01. Proxmox VE
Proxmox Virtual Environment (VE) is a Debian Linux-based platform that integrates the KVM hypervisor for full virtualisation and LXC for lightweight containers, all managed through an intuitive web-based interface.
Zero licence cost. Completely free to use with no licensing fees. Optional low-cost enterprise support subscriptions available for organisations that want vendor backing.
Full enterprise feature set. Live migration, HA failover, snapshots, scheduled backups, all built-in without separate product purchases.
Integrated storage and networking. Built-in Ceph integration for distributed storage and software-defined networking capabilities.
VMware migration support. VM import wizard for converting VMware VMs. Supports NFS, iSCSI, local disks, Linux bridges, and VLANs.
Considerations. VMware still leads in some areas like distributed virtual switching, multi-tenant resource pools, and automated DRS load balancing. Proxmox may require more Linux networking knowledge. However, many environments do not heavily use those premium features, and Proxmox's cost savings are substantial.
02. KVM and Open-Source Hypervisors
KVM turns the Linux kernel into a bare-metal hypervisor with excellent performance and strong isolation. It is the underlying technology powering Proxmox, Google Compute Engine, and many cloud providers.
Zero licensing fees. Included in every modern Linux distribution. Scale to any number of cores or hosts at no software cost.
Multiple management options. libvirt/virt-manager for single hosts, oVirt for multi-host clusters, OpenStack for cloud scale.
Full feature set. Linux/Windows guests, snapshots, live migration, GPU passthrough, paravirtualised drivers.
Enterprise support available. Commercial support via Red Hat, SUSE, or Canonical subscriptions. Large community with active forums and documentation.
Considerations. A pure KVM route requires more hands-on setup than VMware or Proxmox. You may need to assemble different components (hypervisor, management UI, storage solution) rather than getting a single turnkey package. Best suited for organisations with Linux expertise who value extreme flexibility.
03. Microsoft Hyper-V
Included as a role in Windows Server, Hyper-V is particularly attractive to Windows-centric organisations. If your infrastructure already runs on Microsoft technologies, Hyper-V provides a seamless transition with familiar management tools.
Seamless Microsoft integration. Active Directory, Failover Clustering, System Center VMM, and Windows Admin Center integration out of the box.
Enterprise features included. Live migration, Hyper-V Replica for DR, dynamic memory management, shielded VMs, nested virtualisation.
No separate hypervisor cost. Windows Server Datacenter Edition allows unlimited VMs per host. One licence covers hypervisor + guest OS.
Hybrid cloud path. Azure Stack HCI option for hybrid cloud. Full commercial support from Microsoft. Excellent third-party ecosystem (Veeam, Commvault, etc.).
Considerations. Some management tasks may require multiple tools (Failover Cluster Manager + Hyper-V Manager + SCVMM). Windows Admin Center is bridging these gaps with a unified web UI. Verify hardware on Microsoft's HCL.
04. Nutanix AHV
Nutanix offers a broader approach: a hyper-converged infrastructure platform integrating storage, compute, and virtualisation into one solution. Its built-in AHV hypervisor (based on KVM) eliminates VMware licensing costs entirely.
AHV included at no extra cost. No separate hypervisor, storage, or management licences needed. One platform covers everything.
Simplified management. Prism management console praised for simplicity. Single web UI for hardware monitoring, VM management, networking, DR, and backups.
Predictable pricing. Node-based licensing. Flat per-node cost regardless of VM count or CPU cores. Predictable budgeting vs VMware's per-core model.
Full enterprise capabilities. Live migration, HA, snapshots, built-in backup/restore, cloud connect, one-click DR orchestration, Nutanix Flow micro-segmentation.
Considerations. Moving to Nutanix involves adopting an entire platform, not just swapping a hypervisor. Upfront costs may be significant (software + possibly new hardware). However, operational simplicity, elimination of multiple vendors, and hybrid cloud options often justify the investment.
05. Licensing and Cost: VMware's New Model vs Alternatives
Under Broadcom's ownership, VMware vSphere has moved to a stricter per-core licensing model with significantly higher minimums. Even a small deployment must now purchase licences covering at least 72 CPU cores, and the free ESXi hypervisor has been eliminated entirely.
| Platform | Licence Model | Hypervisor Cost | Key Cost Advantage |
| VMware vSphere | Per-core (72-core min) | Subscription required | N/A (baseline) |
| Proxmox VE | None (free) | $0 | Zero licence cost at any scale; optional low-cost support |
| KVM / Linux | None (free) | $0 | No per-core charges; commercial support via RHEL/SUSE optional |
| Hyper-V | Included in Windows Server | Bundled with Windows Server | Datacenter Edition = unlimited VMs; covers hypervisor + guest OS |
| Nutanix AHV | Per-node (subscription) | Included in Nutanix licence | Flat per-node; no per-core or per-VM penalties; all-in-one |
Simpler licensing is a common theme among VMware alternatives. There are also fewer "gotchas." VMware often charges extra for add-ons like distributed switching, backup integration, or advanced security features. With open-source options, those capabilities are included or available via free add-ons. Hyper-V includes many features in Windows without extra licensing, and Nutanix bundles storage clustering and backup in its base licence.
06. Migration Considerations
Switching virtualisation platforms is not a decision to take lightly. Beyond cost savings, you must ensure feature parity, ecosystem support, and seamless integration.
1
Audit feature requirements. List every VMware feature you actively use (vMotion, HA, DRS, snapshots, distributed switches, GPU virtualisation). Map each to the alternative's equivalent and identify gaps that are true deal-breakers vs nice-to-haves.
2
Evaluate ecosystem and tooling. Check backup solutions, monitoring tools, and DR setups for compatibility. Most major vendors (Veeam, Commvault) support multiple hypervisors. Proxmox has built-in backup and Proxmox Backup Server. Nutanix offers integrated backup/restore and cloud connect.
3
Verify infrastructure integration. Confirm the new platform works with existing SAN/NAS storage (iSCSI, NFS, SMB3), networking (VLANs, trunking), and authentication (AD/LDAP). Check automation tools: Terraform, Ansible, and PowerShell have modules for Proxmox, Hyper-V, and Nutanix.
4
Plan the migration process. Export VMware VMs to OVF/OVA or VMDK format, then import into the new platform. Proxmox has a web-based import wizard; KVM uses qemu-img for VMDK to QCOW2 conversion; Nutanix offers the "Move" tool for automated migration; Microsoft provides Virtual Machine Converter documentation.
5
Train your team. Plan training sessions or hands-on labs. Admins may need to learn new CLI commands (PowerShell for Hyper-V, Linux shell for KVM/Proxmox) or new interfaces (Prism for Nutanix). Having 1-2 team members become subject-matter experts smooths the transition.
6
Execute a phased migration. Avoid "big bang" cutovers. Start with non-critical workloads, validate performance, surface integration issues, then gradually increase scope. Some organisations maintain a hybrid approach (smaller VMware footprint + new platform) during transition.
Related Resources
FF
Fredrik Filipsson
Co-Founder, Redress Compliance
Fredrik brings 20+ years of enterprise software licensing experience, including senior roles at IBM, SAP, and Oracle. He advises enterprises worldwide on Broadcom/VMware licensing strategy, alternative platform evaluation, and post-acquisition cost optimisation.
← Back to Broadcom Advisory Services