CSP vs Enterprise Agreement for Microsoft 365 Licensing: Pros & Cons

CSP vs Enterprise Agreement for Microsoft 365 Licensing

Organizations have two primary channels for procuring Microsoft 365 licenses: the traditional Enterprise Agreement (EA) or the Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) program.

Both can provide the licenses you need, but differ greatly in commitment, flexibility, pricing, and management. Choosing the right model can impact your IT budget and agility.

This section discusses the pros and cons of EA vs. CSP for Microsoft 365 and offers guidance on which model may suit different scenarios.

Understanding the Models

• Enterprise Agreement (EA): A volume licensing contract directly with Microsoft (often through a licensing reseller), typically lasting 3 years. EA is designed for larger organizations (generally 500+ users minimum). You commit upfront to a certain number of licenses (with the ability to adjust upwards annually via “true-ups”). Pricing is heavily discounted off retail, based on volume and negotiation. You pay annually (or upfront) for the whole term. An EA can cover not just Microsoft 365, but also Windows, server products, Azure credits, etc., under one agreement.
• Cloud Solution Provider (CSP): A purchasing program where you buy Microsoft subscriptions through a Microsoft partner on a pay-as-you-go basis. There is no minimum seat requirement – you can have five users or 50,000. Commitments can be as short as one month, and you can increase/decrease licenses via the partner’s portal. Pricing is typically at Microsoft’s MSRP (retail list price), though partners may offer small discounts or bundle services. The partner handles support and billing. CSP is a monthly subscription model for Microsoft 365, allowing very granular adjustments.

To illustrate the difference, here’s a quick side-by-side comparison:

Advantages and Disadvantages of an Enterprise Agreement

Advantages of EA:

• Volume Discounts & Cost Predictability: EAs can yield significant cost savings per license. With hundreds or thousands of seats, enterprises often see 15–30% (or more) off the standard prices due to volume pricing and negotiation. That pricing is locked for the 3-year term, protecting you from Microsoft’s periodic price increases. Budgeting is easier when you have a fixed per-user cost for multiple years.
• Comprehensive Coverage & SA Benefits: An EA can bundle all your Microsoft needs – Windows, Office, Microsoft 365, Azure, server licenses, etc. – into one agreement. This can simplify procurement and provide leverage (e.g., you might negotiate a better discount by committing to multiple product lines). Additionally, EAs include Software Assurance, which historically provides extras like training vouchers, planning services, home use program, and upgrade rights. An EA adds value beyond just the licenses for organizations that use these.
• Centralized License Management: EAs offer centralized control through Microsoft’s Volume Licensing portals. It’s easier to track and reassign licenses enterprise-wide and remain compliant. True-up processes, while administrative, ensure you regularly reconcile usage to entitlements rather than falling out of compliance. This is especially helpful for large enterprises with many moving parts.
• Direct Relationship with Microsoft: EA customers often have a dedicated Microsoft account team and higher priority support. Microsoft is more involved in the relationship (often providing deployment assistance, checking in on adoption, etc.), which can be beneficial if you rely heavily on Microsoft’s roadmap and support infrastructure. You may get access to executive briefings or pilot programs as an EA customer.

Disadvantages of EA:

• Rigid Commitment: The biggest drawback is inflexibility. You’re generally committed to certain licenses for the full term. If your company downsizes, you usually can’t reduce your license count (except at the 3-year renewal). This can lead to paying for unused licenses. Enterprise Agreements allow increasing licenses (true-up) during the term, but not scaling down until renewal.
• Complexity and Overhead: Negotiating and managing an EA can be complex. The contract terms need careful review (price locks, renewal options, transfer rights for acquisitions/divestitures, etc.). Managing an EA requires tracking license usage and forecasting needs. This complexity requires a dedicated SAM (Software Asset Management) effort or outside consultants for some organizations.
• Upfront Cost and Payment Structure: EAs typically require upfront annual payments. In contrast to the pay-as-you-go of CSP, an EA can feel like a larger financial commitment (even if it may be cheaper per unit). This can impact cash flow or budgeting models.
• Not Suitable for Small Organizations: If you have under 500 seats (or even a bit above but very uncertain growth), an EA might not be offered or may not be the best fit. Microsoft has steered smaller customers toward CSP/New Commerce. For those customers, an EA’s structure might be overkill and not yield much discount.

Read Optimizing Microsoft 365 Licensing for Hybrid Workforces.

Advantages and Disadvantages of CSP

Advantages of CSP:

• Flexibility and Scalability: The hallmark of CSP is flexibility. You can add or remove users as your workforce changes. This is ideal for industries with seasonality (e.g., retail with holiday staff) or project-based contractors. You’re never stuck paying for licenses you don’t need beyond the current month (or year, if you choose annual subscriptions, which still allow reductions at the next term). It’s very aligned with the cloud mentality of scaling on demand.
• Low Barrier to Entry: There’s no lengthy negotiation or contract to sign with Microsoft. You sign a Microsoft Customer Agreement (much simpler than an EA contract) and work with a partner to provision licenses. This speed and simplicity are great for smaller companies or those that need to get up and running quickly. Also, you don’t need to meet a minimum seat count – even very small businesses can go CSP.
• Partner Support & Services: With CSP, you have a partner who can provide added support. Many CSP partners offer support (sometimes even 24/7 support), and some offer proactive services like tenant monitoring or user training. In an EA, support from Microsoft (beyond the basic level) usually costs extra. A good CSP partner basically acts as an extension of your IT team, potentially reducing your internal workload.
• Pay-as-You-Go Budgeting: Some organizations prefer the OpEx model of CSP – you pay a predictable amount each month per user, and it can fluctuate based on actual usage. This granular billing can be easier to attribute to departments or projects and avoids making large upfront financial commitments. It also means if you need to cut costs quickly, you can drop licenses next month and immediately see savings.

Disadvantages of CSP:

• Potentially Higher Costs for Large Deployments: The per-license cost in CSP is typically at list price (or close to it after partner margin). A company with thousands of seats might find that the lack of a volume discount makes CSP significantly more expensive over time than an EA deal they could negotiate. For example, at 5,000 users, a 20% EA discount vs. CSP list price is substantial money left on the table if you stick with CSP. So, beyond a certain scale, CSP’s flexibility might not justify the extra cost.
• Dependency on Partner Quality: Your experience with CSP is only as good as your partner. If the partner has slow support, billing issues, or limited expertise, you might face challenges. With an EA, you deal more directly with Microsoft or a large reseller and have escalation paths. With CSP, if the partner is small or not specialized in licensing, you could miss out on good advice or timely help. Choosing a reputable CSP partner is crucial.
• Less Direct Influence with Microsoft: Microsoft’s sales focus is generally on EA customers (who represent large revenue commitments). As a CSP customer, you may not have a direct Microsoft representative advocating for you. If you run into a serious product issue, you’ll go through your partner. While Microsoft certainly values all customers, large enterprises under EA often get more mindshare for feature requests or escalations.
• Feature Parity and Program Changes: Microsoft’s CSP program offers nearly all the same products as EA, but occasionally, promotions or features (especially in preview) hit EA customers first. Additionally, CSP pricing and terms can change more frequently (for instance, Microsoft’s New Commerce Experience changes in 2022 introduced cancellation penalties for annual CSP subscriptions). Keeping track of those program changes is another thing to manage, though a good partner will help.

Which Model is Right for You?

There is no one-size-fits-all answer – the decision depends on your organization’s size, financial preferences, and need for flexibility:

• Choose EA if: You have a large user base (generally 500+ users) and plan to maintain (or grow) that headcount steadily over the next 3 years. Also, if getting the lowest possible unit price is a priority and you have budget stability, the EA’s volume discounts and price lock will be attractive. Organizations that want all their Microsoft spend under one agreement (including servers, Azure, etc.) will benefit from the EA’s umbrella. If you value a direct Microsoft relationship – e.g., having Microsoft account managers, access to enterprise-level support, and advisory services – an EA facilitates that. In short, if you can commit and want predictable costs and comprehensive services, EA is likely more suitable.
• Choose CSP if: You value flexibility or have uncertain growth. CSP gives you agility if your organization is scaling up or down frequently or you’re not ready to commit to a long-term solution due to budget uncertainties. This is often the case for startups, companies with high contractor usage, or those still piloting Microsoft 365 features. CSP is also ideal for small and mid-sized businesses that can’t meet EA minimums or don’t have procurement resources to negotiate complex deals. Additionally, CSP is aligned with that approach if you prefer a subscription model that behaves like other SaaS services (with easy in/out). If you want the ability to optimize licenses on the fly and don’t mind potentially paying a bit more per user for that freedom, CSP is the better fit.
• Combine EA and CSP when needed: Some enterprises do both. For example, you might keep your core workforce on an EA (for best pricing) but use CSP for edge cases, such as a newly acquired small company that you plan to fold into the EA at renewal, or for a dev/test environment separate from production. Another scenario is using CSP during an EA mid-term for a sudden surge: suppose you have an EA for 1,000 users but need to onboard 100 temporary users for 3 months. Instead of amending the EA (which might extend commitment), you could use CSP just for those 3 months. Microsoft has no prohibition on this mixed approach. Just ensure proper governance so you maintain license visibility in both channels.

Independent Advice for Decision and Transition

Deciding between CSP and EA is a strategic choice – independent licensing consultants can provide an unbiased analysis:

• Cost-Benefit Modeling: Experts can crunch the numbers for your situation, considering current Microsoft discount levels, projected growth, and any planned changes (e.g., moving from on-prem to cloud, which might affect license needs). They might, for instance, show that at 300 seats CSP costs $X more over 3 years than an EA, but at 600 seats the gap widens significantly, giving you clear insight into when an EA becomes financially preferable.
• Contract Negotiation: If you opt for an EA, an independent advisor (like Redress Compliance) can help ensure you get the best terms and discount, leveraging benchmark data and knowing Microsoft’s negotiation tactics. If you lean toward CSP, they can help vet CSP partners (looking at support offerings, added fees, etc.) and even negotiate value-adds or discounts with the partner. They’ll ensure you’re not leaving value on the table either way.
• Transition Planning: Moving from one model to another can be tricky. If you plan to migrate from CSP to an EA, an expert can time the move to avoid double-paying (since CSP is monthly, you’d want the EA to start when CSP terms end). They can also guide license assignments so users don’t lose access during the changeover. Conversely, if leaving an EA for CSP (perhaps after an EA term ends), they can help manage data and service continuity and ensure all license types you need are available via CSP equivalents.
• Ongoing License Optimization: Regardless of EA or CSP, a consultant can continue to find optimization opportunities. For EA, they can audit usage to ensure you’re not over-committed and help with the true-up/renewal processes. For CSP, they might implement processes to review licenses monthly or quarterly for any that can be removed or downgraded. In both cases, they serve as a watchdog to prevent license waste and ensure you’re leveraging the model’s advantages – whether utilizing all your SA benefits in an EA or fully taking advantage of CSP’s flexibility by turning off unused services promptly.

Ultimately, Enterprise Agreement vs. CSP balances commitment and control vs. agility and simplicity. Many organizations that start small with CSP eventually graduate to an EA as they scale, while some large organizations have moved segments to CSP to become more nimble.

By understanding the trade-offs and perhaps consulting with unbiased experts, you can make the choice that best aligns with your company’s size, culture, and IT strategy – and be confident that your Microsoft 365 licensing approach is cost-effective and fit for purpose.

Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Advisory Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit