

What is the Developer User License in SAP?
The Developer User License is intended for those performing customization and development tasks within the SAP environment, such as ABAP development, building custom reports, and system integrations.

What differentiates SAP S/4HANA Professional and Functional User Licenses?
The S/4HANA Professional User License provides full access across all business domains, whereas the Functional User License offers access to specific functional areas suitable for users handling limited tasks, like procurement officers.

Can SAP licenses be customized based on business needs?
Yes, SAP offers different license types to align with various business roles and needs. This allows organizations to customize their licensing structure for better cost control and efficiency.

How do I decide which SAP license my company needs?
Consider each user’s role and level of access. Employees requiring full access across modules will need a Professional User License, while those with limited roles can opt for a Limited Professional or Employee User License.

Are SAP licenses transferable between users?
SAP licenses are generally assigned to individuals and are not transferable between users. However, exceptions may apply in specific scenarios, such as employee turnover, where licenses may need reassignment.

What is indirect access in SAP licensing?
Indirect access refers to scenarios where third-party applications interact with SAP data, potentially requiring additional licensing. Understanding these scenarios is crucial to avoid non-compliance.

Is the SAP Developer User License required for all customization work?
Yes, a developer user license is required for any development or customization work within SAP. This includes activities such as modifying reports or integrating SAP with third-party systems.

Who benefits from the SAP S/4HANA Functional User License?
The S/4HANA Functional User License benefits users who need targeted access to specific business processes, such as running procurement tasks or generating specific reports. It provides necessary functionality without the costs associated with a full Professional License.

Do SAP Business One licenses work for larger enterprises?
No, SAP Business One is tailored for small and midsize businesses (SMEs). Larger enterprises typically require the more extensive capabilities offered by SAP S/4HANA or other SAP solutions.

How does SAP’s document-based licensing model impact users?
SAP’s licensing charges are based on document transactions rather than user numbers. This model can benefit companies with many indirect users but fewer transaction volumes, allowing better cost control.

How can companies avoid over-licensing with SAP?
Companies should regularly audit their users and system access, align license types with actual job roles, and downgrade unnecessary licenses. Reviewing employee’ needs about their assigned licenses helps prevent over-licensing.

How can we ensure compliance with SAP’s licensing policies?
Maintain accurate records, conduct regular internal audits, and stay updated on licensing changes. Consulting SAP experts or partners can help you navigate complex licensing scenarios and avoid compliance pitfalls.

Can SAP license requirements change as a company grows?
As companies grow or their business needs evolve, their SAP licensing requirements may also change. It’s important to regularly reassess license allocations to ensure that they align with current operations.

How do I avoid costly surprises during an SAP audit?
Conduct regular internal license reviews, maintain clear documentation, and ensure compliance with SAP’s policies. Address indirect access issues proactively and seek external expert advice to prepare for audits and avoid unexpected costs.

Read about our SAP License Management Service.

Do you want to know more about our SAP License Management Services?