Windows 365 and AVD:
Microsoft’s Desktop Strategy Is Designed to Lock You In
Microsoft is steering enterprises toward Windows 365 Cloud PC and Azure Virtual Desktop as the future of end-user computing. But the per-user economics and Azure dependency create a multi-year cost escalation trap. This paper compares the TCO of traditional VDI, AVD, and Windows 365, exposes the contractual lock-in mechanisms, and provides a hybrid strategy that preserves optionality.
Executive Summary
Microsoft’s cloud desktop strategy — Windows 365 Cloud PC and Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD) — is positioned as the natural evolution of end-user computing. The pitch is compelling: eliminate on-premises VDI infrastructure, simplify desktop management, enable hybrid work. The reality is more complex. Microsoft’s cloud desktop economics create a cost trajectory that exceeds traditional VDI for most enterprise workloads, while simultaneously building a multi-layered dependency on Azure that becomes progressively harder and more expensive to unwind.
Key Findings
The Enterprise Desktop Landscape: Three Competing Models
Enterprise desktop delivery has fragmented into three distinct models, each with different cost structures, management complexity, and vendor dependency profiles. Understanding the architecture and economics of each model is the prerequisite for any desktop strategy decision.
On-Premises Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
VDI platforms (Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, VMware Horizon, Parallels RAS) deliver Windows desktops from on-premises data centre infrastructure. The organisation owns and operates the compute, storage, and networking hardware. Licensing includes the VDI platform subscription plus Windows Server or Windows Enterprise VDA rights. Traditional VDI requires significant upfront capital investment but delivers the lowest per-user operating cost at scale, full control over performance and security, and zero cloud vendor dependency. The primary drawbacks are infrastructure management complexity, capacity planning overhead, and limited elasticity for burst/seasonal demand.
Typical 5-year TCO: $45–$75/user/month (fully loaded, including hardware refresh at Year 3–4). Capital-heavy, OpEx-light.
Cloud-Hosted Virtual Desktops on Azure
AVD delivers Windows desktops from Azure infrastructure. Microsoft positions AVD as the “free” VDI platform — the AVD control plane is included with Windows E3/E5 — but the underlying Azure compute (VMs), storage (managed disks), and networking (bandwidth, VPN, ExpressRoute) are billed as Azure consumption. AVD supports multi-session Windows 11 (a capability exclusive to Azure), which allows multiple users to share a single VM — reducing per-user compute costs for task-worker profiles. The primary drawback is cost variability: Azure consumption fluctuates with user activity, concurrency, and storage growth, making budget predictability significantly harder than fixed-cost VDI or Windows 365.
Typical 5-year TCO: $65–$110/user/month (depending on VM sizing, concurrency, and storage). Fully OpEx, variable.
Microsoft-Managed Cloud Desktop (DaaS)
Windows 365 Cloud PC is a fully managed Desktop-as-a-Service offering. Each user receives a dedicated, persistent cloud desktop with a fixed compute configuration (vCPU, RAM, storage). Microsoft manages the underlying infrastructure, patching, and availability. Pricing is per-user-per-month based on the selected compute tier. Windows 365 simplifies desktop management but at a significant cost premium: the per-user price includes no volume discount, is subject to annual escalation, and includes a compute configuration that cannot be dynamically adjusted. Users are assigned a fixed VM size regardless of actual workload, meaning the organisation pays for peak capacity 24/7 whether the user is active or not.
Typical 5-year TCO: $85–$160/user/month (depending on compute tier selected). Fully OpEx, fixed but premium.
Microsoft’s sales team consistently presents Windows 365 and AVD as replacements for traditional VDI, emphasising simplified management and hybrid work enablement. What they do not present is a fully loaded 5-year TCO comparison against the customer’s existing VDI environment. In 86% of Redress desktop strategy engagements, the organisation had not received a TCO comparison from Microsoft or their partner before committing to a cloud desktop migration.
TCO Comparison: The Numbers Microsoft Doesn’t Show You
A fully loaded TCO comparison must account for all cost components — not just the headline subscription price. Microsoft’s Windows 365 and AVD pricing excludes several material cost categories that inflate the total cost of cloud desktop delivery.
| Cost Component | Traditional VDI | Azure Virtual Desktop | Windows 365 Cloud PC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform Licence | Citrix/VMware: $8–$15/user/mo | Free (included with Win E3/E5) | Included in W365 subscription |
| Compute | Server hardware: amortised capex | Azure VMs: $30–$80/user/mo | Included (fixed tier): $28–$105/user/mo |
| Storage | SAN/NAS: amortised capex | Azure Managed Disks: $5–$20/user/mo | Included (limited): $0–$10/user/mo add-on |
| Networking | Existing LAN: minimal incremental | Azure bandwidth: $3–$12/user/mo | Included (Microsoft backbone) |
| Windows Licence | VDA or SA: $4–$7/user/mo | Included with Win E3/E5 | Included in W365 subscription |
| M365 Licence | E3/E5: $36–$57/user/mo | E3/E5: $36–$57/user/mo | E3/E5: $36–$57/user/mo (required) |
| Management Tooling | Citrix/VMware mgmt tools | Intune + Azure management | Intune + W365 admin centre |
| Annual Price Escalation | Hardware: 0% (capex owned) | Azure: 3–8%/yr (consumption) | W365: up to 11%/yr (MCA terms) |
| 5-Year Fully Loaded TCO | $45–$75/user/mo | $65–$110/user/mo | $85–$160/user/mo |
Desktop TCO Benchmarks — Redress Assessment Data
vs. on-premises VDI
initial projections
desktop strategy
comparison from Microsoft
The single most underestimated cost in cloud desktop deployments is annual price escalation. On-premises VDI hardware, once purchased, does not increase in cost. Azure VM pricing and Windows 365 subscriptions are subject to Microsoft’s annual price adjustment rights. A 5% annual escalation on a $100/user/month Windows 365 subscription adds $27/user/month by Year 5 — a cumulative 27% increase that is rarely included in Microsoft’s initial TCO projections.
The Four Layers of Lock-In
Microsoft’s cloud desktop strategy creates four distinct layers of vendor lock-in, each reinforcing the others. Understanding these layers is essential for any organisation considering or already committed to Windows 365 or AVD.
Layer 1: Subscription Lock-In
Windows 365 subscriptions are per-user, per-month commitments. Once assigned, user profiles, application configurations, and data reside on Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure. Cancelling the subscription requires migrating users to an alternative platform — a process that involves re-creating profiles, re-installing applications, and re-establishing management policies. The subscription creates a persistent financial commitment that becomes harder to unwind as user count and deployment duration increase.
Layer 2: Infrastructure Lock-In
AVD runs exclusively on Azure. Unlike traditional VDI (which runs on any hypervisor) or third-party DaaS solutions (which can run on AWS, GCP, or on-premises), AVD is architecturally bound to Azure compute, Azure networking, and Azure storage. Migrating AVD workloads to an alternative cloud or back to on-premises requires rebuilding the desktop delivery platform from scratch. This is not a VM migration — it is a full platform migration.
Layer 3: Licensing Lock-In
Windows 11 Enterprise multi-session — the capability that allows multiple users to share a single VM, reducing per-user compute costs — is exclusively available on Azure. This means the most cost-efficient AVD architecture (multi-session) cannot be replicated on AWS, GCP, or on-premises. Organisations that optimise their AVD deployment for multi-session are simultaneously optimising for Azure lock-in. Moving to another platform requires switching to single-session desktops at significantly higher per-user compute cost.
Layer 4: Data & Identity Lock-In
Cloud desktop environments generate deep dependencies on Azure Active Directory (Entra ID), Microsoft Intune, OneDrive for Business, and SharePoint for user identity, device management, profile data, and file storage. These dependencies are not desktop-specific — they span the entire Microsoft 365 ecosystem — but cloud desktop deployment accelerates and deepens them. User profiles stored in FSLogix on Azure Files, conditional access policies in Entra ID, and application delivery through Intune create a management fabric that does not translate to non-Microsoft platforms.
Each lock-in layer reinforces the others. Subscription lock-in makes migration expensive. Infrastructure lock-in makes migration technically complex. Licensing lock-in makes alternative architectures more costly. Data lock-in makes migration operationally disruptive. After 2–3 years of cloud desktop deployment, the cumulative switching cost typically exceeds 18–24 months of the subscription itself — which is precisely the economic threshold at which most organisations stop evaluating alternatives.
Windows 365 Economics: The Per-User Cost Trap
Windows 365 Cloud PC is Microsoft’s highest-margin desktop offering. The per-user pricing model is simple to understand — and expensive to operate at scale.
Fixed Compute, Variable Demand. Windows 365 assigns each user a dedicated VM with a fixed compute configuration (2 vCPU/4GB, 4 vCPU/16GB, 8 vCPU/32GB, etc.). The user pays for this capacity 24/7, regardless of whether they are actively using their Cloud PC. A knowledge worker who uses their Cloud PC 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, is paying for 168 hours of compute capacity per week and using 40 hours — a 76% capacity waste rate. Traditional VDI and AVD both support shared compute models that dramatically reduce per-user cost by pooling capacity across concurrent users.
No Volume Discounts. Windows 365 pricing is fixed per-user with no volume discount tiers, no negotiated enterprise rates, and limited scope for EA/MCA-level pricing concessions. A 10,000-user Windows 365 deployment pays the same per-user rate as a 100-user deployment. This is a departure from Microsoft’s pricing model for nearly every other enterprise product, and it ensures that Windows 365 economics do not improve at scale.
The Licensing Stack. Windows 365 requires a Microsoft 365 E3/E5 or Business Premium licence in addition to the Windows 365 subscription itself. The combined cost — M365 E3 ($36/user/mo) + Windows 365 Enterprise 4vCPU/16GB/256GB ($66/user/mo) — is $102/user/month, or $1,224/user/year, or $12.2M/year for a 10,000-user deployment. This cost is fixed, non-negotiable, and subject to annual escalation under MCA terms.
| Windows 365 Tier | Configuration | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost (10K Users) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | 2 vCPU / 4GB / 64GB | $28/user | $3.36M |
| Standard | 2 vCPU / 8GB / 128GB | $40/user | $4.80M |
| Premium | 4 vCPU / 16GB / 256GB | $66/user | $7.92M |
| Power | 8 vCPU / 32GB / 512GB | $105/user | $12.60M |
Prices are Windows 365 subscription only; add M365 E3/E5 ($36–$57/user/mo) for total per-user desktop cost.
AVD Economics: The Consumption Cost Variability Problem
Azure Virtual Desktop is positioned as the cost-optimised alternative to Windows 365 — but the consumption-based model introduces cost variability that most organisations underestimate.
The “Free” Platform That Isn’t Free. Microsoft positions AVD as free — the control plane is included with Windows E3/E5. This is accurate but misleading. The AVD control plane (session brokering, gateway services, diagnostics) is indeed included. Everything else — the Azure VMs that run the desktops, the managed disks that store user data, the networking that connects users to their sessions, and the FSLogix profile containers that manage user state — is billed as Azure consumption. The “free” platform typically generates $30–$80/user/month in Azure consumption, depending on VM sizing, concurrency ratio, and storage requirements.
Cost Variability and Budget Predictability. AVD costs fluctuate with user concurrency, session duration, storage growth, and Azure pricing changes. An organisation projecting $50/user/month based on a pilot deployment may find actual costs at $65–$75/user/month in production when peak concurrency exceeds assumptions, storage accumulates, and Azure pricing adjustments take effect. In Redress assessments, AVD production costs exceed initial projections by 25–45% in the first 12 months. This variability makes AVD significantly harder to budget than either fixed-cost VDI or fixed-cost Windows 365.
The Multi-Session Advantage — and Its Lock-In Cost. AVD’s most significant cost advantage over Windows 365 is Windows 11 multi-session, which allows 4–12 users to share a single Azure VM. This reduces per-user compute costs by 60–75% for task-worker profiles. However, Windows 11 multi-session is exclusively available on Azure — making the most cost-efficient AVD architecture the most Azure-locked architecture. Organisations that optimise for multi-session are making a long-term Azure commitment that cannot be replicated on competing platforms.
In 71% of AVD deployments reviewed by Redress, the organisation had not implemented Azure Reserved Instances or Savings Plans for AVD compute. Reserved Instances reduce AVD VM costs by 35–55% compared to pay-as-you-go pricing. This is the single largest cost optimisation available for AVD deployments and is routinely overlooked because Microsoft’s AVD sales motion focuses on capability, not cost management.
The Hybrid Desktop Strategy: Preserving Optionality
A hybrid desktop strategy matches each user profile to the most cost-effective delivery model, preserves platform optionality, and prevents full lock-in to any single vendor or architecture.
Persistent, Performance-Sensitive, and Cost-Optimised Workloads
Knowledge workers with consistent, predictable desktop requirements and performance-sensitive workloads (CAD, development, financial modelling, large datasets) remain on on-premises VDI. This tier delivers the lowest per-user cost, highest performance predictability, and zero cloud dependency. Users in this tier require reliable, high-performance desktops with predictable cost — exactly what on-premises VDI delivers at 40–60% lower cost than cloud alternatives.
Recommended platform: Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, VMware Horizon, or existing VDI infrastructure. Target TCO: $45–$65/user/month.
Elastic, Remote-Access, and Task-Worker Workloads
Users with variable demand profiles — seasonal workers, contractors, branch office staff, and task-oriented users — are well-suited to AVD’s multi-session model. AVD delivers the lowest per-user cloud desktop cost for high-concurrency, low-resource workloads. Reserved Instances and auto-scaling reduce costs further. This tier absorbs demand variability that on-premises VDI handles less efficiently, while the multi-session model keeps per-user costs 30–50% below Windows 365.
Recommended configuration: Multi-session Windows 11 with FSLogix profile containers. Azure Reserved Instances for baseline capacity, auto-scale for burst. Target TCO: $55–$80/user/month.
BYOD, Executive, and Ultra-Simple Provisioning Scenarios
Windows 365 is cost-justified only for a narrow set of use cases where its management simplicity outweighs its cost premium: BYOD users who require a managed corporate desktop on personal devices, executives requiring anytime/anywhere access to a persistent personal desktop, and temporary workers requiring rapid provisioning without infrastructure overhead. For these scenarios, the Windows 365 management overhead is genuinely lower, and the per-user premium is offset by reduced provisioning and support costs.
Recommended configuration: Windows 365 Enterprise, Standard tier (2 vCPU/8GB/128GB) for most users; Premium tier for executives or power users. Target TCO: $76–$117/user/month (including M365 E3).
Across Redress desktop strategy engagements, organisations that implement a hybrid architecture (on-prem VDI + AVD + selective Windows 365) achieve a blended per-user desktop cost that is 25–40% lower than full Windows 365 migration and 15–25% lower than full AVD migration — while preserving the ability to rebalance workloads between platforms as economics and requirements evolve.
Common Desktop Decision Traps
Eight decision traps that consistently lead enterprises into suboptimal desktop strategy commitments.
1. Accepting Microsoft’s TCO Without Validation
Microsoft’s TCO models for Windows 365 and AVD exclude material cost components (Azure networking, storage overages, FSLogix licensing, management tooling, annual escalation) and use favourable assumptions for on-premises VDI costs (including inflated infrastructure refresh rates). An independent, fully loaded TCO comparison is the prerequisite for any desktop strategy decision.
2. Sizing for Peak, Paying for Always
Windows 365 assigns each user a fixed compute tier that runs 24/7. Organisations that size for the user’s peak requirement pay for that capacity during nights, weekends, and holidays. AVD with auto-scaling and traditional VDI with session management handle variable demand at a fraction of the cost. Fixed-tier pricing is simple — and consistently the most expensive model for enterprise-scale deployment.
3. Ignoring Multi-Session Lock-In
Windows 11 multi-session on AVD is the most cost-efficient cloud desktop model — and the most Azure-locked. Organisations that optimise for multi-session are making a de facto Azure infrastructure commitment that cannot be replicated on competing clouds or on-premises. Multi-session is a cost feature that buys lock-in.
4. Not Implementing Reserved Instances
71% of AVD deployments reviewed by Redress had not implemented Azure Reserved Instances for baseline compute. Reserved Instances reduce AVD VM costs by 35–55%. This is the highest-impact, lowest-effort cost optimisation available for AVD and is routinely overlooked during initial deployment.
5. The “Eliminate VDI Complexity” Fallacy
Microsoft positions cloud desktops as eliminating VDI complexity. In reality, cloud desktops replace on-premises infrastructure management with Azure subscription management, consumption monitoring, Reserved Instance optimisation, auto-scaling configuration, FSLogix profile management, and Azure networking. The complexity shifts; it does not disappear. And Microsoft charges for the compute, storage, and networking that were previously amortised capital assets.
6. Piloting with Power Users
Organisations that pilot cloud desktops with power users (developers, designers, data analysts) select high-tier compute configurations and conclude that cloud desktops are expensive. Those that pilot with task workers on multi-session AVD conclude that cloud desktops are affordable. Neither pilot represents the full estate. Desktop strategy decisions should be based on user-segmented TCO analysis, not unrepresentative pilot data.
7. Ignoring Citrix/VMware on Azure
Citrix and VMware both offer cloud-delivered VDI on Azure (Citrix DaaS, VMware Horizon Cloud). These platforms provide multi-session support on Azure without the Windows 11 multi-session Azure exclusivity lock-in, and they offer portability to other clouds or on-premises. Organisations evaluating AVD should include Citrix/VMware-on-Azure as a competitive alternative that preserves platform optionality.
8. Not Negotiating Desktop Pricing in the EA/MCA
Windows 365 pricing, AVD Reserved Instance commitments, and Azure MACC allocations for desktop workloads should all be negotiated as part of the broader Microsoft EA/MCA renewal. Organisations that procure desktop services as standalone transactions or through CSP partners pay 15–25% more than those who negotiate desktop as part of the enterprise relationship.
Contract Protections for Desktop Strategy
Seven contractual protections that preserve optionality, cap cost exposure, and prevent irreversible lock-in.
1. Windows 365 SKU Downgrade Rights
Negotiate the right to downgrade Windows 365 compute tiers (e.g., Premium to Standard) at each annual review without penalty. Standard terms lock the compute tier for the subscription term. Downgrade rights allow right-sizing as actual user requirements become clear.
2. Windows 365 Seat Reduction Rights
Secure bi-directional seat adjustment for Windows 365 subscriptions. Standard terms permit upward-only adjustment. Downward rights are essential for organisations that may reduce Windows 365 scope as they optimise the hybrid desktop mix.
3. Azure Reserved Instance Flexibility
Negotiate Reserved Instance terms that include instance size flexibility, region exchange rights, and cancellation/conversion provisions. Standard 1-year and 3-year reservations are non-refundable. Flexible reservations allow rebalancing as AVD workloads evolve.
4. MACC Allocation for Desktop
Designate a specific portion of the Azure MACC for desktop (AVD) workloads. This provides budget predictability and prevents desktop consumption from competing with other Azure workloads for MACC drawdown. Include desktop-specific consumption monitoring and alerting provisions.
5. Annual Price Escalation Cap
Cap annual price increases on Windows 365 subscriptions at CPI or a maximum of 3%. Standard MCA terms permit increases of up to 11%. A 3% cap limits 5-year compounding to 15.9% versus a potential 68.5% under standard terms.
6. Data Portability Provisions
Negotiate explicit data portability provisions that guarantee the ability to export user profiles, application data, and management configurations from Windows 365 and AVD environments in standard, portable formats. Without portability provisions, data lock-in becomes the most difficult lock-in layer to unwind.
7. Hybrid Co-Existence Rights
Confirm that Windows licensing rights (Windows E3/E5 VDA rights) can be applied simultaneously to on-premises VDI, AVD, and Windows 365 environments during hybrid co-existence. Without explicit confirmation, Microsoft may argue that VDA rights are consumed by the cloud deployment and do not extend to on-premises VDI for the same users.
Recommendations
Seven priority actions for organisations evaluating or already committed to Microsoft cloud desktop platforms.
Commission an Independent, Fully Loaded TCO Comparison
Before committing to Windows 365 or AVD, produce a 5-year TCO comparison across all three models (on-premises VDI, AVD, Windows 365) that includes all cost components: compute, storage, networking, licensing, management, annual escalation, and migration. Do not use Microsoft’s TCO model — it is consistently incomplete and favourable to their platform.
Segment Users by Desktop Requirement
Not every user needs the same desktop model. Produce a user segmentation that maps each user profile to the most cost-effective delivery platform: on-premises VDI for persistent/performance workloads, AVD multi-session for task/remote workers, Windows 365 for BYOD/executive/contractor scenarios. A one-size-fits-all approach is the most expensive architecture for any organisation with more than one user type.
Implement a Hybrid Desktop Architecture
Deploy a hybrid strategy that matches user profiles to delivery platforms. Preserve on-premises VDI for 40–60% of users (lowest cost, highest performance, zero cloud dependency). Deploy AVD for 20–35% of users (elastic, task-worker, remote-access). Limit Windows 365 to 5–15% of users (BYOD, executive, rapid provisioning). This architecture delivers 25–40% lower blended cost than full cloud migration.
Implement Azure Reserved Instances for AVD Immediately
If you have deployed AVD, Reserved Instances for baseline compute capacity reduce VM costs by 35–55%. This is the highest-impact cost optimisation available and can be implemented without operational change. Use auto-scaling for burst capacity above the reserved baseline.
Evaluate Citrix/VMware on Azure as an AVD Alternative
Citrix DaaS and VMware Horizon Cloud on Azure provide cloud desktop delivery with platform portability (can migrate to other clouds or on-premises). Include these alternatives in any desktop strategy evaluation to create competitive leverage and preserve long-term optionality.
Negotiate Desktop Pricing Within the EA/MCA
Windows 365 subscriptions, AVD Reserved Instances, and Azure MACC allocations for desktop workloads should all be negotiated as line items within the broader EA/MCA renewal. Bundled negotiation delivers 15–25% better desktop pricing than standalone procurement. Include SKU downgrade rights, seat reduction rights, escalation caps, and data portability provisions.
Engage Specialist Advisory Support
Desktop strategy decisions made today create 5–7 year lock-in patterns. The intersection of VDI platform evaluation, Azure consumption modelling, Windows licensing rights, user segmentation, and EA/MCA contract negotiation requires specialist expertise that most internal IT teams do not possess. The cost difference between an advised hybrid strategy and an unadvised full-cloud migration is consistently 25–40% of total desktop spend — hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars annually.
How Redress Compliance Can Help
Redress Compliance’s Microsoft Practice provides end-to-end advisory support for desktop strategy, cloud desktop TCO analysis, hybrid architecture design, and EA/MCA renewal negotiation. Our team has advised on 120+ desktop strategy engagements across enterprise organisations.
Desktop Strategy Advisory Services
- Independent 5-year TCO comparison (VDI vs. AVD vs. W365)
- User segmentation & desktop profile analysis
- Hybrid desktop architecture design
- AVD consumption modelling & Reserved Instance optimisation
- Windows 365 vs. AVD workload placement
- Citrix/VMware cloud VDI evaluation
- Windows licensing rights analysis (VDA, SA, multi-session)
- EA/MCA desktop pricing negotiation
- Lock-in risk assessment & portability planning
- Ongoing desktop cost governance programme
Get In Touch
Evaluating Cloud Desktop Migration?
Contact us for a confidential desktop strategy assessment and independent TCO comparison — before you commit to a 5-year architecture decision based on Microsoft’s sales projections.
Book a Meeting
Considering Windows 365 or AVD? Request a confidential call with our Microsoft Practice team.
Request a Meeting
Fill in your details and suggest times. We’ll confirm within 24 hours.
Meeting Request Sent
Thank you. Our Microsoft Practice team will confirm within 24 hours.
What to Expect
30-minute NDA-protected call. We’ll review your current VDI environment, cloud desktop evaluation status, and Microsoft licensing structure.
We’ll provide a preliminary TCO comparison and identify the lock-in implications of each architecture option for your environment.
You’ll leave with a clear desktop strategy framework, expected cost ranges, and a prioritised action plan — no obligation.
100% Confidential. Everything discussed is NDA-protected. We never share client data with Microsoft, Citrix, VMware, or any vendor.
No Obligation. If we can help, we’ll explain how and what it costs. If your desktop strategy is already well-positioned, we’ll tell you that directly.
This document has been prepared by Redress Compliance for informational purposes. Redress Compliance is a fully independent software licensing advisory firm with zero vendor affiliations — including zero Microsoft, Citrix, VMware, or cloud provider partnership. Benchmark data is based on anonymised desktop strategy assessments. Past results are not a guarantee of future outcomes.
© 2026 Redress Compliance. All rights reserved.