Handling Microsoft Price Increases: Strategies When Costs Go Up

Handling Microsoft Price Increases

Introduction – Microsoft EA Price Increases in 2025

Microsoft has been raising its prices and changing its licensing models, leaving many organizations facing unexpected cost increases.

In 2025, Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) price increases have become a pressing concern: list prices for Microsoft 365 went up recently, and Microsoft is even retiring volume discounts that enterprise customers used to enjoy. Read our complete guide to Microsoft EA Pricing Changes 2025

CIOs, procurement leaders, IT sourcing managers, and license compliance officers are all impacted by these changes. While Microsoft positions these hikes as reflections of added product value or “pricing consistency,” the reality is that customers must figure out how to mitigate rising costs.

Every organization will respond differently to Microsoft’s price hikes. Some might rush to renew early and lock in current rates; others will push back and negotiate concessions. The key is to be proactive. This guide offers practical, strategic advice from a Microsoft licensing expert’s perspective.

We’ll cover what’s changing with Microsoft’s pricing (from Microsoft 365 price hikes to currency fluctuation in Microsoft licensing), and more importantly, how you can negotiate and plan to reduce the impact on your budget.

The tone here is intentionally skeptical of Microsoft’s pricing motives – because your job is to protect your organization’s interests. Let’s dive into what’s happening and then explore strategies to handle these increases.

Microsoft’s Recent Price Hikes

Microsoft has not been shy about raising prices on its flagship products in recent years. In 2022, Microsoft rolled out the first major Microsoft 365 price hike in a decade, increasing costs for core plans across the board.

For example, Office 365 E3 jumped from $20 to $23 per user (a 15% increase), and Microsoft 365 E3 went from $32 to $36 (about 12.5% higher). Even smaller business plans like Microsoft 365 Business Basic rose 20% (from $5 to $6 per user).

These 2022 increases set a precedent: Microsoft signaled it is willing to charge more for the same licenses, citing the continuous stream of new features added over the years (from Teams collaboration tools to advanced security and compliance features).

Since then, additional Microsoft price increases have hit specific products. Microsoft has periodically adjusted regional pricing due to currency fluctuations, resulting in localized cost increases (more on that later).

Certain add-ons and services have also crept up in price – for instance, the Teams Phone license (for cloud PBX capabilities in Teams) saw a significant bump, and Power BI Pro became more expensive as Microsoft folded in new analytics features. The trend is clear: not only the main bundles like Microsoft 365, but also related cloud services, are getting pricier over time.

The most dramatic change coming in late 2025 is the elimination of EA volume discounts. Historically, under an Enterprise Agreement, large customers got automatic discounts at higher volume tiers (Levels B, C, and D pricing). Starting November 1, 2025, Microsoft will drop those tiered discounts for all online services.

This means every organization, big or small, will effectively pay “Level A” standard pricing. A company with 50,000 seats used to pay less per license than a company with 500 seats – but after this change, both pay the same list price.

Microsoft pitches this as “pricing consistency” or simplification, but for enterprises that enjoyed, say, a 10% discount for their volume, it’s an immediate 10% cost increase on their next renewal.

Budget forecasting becomes tricky when a built-in discount vanishes overnight. Total cost of ownership (TCO) calculations done under old assumptions will need revision, as the baseline price for your Microsoft licenses is rising.

To illustrate the impact of recent and upcoming price changes, consider a few examples in the table below. These scenarios show how a Microsoft 365 price hike or a currency adjustment can translate into a higher IT spend for the same resources:

*Table: Example price hike scenarios. In these illustrative examples, a customer paying a discounted $30 for Microsoft 365 E3 could see that rise to $33 (about +10%) at renewal. An organization with Microsoft 365 E5 at $57 might face $62 (+9%). For Azure, if you budgeted $100k in a local currency, a currency fluctuation or price alignment could effectively make it $110k in costs – a 10% increase without any additional usage.

As the table suggests, all customers are impacted by Microsoft’s pricing moves, one way or another. If it’s not a direct list price hike, it could be the loss of a discount or an unfavorable currency swing.

The next sections focus on how you can respond. From negotiating the timing of increases to optimizing what you pay for, there are levers you can pull to mitigate the impact of Microsoft’s price increases.

For help, read – Strategies to Maximize Your Microsoft EA Discount (and Avoid Price Increases)

Negotiate Transition Periods

One strategy for handling a sudden price increase is to negotiate a transition period rather than absorbing the full impact immediately. Microsoft may be open to easing you into the new pricing if it means securing your renewal or preventing customer dissatisfaction.

Here are tactics to consider:

• Request phased increases over the contract term: Instead of a 10% jump on day one, negotiate for a gradual ramp-up. For example, you might agree to a 3% increase in year one, 3% in year two, and the remainder in year three of your EA. This phased approach gives your organization time to adjust budgets and realize value before paying the full higher price.
• Renew early to lock in old pricing before hikes: If you know a price increase (or discount removal) is looming, an early renewal can be advantageous. Microsoft often allows customers to renew their Enterprise Agreement a few months early. By doing so before the effective date of a price hike (e.g., before November 1, 2025, for the discount removal, or before a scheduled list price increase), you could secure the current lower prices for another full term. This requires upfront commitment, but it shields you from the impending hike for the next 3 years.
• Negotiate a year-one discount or credit: If neither phasing nor early renewal is possible, aim for a one-time concession to offset the shock. For instance, ask Microsoft for an extra discount in the first year of the new term (or a flat credit) that effectively counterbalances the increase. You might frame it as needing operational budget relief to get internal approval. Microsoft might be willing to provide a 5-10% upfront discount for year one, which softens the blow of a big jump in price and gives you time to plan for higher costs in later years.

By negotiating transition periods or concessions, you turn a steep price hike into a more manageable change.

Microsoft’s sales teams have some flexibility, especially if you are a large or important customer, to structure deals creatively. The key is to ask for these mitigations; don’t just accept the first quote with the full increase baked in.

Locking Multi-Year Pricing

A cornerstone of Enterprise Agreements is multi-year price protection.

By default, an EA locks your unit pricing for a 3-year term on the products you initially purchase. This is a valuable protection: if Microsoft raises global list prices during your term, your existing licenses aren’t affected.

However, there are nuances and additional protections you should negotiate to truly shield your organization from mid-term cost surprises.

First, ensure your contract explicitly confirms that prices won’t increase mid-term for the licenses you’ve purchased. Standard EA terms usually guarantee this, but double-check any language about “price lists” or “prevailing rates” to avoid loopholes.

The goal is to avoid any scenario where Microsoft can reinterpret pricing during your agreement.

Next, consider the scenario of growth or changes during your term. True-ups (adding extra licenses as your user count grows each year) and adding new services can expose you to current list prices if not negotiated otherwise.

To prevent an unplanned cost spike:

• Negotiate caps on true-up pricing: Try to get Microsoft to agree that any additional licenses you add during the EA will be charged at the same unit price as your initial order, or at least cap any increase (e.g., “no more than 5% above the original price”). This way, if you suddenly need 500 more E3 licenses in year 2, you won’t pay the post-hike rate if list prices went up.
• Cap renewal uplifts in advance: While you can’t lock renewal pricing three years ahead, you can set expectations. Negotiate a clause or at least a verbal understanding that at the next renewal, the price won’t jump exorbitantly. For example, some customers negotiate a “rate cap” where Microsoft agrees that renewal pricing will not exceed X% above the current level, as long as the product mix remains similar. Even if it’s not iron-clad, having this in writing can be a strong reference point during the next negotiation.

The big picture is predictability. You want to eliminate any mid-term surprises and know roughly what you’ll pay in the future. Locking multi-year pricing through an EA (and enhancing that with custom terms for true-ups and renewals) is one of the best defenses against Microsoft’s tendency to raise rates.

Make sure you leverage the EA’s protective features fully – it’s one of the reasons you commit to a multi-year agreement in the first place.

Currency Fluctuations & Local Pricing Risks in Microsoft Licensing

For organizations outside the United States or those buying in non-USD currencies, currency fluctuations add another layer of risk to Microsoft costs. Microsoft periodically adjusts local currency pricing to account for exchange rates.

In practice, this means if your local currency weakens against the US dollar, Microsoft could raise the prices you pay even if the USD list price stays the same.

For example, in early 2023, Microsoft implemented price harmonization in many regions. As a result, customers in Europe saw cloud service prices increase by ~11% (and as high as 15% in some countries) due to currency exchange-rate alignment with the dollar.

These adjustments can feel like stealth price hikes – your licensing cost goes up without any new benefits or features, simply because of forex changes.

To manage currency and regional pricing risks, consider these approaches:

• Negotiate billing in a stable currency (or USD): If your company operates globally or has a US entity, you might have the option to negotiate your agreement in USD or another stable currency. By paying in USD, you avoid the semi-annual local price adjustments that Microsoft might impose in, say, GBP or EUR. This isn’t always feasible (and it introduces FX risk on your side if you budget in local currency), but for some it provides predictability since Microsoft’s base pricing is in USD.
• Leverage regional price differences when possible: Microsoft’s goal is to have consistent global pricing, but disparities still exist at times. If one region or licensing channel offers a better rate, consider if your procurement strategy can legally and logistically purchase through that route. For instance, enterprise subsidiaries in different regions could compare notes on pricing. However, be cautious – Microsoft often restricts cross-region use, and the trend is toward eliminating arbitrage. Still, savvy enterprises sometimes make purchases in regions right before a known alignment adjustment. For example, buying a bit more Azure or extending a subscription in a currency that hasn’t yet been adjusted upward can save money, at least until the next cycle.
• Include price adjustment clauses: You can also negotiate in your contract how currency fluctuations are handled. Perhaps you agree on a band (e.g., “if local currency moves more than 5%, we will re-evaluate pricing”). While Microsoft has standard policies, enterprise agreements can sometimes include custom terms if the deal is large enough. The aim is to avoid unwelcome surprises from Microsoft’s global pricing harmonization policy by planning for it upfront.

In summary, don’t overlook currency as a factor in your Microsoft licensing costs. An increase of 10% due to FX can blow a hole in your IT budget just as much as a direct price hike.

By proactively addressing this – either by choosing your billing currency wisely or negotiating terms around currency fluctuations – you can reduce yet another source of cost volatility.

Value Justification from Microsoft

Whenever Microsoft announces a price increase, it tends to justify it by touting the added value and new features included in its subscriptions.

For example, Microsoft might point to the continuous stream of updates in Microsoft 365 – security enhancements, new collaboration tools, and big-ticket innovations like the upcoming Copilot AI assistant as reasons why the product is worth more than it was a few years ago.

Essentially, Microsoft’s message is: “You’re paying more because you’re getting more.” While some of these additions are genuinely useful, organizations should scrutinize these claims and avoid paying for hype or for features they don’t actually need.

To make sure you’re not swallowing a cost increase just because Microsoft says so, take these steps:

• Audit which features you actually need: Look closely at the features and services bundled in your Microsoft licenses. Are you using them all? For instance, if Microsoft 365 E5 now includes advanced analytics or AI features that drove the price up, determine if your company will leverage those. If you’re not fully using the Microsoft 365 suite’s bells and whistles, that weakens Microsoft’s justification for charging you more. Conduct an internal survey or usage analysis of major features (Power BI, Defender security suite, voicemail in Teams, etc.) to see what’s valued and what’s not.
• Negotiate opt-outs or downgrade rights: Armed with that usage data, talk to Microsoft about flexibility. If there are high-cost components you don’t plan to use (like that new AI Copilot at $30/user/month, or an advanced compliance add-on), ask if they can be unbundled or made optional. Microsoft might not openly advertise downgrade options, but in negotiations, you can push for things like the right to switch some users to a lower SKU if the new features aren’t adopted. Another angle is to request credits or alternative licenses – e.g., “We won’t use Feature X that’s driving the cost, can you provide us another product or service of equivalent value, or a discount, instead?” The goal is to avoid paying more for theoretical value that doesn’t materialize for your organization.
• Push back on “one-size-fits-all” upgrades: Microsoft often tries to move customers to bigger bundles (like E5 or new premium suites) by claiming they’re more cost-effective. Be skeptical: if they say “we added these five new capabilities,” ask if those can be sold a la carte. Don’t upgrade all your users to a more expensive license just because Microsoft marketing says it’s a good deal – upgrade because it makes sense for your actual needs.

In negotiations, politely remind Microsoft that while you appreciate improvements, not every new feature justifies an increased price for your use case. Make Microsoft work to demonstrate real value, or make concessions, instead of simply accepting their narrative.

Cutting Costs to Offset Price Hikes

When facing unavoidable price increases, one of your best defenses is to reduce spending elsewhere in your Microsoft portfolio.

Think of it as tightening up your licensing to make sure no dollar is wasted. Many organizations find that through natural growth and lax management, they accumulate excess licenses or over-provisioned services. Now is the time to audit and streamline.

Here are key cost-cutting moves:

• Reclaim unused or inactive licenses: Perform a thorough license usage audit. Identify accounts that are unassigned, inactive, or assigned to users who have left. Microsoft 365 provides activity reports that can show which users haven’t logged in for, say, 90 days. By reclaiming and removing these licenses, you can often cut 5-10% of your seat count without impacting operations. This immediately offsets a comparable percentage of a price increase. It’s a quick win: why pay for 1,000 licenses when only 900 are actually used?
• Rebalance your license mix: Not every user needs the most expensive SKU. Microsoft often pushes the top-tier E5 license (or similar bundles), which include advanced security, voice, analytics, etc. Take a hard look at who truly uses those features. You might find that a portion of users can be downgraded to Microsoft 365 E3 or E1, with a few add-on licenses for specific needs. For example, instead of 100% of users on E5, maybe only 30% genuinely use E5-level features; the rest could be on E3 plus a smaller Power BI or security add-on. This opt-right sizing of licenses can save significant money. You still provide everyone the tools they need, but you’re not overspending on super-set packages for users who don’t benefit from them.
• Optimize Azure and cloud commitments: If your Microsoft relationship also includes Azure consumption or other subscriptions, look for efficiencies there as well. Azure costs can often be trimmed by rightsizing VMs, deleting unused resources, and using reserved instances or Azure Hybrid Benefit for servers you already own. By reducing your Azure spend through optimization, you free up budget that can absorb increases on the Microsoft 365 side. Also, if you have an Azure consumption commitment (like an Azure Prepayment), ensure you are actually using what you committed to – otherwise you’re paying for cloud resources you don’t use. Every dollar saved in Azure or other Microsoft services is a dollar that can counterbalance the higher price of your user licenses.

Taken together, these cost-cutting measures can neutralize a price hike. It’s about increasing efficiency: get rid of waste, pay for what you use, and align resources to actual needs.

Microsoft’s price increase then has less impact because your overall footprint is leaner. Internally, this also demonstrates good stewardship – you’re not just asking for more money to cover vendor hikes; you’re actively finding savings to offset those external increases.

Communicating Price Increases Internally

Handling a Microsoft price increase isn’t just about external negotiation – it’s also about internal communication. Your executives and finance team will want to know why costs are going up and what you did about it.

Being transparent and proactive in these communications is crucial to maintaining trust and demonstrating that you have a plan. Here’s how to approach it:

• Be transparent about Microsoft’s changes: Don’t sugarcoat or hide the fact that Microsoft globally raised prices or changed its licensing terms. Explain to your stakeholders that this is a vendor-driven increase affecting all customers, not a result of increased usage or mismanagement. For example, you might present, “Microsoft announced a 10% increase in licensing costs starting next quarter for all enterprise customers. This is a market-wide change.” Framing it this way helps leadership understand that the baseline moved due to external factors.
• Highlight how you negotiated and mitigated the impact: It’s important to follow up the bad news with some good news. If you’ve taken the steps discussed earlier (transition pricing, locking in rates, cutting unused licenses, etc.), make sure to communicate the savings or cost avoidance achieved. For instance, you can say, “The initial proposal would have raised our spend by 10%, but we negotiated it down and limited the increase to roughly 5%.” Use concrete numbers or percentages to show the value of your intervention. This demonstrates active vendor management – you didn’t passively accept the hike, you fought it and lessened the blow.
• Use examples to tell the story: Sometimes a quick example or visual can drive the point home. E.g., “Microsoft’s list prices went up 10%, but through a price cap arrangement and license optimization, we reduced our effective increase to 5%. In other words, a potential $1,000,000 annual cost became $950,000 – saving about $50,000 compared to if we did nothing.” Showing a before-and-after scenario or a brief case study of your own environment makes it real for your audience. It also sets the stage for future negotiations: leadership will know you have strategies to push back on vendors.

In internal discussions, the tone should be: “We have this under control.” Even if costs are rising, you want to project that you anticipated the change, took action, and aligned the outcome with the company’s budget tolerance as much as possible.

Also, by educating stakeholders on why Microsoft is increasing prices (e.g., “they added new AI features” or “they ended our volume discount program”), you help them understand the situation if they hear it from other sources.

No CIO or CFO likes surprises – clear communication ensures they aren’t blindsided and can defend the IT budget changes when needed.

Checklist – Responding to Microsoft EA Price Increases

To wrap up, here’s a quick checklist of actions when you’re facing a Microsoft EA or Microsoft 365 price increase.

Use this list to ensure you’ve covered all the bases in your strategy:

• Confirm scope and timing of the price increase: Verify exactly which products or programs are impacted and when the changes take effect. Is it a list price change on a certain date? A discount ending at your renewal? Knowing the specifics is the first step.
• Run an impact analysis versus your current contract: Calculate how much more you would pay after the increase, given your current license counts and spend. Identify the dollar impact to your budget if no action is taken. This gives you a baseline for negotiation and internal discussion.
• Negotiate a transition period or phased pricing: Don’t settle for an overnight jump. Ask Microsoft for grace measures – such as gradual increases, a delayed effective date for your organization, or a temporary discount – to smooth the transition.
• Secure multi-year price protection: Leverage your EA to lock prices for the term, and negotiate additional protections (price caps on adds/renewal). Ensure any agreement you sign shields you from mid-term adjustments as much as possible.
• Address currency/FX exposure: If you operate in multiple regions or non-USD currencies, decide on a strategy to handle exchange rate adjustments. This may involve switching the billing currency or budgeting extra for potential currency-related price changes.
• Optimize license mix and reclaim unused seats: Before the new prices hit, scrub your licensing. Remove or reassign any unused licenses and evaluate if all users are on the appropriate plans. Efficiency here can significantly offset the increased rates.
• Communicate savings and risk mitigation internally: Once you’ve negotiated and optimized, report back to your leadership. Show them how you’ve reduced the impact, and confirm that the remaining increase is understood and planned for. This closes the loop and reinforces confidence in IT’s management of vendor costs.

By following this checklist, you can approach Microsoft’s price increases methodically and strategically.

While cost hikes are never pleasant, with the right preparation and negotiation, you can ensure your organization navigates them with minimal disruption and maximum value retention.

Microsoft will continue to adjust its pricing and licensing models in the future – but armed with these strategies, you’ll be ready to respond every time.

Read about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Service.

Read our Microsoft EA Optimization Service – Case Studies.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Optimization Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit