Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Negotiation Trends in 2025
- Shift towards cloud services, such as Office 365 and Azure, with a focus on flexible and scalable agreements.
- Increased focus on cost optimization, seeking more value beyond just pricing.
- Digital transformation initiatives are driving demand for adaptable EA terms to support innovation.
- Sustainability goals become a negotiation point, aligning with corporate environmental objectives.
CIO Guide: Top 20 Trends in Microsoft EA Renewals (2025)
Overview:
Microsoft’s Enterprise Agreement (EA) renewal landscape is undergoing rapid changes. CIOs and procurement leaders must navigate evolving pricing, cloud transitions, and new product offerings. For the basics, read the EA negotiation overview.
Below is a comprehensive guide to the top 20 global trends in EA renewals, each with a clear negotiation focus and advice.
This guide is relevant across industries and focuses only on renewal scenarios (not new EA deals).
1. EA Program Changes: Transition to MCA-E
- What’s happening: Microsoft is beginning to phase out the traditional EA for some customers (starting with smaller enterprises in 2025) and encouraging a move to the Microsoft Customer Agreement for Enterprise (MCA-E). This new contract model is a direct-with-Microsoft, evergreen subscription approach without a fixed 3-year term. Early waves target clients under a certain size (e.g., Level A EA customers), with a broader rollout expected over time.
- What to negotiate: If your organization might be affected, seek clarity early. Negotiate an early EA renewal under current terms to secure pricing and discounts before any potential forced transition. If moving to an MCA-E, negotiate to carry over key benefits — e.g., volume discount percentages, price protections, and any special pricing you had under the EA. Ensure the new model’s contract terms (payment schedules, cancellation rights, etc.) align with your needs.
- Impact: Enterprises pushing off EAs could see 10–30% cost increases over the next few years if they lose volume-based discounts and legacy “from SA” pricing on subscriptions. Pricing may become less predictable with an evergreen contract. Additionally, procurement processes may need adjustment since MCA-E deals directly with Microsoft (no reseller intermediary), and billing could shift from an annual to a more frequent cycle.
- Clear advice: Proactively contact your Microsoft account team to understand if your EA is in scope for this change. Consider securing an early renewal before 2025 under the EA to extend it one more term. If transitioning, budget for potential cost increases and prepare to negotiate hard for discount retention. Align internally (IT, finance, legal) on a strategy to stick with an EA via reseller as long as possible or move to MCA-E with strong negotiated terms. Always plan for scenarios where EA programs change, so you’re not unprepared.
2. Rising License Costs and Price Hikes
- What’s happening: Microsoft has steadily increased list prices for many products and services. Over a typical 3-year EA term, key cloud services (like Microsoft 365, Office 365, Power BI, etc.) have seen double-digit percentage rises. For example, Microsoft has announced significant price increases in recent years (e.g., Office 365 E3 and other suites rose by ~10–15% in 2022, and Power BI Pro prices are slated to increase in 2025). The addition of new AI capabilities to products also increases base license costs by 30–40%. In short, today’s renewal quote is often substantially higher than your last EA due to Microsoft’s pricing updates. See what’s ahead by reading what’s coming in 2025.
- What to Negotiate: Push for Multi-Year Price Protection. Negotiate caps on annual price increases or even fixed pricing for critical products for the full term. If Microsoft is introducing a known upcoming hike (such as a new AI feature surcharge), negotiate your renewal just before it takes effect or request an offsetting discount. Consider an extended term or aligning the deal to precede major price change dates. Benchmark pricing against the market and prior deals to argue for better rates.
- Impact: If unchecked, an EA renewal can shock your budget – many organizations report that renewal cost quotes are 20–30% higher than their previous spending, even without adding more users or products. These rising costs directly hit the IT budget and may force cuts elsewhere or require additional approvals from the CFO. Over a 3-year term, cumulative increases without caps can significantly outpace inflation and strain financial planning.
- Clear advice: Do your homework on Microsoft’s recent and upcoming price changes. Enter negotiations with a clear understanding of which products have increased in price since your last agreement and by how much. Use that data to make the case for either grandfathering old pricing or securing discounts to neutralize the hike. Don’t accept a “standard increase” as given – everything is negotiable if you prepare. Aim to include a clause in the renewal that limits price increases for renewals or additional licenses during the term.
3. Currency Fluctuations and Global Pricing Alignment
- What’s happening: Microsoft is aligning regional pricing with US dollar benchmarks, resulting in periodic adjustments to local currency prices. In recent years, different regions have seen steep price adjustments (many got price increases 10%+ to align with USD in 2023, though occasionally decreases occur if a currency is strengthened—e.g., the UK saw a small price drop in 2025). These adjustments typically happen semi-annually and can catch enterprises off guard. For global companies operating in multiple regions, currency volatility can lead to unexpected cost changes at renewal.
- What to negotiate: If your EA spans multiple currencies or if you budget in a local currency, negotiate terms to mitigate currency risk. Options include locking pricing in a single currency (e.g., USD) for the term or negotiating a fixed exchange rate for the duration of the contract. At a minimum, request advance notice and the ability to adjust quantities if a significant currency-driven price change is coming. For multi-national agreements, consider splitting the agreement by region to isolate currency impacts or ensure Microsoft applies any downward adjustments as readily as upward ones.
- Impact: Without safeguards, a currency alignment move by Microsoft could suddenly raise your costs in a given country by 10–15% overnight (or, conversely, reduce a planned decrease). This complicates budgeting and can consume funds not originally allocated for software. It’s especially problematic for organizations with tight budgets or public sector entities with fixed local currency funds.
- Clear advice: Stay informed on Microsoft’s pricing policy for your currency. Track announcements of regional price changes (Microsoft typically gives a few months’ notice). If your currency has been weaker against the USD, anticipate an increase and negotiate proactively to mitigate its impact. Incorporate currency adjustment clauses in your EA renewal if possible. Internally, hedge against currency-driven price changes by setting aside a contingency in the IT budget or by purchasing needed licenses in advance if a significant price increase is expected in your region.
4. Declining Volume Discounts (Negotiating for Savings)
- What’s happening: Traditional EA volume discount levels (Level A, B, C, D, based on organization size) are becoming less generous. Microsoft has been reducing the default discounts to large deals, meaning even big enterprises might not see the same percentage off list price as they did in past agreements. The built-in volume discounts may also disappear entirely when moving to new models, such as MCA or CSP. Microsoft’s pricing approach is shifting toward uniform global pricing and rewarding strategic product adoption more than sheer size.
- What to negotiate: Fight for your discount. Don’t assume you’ll automatically get the same discount level as before. Explicitly negotiate additional discount percentages on top of Microsoft’s standard pricing, especially if your spending is large. If Microsoft cites policy limiting discounts, bring competitive context (e.g., “Vendor X is offering better terms”) or consider splitting your purchase among providers to maintain leverage. Also, negotiate bundle discounts (across all the products you’re renewing) rather than item-by-item to maximize your savings. Ensure any SA transition discounts (for moving from on-prem to cloud subscriptions) are applied and extended for the full term.
- Impact: If you accept reduced discounts, the bottom-line cost of your EA will be higher for the same licenses. For example, dropping from a 20% discount to 10% on a $1 million software spend means an additional $ 100,000 in annual costs. Over a multi-year period, lost discounts represent a significant missed opportunity for savings. Moreover, some projects or licenses might become cost-prohibitive without good discounts, hindering IT initiatives. Avoid mistakes by checking out mistakes to avoid in the current landscape.
- Clear advice: Do not accept the first offer. Microsoft’s initial renewal quote may bake in lower discounts – treat that as a starting point. Leverage your status as a valued customer by highlighting your long-standing partnership, the Microsoft technology your business runs on, and your plans with Microsoft. Use that to justify why you merit better-than-standard pricing. If needed, escalate to Microsoft enterprise negotiators or executives with a well-documented case for a bigger discount. Remember, once the agreement is signed, it’s hard to change pricing, so secure the best deal now.
5. Cloud-First Licensing (Subscriptions Overtaking Perpetual)
- What’s happening: Enterprises are shifting from traditional perpetual licenses with Software Assurance to subscription-based cloud licenses. At renewal time, Microsoft often encourages replacing on-premises products (such as Windows, Office, and server CALs) with cloud services like Microsoft 365, Office 365, and Azure. Even for products that still run on-premises, subscription models or consumption billing (like Azure and Dynamics 365) are becoming the norm. The EA renewal presents an opportunity to modernize the licensing model, shifting more of the environment to the cloud or subscription-based plans.
- What to Negotiate: When transitioning from perpetual to cloud subscriptions, consider negotiating transition incentives to ensure a smooth transition. Microsoft typically offers “From SA” discounted pricing for clients migrating existing licenses to Microsoft 365 or other cloud bundles. Ensure you take advantage of these offers and understand their duration. Additionally, negotiate to retain hybrid use rights (e.g., Azure Hybrid Benefit for servers or dual-use rights to run software on-premises and in the cloud during the migration process). Clarify what happens to your perpetual rights: if you’ve paid for licenses outright previously, you may want to preserve the right to use the last perpetual version even as you adopt subscriptions. Finally, negotiate flexibility to swap equivalent licenses (e.g., converting some Office 365 E3 licenses to Dynamics seats if strategies change) to avoid being stuck with cloud services you may not use. For practical guidance this year, read how to negotiate the best deal in 2024.
- Impact: Cloud subscriptions provide up-to-date technology and scalability, but can lead to increased long-term costs. You transition from a one-time license and maintenance model to a continuous operational expense. If not negotiated well, you may also inadvertently forfeit rights (for instance, dropping Software Assurance could terminate your ability to upgrade certain perpetual deployments). On the upside, a well-negotiated transition can provide cost predictability and eliminate the big true-up surprises. It also shifts spend to OpEx, which some organizations prefer.
- Clear advice: Align your EA renewal with your cloud strategy. Don’t move to subscriptions just because Microsoft pushes it – do it because it makes sense for your roadmap. If you decide to switch, maximize the incentives by insisting on “transition pricing” and requesting free trial periods or pilot licenses for cloud services. Maintain any necessary on-premises rights during a migration. In short, adopt the cloud on your terms, not just Microsoft’s. A hybrid licensing approach can be negotiated, where you retain some perpetual licenses (for stability or compliance) while introducing subscriptions that add value.
6. Azure Consumption Commitments in EA Deals
- What’s happening: Azure has become a huge part of Microsoft’s enterprise business, and Microsoft often uses EA renewals to lock in Azure consumption commitments. Instead of a pure pay-as-you-go model, EA customers are asked to spend a certain amount on Azure over the term (e.g., a three-year monetary commitment). In return, Microsoft may offer custom pricing or credits. This trend reflects Microsoft’s push for predictable cloud revenue and deeper customer adoption of the cloud. Many EA renewals now include an “Azure commit” clause or are accompanied by a separate Azure enrollment with committed spend.
- What to Negotiate: Approach Azure commitments with caution. Negotiate the lowest reasonable commitment aligned with your forecasted cloud usage – you don’t want to over-commit and pay for unused capacity. Secure discounts on Azure services in exchange for your commitment (for example, a percentage off Azure consumption rates or free services/credits). Additionally, consider negotiating flexibility: Can you carry over unused Azure commitment funds for next year? Can you reallocate the commit among Azure services? If your cloud strategy is uncertain, consider negotiating growth-based commitments (ramping up each year) rather than a big fixed number upfront. Finally, ensure that any Azure Hybrid Benefit (utilizing existing Windows or SQL licenses on Azure) is accounted for, so you don’t pay twice.
- Impact: Committing to Azure spend can yield better pricing, signal a strategic partnership, and introduce risk. If your cloud projects get delayed or you overestimate usage, you might end the term having paid for Azure you didn’t use (essentially a waste of budget). On the other hand, if you under-commit, you might pay higher list prices for cloud consumption or miss out on discounts. Azure spending can also grow quickly. Without careful management, it may exceed the budget, incurring unexpected costs.
- Clear advice: Forecast your cloud usage realistically. Coordinate with your cloud architects and application teams to estimate what you’ll consume on Azure. It’s often wise to commit a bit below your expected usage – you can usually exceed a commit without penalty (pay-as-you-go rates for the overage). Still, you can’t go under without forfeiting money. During negotiation, leverage any multi-cloud plans as a bargaining chip (“We could put this workload in AWS instead…”). Microsoft will be more amenable to a discount if they know you have choices. Get any Azure pricing or discount commitments in writing as part of the EA or an attached Azure contract. Establish internal governance to track Azure consumption versus commits, allowing you to course-correct early.
7. Microsoft 365 E5 Upsell and Suite Expansion
- What’s happening: Microsoft’s flagship bundle, Microsoft 365 E5, and other top-tier suites are a major focus during renewals. Microsoft encourages customers to move from E3 (or older Office 365 plans) to E5, touting its advanced security, compliance, analytics, and voice features. In many regions, Microsoft has even offered promotional discounts (e.g., 15% off) to entice E5 adoption for a limited time. Beyond E5, Microsoft is bundling more into suites (for example, adding new features like Teams Phone, Viva modules, or security add-ons into bundles or discounted add-ons) to increase value perception and stickiness.
- What to negotiate: If E5 is on the table, negotiate the price aggressively. The list price of E5 is significantly higher per user than E3, so consider seeking special discounts or phased pricing (such as a lower price in year 1 that increases later once you’ve realized the value). Additionally, consider a mix-and-match approach: perhaps only part of your user base truly requires E5, while others remain on E3. Ensure your EA allows you to license the right mix rather than forcing a one-size-fits-all approach. If you accept a promotional discount on E5, clarify what happens after the promotional period (no surprise price increase). Finally, if you’re not ready for full E5, consider negotiating specific add-ons (such as E5 Security, E5 Compliance, or Teams Phone) separately and obtain bundle pricing for those components without taking everything.
- Impact: Adopting E5 can substantially increase your per-user costs (often by 30-50% per user). Without proper planning, you may end up paying for advanced functionality that isn’t immediately utilized (e.g., advanced analytics, hunting, or voice features that require time to implement). However, E5 can also consolidate tools (replacing third-party security or telephony systems), potentially saving money elsewhere – that benefit only comes if you deploy those features. There’s also an operational impact: your IT team must be prepared to roll out and manage the new E5 capabilities to maximize the value of your investment.
- Clear advice: Evaluate E5 on value, not hype. Don’t let a sales pitch or a limited-time discount rush you into an upgrade your organization isn’t prepared to utilize. Do a pilot or proof-of-concept on E5 features with a subset of users. Identify which E5 components you truly need (for instance, if you urgently require better security and analytics, E5 could be justified; if not, consider holding off). If you proceed, negotiate a deployment plan with Microsoft – see if they will include deployment assistance or FastTrack support to help you adopt E5 features. Remember, you can often get the security and compliance features à la carte on top of E3; sometimes, that route is more cost-effective if you only need a few things.
8. Security, Compliance, and Add-On Services Proliferation
- What’s happening: Alongside the push for E5, Microsoft is expanding its menu of security and compliance add-on products. Think Microsoft Defender suites, Purview compliance tools, Sentinel, and others – many of which can be licensed as add-ons for users or as Azure services. Companies are increasingly interested in these due to the rising threat of cyberattacks and regulatory requirements. Microsoft’s strategy is to offer a comprehensive stack (often integrated with Azure AD/M365), and they will position these add-ons during EA renewals. This trend means that renewals often involve negotiating not just the core Office suite, but also a host of ancillary security and compliance products.
- What to negotiate: Don’t let these add-ons bloat your agreement without scrutiny. Prioritize the security and compliance tools you need and will use. For the ones you need, negotiate bundle discounts or package deals (for example, if you adopt multiple Defender products, ask for a percentage off). Ensure any add-on licenses can be flexibly assigned (you may not need them for all users). You can also negotiate trial periods or opt-out clauses – if a product doesn’t meet your requirements after a year, can you swap it for a different one? Given that Microsoft sales reps are often incentivized on security product sales, leverage that by expressing interest but attaching it to demands for better pricing across your EA.
- Impact: Adding multiple security and compliance products can significantly raise your annual Microsoft spend. There’s also a complexity impact: these tools require deployment and expertise to use effectively. If negotiated poorly, you might over-license (e.g., purchasing advanced compliance for all 10,000 users when only 2,000 require it) or pay for overlapping functionality (perhaps you already own a third-party solution). However, if done right, consolidating on Microsoft’s stack could reduce costs on other vendors and improve integration, but only if those third-party tools are truly replaced.
- Clear advice: Be strategic with add-ons. Conduct a security gap analysis internally: Which Microsoft security/compliance features fill those gaps? This ensures you only buy what’s needed. Then, during renewal, bundle your ask – for instance, “We’ll commit to Defender X and Compliance Y, but we need a better overall discount on our EA” or some concessions. Also, Microsoft should provide technical roadmaps or assurance that these products will meet your needs (especially if you’re replacing existing tools). Bringing your CISO or security architects into the negotiation can help articulate value and avoid over-purchasing.
9. Emergence of AI and Microsoft Copilot Licensing
- What’s happening: 2025 is the year AI features make their way into Microsoft’s product lineup in a big way. Microsoft Copilot (AI-powered assistance across Office 365 apps, GitHub, Dynamics, etc.) is often offered as a premium add-on license. Microsoft is heavily promoting AI capabilities as game-changers for productivity. In some instances, they are bundling basic AI features into existing licenses (while introducing separate charges for full Copilot functionality). This is a new frontier – pricing is high (Copilot licenses can cost as much as a full Office 365 plan) and is still in the process of evolving. Many enterprises are curious but cautious about committing to AI add-ons at renewal.
- What to negotiate: If you intend to explore AI in this EA cycle, negotiate pilot programs and flexible terms. For example, instead of buying Copilot for all users, negotiate a smaller quantity for a pilot at a discounted rate, with an option to expand later at the same price. Insist on any introductory discounts that are locked for the term if you scale up your usage. Clarify how AI features that are included free (e.g., a basic AI-assisted feature in Word) are differentiated from those that require the paid license – you don’t want to pay extra for something that becomes part of the standard product later. If you’re not ready for AI, keep it out of your EA or limit it to a trial – explicitly state that major new products like Copilot are excluded so they don’t inflate your renewal cost.
- Impact: AI licenses, such as Copilot, have the potential to significantly increase spending with an uncertain return on investment. If you buy too many and users don’t adopt them, it’s pure waste (and could even distract from core productivity tools). There’s also a strategic impact: early access to AI could be a competitive advantage, but only if implemented well. From a negotiation standpoint, showing interest in AI could either give you leverage (Microsoft wants references and adoption so that it might trade discounts in other areas) or it could backfire if you reveal your hand too early (Microsoft might hold out on other concessions, expecting the AI sale to be completed).
- Clear advice: Treat AI as an experiment, not a guaranteed need. Unless you have a clear business case ready, approach Copilot and similar offerings cautiously. It’s okay to tell Microsoft you’ll evaluate it mid-term rather than at renewal. If you do negotiate it, tie it to outcomes: for instance, “We will consider a broader Copilot rollout in year 2 if the pilot shows X% productivity gain – let’s include a provision to add at the same discount later.” Keep your negotiation leverage; don’t give it all away for the shiny new thing. Most importantly, ensure any AI investment is accompanied by a plan for user training and measuring benefits, so if you invest, you can justify it with real results.
10. Product Bundle and Licensing Changes (Teams, Viva, etc.)
- What’s happening: Microsoft frequently changes how products are bundled or licensed, which can affect renewals. Recently, due to regulatory pressures, Microsoft had to unbundle Teams from Microsoft 365 suites for new customers in some regions (e.g., Europe) – a sign that packaging can change. New product families, such as Microsoft Viva (an employee experience suite), have been introduced as separate modules or bundles. As these changes roll out, enterprises at renewal might find certain features are now licensed differently (perhaps requiring new SKUs or additional licenses). The general trend is a dynamic product catalog: today’s inclusive feature might become tomorrow’s add-on (and vice versa).
- What to negotiate: Clarity and protection are key. In your renewal, list the critical features and confirm which licenses currently cover them with Microsoft. Negotiate a clause that if Microsoft re-packages products mid-term, your pricing or entitlements won’t be negatively impacted (for example, if Teams suddenly requires a separate license in your region, existing subscribers should get it included or at a grandfathered price). If you adopt new bundles, such as Viva or others, consider trying a pilot first or taking advantage of a bundle discount for adding it on top of your core licenses. Also, negotiate swap rights – if Microsoft replaces a licensed product with a new equivalent, you should receive the new product without additional cost throughout the term.
- Impact: These bundle shifts can have cost implications. An included feature becoming paid could mean an unexpected purchase (unless negotiated otherwise). Conversely, Microsoft might bundle more value into existing licenses (as a competitive response), which could increase your usage of their ecosystem – that’s beneficial if you leverage it. Still, you need to stay informed to take advantage. Also, licensing changes can create administrative confusion in true-ups and compliance if not tracked (you might be unknowingly under-licensed if something was carved out).
- Clear advice: Stay informed about Microsoft product news during your EA. Don’t assume the product set in your last agreement is unchanged – explicitly review the Product Terms or ask your reseller about changes affecting your licenses. When negotiating, use real-world examples (such as the team’s unbundling or a pricing change in a service) to justify contract language that protects your interests. It’s fair to ask for “most favored customer” treatment if a change happens – e.g., “if this product becomes cheaper or bundled differently, we get the best advantage of that change.” The goal is to avoid surprises: to ensure Microsoft commits to transparency and fairness if licensing evolves over the next three years.
11. Flexibility in True-Ups and License Counts
- What’s happening: Organizations demand more flexibility to scale licenses up and down during an EA term. Traditionally, EAs allow you to add licenses (true-up) yearly as needed, but reductions (true-down) can only happen at renewal, and even then, some agreements limit how much you can reduce. Given business volatility (mergers, divestitures, shifts in workforce), enterprises are seeking terms that allow them to adjust their license counts more dynamically. Microsoft has hesitated to allow mid-term reductions, but some customers negotiate special terms or use alternate licensing programs for flexibility on portions of their environment.
- What to negotiate: If flexibility is important (for instance, if you anticipate a restructuring or downsizing), negotiate the right to annual quantity adjustments both upward and downward. One approach is an elastic pool of licenses – you commit to a certain baseline but can drop a percentage at the anniversary if needed without penalty. Another approach is shortening the term for certain products (e.g., a 1-year subscription for a segment of users, renewable annually, even if the core EA is 3 years). At a minimum, negotiate a grace period for decreases at renewal, ensuring you can reduce to actual usage at the end of the term with no additional fees. If Microsoft won’t allow flexibility within the EA, consider moving some fluctuating users to a CSP (cloud solution provider) subscription model, which is month-to-month; you can negotiate that as part of your strategy (Microsoft might prefer to keep you all-in EA and thus be more flexible rather than lose those seats to CSP).
- Impact: Not having flexibility can mean paying for significant shelfware. For example, if your user count drops by 15% in year 2 of the EA due to business changes, you keep paying for those licenses until the term ends – a direct waste of funds. It can also hinder your agility; you might delay necessary organizational changes to avoid license penalties. Conversely, too much flexibility for you is a risk for Microsoft – they fear revenue loss, so it’s a give-and-take in negotiation. If you do secure flexibility, it could save costs and align spending tightly with actual needs, but be aware that Microsoft might price in that risk (slightly higher unit prices).
- Clear advice: Assess your outlook for growth or contraction. If relatively stable, flexibility might be less critical; focus negotiation capital elsewhere. However, if you foresee change, make it a top priority in your negotiation. One tactic is to tie flexibility to new investments: for instance, “We’ll commit to adopting Product X (new Microsoft tech) if you allow us to shed Y% of our seats in year 2 if not needed.” Always document any flexibility clearly in the contract – verbal assurances won’t count when true-up time comes. Remember to utilize the flexibility if you have it: track your usage annually and adjust it down where possible to capture savings.
12. Contract Term and Renewal Timing Strategies
- What’s happening: While the standard EA term is typically 3 years, some enterprises are reconsidering contract length and timing in light of the rapid pace of technological changes. Microsoft’s new models (like MCA-E) even allow evergreen or shorter-term subscriptions per product. There’s a trend of aligning EA renewals with strategic planning cycles – for instance, avoiding major renewals in the same year as a big merger or IT overhaul. Conversely, Microsoft often incentivizes sticking to 3-year commitments (or even longer commitments in certain cloud deals) to lock in customers. Early renewals have also become common – some companies renew months early to take advantage of current pricing or incentives.
- What to negotiate: Determine what term serves you best. If you want stability and a price lock, a 3-year (or even an extended 4-5-year) term might be suitable, but only negotiate it if you receive strong price protection throughout. If you need flexibility, consider a shorter term or an opt-out option: you could negotiate an 18- or 24-month agreement as a bridge (Microsoft sometimes allows non-standard terms on a case-by-case basis). You can also negotiate coterminous dates if you have multiple agreements so that all renewals align for simplicity (or conversely, stagger them if that gives you leverage). Additionally, consider evaluating an early renewal: if Microsoft is willing, renewing 6-12 months before your current EA expires can lock in today’s terms before potential price increases or program changes take effect. If pursuing that, negotiate to have the unused time on the old EA credited or extended into the new term.
- Impact: The length of your EA impacts your risk and flexibility. A longer term locks current discounts and shields from list price increases, but if the market shifts (e.g., new tech emerges, or your company changes direction) you’re stuck. A shorter-term or off-cycle renewal could give you agility but may come at the cost of higher annual pricing (since Microsoft usually rewards longer commitments). Early renewal can be financially wise if a big price hike is looming, but it requires budget readiness sooner. Timing also affects negotiation leverage: if Microsoft has a quarterly sales target to meet and your renewal aligns with their Q4, you might get a better deal than if it’s off-quarter – something to consider when scheduling your negotiations.
- Clear advice: Use the term as a negotiation lever. If Microsoft is pushing for a longer commitment, ask yourself what you get in return – demand better pricing or extras for that lock-in. If you want a shorter term, you may need to trade something for it, such as agreeing to evaluate a new Microsoft technology mid-term. Always align the contract term with your organization’s roadmap (for example, if you plan a major cloud migration in two years, having an EA renewal right before that might give you a chance to reshape your deal at the right time). And no matter the term, start renewal discussions early – complex negotiations can take months, and you’ll want time to explore options like alternate terms or early renewal benefits.
13. Decoupling Unified Support from EA Renewals
- What’s happening: Microsoft’s Unified Support (the post-sales support contract replacing Premier Support) has its costs tied partly to your Microsoft product spend. Many enterprises have historically aligned their support renewals with the end of the EA term. A growing trend is to separate the negotiation of support from the EA because bundling them can diminish leverage and lead to higher costs. Third-party support providers are also emerging as alternatives. Essentially, CIOs and procurement are questioning the value of paying escalating support fees that rise in tandem with EA spend, and are examining timing or provider changes to control this.
- What to negotiate: If you currently co-term your Unified Support with the EA, consider splitting the renewal cycles to avoid overlapping. Negotiate your EA without touching support (or vice versa). This way, you can independently evaluate support options (including third-party support vendors). If you decide to stay with Microsoft Unified Support, negotiate its price and scope separately: for example, push for a cap on support cost increases or a reduction if your support ticket volume has been low. Highlight to Microsoft if you have competitive quotes for support – even if you prefer to stay, that could yield a concession. Ensure that any Microsoft-provided support hours or benefits included via Software Assurance (now mostly retired) are accounted for in the new support contract or offset in the price.
- Impact: Decoupling can significantly increase your negotiation power. Microsoft will no longer be able to leverage one contract against the other (e.g., “We’ll give you a break on EA if you renew support at this high price”). It also allows you to right-size support levels – you might discover that you don’t need the very expensive Unified Support if a third-party or lower-tier option could suffice, potentially saving 30-50%. The risk is that Microsoft prefers clients to stay bundled; by separating, you might lose some convenience or integrated escalation paths, but many find the cost savings worth it. Timing-wise, having different end dates means you’re not overwhelmed negotiating everything at once, but it does require tracking two calendars.
- Clear advice: Analyze your support usage and costs to optimize your support strategy. If your Unified Support fees have skyrocketed in tandem with license spend, it’s a signal to reconsider. Bring this up with your Microsoft rep – sometimes, just signaling that you might shop around for support can prompt a better support renewal offer. If you choose to decouple, plan the sequence: ofte,n it’s wise to renew the EA first (since product licensing is core) and postpone the support decision, perhaps extending the existing support a few months if needed. Engage stakeholders (IT support leads, CIOs, etc.) to ensure they are comfortable with the plan. The goal is to avoid “bundled” deals that favor the vendor – negotiating each on its own merits likely yields better value for you.
14. Software License Optimization and Cleanup Before Renewal
- What’s happening: Enterprises are getting smarter about license optimization ahead of renewals. Rather than blindly renewing the same quantities and products, CIOs and procurement teams conduct internal audits to find unused licenses (“shelfware”) and redundancies. This trend is driven by the sticker shock of EA renewals – when faced with a big increase, organizations dig in to see where they can trim the fat. Tools and services for software asset management (SAM) and FinOps (for cloud usage) are being employed to present a clear picture of actual usage. By the time negotiations start, many companies have come armed with data to potentially reduce quantities or eliminate products that aren’t providing value.
- What to negotiate: Use your findings to negotiate a leaner, more efficient EA. If you identified 1,000 Office 365 licenses assigned to ex-employees or unused test accounts, ensure those are removed from the renewal count (and communicate that you expect not to pay for them). If certain products were bought and never deployed (e.g., you licensed Project or Visio for everyone, but only 100 people used them), consider removing them from the enterprise-wide commitment – negotiate those as optional or smaller add-on pools instead of enterprise products. Microsoft may resist reductions because it lowers their revenue, so be prepared to justify with data and, if needed, consider reallocating some of that budget to new things you do need (so Microsoft can save face on revenue – e.g., “We’ll drop 500 unused Visio, but we are considering adding 500 Power BI; give us a good deal on Power BI and we have a win-win”). Also, negotiate any credit or compensation if you’ve prepaid for something unused – while refunds are unlikely, you might get service credits or a concession elsewhere.
- Impact: By optimizing, you can potentially save a significant amount. It also signals to Microsoft that you are an informed customer, likely leading them to present more tailored proposals rather than generic upsells. The primary impact is financial savings and a better alignment of spending with actual needs. One caution: Microsoft could respond to reduction requests by offering a bundle of products at a slight discount to dissuade you from cutting (for example, “Instead of dropping Visio, what if we give it to you at 50% off if you keep it for everyone?”). Assess such offers carefully – sometimes, it’s worth accepting if the product has future value; other times, it’s best to trim it out entirely.
- Clear advice: Start the renewal process by looking inward. Get your usage data for all Microsoft products. Involve department heads in identifying what software is mission-critical and what isn’t being used. Use this to create a “must-have” and “nice-to-have” list. When negotiating, be clear on what you intend to drop if the terms aren’t favorable. You can even issue an RFP to your internal stakeholders – ask each product owner, “Do you still need this many licenses? What could you live without if budgets are cut?” This internal negotiation strengthens your position in the external negotiation. When you sit with Microsoft, you should have a precise picture of demand, which allows you to push back on any attempt to sell you more than necessary.
15. Increased Audit and Compliance Scrutiny
- What’s happening: Microsoft, like other software vendors, often uses the renewal cycle as an opportunity to ensure compliance. There’s a trend of software license audits or compliance checks coinciding with EA renewals. Microsoft may initiate a formal audit (through a third-party auditor) or a less formal “self-attestation” process via your reseller. The goal is to ensure you’re not under-licensed in the new term. With the shift to cloud services, Microsoft monitors usage (seats, Azure consumption, etc.) and may flag the overuse of services or features beyond what you’ve paid for. This means enterprises must be prepared to address compliance gaps during renewal negotiations.
- What to negotiate: If an audit is underway or looming, try synchronizing its resolution with your renewal discussions. Negotiate any required license true-ups as part of the new EA rather than as a separate penalty payment. Microsoft may waive potential back penalties if you commit to the licenses moving forward in the renewal. Additionally, consider negotiating audit clauses in your contract, such as providing reasonable notice, specifying the frequency of audits, and possibly including a curing period to acquire licenses at a discounted rate if any issues are identified. If you suspect you are out of compliance. Still, an audit hasn’t been announced. Consider voluntary disclosure during negotiation to control the narrative and outcome (e.g., “We discovered we’re 200 licenses short on SQL Server – we’re willing to fix that in the renewal if you give a 15% discount on those licenses to resolve it”). Always get any compliance settlement agreements in writing, tied to the new EA, to prevent surprises later.
- Impact: Licensing audits can be stressful and expensive. An audit conducted immediately after renewal may require you to spend unbudgeted funds or pay backdated fees if the renewal is not properly managed. By tackling it during renewal, you maintain leverage (Microsoft wants the renewal signed, which you can use to negotiate away some audit fallout). On the other hand, raising compliance issues means revealing where you’re under-licensed – you must be ready to address it. The positive impact of negotiating this is cost avoidance of penalties and a cleaner licensing position in the future. It also sets a tone with Microsoft that you intend to be compliant but expect fair treatment.
- Clear advice: Don’t wait for an official audit notice. In the year leading up to your renewal, conduct an internal compliance check by inventorying your deployments against your licenses. Fix obvious shortfalls, if possible, by reallocating unused licenses or plan to purchase what you need at renewal. If Microsoft or the reseller initiates a compliance review, be cooperative but strategic – engage your procurement and legal teams to ensure a coordinated approach. Use the renewal as a chance to reset the compliance baseline: clear any past issues and ensure your teams clearly understand the new agreement’s terms to prevent future accidental breaches. A smoothly handled compliance discussion can turn a potential negative (audit risk) into a trust-building exercise with Microsoft, possibly yielding a better relationship (and even better terms) in the long term.
16. Future-Proofing and New Technology Inclusion
- What’s happening: Technology is evolving faster than the typical EA cycle. During a 3-year term, Microsoft may release entirely new products or services (for example, new AI services or a future collaboration platform). Enterprises are increasingly concerned with “future-proofing” their agreements – ensuring that if they want to adopt new Microsoft innovations mid-term, they can do so without renegotiating from scratch or incurring exorbitant costs. We observe trends where enterprises negotiate framework clauses for upcoming tech or, at the very least, maintain open conversations about incorporating new offerings (such as Azure services, AI tools, or industry-specific clouds) during the term.
- What to negotiate: Discuss with Microsoft what major releases or changes are on the horizon that could affect you. Negotiate rights of first access or favored pricing for new technologies not yet generally available. For instance, if Microsoft were to release a new module for Dynamics 365 or an industry cloud, you could include language that allows you to opt in at a pre-agreed discount. Alternatively, consider negotiating a mid-term review (e.g., at 18 months) to evaluate any new products, with the option to add them to your EA under the same discount structure. Ensure that adopting something new won’t extend your term unless you want it to (sometimes Microsoft will say, “Sure, you can add that new thing, but it will co-terminate with a later end date” – negotiate that up front). Allow for some flexibility to adjust the product mix as new technology arrives.
- Impact: Without future-proofing, you might find yourself stuck waiting until the next renewal to get a new product or purchasing it separately outside the EA (likely at a higher cost or less favorable terms). That can be operationally inefficient and costly. Conversely, if you negotiate this well, your organization can be an early adopter of beneficial new tech with minimal friction, maintaining a competitive advantage. It can also strengthen your partnership with Microsoft (they love it when big customers try new offerings), which can indirectly help your support and pricing on other elements. Just be cautious: you don’t want to commit blindly to unknown products – you’re simply securing the option, not the obligation, to adopt them.
- Clear advice: Be forward-looking in negotiations. Ask Microsoft outright: “What’s on the roadmap in the next 2-3 years that enterprises like us will care about?” Use publicly available information as well – if you know, for example, that Microsoft is investing heavily in a new AI-driven CRM, and your company might benefit, consider pre-negotiating access and pricing. It’s much easier to get a commitment now (“If/when this comes, you’ll give us 20% off because we’re a loyal EA customer”) than it is later, when the product is in high demand and every company wants it. Also, allocate a little financial wiggle room in your EA for new initiatives – maybe don’t spend 100% of your budget on day one; keep a slice that you can deploy on emerging technologies when they arrive.
17. Sustainability and ESG Considerations
- What’s happening: Enterprises worldwide are placing a higher emphasis on sustainability and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals. This is even entering IT procurement. In EA renewals, some organizations are raising sustainability points – for example, ensuring their cloud providers use green energy or seeking ways to optimize the power usage of software. Microsoft has its sustainability initiatives (like aiming for carbon-negative operations, offering power-efficient cloud options, etc.), which can become part of the customer conversation. While not a traditional licensing term, sustainability commitments are gradually becoming a negotiation topic to align the EA with corporate values.
- What to negotiate: If sustainability is a priority for your organization, bring it to the table. Negotiate for transparency and collaboration on sustainability: request regular reports on the carbon footprint of your Azure usage or Microsoft 365 usage (Microsoft can provide insights like data center energy mix and carbon emission equivalents of your consumption). You may also consider negotiating the inclusion of Microsoft’s sustainability solutions or assessments as part of the EA value-added benefits. For instance, request access to Microsoft Sustainability Manager tools or services that help you track and reduce emissions at no additional cost. Another approach is to seek contractual commitments that your services will be run in carbon-neutral or renewable-powered data centers whenever possible, or that Microsoft will partner with you on sustainability initiatives (such as tree planting to achieve specific Azure consumption milestones). These tasks may or may not directly influence pricing, but they signal what matters to you as a customer.
- Impact: Incorporating ESG into the EA can deepen stakeholder buy-in for the deal (your sustainability office or board will appreciate it). It can also future-proof your company against potential regulations (for example, if you’re required to report supply chain emissions, having Microsoft’s data is useful). The direct financial impact is usually minimal in the short term – you’re not typically getting a discount for being green – but there could be long-term benefits if efficient cloud usage reduces energy costs or if Microsoft provides some incentives for sustainable usage patterns. One risk is focusing too much on extras like this and missing core cost issues; ensure sustainability is an “also and” in negotiation, not an “instead of” basic financial asks.
- Clear advice: Align your EA with your company’s values. If ESG is on your scorecard, make it part of Microsoft’s scorecard in the negotiation. Even simple tasks, such as quarterly sustainability briefings or incorporating Microsoft’s latest green technology into your stack, can make a difference. Document any commitments Microsoft makes on this front in writing, even if they are appendices or side letters. And remember, an EA renewal negotiation is ultimately a business discussion – tie sustainability to business outcomes (e.g., “By optimizing our cloud for efficiency, we save costs and carbon – Microsoft, help us do that as part of this agreement”). This way, even abstract goals translate into mutual benefit, which Microsoft is more likely to support.
18. Inclusion of Value-Added Services and Support
- What’s happening: Beyond licensing, companies now expect value-added services from Microsoft as part of large deals. This can include technical support, training, planning workshops, adoption programs, and dedicated customer success resources. Microsoft has programs like FastTrack (for onboarding cloud services). It can also provide consulting days or training vouchers (though the classic Software Assurance training vouchers were retired, Microsoft often offers new forms of assistance). The trend is that at renewal, especially if you’re committing to new products or higher spending, enterprises negotiate for Microsoft to throw in some services that ensure the successful use of the products. It’s seen as a way to maximize the value of the EA and drive user adoption.
- What to Negotiate: Create a shopping list of services to support your organization. This might include several free consulting days for Azure architecture review, end-user training sessions for Office 365, access to Microsoft engineers for performance tuning, or even strategic briefings with product experts. Then, negotiate these as part of the renewal bundle. For example, “We will renew at this spend, but we want 100 hours of Microsoft Consulting Services or partner vouchers for deployment assistance.” If you’re upgrading to new technology (such as moving to E5 security features), consider asking Microsoft’s experts to perform initial configurations or health checks. Also, ensure you take advantage of included programs: FastTrack is free for many cloud services – explicitly include FastTrack engagement in your plan and get Microsoft to commit to certain outcomes (like migrating all mailboxes to Exchange Online by X date under FastTrack). If your EA is very large, you may even consider negotiating a Dedicated Support Engineer or a higher support tier as a value-added benefit.
- Impact: Getting these services can significantly accelerate your ROI on the licenses. It reduces the need to hire third-party consultants for deployment and can improve adoption (which means you truly use what you pay for). It also tightens the relationship with Microsoft – you have their folks directly involved in your success, which can be valuable if issues arise. On the downside, if not utilized, these services could be wasted, and Microsoft might limit its offerings if the costs become too high. However, for strategic customers, Microsoft is generally willing to invest in services to ensure the EA delivers value.
- Clear advice: Ask for more than just software. Especially if your renewal involves significant new deployments or changes, make it clear that success will require help. Negotiate these as part of the deal rather than as separate paid engagements later. Be specific: for instance, “We need three training workshops for our admins on Azure security” or “We expect quarterly operations reviews with Microsoft’s cloud success team.” Once agreed, assign someone on your side to utilize these services and hold Microsoft accountable for delivering them as promised. It’s a win-win: you get better outcomes, and Microsoft gains a referenceable success story (and a customer is more likely to renew).
19. Focus on ROI and Business Value Outcomes
- What’s happening: CIOs and procurement leaders are shifting the conversation from just price to value and ROI. Instead of purely haggling over cost, more renewal discussions now revolve around “How will this investment support our business objectives?” This trend is driven by boards and CFOs asking IT to justify spend in terms of outcomes (productivity gains, cost savings elsewhere, innovation enablement, etc.). Microsoft’s response has been to bring value cases and even business value workshops to clients rather than just quotes. In negotiations, both parties discuss usage, adoption, and achieving certain milestones (not just getting the lowest unit price).
- What to negotiate: Use this value focus to your advantage. Negotiate commitments from Microsoft on specific outcomes – for example, if you’re investing in Power Platform, consider asking Microsoft to commit to helping you build and deploy 10 apps within the first year (a measurable outcome). Alternatively, if moving to Microsoft 365 E5 for security, set a goal like “deploying threat protection to 100% of devices by month 6” and have Microsoft support it. Include these in a joint success plan annexed to the EA. Also, negotiate flexibility or credits tied to value: e.g., “If we deploy under 50% of X product’s seats by year 2, Microsoft will fund additional consulting or provide a credit” – sharing responsibility for achieving value. Internally, negotiate terms that allow you to downgrade or replace solutions that aren’t delivering value at certain checkpoints (even if Microsoft might not agree contractually, you can set expectations). Finally, ensure that you are not paying for items that have no clear value for you – use the value argument to remove or swap things that don’t align with your strategy.
- Impact: A value-focused EA is more likely to succeed and be renewed again because your business sees tangible benefits. This approach can also change the tone of negotiations – instead of adversaries purely on cost, you become partners trying to craft a win-win. Microsoft often responds positively to this because it aligns with its “customer success” ethos. Financially, you might still pay a significant amount, but ideally, every dollar works towards something purposeful rather than “shelfware.” One caution: ensure that the pursuit of value doesn’t distract from obtaining a fair price – you still need to conduct due diligence on cost competitiveness. The best scenario is achieving both a good price and well-utilized services.
- Clear advice: Come to the table with your business goals. For example, “We need to enable remote work, improve security, and drive analytics adoption.” Center the deal around these themes. Push Microsoft to demonstrate how each component of the EA contributes to these goals and to commit resources to support them. Make it part of the contract management to review value periodically (quarterly business reviews focusing on adoption and outcomes). By negotiating in terms of value, you also create a story to tell your executives: it’s not just “we bought X licenses,” but “we’re investing with Microsoft to achieve A, B, and C, and they are co-investing with us.” This narrative will help maintain support for the EA throughout its term.
20. Software Assurance Benefit Changes and Renewals
- What’s happening: Microsoft’s Software Assurance (SA) has long been a staple of EAs (providing upgrade rights and benefits). However, Microsoft has been restructuring SA benefits in recent years. They retired some popular perks, such as Training Vouchers and 24/7 Problem Resolution Support via SA, which have been phased out (as of 2022-2023). Planning Service days are no longer available; FastTrack and other programs have replaced them. These changes mean an EA renewal today might deliver a different set of value-adds than your previous term. Companies that utilize these benefits need to adjust accordingly. Microsoft is repositioning value into other areas (like free training on Microsoft Learn or paid support plans) rather than bundling it in SA.
- What to negotiate: Review which SA benefits your organization utilizes (training days, support incidents, home use program, etc.). If some have been eliminated, negotiate something in return. For instance, if you heavily utilized training vouchers that are now expired, consider asking Microsoft to include several complimentary official training engagements or certifications for your team. If SA no longer provides free support cases, negotiate a discounted package or ensure your Unified Support reflects that change (possibly at a lower cost since you’re not getting those “included” cases anymore). You can also negotiate alternative benefits; some customers request Azure credits or additional product licenses as a substitute for lost benefits. Additionally, ensure you still get the core of SA that matters – things like new version rights (which now mostly apply to server software) and license mobility. Those should be included in your agreement and documented.
- Impact: Changes in SA benefits can leave a gap in your IT enablement plans. For example, if you relied on Microsoft training vouchers to skill up your staff, losing them could mean higher training costs if you have to pay separately. If you were counting on the Home Use Program for Office (to allow employees to use Office at home at a reduced cost), changes to this program could impact employee benefits. Financially, the value of your EA is slightly diminished when benefits are removed, but Microsoft is unlikely to reduce the price accordingly unless you request it. If negotiated well, you can fill the gap with equivalent value (maybe in a different form). If not addressed, you might end up paying the same EA cost but getting less out of it, effectively a disguised price increase.
- Clear advice: Stay informed on SA changes. Don’t assume the entitlements you had last time will all be there – explicitly confirm what’s included now. Raise the issue during negotiation: “We notice we no longer get X benefit; this reduces the agreement’s value for us. How will Microsoft compensate or help us in this area?” Even if Microsoft doesn’t officially offer a “discount” for it, getting some free training or services can make up for it. And if certain benefits are critical (such as the ability to spread payments annually or step-up licenses), ensure that they remain. Software Assurance is evolving to focus primarily on upgrade rights and some cloud transition benefits. Ensure your organization is comfortable with this approach and fill any gaps through negotiation or planning. Ultimately, don’t leave value on the table – if something was taken away, it’s fair to ask, “What can we get instead to maintain our partnership value?”
Read Azure Arc in the Enterprise: A CIO’s Playbook for Optimization and EA Negotiation.
FAQs
1. What is a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA)?
An EA is a volume licensing package offered by Microsoft. It allows organizations to purchase and manage software licenses under a single, simplified agreement. It’s designed for organizations with 500 or more users or devices.
2. How can I prepare for EA negotiations with Microsoft?
Start by gathering detailed information on your current software usage and future needs. Assess your organization’s growth plans, technology roadmap, and any specific requirements to ensure you enter negotiations with a clear understanding of your needs.
3. What should be my first step in the negotiation process?
Develop a negotiation strategy that outlines your objectives, priorities, and the flexibility needed in your agreement. Having a clear plan will guide your discussions and help you focus on achieving favorable terms.
4. How important is timing in EA negotiations?
Very. Timing negotiations around Microsoft’s fiscal year end (June 30) can leverage their eagerness to close deals, potentially resulting in better terms or discounts for your organization.
5. Can I negotiate prices within an EA?
Yes, pricing is a negotiable aspect of an EA. However, focus also on the value beyond the cost, such as added services, support, and flexibility in the agreement.
6. What is the significance of understanding Microsoft’s product roadmap?
Understanding Microsoft’s product roadmap can inform your negotiation strategy, enabling you to anticipate future needs and negotiate agreements that incorporate the latest technologies and services to benefit your organization.
7. How can I ensure flexibility and scalability in my EA?
Negotiate terms that allow for adjustments in your licensing and service needs over time. This includes options for scaling up or down and making changes as your organization evolves.
8. Should I involve negotiation experts or consultants?
Yes, engaging experts specializing in Microsoft licensing can provide valuable insights, help you understand complex terms, and ensure you secure the best possible agreement.
9. What common mistakes should I avoid in EA negotiations?
Avoid overlooking hidden costs, focusing solely on price, and underestimating the importance of flexibility and scalability. Also, ensure that you enter negotiations with a clear strategy and a thorough understanding of your needs.
10. How can I manage compliance and avoid penalties?
Understand the compliance requirements outlined in the EA and conduct regular reviews of your software usage to ensure adherence to these requirements. This proactive approach can help avoid penalties for non-compliance.
11. What are the benefits of a multi-year agreement?
A multi-year agreement can lock in pricing and terms for an extended period, providing cost predictability and stability. However, ensure the agreement allows for enough flexibility to adapt to your changing needs.
12. Can I renegotiate my EA before the end of the term?
While EAs are typically fixed, certain conditions, such as significant changes in your organization’s size or needs, may allow for renegotiation. It’s important to discuss these possibilities upfront.
13. How does Microsoft’s shift to cloud services impact EA negotiations?
The shift towards cloud services presents opportunities to negotiate terms that reflect the flexible and scalable nature of cloud computing. Emphasize your cloud strategy to align your EA with your usage and needs.
14. What role does data analytics play in EA negotiations? Data analytics can provide valuable insights into software usage patterns, enabling you to make informed decisions and negotiate an agreement that aligns with your specific needs. This can potentially lead to cost savings.
15. How can sustainability goals be addressed in my EA? Discuss your sustainability goals with Microsoft and explore how their cloud services and technologies can support these objectives, potentially incorporating this into your negotiation strategy.
Do you want to know more about our Microsoft EA Optimization Service?
