Microsoft Audit

Preparing for a Microsoft Audit: Proactive Steps to Fortify Your Compliance

Preparing for a Microsoft Audit: Proactive Steps to Fortify Your Compliance

Preparing for a Microsoft Audit

Why Microsoft Audit Preparation Matters

Microsoft software audits are becoming more frequent in 2025, catching many organizations off guard. With Microsoftโ€™s vast product reach, nearly every enterprise has some inadvertent licensing gaps.

An official audit can result inย millions of unbudgeted costs if non-compliance is found, even if the mistakes were unintentional. Preparing early for a Microsoft audit significantly reduces cost, risk, and stress by avoiding last-minute scrambles and potential penalties.

Microsoft isnโ€™t shy about using audits as a revenue tool. For a complete guide, read our CIO playbook on Microsoft Audits.

They have dedicated compliance teams and often partner with major accounting firms to thoroughly review your deployments. Being proactive and skeptical of Microsoftโ€™s audit practices is wise โ€“ the โ€œdeckโ€ can feel stacked against customers.

By strengthening your compliance now, you turn a potential audit from a crisis into a routine check. In short, the best Microsoft audit is the one youโ€™re fully prepared for or can avoid entirely.

Building a Software Asset Management (SAM) Program

A robust Software Asset Management (SAM) program is the foundation of Microsoft audit readiness. SAM is all about knowing what software you have, what licenses you own, and how theyโ€™re being used at all times.

Without an effective SAM program, itโ€™s nearly impossible to stay on top of Microsoftโ€™s complex licensing terms or detect compliance gaps early.

Key elements of a strong Microsoft-focused SAM program include:

  • Comprehensive Inventory: Maintain an up-to-date inventory of all Microsoft software installed across your desktops, servers, and cloud services. This inventory should track product names, versions, and the number of installations.
  • Entitlement Tracking: Organize records of every Microsoft license youโ€™ve purchased โ€“ Enterprise Agreements, volume licenses, OEM licenses, subscriptions, etc. Know your entitlements (e.g., how many users or installations youโ€™re allowed) and any special rights like upgrade or downgrade rights.
  • Periodic Reconciliation: Regularly reconcile your usage against your entitlements. For example, if you have 500 Office 365 licenses and 520 active users, thatโ€™s a red flag that needs to be addressed before an audit. Schedule internal license reviews (quarterly or at least annually) to catch over-deployments or lapses in licensing.

A well-run SAM program gives you visibility into your Microsoft software usage. It helps you spot compliance issues early and address them on your own terms.

It also creates a paper trail of diligent management โ€“ something you can show auditors to demonstrate your commitment to compliance. Investing in SAM expertise and tools now will pay off by making any future audit far less painful.

Maintaining Strong Documentation

Documentation is your lifeline in a Microsoft audit. If Microsoft comes knocking, youโ€™ll need to prove every license you claim to have.

That means keeping thorough, organized records long before an audit notice arrives. Donโ€™t wait until auditors request documents โ€“ set up a system to maintain them proactively.

What to document:

Keep all proof of your Microsoft software licenses and deployments. This includes contracts, purchase orders, license certificates, invoices from Microsoft or resellers, Enterprise Agreements (EA), True-up records, activation keys, and Microsoft License Statements. You should also retain records of software deployments and assignments (for instance, a list of which users have Office 365 licenses). If youโ€™ve had any previous compliance checks or audits, save those reports and correspondence, too.

How to organize: Store these documents in a centralized repository accessible to your IT asset management and compliance teams. They should be indexed or tagged by product and date, so you can quickly retrieve, say, your Windows Server 2019 license proof or last yearโ€™s true-up summary.

Regularly update this repository whenever you purchase new Microsoft licenses or renew subscriptions, and remove or archive records that are no longer relevant (such as expired contracts), while maintaining an audit history.

Must-Have License Documentation (Checklist):

  • License Agreements & Contracts โ€“ e.g., Microsoft Enterprise Agreements, Select/Open license agreements, and any amendments.
  • Purchase Records โ€“ invoices or receipts for all Microsoft software purchases (on-premises licenses, cloud subscriptions, etc.).
  • License Certificates/Keys โ€“ license keys, activation IDs, or Microsoft License Statements (MLS) confirming your entitlements.
  • True-Up and Renewal Documents โ€“ records of annual true-ups, renewal quotes, and proof of payment for additional licenses added.
  • User Assignment Logs โ€“ for subscriptions like Office 365 (Microsoft 365), maintain lists or screenshots that show which users are assigned to which licenses.
  • Previous Audit Reports (if any) โ€“ documentation from any prior Microsoft license audits or self-assessments, including correspondence and resolution details.

Having these documents at your fingertips means you can quickly answer auditor questions about what you own. It also prevents panic if Microsoft gives you a tight deadline to produce evidence.

Strong documentation is one of the best defensive measures in a software audit โ€“ itโ€™s hard for Microsoft to claim youโ€™re missing licenses when you can show the receipts.

Conducting Internal Microsoft License Audits

Why wait for Microsoft to find compliance issues when you can find them yourself? Conducting periodic internal license audits is a proactive way to stay audit-ready. Essentially, you simulate the audit process internally to spot and fix problems early.

Start with Microsoftโ€™s own tools to collect deployment data. The Microsoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) Toolkit and System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) are invaluable for scanning your environment and listing installed software.

These tools can generate reports on the number of instances of SQL Server, Windows Server, or Office that are deployed, as well as their locations.

For cloud services like Azure and Microsoft 365, use the admin portals to extract usage reports (for example, how many users are assigned each Office 365 license, or how many Azure VMs youโ€™re running).

Next, compare usage to entitlements.

This is essentially building your Effective License Position (ELP) internally. For each major product, look at whatโ€™s deployed vs. what you have licenses for.

If MAP/SCCM shows 120 SQL Server instances but you find licenses for only 100, youโ€™ve uncovered a compliance gap. Similarly, if 600 users have been assigned an Office 365 E3 license but you only purchased 500 seats, thatโ€™s a problem to address.

Treat this internal audit as if you were Microsoftโ€™s auditor:

  • Gather deployment data from all sources (on-premises and cloud).
  • Gather all licensing documents as evidence of entitlements.
  • Identify any mismatch or shortfall where usage exceeds licenses.
  • Also, identifyย unused licensesย โ€“ perhaps youโ€™re over-licensed in some areas, which represents wasted spend that could be optimized.

By conducting a self-audit, you identify gaps before Microsoft does. You can then take corrective actions quietly (more on that soon) without the pressure of an official audit timeline.

Document the findings of your internal audits and the steps taken โ€“ this shows a pattern of due diligence. Microsoft might even ask if youโ€™ve done a self-assessment; being able to say โ€œyes, and we addressed the issues foundโ€ can demonstrate good faith.

Regular internal audits (for instance, annually or before any major Microsoft contract renewal) are a cornerstone of audit readiness. They ensure no big surprises are lurking in your environment and signal to Microsoft that you take compliance seriously.

For more insights, see Common Microsoft Audit Findings (and How to Remediate Them Before They Cost You).

Audit Readiness Checklist: Common Areas of Exposure

Even well-managed IT environments can have hidden compliance exposures.

Use this checklist to review common areas where Microsoft license compliance often falls short. Focusing on these areas will improve your overall audit readiness:

  • Desktop Software Licensing โ€“ Check that every installation of Windows and Microsoft Office on company PCs is licensed. Beware of scenarios like cloned PC images that accidentally deploy extra Windows instances, or Office installed on more devices than allowed. Ensure that older versions (e.g., Office 2016) and any stand-alone products (e.g., Visio, Project) are also tracked.
  • Office 365 User Assignments โ€“ Verify your Microsoft 365 (Office 365) licenses are correctly assigned. Every active user consuming a service requires an appropriate license to be assigned in the admin portal. Watch for โ€œlicense creep,โ€ such as accounts that were not de-provisioned after employees left, or users with multiple licenses. Ensure that youโ€™re not assigning premium licenses to users who donโ€™t need them, and conversely, that every feature in use (email, Office apps, Power BI, etc.) has a corresponding license.
  • SQL Server & Windows Server โ€“ Audit your server environment closely. Ensure that SQL Server instances are licensed per Microsoftโ€™s rules โ€“ whether per core or using Server/CAL, you must license the correct number of cores for each server or have enough CALs for user/device access. In virtualized clusters, all physical hosts where VMs can run may need licensing (or you need proper license mobility with Software Assurance). Similarly, for Windows Server, confirm you have the required core licenses for each host and that you have purchased Client Access Licenses (CALs) for every user or device accessing those servers. Miscounting cores or neglecting CALs is a frequent audit finding.
  • CAL Compliance โ€“ Beyond Windows Server, remember that many Microsoft products require CALs or similar entitlements for users/devices. Exchange Server, SharePoint Server, SQL Server (if not using per-core licensing), and Remote Desktop Services (RDS) โ€“ all these require proper CALs or user licenses. Review if you have documentation for all CAL purchases and that the number of CALs covers all active users. This is often an area of inadvertent shortfall because CAL purchases arenโ€™t always tracked as closely as main server licenses.
  • Azure and Dual-Use Rights โ€“ If youโ€™re using Azure, be mindful of hybrid use rights and dual consumption. For example, if youโ€™re using Azure Hybrid Benefit to apply your on-premises Windows or SQL licenses to Azure VMs, ensure those on-premises instances are either decommissioned or covered by other licenses. In contrast, the original license is used in the cloud. Donโ€™t accidentally โ€œdouble dipโ€ by using one license to cover two running instances (one on-prem, one in Azure) unless your agreement allows it. Also, track any Azure services that may incur licensing needs (e.g., bringing your own SQL licenses to Azure vs. paying per usage).
  • Development/Test Environments โ€“ Review how you license non-production environments. Using a server or SQL instance in development or testing doesnโ€™t exempt you from licensing it. Many companies forget to license dev/test installations, assuming theyโ€™re free โ€“ but unless you have MSDN/Visual Studio subscriptions or special dev/test licensing, those instances require licenses too. Ensure your developers arenโ€™t deploying Microsoft software outside of production without proper coverage. Microsoft often checks for consistency between production and test environments during audits.

By running through this checklist regularly, you can identify and address common compliance pitfalls. These areas are audit hot spots that Microsoftโ€™s auditors know many customers struggle with. Shore them up before Microsoft ever asks, and youโ€™ll drastically reduce your audit risk.

> Top Risks to Watch (Audit Hot Spots)

SQL Server in Virtualized Clusters: Ensure every physical server in a VM cluster is fully licensed or that you have unlimited virtualization rights. Microsoft auditors pay special attention to SQL in VMware/Hyper-V environments, since moving VMs can inadvertently cause licensing gaps.
Multiplexing & Indirect Access: Beware of scenarios where many users access a Microsoft server through a single service or app (e.g. a middleware or pooling system). This โ€œmultiplexingโ€ doesnโ€™t eliminate license requirements โ€“ all indirect users still need proper CALs or licenses. Donโ€™t assume one technical connection equals one license if dozens of people are behind it.
Shadow IT Deployments: Unknown or unapproved Microsoft deployments can fly under the radar. A department might spin up an SQL Server or install Visio without telling IT. These installations wonโ€™t be in your SAM inventory initially, creating compliance blind spots. Regular network scans and good internal policies can mitigate shadow IT risk.
Office 365 Misassignments: Common mistakes include assigning the wrong license plans to users or not reassigning licenses when roles change. For instance, if a user was given an E5 license for a project but no longer needs it, downgrading or reallocating it can save money and prevent compliance issues. Also monitor admin accounts and service accounts โ€“ they might not need full licenses but are sometimes assigned one improperly.
License Agreement Changes: Keep an eye on changes to Microsoftโ€™s product terms or bundling. Audit risks emerge when, say, Microsoft changes how a product is licensed (like a shift from device to user licensing) and your organization doesnโ€™t adjust. Staying informed on Microsoftโ€™s licensing rule updates helps avoid falling out of compliance due to ignorance.

(These risk areas are frequently cited in Microsoft audits โ€“ make sure theyโ€™re on your radar.)

How to Rectify Issues Before Microsoft Sees Them

Discovering a compliance gap internally can be unsettling, but itโ€™s far better than having Microsoft discover it.

Once you identify an issue (via your SAM program or self-audit), take quiet remediation steps to fix it before an official audit:

  • Uninstall or Reassign Licenses: If you find unused or underused installations of Microsoft software, removing them can instantly bring you back into compliance. For example, if 10 extra copies of Visio are installed but not truly needed, uninstalling them eliminates the need to buy 10 licenses. Likewise, if certain users have more licenses than they use (e.g., two different Office 365 accounts), reassign or consolidate to free up licenses.
  • Purchase Missing Licenses Proactively: For genuine shortfalls where software is necessary for your operations, itโ€™s often more cost-effective to purchase the needed licenses now rather than waiting for an audit. When Microsoft audits, any shortfall is typically charged at full list price plus backdated support fees or penalties. By purchasing licenses through your normal channels (e.g., via your Microsoft reseller or through an enterprise agreement true-up), you may receive better pricing and avoid penalties. It also shows good faith โ€“ youโ€™re keeping compliant without being forced.
  • Document Your Remediation: Each time you fix a compliance issue, document what was done โ€“ e.g., โ€œRemoved 15 installations of Project Professional on Date Xโ€ or โ€œPurchased 20 SQL Server core licenses to cover VM cluster Y.โ€ This creates an audit trail that proves you addressed the problem. If an audit happens later, you can show that these items were resolved (and should no longer count as a compliance gap).

When deciding whether to fix internally or wait, consider the cost-benefit. In almost all cases, fixing the issue internally is cheaper and safer.

You maintain control over the timing and cost (perhaps by aligning purchases with budget cycles or negotiating a favorable deal). In contrast, if Microsoft catches the issue, you lose leverage โ€“ youโ€™ll likely pay more and have to fix it under a tight deadline.

The only exception might be extremely minor issues that you know are within a tolerance (but assuming โ€œminorโ€ is risky, as even small gaps can add up).

By quietly rectifying compliance issues, you also maintain a clean reputation. Microsoft might not even be aware that you ever had a shortfall if you resolve it in advance. Itโ€™s akin to correcting your course before anyone else notices you drifted โ€“ a smart move in audit preparation.

Read how to resolve any commercial negotiations, Negotiating the Outcome of a Microsoft Audit: How to Reduce Back Charges and Penalties.

Optimization vs. Compliance: Striking the Balance

Organizations often pursue license optimization to reduce costs, such as eliminating unused licenses, consolidating servers, or downgrading plans.

Optimization is good, but it must be balanced with maintaining compliance. Itโ€™s important to avoid over-optimization that inadvertently puts you below the licensing requirements.

For example, you might decide to save money by uninstalling some SQL Server instances or moving users from Office 365 E5 to E3 licenses.

These can be sensible moves, but be sure to double-check that these changes still align with usage needs and license terms. If you remove too many SQL instances but then a team spins one up without telling you, youโ€™re suddenly unlicensed in that area.

Or, if an E5 feature (such as advanced security) is mission-critical and you downgrade the license, you could be non-compliant or at risk if people start using that feature without entitlement.

The key is to optimize safely.

Use data from your SAM tools to identify genuinely unused licenses or software. Reharvest and reallocate licenses where possible โ€“ for instance, reclaim Office 365 licenses from departed employees and assign them to new hires instead of buying new ones. However, always maintain a buffer or safety margin.

It can be wise to keep a few extra licenses for critical products in reserve. That way, if usage spikes unexpectedly, you have coverage and wonโ€™t fall into non-compliance before you can react.

Think of compliance as the floor and optimization as the ceiling: Never go below the floor of whatโ€™s needed to be compliant, even if the ceiling of budget pressure is coming down. The cost of a compliance violation (true-up fees, penalties, and audit hassles) will far outweigh the savings from trimming one license too many. Educate your finance or optimization team about these risks so they understand why you canโ€™t cut certain licensing corners.

In summary, you want to right-size your licenses โ€“ not too many (to avoid waste), but not too few (to avoid compliance gaps). With careful monitoring and a bit of cushion for critical licenses, you can strike a balance that is both cost-efficient and fully prepared for any Microsoft audit.

Creating a Microsoft Audit Response Plan

Preparing for an audit isnโ€™t only about licenses and tools โ€“ itโ€™s also about having a clear response plan if Microsoft initiates an audit. Think of this as a disaster recovery plan, but for licensing audits. You hope you never need to use it, but youโ€™ll be glad to have it.

Define an Audit Response Team: Identify ahead of time who will be involved the moment an audit notice arrives. This typically includes: an IT Asset Manager or SAM (Software Asset Management) lead who knows your licensing inside-out, a representative from Procurement (who can handle purchasing and contract discussions), someone from Legal (to review audit communications and ensure Microsoft sticks to the contract terms), and potentially an outside licensing consultant or auditor (if you plan to get external help for negotiation or validation). Also, loop in an executive sponsor (like a CIO or CFO) so theyโ€™re aware of the stakes and can provide support or approvals quickly.

Establish Communication Rules: All communication with Microsoft (or their appointed auditors) should be channeled through a single point of contact โ€“ usually someone from your compliance or legal team. This prevents accidental oversharing or conflicting messages. Decide internally that only the designated lead will answer auditor questions, and train staff to forward any audit-related queries to the designated lead. Also, plan how to escalate issues: if an auditor requests something unusual or beyond scope, your team should know to bring legal into the loop before complying.

Plan Data Gathering and Verification: Your response plan should outline how you will collect the data requested during an audit. Since youโ€™ve maintained documentation and done internal audits, you already have a head start. Still, assign responsibilities: e.g., โ€œIT will run the required inventory tools, Procurement will pull purchase records, SAM manager will compile the Effective License Position.โ€ Set internal deadlines to meet auditor timelines with some buffer for review.

Documentation and Record-Keeping: During an audit, keep a log of every interaction. Document what data was provided, on what date, and any communications. If the auditor provides an initial finding or report, save it and also keep notes on your internal analysis of it. Basically, create an audit trail of the audit process itself. This helps if thereโ€™s any dispute later about what was said or agreed. It also helps you learn for next time by reviewing how the process went.

Having a Microsoft audit response plan means you wonโ€™t be scrambling if that official letter comes in. Your team will know their roles, and youโ€™ll respond in a coordinated, controlled manner. This not only makes the audit go smoother, it also shows Microsoft that youโ€™re organized โ€“ which can sometimes lead them to handle your case with a bit more respect and efficiency.

Training IT Staff to Avoid Compliance Slips

Technology teams are often focused on getting systems up and running, sometimes at the expense of adhering strictly to licensing rules. Thatโ€™s why regular training and awareness for IT staff is critical in preventing accidental non-compliance. The goal is to create a culture where everyone, from system administrators to developers, understands thatย license compliance is part of their job.

Raise Licensing Awareness: Incorporate basic Microsoft licensing education into your IT onboarding and routine training. For instance, ensure admins know that spinning up a new SQL Server VM isnโ€™t free just because itโ€™s easy โ€“ they need to check license availability first. If developers request a new server or software for a project, they should involve the SAM/licensing team or at least follow a process to account for licensing. Even a short session on โ€œTop 5 licensing mistakes to avoidโ€ can open eyes.

Clear Policies and Guidelines: Develop internal guidelines for deploying Microsoft software. For example, a policy might state that all new server installations must undergo IT asset management for license assignment or that any use of a product outside the standard (such as a developer installing Visio or Visual Studio on a personal machine) requires approval. When policies are in place and communicated, staff are less likely to inadvertently create compliance issues.

Preventing Accidental Overuse: Many licensing breaches are not willful, but rather accidental โ€“ a classic example is an administrator enabling a feature or component that wasnโ€™t licensed. To counter this, document and disseminate โ€œsafe configurations.โ€ For example, if your Windows Server license doesnโ€™t cover a certain feature, note this in runbooks so administrators wonโ€™t inadvertently turn it on. In cloud services, use role-based access controls to ensure that only authorized individuals can assign licenses or spin up resources, thereby reducing the risk of inadvertently exceeding license counts.

Feedback Loop: Encourage IT staff to ask questions whenever theyโ€™re unsure about licensing. They should pause and confirm before charging ahead. Create a channel (such as an internal email or chat group) where experts can address licensing-related questions. Sometimes, just consulting before deploying can save a huge headache later.

By training your team and integrating compliance into the IT workflow, you reduce โ€œlicense accidents.โ€ When everyone knows that compliance is a shared responsibility, your organization is far less likely to drift out of bounds. This proactive education can be the difference between an audit finding and an audit non-event.

Leveraging Tools for Continuous Audit Readiness

Manual efforts aside, technology can greatly assist in staying audit-ready. Microsoft provides some native tools, and there are third-party solutions specifically aimed at continuous license compliance monitoring. The right tools give you real-time insight and alerts, so youโ€™re never caught off guard.

Microsoft SCCM and Inventory Tools: If you use System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) or its modern cloud counterpart (Microsoft Endpoint Manager), take advantage of its software inventory capabilities. SCCM can report all installed software across your network, including Microsoft products. Set up regular reports or dashboards that display your counts of Windows, Office, SQL, and other software, along with comparisons to purchased licenses. Microsoft also offers theย Microsoft 365 Admin Centerย andย Azure Portal,ย which provide usage analytics โ€“ use these to continuously monitor license assignments and Azure resource usage.

Microsoft Compliance Manager / Dashboards: Microsoft 365 features aย Compliance Centerย (formerly known as Security & Compliance), which, although primarily focused on regulatory compliance, can help ensure youโ€™re following certain best practices. Additionally, Microsoft often provides licensing statements or reports via their portals โ€“ check if your Microsoft Volume Licensing Service Center (VLSC) or Microsoft 365 portal gives any license summary. Being familiar with these Microsoft-provided views ensures you know what Microsoft might see or highlight.

Third-Party SAM Tools: There are robust third-party Software Asset Management tools (like Flexera, Snow License Manager, ServiceNow SAM, and others) that specialize in tracking license entitlements vs. usage. These tools often have built-in intelligence for Microsoftโ€™s product use rights and can automatically calculate your license position. They can flag when youโ€™re nearing a license limit or if a deployment is out of scope. If your organization has a large and complex Microsoft footprint, investing in one of these tools can be worthwhile for continuous compliance management.

Automation and Alerts: Whether using SCCM, a third-party tool, or scripts, set up alerts for key thresholds. For example, if your Office 365 license assignment hits 95% of purchased seats, trigger an email to the IT asset manager to either acquire more licenses or revoke some from inactive users. If a new installation of SQL Server appears on the network, have a process to immediately check it against your license pool. Automation ensures that compliance checks are conducted as part of regular IT operations, not just during special audits.

Regular Reviews: Incorporate license compliance reviews into IT governance โ€“ for instance, a monthly or quarterly meeting where you review compliance dashboards and address any deviations. The idea is to treat license compliance as an ongoing responsibility, not a one-time project.

By leveraging these tools and practices, audit readiness becomes a continuous state, rather than a frantic project when an audit is looming. Youโ€™ll have confidence that at any given moment, you have an accurate picture of your Microsoft license compliance, and you can produce that evidence quickly if needed. Microsoft audits wonโ€™t faze you because youโ€™re effectively doing your own audit year-round with the help of smart systems.

FAQ: Microsoft Audit Preparation Questions

Q1: How often does Microsoft audit its customers?
It varies, but enterprise customers typically face a Microsoft audit about every 3-5 years. Frequency depends on factors like your size, license spend, and any red flags in usage.

Q2: What products does Microsoft audit the most?
Common targets includeย Windows Server, SQL Server, and Microsoft 365 (formerlyย Office 365), as these have complex licensing and high value. Other server products (Exchange, SharePoint) and Azure usage are also frequent audit focuses.

Q3: Can I refuse Microsoftโ€™s audit request?
Usually no. Most Microsoft agreements include an audit clause obligating you to comply. Refusing an audit can breach your contract, leading to penalties or termination of licenses, so itโ€™s best to cooperate (with caution and preparation).

Q4: Do I need external help for audit readiness or defense?
Not necessarily, but many companies engage external SAM consultants or licensing experts. These experts can identify hidden compliance issues and guide you through the audit negotiation process. If you lack in-house licensing expertise, external help is advisable.

Q5: Whatโ€™s the first step if I get an audit letter from Microsoft?
Stay calm and activate your response plan. Assemble your audit response team immediately and review the audit clause in your Microsoft agreement. Notify Microsoft (or the auditor) that youโ€™ve received the notice and will comply, and coordinate internally to gather the requested data under your plan. (Always involve your legal team before sending data to ensure you only provide whatโ€™s required.)

Read about our Microsoft Audit Defense Service.

Microsoft License Audit Defense Compliance & Negotiation Strategies Explained

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Audit Defense Service?

Name
Author
  • Avatar

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizationsโ€”including numerous Fortune 500 companiesโ€”optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts