Nutanix and Oracle licensing is quite simple; this is how it works
- Oracle does not approve Nutanix as a sub-capacity license.
- You must fully license the servers and/or clusters that run Oracle software. Licensing cannot be done on the virtual CPU level.
Oracle licensing on Nutanix
- Licensing Unit: The smallest licensable unit is a standalone Nutanix node.
- Compliance: Ensure all physical hosts capable of running Oracle are licensed.
- Nutanix AHV: Enhanced with VMware-like features, impacting licensing.
- Regular Audits: Conduct audits and use Prism Central for tracking.
- Shared Storage: Be aware of Oracle’s potential overreach with shared storage licensing.
Nutanix Oracle Licensing
Running Oracle databases or other Oracle software on Nutanix’s hyper-converged infrastructure can deliver great technical performance.
Still, it also introduces licensing challenges that every SAM manager and IT architect must be aware of.
Oracle’s licensing policies in virtualized environments are notoriously strict, and Nutanix (especially with its AHV hypervisor) is no exception.
This guide explains how Oracle licensing works on Nutanix, covering concepts such as soft partitioning, Oracle’s requirements, audit risks, and best practices to ensure compliance.
We’ll also walk through example configurations and key considerations so you can run Oracle on Nutanix without incurring a licensing nightmare.
Oracle Licensing on Nutanix 101: Full Capacity Licensing
The first principle is that Oracle does not recognize Nutanix’s virtualization as a valid method for limiting license counts.
In Oracle’s eyes, Nutanix is treated similarly to other non-Oracle hypervisors, such as VMware vSphere, when it comes to licensing. Any “soft” partitioning form, where software limits hardware usage, is not acknowledged.
What does this mean practically?
You must license all physical hardware that could run Oracle in a Nutanix environment, not just the virtual CPUs you allocate to an Oracle VM.
Oracle’s standard processor licensing terms apply, typically using their core factor table on the number of physical cores.
On Nutanix, the smallest licensable unit is a full Nutanix node, also known as a server. You cannot, for example, say “my Oracle VM has four vCPUs, so I’ll just license four cores.”
If that VM resides on a Nutanix cluster with nodes each having 20 physical cores, Oracle expects you to have licenses for all those cores, per node, across all nodes that form the cluster where Oracle is running.
To put it bluntly: Oracle does not approve Nutanix for sub-capacity licensing.
“Sub-capacity” would mean licensing less than the full machine, as one might do with IBM sub-capacity or certain VMware partitioning under IBM’s rules.
Oracle only allows sub-capacity in limited, Oracle-approved cases, such as Oracle VM hard partitioning or Oracle’s cloud. Nutanix AHV is not on that approved list. Therefore, Oracle treats Nutanix deployments as if you are running on the full physical hardware.
Example: If you have a Nutanix cluster with four nodes, each with two CPUs (10 cores each), the total number of cores is 80. Under Oracle’s core factor (if x86, core factor 0.5 for many Intel chips), 40 processor licenses would be needed to fully cover the cluster.
Even if your Oracle VM only uses a fraction of that, Oracle’s policy says you must have licenses for all 80 cores in that cluster to be compliant, because the Oracle software could run on any of those cores.
AHV vs. VMware on Nutanix:
Whether you use Nutanix’s own AHV hypervisor or run VMware vSphere on top of Nutanix hardware, the logic is the same – Oracle sees a pool of compute and insists you license the whole thing if Oracle workloads are present.
Nutanix AHV, built on KVM with added features, offers capabilities such as live migration and dynamic scheduling, similar to those found in VMware.
Oracle considers these features “soft partitioning” mechanisms, meaning you can’t use them to reduce licensing.
In other words, AHV with virtual machine mobility is treated like VMware vMotion in Oracle’s book – all hosts are fair game. A source humorously put the answer to “How is Oracle licensed on Nutanix AHV?” as “Very carefully,” noting that Oracle’s policy is silent on AHV, so it falls under the same rules as VMware.
Key takeaway:
When planning to run Oracle on Nutanix, plan to license the entire physical footprint where the Oracle software will run. This typically means all nodes in the Nutanix cluster that host the Oracle VMs. The only way to reduce that is by physically limiting where Oracle can run (more on that in best practices).
Read Preparing for an Oracle License Audit on Nutanix: Compliance Guide.
Soft Partitioning vs. Hard Partitioning: Why Oracle’s Policy Matters
Oracle uses the term “soft partitioning” to refer to virtualization or software controls that limit the hardware resources for a software instance.
However, Oracle explicitly does not accept soft partitioning for limiting licenses.
Nutanix AHV, VMware ESXi, and Microsoft Hyper-V are all considered soft partitioning from Oracle’s perspective.
You can pin a VM to a subset of CPUs or a specific host, but Oracle will say, “That’s a soft control; we don’t care – you still need to license everything in that environment.”
On the other hand, hard partitioning (which Oracle does accept for limiting licensing) generally involves physical segregation or Oracle-sanctioned methods.
Examples of hard partitioning include using Oracle’s own Oracle VM Server with CPU pinning, certain hardware-based partitioning, such as IBM LPARs, or running on a dedicated physical server that is not part of a larger virtualization pool.
Oracle does not consider Nutanix hard partitioning.
There is no Oracle-approved method to license only part of a Nutanix node or cluster, short of physically splitting it out.
Why is Oracle so strict? It’s partly business (to sell more licenses) and partly the difficulty of verifying soft partitions. Oracle’s audit scripts can query vCenter or other systems to view the entire cluster.
If they see Oracle installed on one VM in a cluster, they assume it could be moved or configured with more cores, etc., at any time.
To avoid debates, Oracle’s policy states that it should either license it all or not license any of it.
Implications for Nutanix AHV users:
Even if you implement AHV pinning or segmentation features (like affinity rules to tie an Oracle VM to a specific host), Oracle’s contractual stance is that this is irrelevant to licensing.
There have been cases where Oracle sales or even some resellers have given informal advice, such as “if you pin the VM to one node, you only need to license that node.” Be cautious with such advice – it does not align with Oracle’s official policy.
Without an explicit written agreement from Oracle allowing this (which is rare), you would be at risk in an audit.
Common misunderstanding:
Some Nutanix users think, “Well, Nutanix isn’t mentioned in Oracle’s partitioning policy document at all, so maybe we have wiggle room.”
Unfortunately, being absent from the approved list means it is not recognized, and thus it is treated as full capacity.
Oracle’s silence on Nutanix AHV places it in the same category as VMware, which Oracle mentions as an example of soft partitioning.
In Oracle’s words, “soft partitioning is not permitted to determine or limit the number of software licenses required”. So, we must assume that Nutanix AHV is soft partitioning from their perspective.
To summarize: In any virtualized scenario (like Nutanix) that Oracle hasn’t blessed, always assume that you must license every physical core in any server that can run Oracle. Soft controls won’t reduce that requirement.
The only way to legally reduce license counts is through hard partitioning or reducing the physical scope where Oracle runs (which we’ll address in best practices).
Read Optimizing Oracle Licensing on Nutanix.
Audit Risks and Oracle’s Tactics in Virtual Environments
Understanding the risk is crucial. What could happen if you run Oracle on Nutanix without licensing the full environment?
The big fear is an Oracle license audit. Oracle’s License Management Services (LMS, now part of GLAS – Global License Advisory Services) team conducts audits, paying special attention to virtualization.
Oracle typically requests detailed system data during an audit.
Some scripts collect information on all ESXi hosts, clusters, and VMs for VMware environments from vCenter. For Nutanix AHV, Oracle doesn’t have an official AHV script (since AHV is less common).
Still, they will ask the customer to provide environment details – often by running certain commands or reports from Nutanix Prism (the management tool) to show hosts, clusters, and VMs. They may also request outputs from odusg or other Oracle tools on each VM to detect Oracle installations.
“Galaxy” licensing (Oracle’s overreach):
A notorious tactic Oracle uses is sometimes referred to as “galaxy licensing” by the licensing community.
This is when Oracle claims you must license the cluster running Oracle and the individual nodes. Still, potentially all servers connected to the same storage or environment, under the argument that VMs or data could spread to any server.
For example, Nutanix often uses shared storage across clusters or data protection mirroring. Oracle might attempt to say, “Oh, your Nutanix clusters share storage or are in the same management fabric, so any of those machines could run the Oracle workload if it were moved or restored there – hence, all of it needs licensing.”
This is an aggressive stance (and can often be negotiated or fought against), but you should be aware of it.
Be cautious if your Nutanix environment has multiple clusters interconnected or utilizes the same storage pools.
Oracle’s argument (not one most customers agree with, but they try) is that shared storage means potential shared access to Oracle binaries or VMs; hence, all connected nodes must be licensed.
Audit liability example:
Suppose you license only two nodes for Oracle out of a 4-node Nutanix cluster by pinning the virtual machines (VMs) to those two nodes.
In an audit, Oracle’s position would be that you owe licenses for the other two nodes (and back support fees for all years of usage, plus potentially penalties).
If each node had, say, 20 cores and you missed those, that could be tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars per node, depending on the Oracle product (e.g., Oracle Database Enterprise Edition is approximately $47,500 per 2-core license plus support).
It adds up frighteningly fast. Because of this exact issue, some audits have revealed compliance gaps in the millions of dollars.
Real scenario: A health organization ran Oracle on a VMware cluster and only licensed part of it. They were found to be $14 million out of compliance, and Oracle’s “solution” was to suggest a $5 million ULA to cover it.
Similarly, it could happen on Nutanix – Oracle might push you to buy a large ULA or cloud subscription as a settlement if you’re caught under-licensed.
Engaging in such an audit unprepared can blow up IT budgets or force decisions under duress.
Oracle’s view on AHV audit data:
Because Oracle doesn’t have an automated way to scan AHV (no script is available like for VMware), they rely on customer-provided information.
This might sound like you could theoretically “hide” some info, but that is extremely risky and not recommended. First, providing incomplete or false data in an audit can lead to legal issues.
Second, Oracle auditors are experienced. They will ask detailed questions and potentially cross-verify (for example, they might review cluster logs or references in Oracle’s support system if you have ever raised an SR referencing Nutanix).
It’s best to assume transparency and ensure compliance beforehand rather than gamble during an audit.
Bottom line:
If you are not following Oracle’s licensing rules on Nutanix, an audit could expose a significant financial risk.
Oracle may attempt to maximize the scope (e.g., include all connected hardware). Thus, it’s critical to mitigate these risks through proper architecture and licensing, which leads us to the next section.
Read Architecting Nutanix for Oracle License Compliance: Best Practices and Pitfalls.
Best Practices for Configuring Nutanix for Oracle (and Staying Compliant)
To safely run Oracle on Nutanix and control costs, implement architectural and operational best practices that align with Oracle’s licensing requirements while minimizing unnecessary expenses.
Here are the top strategies:
1. Isolate Oracle workloads on a dedicated
Nutanix Clusters: This is the single most effective practice. Create a small, dedicated Nutanix cluster for your Oracle databases and applications if possible.
For example, instead of a 10-node general-purpose cluster that runs everything, including Oracle, carve out a 2-node or 3-node cluster that runs only your Oracle VMs and nothing else.
That way, you only need to license those 2-3 nodes for Oracle, not all 10. Ensure that the Oracle cluster is not part of the same virtualization fabric as others – it should have its separate pool of resources.
This physical isolation essentially creates a “hard partition.” Oracle cannot demand licenses for truly segregated hardware that doesn’t run Oracle.
Many firms maintain a separate VMware or Nutanix cluster for Oracle workloads to keep the scope of the project contained. Isolation is key to limiting license requirements.
2. Disable Oracle VM mobility outside the licensed nodes:
On Nutanix AHV, you can control host affinity to some degree. Ensure that Oracle VMs are pinned or have affinity to only the licensed nodes.
Also, disable auto-migrate for those VMs. In VMware terms, one would create rules to tie VMs to hosts and disable DRS.
In AHV, ensure that no automatic scheduling moves them to unlicensed nodes.
While, as discussed, this pinning is not a bulletproof legal control, it operationally prevents accidental drift of Oracle workloads.
It shows good faith that you’re containing Oracle. If an audit occurs, you can at least demonstrate that you configured the environment to isolate Oracle on specific hardware (even though Oracle will still recommend “licensing all possible hosts”). This provides added assurance if you have also physically isolated as per point 1.
3. Segregate storage for Oracle:
Ensure that Oracle data (VM disks, database files) resides on storage inaccessible by other clusters or unlicensed nodes.
In Nutanix, storage is usually tied to the cluster – so if you have a dedicated Oracle cluster, its storage won’t be mounted elsewhere, which is good.
Be cautious if you’re using a shared storage resource (less common in Nutanix since it’s hyper-converged, but possible if using Volumes or Objects across clusters).
The goal is that an Oracle VM cannot be spun up on a different cluster using a copy of the data, or another server cannot access the Oracle DB files.
Keeping Oracle data siloed prevents Oracle auditors from making a case about shared storage requiring broader licensing.
4. License all nodes that contribute to Oracle HA/DR:
If you have high availability or disaster recovery setups, include them in your licensing. For instance, if you have a third Nutanix node that normally doesn’t run Oracle but is configured as a failover target (such as using Nutanix replication or cluster failover), you should also license that node.
Oracle licensing requires covering all servers where the software is installed and/or running.
Even if Oracle is just installed and idle on a DR node waiting for a failover, technically that node needs to be licensed (Oracle’s policy on backup servers has some allowances if the server is truly cold and never powered on except in a disaster, but in practice, it’s safer to license any warm standby).
A good rule of thumb is to license it if you rely on that server to run Oracle in an emergency or for load balancing.
This ensures you’re not caught off guard if an auditor asks, “What about this other host with the Oracle VM template ready for DR?”
5. Maintain strict documentation and records.
Keep an up-to-date diagram and inventory of all Oracle installations within your Nutanix environment. Document the cluster names, node details (CPU counts, etc.), and how they are separated from other infrastructure.
Also, log any changes – for example, if you ever move an Oracle VM or add a new Oracle database to a different cluster (hopefully you don’t do this without licensing, but if you do for testing, note it).
This documentation is invaluable in an audit to demonstrate your isolation and control.
It’s also good for internal clarity. Nutanix Prism Central can help by showing which VMs (tagged as Oracle) run on which hosts.
Export or record this information regularly. Conduct internal audits periodically (e.g., every six months) to verify that no one spun up a surprise Oracle instance elsewhere.
6. Consider Oracle’s Authorized Cloud or special cases, if applicable.
Nutanix has integrations with public clouds, and there are Nutanix Clusters available on AWS, among others.
If you extend Nutanix to AWS or use a hybrid setup, remember that Oracle has separate cloud rules (e.g., licensing Oracle on AWS/Azure sometimes counts two vCPUs as one license).
However, if it’s Nutanix on AWS bare metal, it’s likely to be treated similarly to on-premises deployments.
Also, note that Oracle has different terms for Oracle Cloud (if you ever consider moving Oracle workloads to Oracle’s cloud, they let you bring licenses or use Oracle Cloud credits which can be more cost-effective for burst needs – not Nutanix-specific, but an aside if you consider alternatives for DR or test environments to avoid licensing extra Nutanix nodes).
7. Get clarity in writing, if possible:
In some cases, customers negotiate specific terms with Oracle. For example, if you have a large Nutanix deployment, you might consider obtaining a written amendment that only requires licensing for X cluster.
Oracle doesn’t often grant such exceptions, but it’s worth a try if you have leverage or are making a big purchase. Without it, rely on the standard policy as discussed.
8. Consult experts for complex setups:
If your Nutanix environment is complex or you suspect Oracle will be a significant cost, involve an Oracle licensing expert or consultant early. They can validate your architecture plan and even help defend it if Oracle later questions it.
Consultants specializing in Oracle licensing have encountered numerous audit scenarios; they may suggest specific configurations or arguments.
Engaging them proactively can save headaches – consider it a proactive measure. Even Oracle-focused SAM tools (some of which are designed to track Oracle licensing) could be used, although they tend to focus more on options rather than virtualization.
9. Be cautious with Enterprise features:
Oracle Database Enterprise Edition has add-on options (such as Partitioning and RAC), each with its own license.
Ensure you’re not accidentally using something like RAC across nodes, which would complicate licensing further (RAC on Nutanix means multiple nodes actively running DB instances – you’d need to license all those nodes for sure).
Also, watch for features like Oracle’s virtualization (Oracle VM), which is not typical on Nutanix. However, if you tried to run Oracle VM on Nutanix hardware (an unusual scenario), Oracle might allow sub-capacity.
Mixing that with Nutanix’s environment would be odd. Generally, stick to known territory: treat it as standard x86 virtualization.
Implementing the above best practices means designing your Nutanix deployment to align with Oracle’s licensing rules, thereby avoiding any unpleasant surprises.
Yes, it might mean running Oracle on fewer nodes than you ideally would for optimal performance, or not fully leveraging all virtualization convenience (such as being unable to freely vMotion Oracle VMs around).
But these trade-offs are a reality if you want to minimize license costs. A 2-node dedicated cluster is often sufficient for an Oracle workload, and the license cost savings often justify this approach.
Example Configurations and Compliance Scenarios
Let’s illustrate with a couple of simplified scenarios:
- Scenario A: Single Nutanix Cluster, Mixed Workloads: Company ABC has a 5-node Nutanix cluster running a mix of applications, including one Oracle database virtual machine (for a mid-sized enterprise application). Each node has 16 cores. Oracle’s policy would require ABC to license all five nodes (80 cores). At, say, $25k per Oracle core license (including 2 years support), that’s roughly $2M in licensing to run one database – not ideal. ABC wisely decides to move that Oracle VM onto its small cluster.
- Scenario B: Dedicated Oracle Cluster: ABC creates a new Nutanix cluster with two nodes (maybe repurposed hardware or new nodes) specifically for the Oracle DB. Now they only need to license those two nodes (32 cores, which might be around $ 800,000 in licenses – much more palatable than $2M). They disable cross-cluster VM moves and ensure that the data is on storage used only by the 2-node cluster. In an audit, Oracle will verify that the Oracle software is installed on those two nodes and nowhere else, which aligns with the licenses purchased. ABC stays compliant and saved over $1M by isolating Oracle. They sacrificed some fault tolerance (only 2 nodes means fewer places to fail over), but they deemed it acceptable given budget constraints. To mitigate risk, they also licensed a third node that can act as a DR (so three nodes are licensed).
- Scenario C: Nutanix with DR site: Company XYZ runs a Nutanix cluster of 4 nodes in the primary data center for Oracle, and replicates VMs to a 4-node Nutanix cluster in a DR site (using Nutanix asynchronous replication). They initially licensed only the primary. However, their DR site is technically a cold standby, as the VMs are powered off. Oracle’s rules on backup: if the DR server is idle and Oracle is not installed until a disaster occurs, you may not need to license it until failover. However, because replication implies that data is at the DR site and could be tested, Oracle could argue that those DR nodes require licensing. XYZ licenses both primary and disaster recovery (DR) clusters, totaling eight nodes, for redundancy and safety. They may negotiate a term license or cloud option for disaster recovery (DR) to reduce costs. Alternatively, some companies choose not to have traditional DR for Oracle and instead rely on restoring backups to the cloud in the event of a disaster, avoiding the need to license a second environment. These decisions are also part of the strategy.
- Scenario D: Misconfigured Environment: Company Q had a Nutanix cluster and assumed that pinning a VM to one of the eight hosts was sufficient. They only licensed that one host. Years later, an administrator, unaware of the implications, migrated the VM to another host for maintenance. In an audit, Oracle discovered that Oracle software had run on two hosts (via log files or configuration remnants) and demanded licenses for all eight (since technically it could run anywhere). Q ended up settling by purchasing licenses for all 8 to avoid penalties. The lesson: don’t rely on manual controls or human processes – physically separate or strictly automate constraints, and license conservatively.
These examples demonstrate how different approaches can significantly impact the compliance and cost outcomes.
The safest route is always to minimize the scope where Oracle can run and fully cover that scope with licenses. Doing that transforms the problem from a sprawling unknown into a contained, budgetable item.
Recommendations
For any enterprise considering or already running Oracle on Nutanix, here are the key recommendations to ensure compliance and cost-efficiency:
- Architect with Licensing in Mind: Design your Nutanix deployment to isolate Oracle workloads to the smallest environment possible. Dedicate a Nutanix cluster (or set of nodes) exclusively for Oracle. This containment will save you money on licenses and significantly simplify compliance.
- License All Physical Cores Where Oracle Runs: Count up the cores on all Nutanix nodes that will host or could host Oracle software, and ensure you have purchased the appropriate number of Oracle licenses for those cores. Do not assume that any software-enforced limits (vCPUs, pinning) will reduce this requirement – they won’t, according to Oracle’s policy.
- Avoid Mixed Workloads with Oracle: Do not mix Oracle VMs with other workloads on a large cluster unless you are prepared to license that entire cluster for Oracle. The cost usually isn’t justifiable. Keep Oracle separate to prevent Oracle from claiming licenses for unrelated servers.
- Disable Unnecessary Mobility: Turn off or restrict features like live migration for Oracle VMs. You don’t want Oracle VMs wandering to unlicensed hardware. Lock them down to their home cluster or hosts. This operational step will back up your isolation strategy.
- Regularly Audit Your Oracle Deployments: Perform your internal compliance checks. Ensure no one has started a new Oracle instance on an unlicensed Nutanix cluster. Utilize Prism reports or scripts to scan for Oracle software installations in VMs. It’s easier to fix things proactively than to deal with them during an official audit.
- Keep Documentation and Evidence: Maintain clear documentation of your Nutanix cluster configurations, including which clusters run Oracle, and provide proof of license. In the case of an audit, you can quickly show that “Oracle runs here and here, and we have licenses for 100% of those cores.” Having that ready can shorten and make the audit easier.
- Be Wary of Oracle’s Audit Requests: If audited, be prepared to push back (politely) on any overreaching requests. For example, you can question the relevance if Oracle asks for info on clusters that don’t run Oracle. Only provide what’s scoped to where Oracle is installed. And if they try the “shared storage” angle, show them how you’ve isolated Oracle’s storage. In other words, don’t let Oracle define the narrative—stick to what you know is required by contract.
- Consult Licensing Experts if Needed: Oracle licensing is a complex domain. If you have any uncertainty, especially in large environments, consider consulting firms or specialists to validate your approach. The cost of consultation is minor compared to a multi-million-dollar licensing mistake.
- Educate Your Team: Ensure your virtualization admins, DBAs, and architects know Oracle’s licensing constraints on Nutanix. They might otherwise, with good intentions, perform an action (such as vMotioning a VM) that has significant compliance implications. Make it a policy: no one moves or deploys Oracle outside the designated area without management approval.
- Explore Alternatives for Cost Savings: If the Oracle licensing burden on Nutanix is too high, consider whether any workloads can be migrated to other platforms. Some companies run Oracle on dedicated, bare-metal servers (even if they are not virtualized) to avoid the issue altogether. Others might consider replacing Oracle with other databases for specific applications if feasible (as part of a long-term strategy). Or leverage Oracle’s cloud for ephemeral needs. These are broader IT strategy considerations that can reduce reliance on Oracle or, at the very least, change the licensing model.
Running Oracle on Nutanix requires a cautious approach: contain, document, comply. Nutanix’s tech benefits can certainly be enjoyed with Oracle, but one must be aware of Oracle’s licensing stance.
Following the above recommendations can significantly mitigate the risk of an Oracle audit becoming a financial disaster and ensure that your Oracle on Nutanix deployment is efficient and compliant.
Remember, Oracle licensing may not be the most exciting part of innovation, but it is the guardrail that keeps your organization safe while you innovate.
Put the work in upfront on licensing strategy, and you’ll reap the rewards of Nutanix’s powerful platform without unwelcome surprises.
FAQ: Oracle Licensing with Nutanix
What is the smallest licensable unit for Oracle on Nutanix?
The smallest licensable unit for Oracle on Nutanix is a standalone Nutanix node.
Can Nutanix nodes be divided into smaller units for licensing?
No, unlike soft-partitioned platforms like Hyper-V and vSphere, Nutanix nodes cannot be divided into smaller units for licensing.
How does Nutanix AHV impact Oracle licensing?
Nutanix AHV enhances CentOS KVM with VMware-like capabilities, which can impact Oracle licensing due to features such as virtual motion.
What considerations should I take into account when running VMware on Nutanix with Oracle?
Ensure that all physical hosts capable of running Oracle software are licensed, even if Oracle VMs are not currently used.
How does Oracle conduct audits for compliance?
Oracle may request script outputs from VMware vCenters to identify all physical hosts during an audit.
Is there an automatic script for Oracle to assess Nutanix AHV?
No, Oracle does not have an automatic script available to assess Nutanix AHV. Customers need to identify and declare their physical Nutanix servers.
How should I manage shared storage on Nutanix for Oracle licensing?
Be aware that shared storage can impact licensing. Ensure all nodes connected to shared storage are properly licensed.
What are the implications of virtual motion for Oracle licensing?
Virtual motion and similar features require that all potential physical hosts for Oracle software be licensed.
How can I ensure compliance with Oracle’s licensing on Nutanix?
Conduct regular audits, maintain accurate documentation, and use tools like Prism Central to track and declare physical servers.
What is the importance of licensing Oracle’s compute capacity on Nutanix?
Licensing compute capacity ensures support for high availability, disaster recovery, and system management, which helps avoid compliance issues.
Should non-Oracle running servers be licensed on Nutanix?
Yes, servers that do not run Oracle but are used for its continuity, such as for disaster recovery, should also be licensed.
What strategies can help manage Oracle licensing costs on Nutanix?
Regularly review and optimize your licensing strategy, isolate Oracle workloads, and ensure accurate reporting to avoid over-licensing.
How does Oracle’s stance on Galaxy licensing affect Nutanix users?
Oracle may attempt to apply Galaxy licensing due to shared storage features, which could potentially increase licensing requirements and costs.
What steps can mitigate risks associated with Oracle’s licensing claims?
Isolate Oracle workloads, maintain accurate records, and consult with legal and licensing experts to challenge any overreaching claims.
Why is it crucial to stay informed about Oracle’s licensing policies?
Staying informed helps ensure compliance, optimize licensing costs, and adapt to changes in Oracle’s policies that may affect your environment.
