IBM Rational Licensing Advisory for Global ITAM Teams

IBM Rational Licensing Advisory for Global ITAM Teams

IBM Rational tools are critical in many enterprises, but their licensing can be complex and costly if not managed well.

This advisory provides an in-depth look at IBM Rational Licensing – covering key Rational products (DOORS, Rational Team Concert, Rhapsody, ClearCase, etc.), their typical license models, and how to optimize usage.

We break down the main licensing models (Authorized User, Floating, Token) and compare on-premises vs. SaaS (cloud) deployment options. IT Asset Management (ITAM) professionals will learn how to monitor license consumption using IBM’s tools, avoid compliance pitfalls, and implement cost optimization strategies.

The goal is to ensure your organization gets maximum value from IBM Rational licenses while staying compliant and controlling costs.

Licensing Models and Rational Tools

IBM Rational offers several licensing models to accommodate different usage scenarios. The three primary models are Authorized User, Floating (Concurrent), and Token-based licensing, as well as newer SaaS subscription options.

All Rational products – including IBM DOORS (requirements management), Rational Team Concert (now part of Engineering Workflow Management), Rational Rhapsody (systems modeling), and Rational ClearCase (configuration management) – leverage these models in various ways.

Understanding each model is essential:

• Authorized User (Named License): A license dedicated to one specific user. Only that named individual may use the software under this license. This model is straightforward and ensures 24×7 access for the user, anywhere in the world. Licenses can be reassigned to a different user if a staff change occurs (e.g. employee leaves or changes roles). Authorized licenses are available as perpetual (one-time purchase with annual support) or fixed-term subscriptions. This model suits core team members who use a tool heavily every day.
• Floating User (Concurrent License): A shared license pool from which any user can draw, up to the number of licenses purchased at a given time. For example, with 5 floating licenses, any users can use the software, but only five can run it simultaneously. Floating licenses are managed by a license server (IBM’s Rational License Key Server), which issues licenses on request and revokes them when users exit the application. These licenses are ideal for large teams where individuals use the tools at different times – e.g., distributed engineering teams or infrequent users. Floating rights often allow for global use within the company and its subsidiaries that are more than 50% owned. Like authorized licenses, floaters can be perpetual or term. They require running a license service (FlexLM-based) on a server to distribute licenses on checkout.
• Token-Based Licensing: A flexible model where you purchase a pool of generic license “tokens” instead of product-specific licenses. Tokens act as a shared currency across multiple IBM Rational (Engineering) tools. Each product or role has a defined token cost; when a user launches a tool, a certain number of tokens are checked out from the pool and returned when they close it. For example, using DOORS might consume 1 token per user, while Rhapsody might consume 2 tokens (exact values vary by product and version). If today more team members need DOORS and tomorrow more need Rhapsody, the same token pool dynamically covers both needs. Tokens are essentially a type of floating license that “floats” not just among users but among different tools. This model maximizes utilization and can significantly reduce idle licenses in a multi-product environment. Note: IBM offers tokens only as term licenses (subscriptions) – you pay for the token pool annually or over multiple years, typically as an operating expense. Token licensing requires the use of IBM’s common license server and supported product versions. Tokens cannot be used for offline (node-locked) or authorized-user scenarios.
• SaaS Subscription (IBM ELM Cloud): Instead of managing licenses on-premises, IBM offers Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) as a cloud service. In the SaaS model, you subscribe to several users per month, and IBM hosts the tools for you. Licenses are metered by usage: IBM counts the unique users who log in each month (or concurrent users, depending on subscription type) and bills according. For example, if you subscribe for 100 users/month and 110 users use the service in one month, you pay an overage for the extra 10 (often at a premium rate). IBM’s SaaS uses a floating license server under the covers, giving you flexibility beyond strict named counts. You don’t have to manually assign licenses to each user; you can add as many user accounts as needed and only pay for those who actively use the system. This cloud model includes support, automatic upgrades, and relieves you from running license servers, but you trade off direct control. It’s purely subscription (no perpetual option) and can be more expensive over a long period, though it offers scalability and reduced IT overhead.

Typical Licensing by Product

All the above models apply across the Rational portfolio, but usage patterns differ:

• IBM DOORS (and DOORS Next): Requirements management often involves many stakeholders. Organizations typically favor floating or Token licenses for DOORS, allowing multiple engineers, business analysts, and testers to contribute without needing a dedicated license at all times. Authorized user licenses might be used for core requirements engineers who live in DOORS daily. DOORS Next is part of the ELM suite and supports token licensing, where a DOORS Next Analyst or Contributor role consumes a certain token count when in use. DOORS licenses (whether floating or token-based) can thus scale with project phases – e.g., more tokens during intensive requirements phases and fewer later.
• Rational Team Concert (RTC) / Engineering Workflow Management: This collaborative development tool uses client access licenses for various roles (Developer, Contributor, Stakeholder, etc.). Large development teams often use a mix of Authorized and Floating licenses – e.g., a core of full-time developers on named licenses and additional part-time team members (or offshore contractors) sharing a pool of floating licenses. IBM historically even allowed 10 free RTC developer licenses (Authorized) for small teams. RTC (and related Jazz-based tools, such as Rational Quality Manager and Requirements Composer) also support tokens; in a token setup, a RTC Developer might consume ~8 tokens, a Contributor 5, and so on, from a shared pool. This can be particularly efficient in organizations where not all users are active concurrently or where users frequently transition between roles.
• Rational Rhapsody: A systems and software modeling tool, often used by systems engineers and developers for model-driven design. Rhapsody tends to have a smaller user base of specialized engineers, so some companies use Authorized User licenses for each modeler. However, Rhapsody is also token-enabled and commonly part of an ELM token pool. For instance, when a Rhapsody user runs the tool, it will check out a higher number of tokens (reflecting its value) compared to, say, a test management tool. This works well if your Rhapsody usage fluctuates or if the same engineers also use DOORS or testing tools at different times – tokens will cover whichever tool is needed at the moment.
• Rational ClearCase (and ClearQuest): These legacy configuration management tools are typically licensed per user either as Authorized or Floating. In practice, most enterprises used Floating licenses for ClearCase to let a pool of developers consume licenses as needed (since not every developer builds or performs version control operations at the same time). ClearCase and ClearQuest have been updated to support token licensing as well – they can draw from a common token pool via IBM’s license server (with newer versions of the IBM Common Licensing). For example, a ClearCase user could consume tokens when accessing the repository, allowing flexibility if your development teams also use other Rational tools. However, given ClearCase’s specialized use, many organizations continue to stick with floating licensing for it.

Table: License Model Comparison (On-Premises Models and SaaS)

Cost Drivers in Rational Licensing

Managing IBM Rational licenses in a large enterprise means balancing several cost drivers:

• License Type & Count: The choice between authorized user vs. floating vs. tokens directly impacts cost. Authorized user licenses are one-to-one with users – straightforward but potentially costly if many users only use the tool occasionally (each named license might sit idle). Floating licenses typically cost more per license than authorized (often a 1.5x to 2x price factor). Still, you can buy far fewer than total users, achieving savings if not everyone uses the software at once. Token packages have a high upfront cost (since they cover multiple products), but they can replace a larger number of individual product licenses. The optimal count depends on peak concurrent usage: e.g., if 30 engineers need DOORS but only 10 at a time, 10 floating licenses (or ~10 tokens if cross-product) might suffice. Conversely, if each of 30 users needs constant access, 30 named licenses may be a more cost-effective option.
• Product Mix and Token Values: Each Rational tool carries its weight in a token model – more “valuable” tools or roles consume more tokens. For instance, high-end roles like a Quality Manager or DOORS Analyst may consume ~9-10 tokens, whereas a casual Contributor role might use 1-5 tokens. This means the mix of products you use drives how many tokens you need. If your project heavily uses a tool with a high token cost, you’ll need a larger pool (driving cost up). On the other hand, if usage is balanced, tokens allow you to reuse capacity efficiently between tools. Always refer to IBM’s latest token consumption table to understand these ratios, as IBM can adjust token values with new releases.
• Geography and License Pools: IBM floating licenses are often global; however, contracts or technical limitations may require regional pools (license files can be restricted to specific regions or server nodes). If your company operates separate license servers in the US, Europe, etc., you might need duplicate license entitlements to ensure availability in each region (driving up total needed). Conversely, if allowed, a “follow the sun” approach can let one pool serve multiple time zones, extracting more value from the same licenses (night shift in one region reusing what the day shift used elsewhere). Coordinate with IBM on any geographical use restrictions to avoid compliance issues.
• Support & Maintenance Costs: For perpetual licenses, IBM charges annual Subscription & Support (S&S), typically ~20% of license cost per year. This is a significant ongoing cost driver. Ensuring you only pay S&S on licenses that are actively used (and consider dropping support on shelfware licenses) can save money. On the SaaS side or term licenses, support is bundled, but the entire fee recurs yearly or monthly. Budgeting for multi-year contracts (e.g., 3-year commitments) can sometimes lock in better pricing, but it commits to spending up front.
• Shelfware and Utilization: Idle licenses = wasted spend. If you’ve purchased 50 authorized user licenses but only 30 users actively use the software, 20 are shelfware, costing money. Similarly, a floating pool sized for a peak that never happens is excess. Regularly reviewing utilization (peak concurrent use vs. entitlements) will reveal these inefficiencies. Token models mitigate product shelfware (another can use unused licenses of one product), but you can still overbuy tokens if your anticipated usage doesn’t materialize. Accurate forecasting of usage needs is key – tokens can help avoid buying too many fixed licenses for each tool, but only if the token pool size is right.

Optimization Strategies for Cost and Compliance

Optimizing IBM Rational license usage requires both process discipline and the right mix of license models. Here are key strategies:

• Mix and Match License Models: Rarely does one model fit all users. Identify power users vs. occasional users. Power users (using a tool daily) are cost-effective to put on Authorized User licenses, ensuring they always have access. Occasional users (a few times a week or a month) should share a Floating license pool to avoid one license per person. For organizations using multiple Rational tools, consider a Token model for maximum flexibility – tokens allow a limited budget to cover requirements, development, and testing tools as needs fluctuate. The right mix can dramatically reduce the total number of licenses required. For example, you might buy a small number of named licenses for each critical tool plus a token pool or floating pool for the rest.
• Monitor License Usage Continuously: Effective monitoring is the backbone of optimization. IBM provides the Rational License Key Server Administration and Reporting Tool (RLKS ART) to track license usage in detail. This tool (and similar third-party tools) can report peak usage, average usage, and even who or what department is consuming licenses. Leverage these reports to identify trends – for example, an uptick in concurrent usage indicating that you might soon exceed your floating pool, or consistently low usage indicating an opportunity to reduce license. Monitor token checkout logs as well to see which products are consuming the most tokens and when. By having data on actual usage, you can make data-driven decisions on adjusting license counts or models.
• Right-Size and Rebalance Regularly: Treat license capacity as a dynamic resource. On a quarterly or semi-annual basis, compare your entitlements to actual peak needs. If you have 100 floating licenses but reports show peak concurrent use never exceeded 70 in the last year, consider reducing the excess at renewal (or reallocating them to other tools if possible). Conversely, if you see frequent denials in the license server log (users turned away because no license available), that’s a sign to add capacity or tokens, for tokens, check the maximum tokens ever in use against the tokens you own. If you consistently only use half your tokens, you might be able to negotiate a lower token count later. If you max out often, plan to increase your token count to prevent productivity loss.
• Global Pooling and Time Zone Optimization: If your license agreement allows, consolidate license servers to serve multiple regions. A single global floating pool can cover users in different time zones who rarely overlap in usage, effectively “reusing” licenses around the clock. For example, one license pool could serve Europe during its day and the US during its day, with minimal concurrent overlap, effectively doubling usage from the same pool. Ensure technically that latency is manageable and check IBM’s terms (some licenses may require separate pools for separate geographies, so get clarity to stay compliant). If separate pools are a must, allocate licenses based on regional peak and try not to silo too much slack in any region.
• Educate and Enforce Best Practices for Users: Sometimes the easiest way to optimize is through user behavior. Train users to release floating licenses when not actively in use – for example, log out of the tool or close it at the end of the day so the license is returned to the pool. IBM’s newer versions allow an explicit logout to free a floating license, and some tools have idle timeouts – configure these to prevent “license hogging” by forgotten open sessions. For tokens, avoid having one person unnecessarily consume multiple tokens (like opening multiple instances of a tool). Basic awareness can improve utilization and reduce the number of licenses you need.
• Leverage Fixed-Term Licenses for Flexibility: IBM offers most licenses as either perpetual or fixed-term. Term licenses (such as one-year rentals) may cost more in the long run, but they offer flexibility to adjust costs year by year. If you anticipate project ramp-ups or ramp-downs, using term licenses (or SaaS subscriptions) allows you to scale without owning excess perpetual licenses that you may not use later. Some organizations combine this approach: maintaining a core of perpetual licenses (for the always-needed baseline) and utilizing additional term licenses or tokens during peak project periods.
• Consider SaaS for New or Temporary Needs: If deploying on-premises infrastructure is a barrier or you need to get a team started quickly, IBM’s ELM SaaS can be an attractive option. The cloud model is an OpEx model and can be started or expanded more quickly than procuring perpetual licenses and setting up servers. It may come at a premium, but consider it for short-term needs or for tools you don’t want to maintain in-house. Just be cautious of the subscription size you commit to – as noted, you cannot scale down user counts until the contract ends. One strategy is to start with a modest number of users and allow overage (paying a premium) if you exceed it, then adjust at renewal. This avoids overcommitting to unused capacity.

Negotiating with IBM for Licensing

Negotiation is a critical phase to optimize both cost and contract terms. Go into IBM license negotiations armed with data and a clear strategy:

• Assess Current Usage and Needs: Before negotiating any renewal or purchase, gather detailed records of your current license entitlements and actual usage. Know your peak usage for each tool (or tokens) and number of active users. IBM is likely to have this data from any audit or reports as well, so you want to present a well-informed request. For instance, if you found that you only used 80 tokens out of 100, you might negotiate to reduce the cost to 80 (or push for additional products in the token bundle at no extra cost). Conversely, if you’re short on licenses, have evidence ready to justify volume discounts for more.
• Consider an Enterprise Agreement: If your organization uses a broad range of IBM software (not just Rational but possibly other IBM products), you may explore an Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) or a Global Enterprise Agreement. IBM sometimes includes Rational token pools in large enterprise deals to provide you with more flexibility across your portfolio. Enterprise agreements can simplify management and potentially yield better discounts, but be careful to ensure the terms meet your specific usage – you don’t want to pay for unlimited use if your actual needs are limited to certain tools.
• Token Conversion and Bundling: If you have a lot of individual licenses, ask IBM about converting them to tokens. IBM has been open to converting existing licenses into token pools (e.g., they might take your 10 DOORS licenses and convert them into a certain number of tokens). This can sometimes be negotiated during renewals to modernize your license model. Ensure that you receive credit for your sunk costs in perpetual licenses if you are moving to a token subscription model. Also, discuss bundling of support or additional software – IBM might bundle in related tools or training if you are making a large commitment.
• Compare SaaS vs On-Prem Pricing: IBM sales reps can provide quotes for both SaaS and traditional license models. Even if you plan to stay on-prem, obtaining a SaaS quote gives you leverage – for example, if SaaS would be cheaper for your user count, you can push for a better discount on perpetual/term licenses, or vice versa. IBM’s pricing teams have some flexibility, especially at the end of the quarter or the fiscal year. Show that you’ve done the math: total 3-year cost of SaaS vs 3-year cost of on-prem, including support. This also helps ensure you choose the financially favorable option for your situation.
• Negotiate User Definitions and Transfer Rights: Ensure the contract definitions align with your enterprise’s needs. For Authorized User licenses, clarify how license transfers are handled (you want the ability to reassign when staff changes, without extra fees). For floating, confirm that global use is permitted if necessary, or negotiate regional pools accordingly. If you work with contractors or partners who require tool access, discuss how these are counted (sometimes external users can be covered under your licenses with the proper clauses). If you foresee a merger or organizational change, ask for license transfer rights so licenses can move to an affiliate if needed – avoiding having to re-buy licenses after a reorg.
• Audit Protection and Compliance Clauses: IBM license audits are a known risk – make sure any deal includes clarity on how future compliance will be measured for these user-based licenses. If possible, negotiate some “soft landing” in case of over-deployment – e.g., the ability to true-up at renewal rather than retroactive penalties. While IBM may not always grant this, showing that you are proactive about compliance can set a cooperative tone. At minimum, understand the audit process for user licenses: IBM will expect records of entitlements and possibly usage logs. Being prepared for this (and even mentioning your robust internal tracking during negotiation) can sometimes reassure IBM and make them more flexible on terms.

Recommendations (Tips for License Management)

• Implement Central License Tracking: Use IBM’s Rational License Key Server reports or a license management tool to track usage across all Rational productsibm.com. Maintain a consolidated view of all license servers and user assignments to avoid anything falling through the cracks.
• Regularly Audit Internal Usage: Don’t wait for IBM’s official audit. Conduct your quarterly internal audit comparing what you have purchased vs. peak usage vs. active user lists. This helps catch any compliance issues early and identifies opportunities to reduce or reallocate licenses.
• Optimize License Allocation by Role: Match license types to user roles. Heavy, daily users = Authorized licenses; Light or infrequent users = Floating pool; Multi-tool users across lifecycle = Token pool. By aligning the license model to the usage pattern, you prevent paying for full licenses that sit idle.
• Manage the “Idle License” Problem: Enforce policies or technical measures (timeouts, auto-logoff) so that floating licenses aren’t consumed all day by inactive sessions. Educate users to close Rational applications when done. This increases availability for others and may reduce the number of concurrent licenses you need.
• Keep Software and License Servers Up-to-Date: Ensure you upgrade to Rational product versions that support the latest licensing (e.g., token-enabled versions, latest RLKS server). IBM Common Licensing updates often enhance reporting and occasionally improve efficiency. An outdated license server could miscount or fail to serve newer license keys.
• Leverage Token Flexibility but Plan for Peaks: If using tokens, always know your peak token consumption. Plan token pool size for worst-case simultaneous usage of key tools – and leave a buffer if possible. It’s cheaper to buy a few extra tokens up front than to have teams blocked because the token pool maxed out (or to scramble for more tokens mid-term at premium prices).
• Negotiate Multi-Year for Discounts: If budget allows and you expect consistent usage, negotiating a 2- or 3-year term with IBM can yield better discounts or concessions (such as fixed pricing or extra tokens). Just be cautious not to overcommit on quantities – use your usage data to drive the numbers.
• Utilize IBM’s License Portal: Use the IBM Rational License Key Center for managing entitlements – it’s where you generate license files and can see what you own. Keep records from this portal and proof of purchases; they will be crucial during compliance audits.
• Consider Third-Party Tools for Added Insight: If IBM’s tools don’t meet all your needs, products like Flexera or OpenLM can help monitor FlexLM license usage across vendors. These can sometimes provide alerts on denials, automated optimization suggestions, or combine multiple license server data. It’s an added cost, but it can pay off in large environments.
• Stay Informed on IBM Licensing Changes: IBM occasionally changes licensing terms, editions, or token values (especially with new version releases or acquisitions). Assign someone in your ITAM team to stay updated via IBM announcements or partner advisories. This ensures you won’t be caught off-guard by a change that impacts compliance or costs (e.g., a new version requiring more tokens or a change in support policy).

Checklist: 5 Actions to Take Now

1. Inventory Your Licenses and Usage: Gather a complete inventory of all IBM Rational licenses you own – by product, type (authorized, floating, token), quantity, and current assignment. At the same time, collect recent usage data: peak concurrent usage for each floating pool, token consumption reports, and a list of named users for authorized licenses.
2. Enable Usage Monitoring: If not already in place, set up the IBM Rational License Key Server Administration & Reporting Tool (or an equivalent). Configure it to log and report license usage for all your Rational license servers. Ensure logs capture denials as well – a denial log is an early warning that you might be under-licensed.
3. Review and Rebalance Licenses: Analyze the collected data to identify under-utilized licenses and any shortfalls. For under-used licenses (e.g., 20 named users but only 10 active), plan to reduce or reassign them. For over-utilization (e.g., consistently hitting 100% of a floating pool), plan to acquire additional licenses or tokens before it impacts users.
4. Engage Stakeholders: Meet with engineering/tool owners to validate the findings. Discuss whether the current license model mix is meeting their needs or if, for example, tokens would give more flexibility between DOORS, Rhapsody, and other tools. User input will help shape a licensing strategy that balances cost with productivity (they can often identify upcoming project changes that will need more or fewer licenses).
5. Plan Your Next Renewal Strategy: If a renewal or true-up is upcoming, start preparations early. Use your internal audit and stakeholder feedback to decide what to negotiate (e.g., reduce some licenses, switch some to tokens or SaaS, etc.). Reach out to IBM or your reseller with this data to get preliminary quotes. Align this with budget timelines. By having a concrete plan and data, you’ll enter negotiations with a strong position to optimize terms and pricing.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main IBM Rational license types, and how do they differ?
A1: The three main license types are Authorized User (each license is tied to a specific named user), Floating (a pool of concurrent-use licenses shared among users), and Token-based (a pool of tokens that can be used across multiple IBM Rational tools). Authorized User is like a personal seat – simple but inflexible. Floating licenses allow sharing among multiple users (only a limited number can use the software at a time). Token licenses extend the floating concept across different products, providing a lot of flexibility by using a “license currency” for any tool in the suite. Each model has its pros and cons, as detailed above (see the Licensing Models section). SaaS subscriptions are another model where you pay per user or concurrent user on IBM Cloud, without managing license servers.

Q2: How can we monitor our IBM Rational license usage effectively?
A2: IBM provides the Rational License Key Server Administration and Reporting Tool, which gathers usage data from the license servers. By using this, you can generate reports on peak usage, total usage over time, and even user-based reports. Make sure all license servers (for floating and token pools) are configured to log usage. Regularly review these reports – for example, check the peak concurrent users each month against your entitlements. You can also set up email alerts for when license usage hits a threshold (some third-party tools or custom scripts can do this using the FlexLM lmutil outputs). Effective monitoring will show if you have too many licenses (low usage) or risk running out (high usage or denials). It’s the foundation for both optimizing cost and avoiding non-compliance.

Q3: What are IBM Rational tokens, and when does a token model make sense?
A3: IBM Rational tokens are a flexible licensing currency that different Rational (Engineering) products can use. Instead of buying a fixed number of licenses for each tool, you buy a pool of tokens. Each tool consumes a certain number of tokens per user session. Tokens make sense if your organization uses multiple IBM tools or has variable usage patterns. For example, if your systems engineers alternate between DOORS Next, Rhapsody, and Test Management, a token pool can cover all three without having to own separate licenses for each per user. Tokens help avoid paying for software that’s not being actively used by allowing one product’s idle capacity to be used by another product. They are especially cost-effective when no single tool is used by everyone simultaneously. However, if you only use one Rational product heavily (and nothing else), tokens might be less efficient than just licenses for that product.

Q4: How does SaaS (cloud) licensing for IBM Engineering differ from on-premises licensing?
A4: With IBM’s SaaS for Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM), you don’t manage license keys or servers at all – IBM runs the tools in its cloud, and you subscribe to several users. On-premises licensing means you purchase the software and run it on your infrastructure, using either perpetual or term licenses (authorized, floating, or tokens). The key differences: Cost model – SaaS is a subscription (OpEx) billed regularly, whereas on-prem can be CapEx (perpetual + support). Flexibility – SaaS allows you to exceed your subscribed users (with overage fees) and then true-up, while on-prem you’re hard-capped by your license keys (users simply can’t exceed what’s installed)ibm.comibm.com. Maintenance – SaaS includes updates and maintenance by IBM, ensuring you’re always on a supported version.

Q5: What are common compliance pitfalls with IBM Rational licensing, and how can we avoid them?
A5: A few common pitfalls: (1) Untracked Named Users: Losing track of who has an authorized user license – e.g., an ex-employee still assigned a license, or multiple people using a single login (the latter violates licensing). Regular user audits help avoid this. (2) Exceeding Floating Capacity: While the license server will prevent more than the allowed concurrent uses, issues arise if teams create additional unauthorized license servers or use trial keys to get around limits – this is a big compliance no-no. Stick to official license files and monitor usage logs for any denials (a sign of insufficient licenses). (3) Misusing Tokens: Ensure you don’t run more users on a token pool than purchased tokens would allow (again, the system typically prevents it, but in an audit, IBM will check your peak token usage vs entitlement). Another token pitfall is not understanding token values – deploying a new module that uses more tokens than expected could unknowingly put you over capacity. Always check IBM’s token usage documentation when adding new tools or versions. (4) Geographical or Affiliate Use: Using licenses in ways not covered by your agreement – for example, sharing a license pool with a subsidiary or partner company that isn’t included, or using licenses outside permitted countries. Clarify these terms in your contract and keep usage within bounds. (5) Audit Readiness: Failing to keep proof of entitlements (Passport Advantage certificates, license purchase documents). IBM audits will ask for proof of what you have bought and compare to deployments. Keep good records and use IBM’s License Key Center to track all your entitlements. By proactively monitoring and managing these areas, you can avoid surprises during an audit and stay compliant.

Do you want to know more about our IBM License Management Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit