Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Optimization: 5 Key Strategies

Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Optimization

Microsoft Enterprise Agreements (EAs) offer volume licensing and cost predictability, but without active optimization, they can lead to overspending.

This advisory outlines five key strategies to optimize your Microsoft EA: right-sizing licenses to actual use, leveraging data and tools for continuous management, negotiating smarter renewals, optimizing cloud commitments, and aligning the EA with business needs.

By applying these strategies, CIOs, CTOs, and CFOs at global enterprises can reduce waste, secure better terms, and ensure their Microsoft EA delivers maximum value for the organization.

The Need to Optimize Your Microsoft EA

Enterprise Agreements are complex, and it’s easy for companies to pay for more than they use. Common pitfalls, such as over-provisioning licenses or accepting one-size-fits-all bundles, can quietly inflate costs.

Proactively optimizing your EA is crucial for eliminating waste and adapting the agreement to your evolving business needs.

The table below highlights typical overspending pitfalls and their impact:

These challenges underscore why optimizing the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement is a priority.

The strategies below address each issue with practical steps and examples, helping you turn your EA into a lean, cost-efficient contract.

1. Right-Size Licensing to Actual Needs

Many enterprises find that a significant percentage of their Microsoft licenses are underutilized.

The first strategy is to audit and right-size your licensing:

• Conduct a usage audit: Inventory all Microsoft licenses (Office 365, Windows, Azure, etc.) and identify the number of licenses that are actively used. It’s common to discover dormant accounts or duplicate licenses.
• Eliminate “shelfware”: If 10% of your seats haven’t been used in months, reduce those licenses at renewal or reassign them to avoid paying for inactivity. For example, unused Microsoft 365 E5 licenses (typically costing around $50/user/month) can incur thousands of dollars in costs per month if left unchecked.
• Align license levels to roles: Not every employee needs a top-tier product suite. Evaluate user needs – a frontline worker might only require an email and Teams license (e.g., Microsoft F3 or E3), whereas a data analyst might justify the full Office 365 E5. By provisioning licenses according to job function, you avoid overspending on features that certain groups don’t use.
• Reharvest and recycle: Implement a process to reclaim licenses when employees leave or projects end. Before purchasing new licenses, check if you have spare ones available due to attrition or changes. This continuous cleanup prevents the accumulation of excess licenses.

Actionable takeaway: Make right-sizing an ongoing discipline.

Before each EA renewal (and ideally at least yearly), “clean house” by removing or reallocating any license not actively in use. This ensures you enter negotiations only paying for what your organization truly needs.

2. Continuously Monitor Usage and Compliance

Optimization isn’t a one-time project – it requires continuous license management throughout the EA term:

• Leverage SAM tools: Utilize Software Asset Management tools (or built-in admin center reports) to track Microsoft product usage in real-time. They automate usage tracking, highlight under-utilization, and ensure compliance with license terms.
• Quarterly true-up checks: Don’t wait for the annual true-up report to find out you’ve added 200 new users. Conduct internal true-up reviews quarterly to track growth and reductions. This proactive approach means fewer surprises and a smoother (and often smaller) true-up bill at year-end.
• Optimize dynamically: If certain licenses are consistently underutilized, adjust your allocations accordingly. For instance, if a team isn’t using a purchased Power BI Pro add-on, consider removing it or scaling it down. Conversely, if a new project spikes Azure usage, plan how to optimize that spend (such as using reserved instances or shutting down VMs off-hours) before costs balloon.
• Ensure compliance, avoid audits: Regularly reconcile deployed software against entitlements. By staying compliant, you avoid audit penalties and also identify licenses that can be optimized or streamlined. Many firms that proactively manage compliance find cost savings through tighter control of deployments.
• Integrate with IT processes: Tie license management into employee onboarding and offboarding. When someone joins, assign a license appropriate to their role; when they leave, immediately free that license. Automation or simple checklists here prevent licenses from lingering unused.

Actionable takeaway: Treat your Microsoft EA as a living contract. Set up dashboards and alerts for license usage.

A continuous monitoring practice not only reduces waste but also provides data to inform negotiations and informed decisions. In short, Microsoft Enterprise Agreement optimization becomes part of your IT governance routine – yielding both cost savings and audit peace of mind.

3. Negotiate Proactively and Benchmark at Renewal

Renewal time is your prime opportunity to improve EA terms and pricing.

Rather than simply signing Microsoft’s first offer, adopt a strategic negotiation stance:

• Start early (6–12 months in advance): Microsoft’s sales cycle and fiscal calendar can work to your advantage if you plan accordingly. Engage with Microsoft or your reseller well in advance of the EA expiration. Early negotiations allow you to explore options, solicit competitive bids (through different Licensing Solution Providers), and signal that you won’t rush into a subpar deal at the last minute.
• Benchmark pricing and discounts: Microsoft EAs have volume-based discount levels, but don’t assume the standard discount is the best you can do. For example, an organization with 5,000 users might qualify for a ~10% built-in discount, but peers of similar size have negotiated 20% or more. Research industry benchmarks or consult with experts to understand the discount percentage and pricing others receive for similar volumes. Go into talks with a target price (e.g., “we need at least 25% off Office 365 E5”) based on those insights.
• Leverage Microsoft’s timing: Be aware of Microsoft’s fiscal year and quarter-end pressures. Historically, a large share of EA deals close in Microsoft’s Q4 (around June), which can make their internal resources constrained. Microsoft now encourages earlier renewals (even offering incentives to close deals in Q2 or Q3). You can use this to your advantage: negotiating off-peak (earlier in the quarter or year) may give you more attention and flexibility. Alternatively, if the end of the year is nearing, Microsoft might be eager to close and hit targets – potentially offering additional discounts if you can execute quickly. Understand their motivators to time your asks.
• Negotiate terms, not just price: Push for contractual terms that add value. Key examples include price protections (caps on annual price increases or fixed pricing for the 3-year term, protecting you from the 5-10% hikes Microsoft has sometimes applied), flexible reduction rights at renewal (ability to scale down licenses if business shrinks), and payment terms that suit cash flow (annual vs upfront payments). If certain clauses in the standard contract don’t suit you, propose alternatives. For instance, if you’re concerned about committing all users to a new product, consider seeking an option to pilot it for a year with the ability to adjust quantities.
• Use competitive alternatives as leverage: While Microsoft is often indispensable, have a “Plan B” in mind. Determine what you could do if the EA deal isn’t acceptable – for example, moving some workloads to another vendor’s cloud, extending your current agreement briefly, or shifting parts of the business to a monthly subscription model. Communicating that you have alternatives (even if just internally approved contingencies) signals to Microsoft that you are prepared to walk away from a bad deal. This strengthens your hand in negotiations for a better EA outcome.
• Involve the C-suite: As a CIO/CTO/CFO, your voice carries weight. Microsoft negotiators pay attention when executives are directly involved and when financial objectives are clearly stated. Articulate your top priorities – e.g., “We need to reduce our total Microsoft spend by 15% next year” or “We cannot exceed $X over three years” – and hold that line with support from data. A united front between IT and Finance, showing clear requirements, will push the vendor to meet your needs or risk losing enterprise-wide adoption.

Actionable takeaway: Treat your EA renewal like a major sourcing project. Set a timeline for preparation (assess needs and gather usage data), negotiation (multiple rounds, possibly including an RFP to resellers), and decision-making well in advance of the deadline.

By negotiating methodically and using market data, enterprises routinely save millions of dollars and secure more favorable terms in their Microsoft Enterprise Agreements.

4. Optimize Cloud and Subscription Commitments

Today’s EAs often include significant cloud services (Azure, Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365). Optimizing cloud usage and commitments is a core strategy to control EA costs:

• Use Azure Hybrid Benefit and existing licenses: If you have on-premises Windows Server or SQL Server licenses with Software Assurance, leverage those in Azure to run VMs at a lower cost. This benefit can reduce Azure VM costs by 30-50% by allowing you to pay only for cloud infrastructure, not the OS license again. It’s a prime example of using what you already paid for to avoid double-spending.
• Reserved instances for predictable workloads: Analyze your Azure consumption – for steady-state workloads (e.g., a production database or an app server that runs 24/7), purchase Azure Reserved Instances for 1 or 3 years at a discount (often 20-40% cheaper than pay-as-you-go). These can be aligned with your EA term. The savings on cloud spend contribute directly to a lower total EA cost of ownership.
• Monitor and trim cloud resources: Cloud services can proliferate quickly. Make it a practice to regularly review Azure and Office 365 usage. Shut down or right-size any virtual machines, databases, or services that are idle or over-provisioned (for example, a test VM running on a costly instance type long after the project ended). Tools like Azure Cost Management can send alerts if your monthly spend exceeds the thresholds you set, giving you an early warning to intervene. Optimizing cloud usage ensures you truly benefit from any Azure monetary commitment in your EA rather than overshooting it.
• Evaluate license mobility and BYOL: Some organizations save by using existing licenses in cloud environments (bring-your-own-license) when possible. For instance, if you have spare SQL Server licenses, using them in a cloud VM might be cheaper than a fully licensed Azure SQL service – as long as compliance allows it. Evaluate these options to avoid unnecessary new purchases.
• Don’t overcommit to new cloud products: Microsoft often pushes new cloud offerings (e.g., AI add-ons, security suites, Power Platform) during EA negotiations, sometimes with enticing discounts. While planning for modern capabilities is wise, commit only to those that fit your strategy. It might be better to pilot a service with a small user group (even outside the EA as a monthly subscription) before committing enterprise-wide in the EA. This way, you validate the value and adoption, and can negotiate to include it later with hard evidence of need. It prevents locking into a costly line item that your organization isn’t ready to utilize fully.
• Consider CSP or hybrid licensing for flexibility: If your business has rapidly changing needs, complementing your EA with a Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) agreement for certain subscriptions can add flexibility. For example, seasonal or project-based staff might be better on month-to-month CSP licenses rather than the fixed EA count. Some enterprises use a hybrid approach, combining a core commitment in the EA for stable needs with CSP for elastic needs. While EAs typically require a 3-year commitment on quantities, CSP allows for scaling down on a month-by-month basis. Ensure any such plan is balanced; moving too much to CSP could reduce your EA volume discounts. The goal is to optimize cost while retaining agility where needed.

Actionable takeaway: Microsoft Enterprise Agreement optimization must extend to how you handle cloud services.

By actively managing Azure and Microsoft 365 consumption, utilizing benefits and discounts, and remaining flexible with new cloud products, you can prevent cloud adoption from becoming a budget buster.

In essence, treat cloud spend with the same rigor as on-prem licenses – optimize unit costs and eliminate waste continually.

5. Align the EA with Business Strategy and Value

Finally, ensure your Microsoft EA is tailored to your organization’s strategic needs and that you’re extracting all possible value from it:

• Customize product mix to business priorities: Review which Microsoft products and services are truly mission-critical for your enterprise, and which might be nice-to-have. For example, if advanced analytics or voice features in Microsoft 365 E5 aren’t a priority, consider standardizing most users on E3 and only upgrading specific teams that will use those advanced features. Microsoft EAs support mixed licensing (e.g., a percentage of users on one plan and others on another), so craft a mix that aligns with your business use cases. This avoids the “one-size-fits-all” overspend and ensures every product in your EA has a justified purpose.
• Maximize Software Assurance benefits: Since EA includes Software Assurance (SA) by default (typically accounting for ~25% of the license cost annually), ensure you utilize the benefits it provides. SA offers valuable perks, including free or discounted training courses for IT staff, planning services for deployments, support for incidents, and new version rights. If you’re paying for SA, set up internal programs to use those training days and consulting hours – for instance, send IT teams for Microsoft-certified training or use Planning Services days for expert guidance on an upcoming Azure migration. These benefits can save money that you’d otherwise spend on third-party training or consulting, effectively lowering your overall IT spend. If certain SA benefits (like upgrade rights) are not needed for a particular product, you might even evaluate not renewing SA on that product at the next EA (though be cautious, as dropping SA means losing future upgrades and cloud use rights for that product).
• Plan for organizational changes: Align the EA with your 3-5 year business roadmap. If you anticipate significant growth, mergers, or divestitures, discuss scenarios with Microsoft. In some cases, you can negotiate clauses for adding subsidiaries at a fixed rate or carve-out options if a part of the company is sold (so you’re not stuck paying for licenses you no longer need). Ensuring the EA has provisions that mirror your business evolution can save headaches and costs down the line.
• Integrate cost accountability: To maintain optimization, tie EA costs to business units or projects internally. Many enterprises implement charge-back or show-back of license costs to departments. When business unit leaders see the direct cost of their team’s licenses, they become more vested in not oversizing their allocations. For example, allocate Microsoft 365 costs per head to each department’s budget – this transparency often encourages departments to relinquish unused licenses and be judicious with requests, supporting the overall optimization effort.
• Review support needs and strategy: Microsoft Unified Support fees (if you use Microsoft’s support) are typically calculated as a percentage of your EA spend. This means that if your EA costs increase, so do support costs. To optimize holistically, consider negotiating support separately or adjusting the support plan tier to match your actual requirements. Some organizations have saved money by moving to a lower support tier or utilizing third-party support providers for specific products. At a minimum, if you renew a big EA, revisit whether the default support model is still the best value for your needs.
• Governance and Oversight: Establish an EA governance team or steering committee that includes representatives from IT, procurement, and finance. Their role is to regularly review EA usage, costs, and upcoming needs. They can also evaluate new Microsoft offerings through a business-value lens. This governance ensures the EA is continuously aligned with business objectives (for instance, if the company pivots to a cloud-first strategy, the EA can be adjusted to support that, rather than hindering it). In short, treat the EA as a strategic asset to be managed, not just a line item in procurement.

Actionable takeaway: An optimized Microsoft EA fits your organization like a glove – no excess, no missing pieces.

By aligning license plans with actual user needs, leveraging all included benefits, and incorporating flexibility for the future, you maximize the return on your EA investment. Moreover, you create a culture of efficiency and accountability around software spending, which will serve the enterprise well beyond just Microsoft licensing.

Recommendations (Expert Tips)

• Plan EA renewals as a continuous process: Don’t treat optimization as a one-off project every three years. Continuously manage and adjust your license usage so that renewal negotiations are based on well-vetted needs.
• Engage an internal “Microsoft licensing guru” or external advisor: Navigating Microsoft’s licensing programs and jargon can be challenging. Having expertise on hand (through a dedicated team member or a consultant) can uncover savings and ensure you’re not leaving money on the table.
• Benchmark and validate all quotes: Before signing anything, compare Microsoft’s proposal against industry benchmarks or third-party pricing data. Ensure the discounts and terms offered to your enterprise are in line with those received by similar companies – or push for explanations and improvements if not.
• Push for price locks and caps: Aim to include clauses that lock pricing for the EA term and cap any increase on renewal options. This protects your budget from sudden hikes in Microsoft’s list prices or currency fluctuations over the next few years.
• Use Microsoft’s incentives to your advantage: Microsoft often has incentive programs (such as extra Azure credits, discounted advanced security add-ons, or promotional pricing for product upgrades). Ask about these proactively. You might secure a bonus (e.g., “free” Azure spend or 50% off a new module for year 1) that sweetens the deal – just be sure to quantify the long-term value and plan for when the incentive ends.
• Don’t overbuy “just in case”: It’s tempting to grab a bigger bundle or more licenses anticipating future needs, especially under pressure from sales reps. Stay disciplined – license for what you know you need and add more later if growth occurs. Microsoft allows adding licenses mid-term, so you won’t be left unable to expand. Paying for hypothetical users or projects that don’t materialize is a waste of resources.
• Review the EA annually with stakeholders: Gather IT and finance leaders at least once a year to review the state of your EA, including usage versus entitlements, costs by service, and any issues or new requirements. This keeps everyone aware of the value being derived and flags any adjustments needed (like a decision to drop a service or adopt a new one). Such reviews ensure surprises are caught early and the EA continues to serve the business optimally.
• Prepare for audits: While not directly a cost-saving tip, being audit-ready (with proper documentation of licenses and usage) prevents costly compliance gaps. Microsoft occasionally audits enterprise customers; if you’ve optimized correctly, you should be compliant without having over-bought. Regular internal compliance checks under your EA can help you avoid significant true-up bills or penalties.
• Consider alternative licensing for fringe cases: Not every software need must fall under the EA. For instance, for a small acquired subsidiary or a temporary development project, it may be more cost-effective to use a separate Cloud Solution Provider subscription or even open licenses outside the EA. This can be complex to manage, but a deliberate strategy where certain scenarios bypass the EA can sometimes reduce cost. Just weigh the administrative overhead and any lost discount in the EA before doing this.

Checklist: 5 Actions to Take

1. Audit Your Current Estate: Gather data immediately on your current Microsoft license deployment and usage. Identify unused or underused licenses across all departments. This forms the baseline for any optimization.
2. Engage Stakeholders & Set Goals: Bring together IT, procurement, and finance leaders to agree on cost optimization goals (e.g., “reduce Microsoft licensing costs by 15%” or “avoid any idle licenses within 3 months of issuance”). Ensure everyone understands the plan and their role in it.
3. Optimize Ahead of Renewal: If your EA renewal is within the next 12 months, begin preparing now. Remove or reassign dormant licenses, downgrade users who don’t need premium products, and consolidate accounts. The smaller and more accurate your license footprint, the lower your future costs will be.
4. Develop a Negotiation Strategy: Outline your negotiation approach well in advance. This includes researching benchmark pricing, determining which products or services to add or remove, identifying necessary contract terms (e.g., adding a price cap), and establishing a timeline for discussions with Microsoft. Secure executive backing for your non-negotiables and nice-to-haves.
5. Implement Continuous License Management: Post-renewal (or if your current term has a while to go), institute ongoing management. Schedule quarterly license usage reviews, implement a SAM tool or process, and assign responsibility for keeping the EA optimized. Make it part of your IT operations to regularly validate that the company’s Microsoft footprint matches actual needs and that any new spend is scrutinized.

By following this checklist, you create a cycle of Microsoft Enterprise Agreement optimization that starts well before a contract is signed and continues throughout its life, ensuring no momentum or savings are lost.

FAQ

Q1: When should we start preparing for our Microsoft EA renewal?
A: Begin preparations 6 to 12 months before your EA expiration. Early planning allows you to audit current usage, determine what to keep or eliminate, and engage with Microsoft or other providers in pricing discussions. Microsoft’s approval process for discounts can be lengthy, so starting early increases your leverage and prevents a last-minute rush where you might accept suboptimal terms.

Q2: Can we reduce our license count if our user base drops during the EA term?
A: During an active 3-year EA term, you generally cannot reduce the committed license quantities until renewal (a concept often called “true-down” at renewal). However, you are free to add licenses (true-up) as needed. To address potential reductions, negotiate flexibility at renewal time: if you foresee downsizing, you can renew with fewer licenses. Also, consider shorter-term add-ons or CSP licenses for temporary needs rather than overcommitting in the EA. In exceptional cases (such as divestitures or major layoffs), discuss options with Microsoft – they may allow adjustments or offer compensating services, although this is not guaranteed.

Q3: What alternatives exist to a traditional Enterprise Agreement for Microsoft licensing?
A: Alternatives include the Microsoft Customer Agreement (which is common for Azure consumption without a formal EA) and the Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) program delivered via partners, which offers monthly subscription flexibility. There are also Open or Select volume licenses for smaller purchases. If your organization has fewer than 500 users or requires high flexibility, these options may be more cost-effective. However, large enterprises often still benefit from an EA’s discounts and centralized management. In some cases, a hybrid approach is used – core services under EA for volume discounts, and niche or fluctuating services under CSP. Always evaluate the trade-offs: CSP can reduce commitment, but you might pay a higher unit price; an EA locks in pricing and discounts, but with less flexibility.

Q4: How can we be sure we’re getting the best pricing from Microsoft on our EA?
A: The best approach is to benchmark and solicit competitive quotes. Use pricing data from industry peers or advisors to know the typical discount range for a company of your size and spend. You can also issue an RFP to multiple Microsoft resellers (LSPs) – they often offer different discount levels or promotional incentives. Ensure you compare “apples to apples” on all components (licenses, Azure rates, support fees). Don’t hesitate to ask Microsoft outright if the pricing can be improved – and back your request with a business case (for example, “Budget constraints require us to cut 10%, what can you do on price or scope to achieve that?”). Microsoft wants to retain your business, so if you demonstrate knowledge of the market and a willingness to consider alternatives, they are more likely to bring a better offer.

Q5: What are the Software Assurance benefits, and why should we use them?
A: Software Assurance (SA) is included in an EA and provides a suite of value-added benefits at no extra charge. Key benefits include: rights to new version upgrades (so you can move to the latest software releases), training vouchers or credits for employee training on Microsoft technologies, Planning Services (consulting days to help plan deployments or migrations), extended support coverage, and unique use rights like license mobility (ability to use licenses in cloud environments). These benefits are essentially “prepaid” as part of your EA costs, so utilizing them maximizes your ROI. For example, if your EA grants you 100 training voucher days, use them for professional training instead of paying external trainers – this could save tens of thousands of dollars. Similarly, use Planning Services for upcoming projects (cloud migrations, for instance) to offset consulting fees. In short, SA benefits can improve your IT capabilities and reduce other expenses; ignoring them is like leaving money on the table.

Read about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Service.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Optimization Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit