An executive survival playbook for mastering S/4HANA licensing — covering perpetual vs. subscription vs. RISE, FUE, Digital Access, pricing dynamics, audit risks, M&A strategy, and negotiation tactics.
Transitioning from SAP ECC to S/4HANA is a fundamental shift in pricing models and risk exposure. Under ECC, companies managed perpetual licences with named user types and annual maintenance. S/4HANA introduces subscription models (RISE), Full User Equivalents (FUE), Digital Access, and mandates SAP HANA as the database.
| Dimension | SAP ECC | SAP S/4HANA |
|---|---|---|
| Licence Model | Perpetual + 22% maintenance | Perpetual OR subscription (RISE) |
| User Metrics | Named users (Professional, Limited) | Named users or FUE (cloud) |
| Indirect Access | Ambiguous — led to lawsuits | Formal Digital Access (9 document types) |
| Database | Choice (Oracle, SQL, DB2) | SAP HANA mandated |
An ECC licensing strategy applied to S/4HANA will result in surprise costs and weaker negotiation positions.
Read: CIO Playbook: SAP S/4HANA Deployment Models
Three primary models exist in 2026:
5-year TCO example (500 users): Perpetual = ~$10.5M | RISE (negotiated) = ~$2.7M + migration + BTP + renewal escalation. Always run complete 5-year and 10-year TCO models before committing.
Read: RISE vs. On-Premise Licensing | SAP RISE Negotiations Guide
SAP's Digital Access model charges by documents created in SAP via non-SAP systems. Nine document categories are defined, with tiered pricing and 0.2 weighting for Material and Financial documents. This is now a top audit focus area in 2025–2026.
High-risk scenarios: Salesforce creating orders, RPA bots generating transactions, IoT devices producing material documents, and any scenario with thousands of external users indirectly accessing SAP.
Read: DAAP: How to Evaluate and Negotiate
Full User Equivalent (FUE) is the primary metric for S/4HANA Cloud and RISE: 1 Advanced = 1 FUE | 5 Core = 1 FUE | 30 Self-Service = 1 FUE.
Example: 50 Advanced (50 FUE) + 200 Core (40 FUE) + 1,500 Self-Service (50 FUE) = 140 FUE total
Key risks: mis-estimating your user mix, minimum commitments (40+ FUE for private, 35+ for public), and no reduction during term. Right-size from the start.
Read: FUE Licensing: User Classifications and Optimisation
SAP's pricing is deliberately opaque, but discounts of 30–70% are common in enterprise deals. Key dynamics: volume tiers, block pricing for Digital Access, true-ups, 22% support inflation, and 5–7% cloud renewal uplift. Always pre-negotiate growth pricing and renewal caps.
Read: S/4HANA Licensing: Models, Costs & Strategic Considerations
Read: S/4HANA Licence Optimisation Strategies
Align licensing with M&A plans (consolidate contracts post-merger for volume discounts), cloud strategy (negotiate ability to trade perpetual licences for cloud credits), and AI/RPA deployments (bots require Digital Access or named-user licences).
Read: Modelling S/4HANA Licensing Costs After ECC Migration
| Tactic | Expected Impact |
|---|---|
| Aggregate all SAP purchases into one deal | 10–20% better discount vs. piecemeal |
| Create competitive pressure (third-party support, Oracle/Workday alternatives) | Unlocks SAP's best discounts |
| Lock renewal pricing (max 3%/year caps) | Prevents 25–35% cost escalation |
| Pre-negotiate growth pricing | Same discount on mid-term additions |
| Negotiate dual-use rights (12–18 months) | Eliminates $1M+ dual-running costs |
| Address Digital Access proactively | Avoids audit exposure, best pricing |
Timing: Negotiate in SAP's Q4 (October–December) for maximum leverage.
Read: SAP Contract Negotiation Playbook
Redress Compliance provides vendor-independent SAP licence assessments, RISE advisory, Digital Access evaluations, contract negotiation support, and audit defence for Fortune 500 organisations.
Book a Confidential Call SAP Advisory Services