CIO Playbook: Dynamics 365 Licensing Strategy

CIO Playbook: Dynamics 365 Licensing Strategy

Microsoft Dynamics 365 offers a powerful suite of CRM and ERP applications, but with that power comes a complex licensing landscape.

As a CIO, crafting a licensing strategy is crucial to controlling costs and supporting your digital transformation.

We’ll cover D365’s modular structure, the base vs. attach model, recent pricing changes (2024–2025), TCO calculations, negotiation tactics for enterprise agreements, common pitfalls, and actionable CIO recommendations.

Use this guide to ensure your organization gets maximum value from Dynamics 365 while avoiding costly licensing missteps.

Dynamics 365 Modular Licensing Overview

Dynamics 365 is modular by design, enabling organizations to select and customize the business applications they need.

Each module (or app) addresses a specific business process, and licenses are generally issued per user per month for each app.

The primary categories include:

• Customer Engagement (CRM) – e.g,. Dynamics 365 Sales, Customer Service, Field Service, Marketing, and Project Operations. These apps focus on front-office functions like sales force automation, customer support, field technician management, marketing campaigns, and project-based services.
• Unified Operations (ERP) – e.g,. Dynamics 365 Finance, Supply Chain Management (SCM), Commerce, and Human Resources. These cover back-office operations: finance/accounting, supply chain, retail commerce, and HR processes.
• Power Platform & Other Add-Ons – e.g., integration with Power BI, Power Apps, and specialized add-ons like Dynamics 365 AI for Customer Insights or the new Copilot AI features. (These often have separate licensing or are included in certain editions.)
• Team Member Licenses – A light-use license type that provides limited access across Dynamics 365 apps. Team Member licenses are low-cost and intended for users who only need to read data and perform very basic tasks (e.g,. updating a few fields or viewing reports). This is useful for granting broader teams access to the system without incurring the cost of full licenses.
• Device Licenses – For scenarios such as retail or warehouse operations, a device license (instead of a per-user license) allows multiple users to share a single device login (e.g., a point-of-sale register or shop floor terminal) under one license at a fixed monthly cost. This can be cost-effective for shift-based roles.

Key Characteristics of the Modular Approach:

• Flexibility: You can license users for only the Dynamics 365 modules they need. For example, your sales team can be licensed for the Sales app, while your accounting staff uses only the Finance app. This tailored approach prevents the need to pay for a single, monolithic license if only some of those features are required.
• Consistency: Each major module has its own per-user pricing. You can mix-and-match modules for each user (and we will discuss how to optimize costs when users need multiple modules).
• Seamless Integration: Although licensed separately, these modules are designed to work together. A global enterprise may deploy numerous modules across departments, whereas a mid-sized company might start with one or two key applications and expand later. Your licensing strategy should anticipate this growth and integration, for instance, ensuring the contract can scale as you add more modules over time.

Major Dynamics 365 Modules & Purpose (Examples):

• Dynamics 365 Sales – Manages sales pipeline, accounts, contacts, and opportunities (CRM for sales teams). Available in Professional (basic) or Enterprise (advanced) editions.
• Dynamics 365 Customer Service – Handles support cases, service scheduling, and omni-channel customer support. (Professional vs Enterprise editions are similar to Sales.)
• Dynamics 365 Field Service – Schedules and dispatches field technicians, manages work orders, and performs asset maintenance for field operations.
• Dynamics 365 Marketing / Customer Insights – Journeys – Manages marketing campaigns, email outreach, and customer journeys. (Often licensed per tenant or by contacts rather than per user; more on later.)
• Dynamics 365 Finance – Core financial management (GL, AP, AR, budgeting) for enterprise ERP needs.
• Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management – Manufacturing, inventory, warehousing, and distribution operations. Often paired with Finance in an ERP deployment.
• Dynamics 365 Commerce – Retail and e-commerce management, point-of-sale, and commerce operations (formerly part of the Retail module).
• Dynamics 365 Human Resources – HR management (employee records, benefits, leave, etc.). (Note: Microsoft has been evolving HR; it was once a standalone module and has been merging with Finance & Operations capabilities.)
• Dynamics 365 Project Operations – End-to-end project management integrates project management (scheduling and resource allocation) and project accounting (billing, budgets). Replaced the older Project Service Automation module.

Each application is licensed separately, creating a modular licensing structure. This granularity is great for tailoring to needs but requires careful planning: assigning the right mix of licenses to each user based on their role.

In a global enterprise, it’s common to have thousands of users with different combinations of modules. In a mid-sized company, one person might wear multiple hats and thus need access to multiple modules.

This is where Microsoft’s “Base and Attach” licensing model comes into play to optimize costs.

Base vs. Attach License Model Explained

One of the most important concepts in Dynamics 365 licensing is the distinction between the Base and Attach models.

Microsoft designed this model to allow cost-effective licensing when a single user needs multiple Dynamics 365 apps.

Here’s how it works:

• Base License (Primary App License): Every user must have at least one “base” license – this is the first Dynamics 365 app you assign to them, paid at full price. The base license provides access to the core functionality of that module. It’s the foundation for that user’s access. For example, if a user’s primary role is in Sales, you might assign Dynamics 365 Sales Enterprise as their base license. Base licenses are the most expensive for users because they pay the standard list price. (Consider this the “main course” in a meal – you pay full price for your entrée.)
• Attach License (Additional App License): If that same user needs additional Dynamics 365 apps, you do not have to pay full price for a second or third module. Instead, Microsoft offers “attach” licenses for those additional apps at a significantly reduced cost (often a fraction of the base price). The attached license gives the user full rights to the second module’s functionality, but at a discounted rate because it is “attached” to a base license they already have. (In the meal analogy, these are your side dishes – substantially cheaper than the main course, but they complement it.)

How Base/Attach Licensing Saves Money:

The attach license concept recognizes that one person can only use so much software—charging them full price for each app would be cost-prohibitive and discourage the adoption of multiple D365 modules.

Instead, Microsoft’s model states: pay the full price for the user’s most expensive (or first) app, then pay a flat, lower fee for any other apps the user needs.

This encourages customers to license users for multiple workloads without incurring duplicate payments. From a budgeting perspective, this is a “better together” discount for multi-app users.

Pricing Differences – Base vs Attach: As of 2025, attach licenses are deeply discounted relative to base licenses. For example:

In the above table, note how a base license for a CRM app like Sales costs $105, but adding another CRM app for the same user is only $20 more as an attach license. Likewise, an ERP app like Finance costs $210 as a base, but an additional license for an ERP module (say Supply Chain) is $30.

These flat attach prices apply regardless of the base module’s cost – they are fixed “add-on” rates. (Microsoft sets attach prices at roughly 1/5 of the base price for CRM apps, and around 1/6 for ERP apps.)

Example: If a sales manager needs both the Sales and Customer Service modules:

• Without the base/attach model, you might have purchased two full licenses (Sales: $105 + Customer Service: $105 = $210 per month for that user).
• With Base/Attach, you buy Sales as the base ($105) and Customer Service as an attachment ($20), totaling $125 per month for that user. This is a ~40% cost reduction for the two-app user. Multiply that saving across hundreds of users, and the financial impact is huge.

Now, imagine an operations manager who needs both Finance and Supply Chain apps:

• Paying full price for both would be $210 + $210 = $420/user.
• Using Base/Attach, you pay $210 (Finance Base) + $30 (Supply Chain Attach) = $240/user, which is nearly half the cost for dual access.

Optimizing Assignments:

You only need one base license for each user; their other entitlements should be attached whenever possible. It’s critical to assign the right app as the base license:

• Within the same category (CRM or ERP), it usually doesn’t matter which you choose as base or attach, since base prices are often identical (e.g., Sales vs. Customer Service, both $105). You might base it on which module the user primarily uses or simply on administrative convenience.
• Across categories, if a user requires both a CRM app and an ERP app, you can technically choose either as the base. However, check Microsoft’s rules: A “qualifying base license” is required for each attached SKU. In practice, any full Dynamics 365 app can qualify as a base for attaching others, but you should confirm the combination is allowed. (For instance, attaching a $210 Finance license onto a $105 Sales base at $30 is extremely cost-effective – if your scenario permits this, it’s a smart cost move. Ensure compliance with the licensing guide; Microsoft generally allows cross-category attaching, but always double-check the official qualifying base list for each attach SKU to avoid mistakes.) In many cases, enterprises choose the higher-priced app as the base to be safe, then attach the lower-priced one, ensuring they’re not leaving savings on the table.
• Only full user licenses count as base licenses. A Team Member license cannot serve as a base (it’s a different category of limited license), and you cannot attach additional apps to a Team Member license. Also, some modules (like older Dynamics 365 Marketing) aren’t part of base/attach – they have separate licensing models.

Base/Attach in Practice: 

Let’s say you have a user, Jane, who is in a role that straddles sales and support. You assign her Sales Enterprise as a base license.

Later, you realize she also needs to work in Customer Service. When you add Customer Service for Jane, you purchase it as an attached license at $20.

Jane will now have two licenses in the Microsoft 365 admin portal or licensing system: “Dynamics 365 Customer Service Attach” (which requires that she already has Sales or another base).

That attached license remains valid as long as Jane maintains a qualifying base license. (If you ever removed her Sales base license, the attached license would become invalid – Microsoft enforces that you must have a base to use an attachment; if the base is canceled, the attachment stops working or is not compliant.)

Licensing Multiple Apps per User – Summary of Best Practices:

• Ensure each user has only one base license. If you find a user with two full licenses of different modules, you are overpaying; reassign one as an attach license.
• Plan which module will be the base per user. A good rule is that each user’s most critical or highest-tier application serves as their base; all other necessary apps for that user are attached to it.
• Please note that the attached licenses provide the same full capabilities as the base license for the app. There is no functional difference in the software itself – only the pricing differs. Therefore, the attached Customer Service provides the user with the same features as a full Customer Service license. The only difference is that you paid less.
• Exception – Mixing License Editions: You cannot mix Enterprise and Professional editions of the same app in one environment/user. For example, some users choose Sales Enterprise. You cannot have other users on Sales Professional in the same tenant for the same functionality – Microsoft requires a single edition choice for consistency. Similarly, attach licenses generally assume Enterprise-level apps. Suppose cost is a concern for smaller teams. In that case, you might consider Professional licenses (e.g., Sales Professional at approximately $65), but be aware that you can’t attach an Enterprise app to a Professional base. Typically, larger and mid-sized organizations opt for Enterprise licenses to obtain full functionality and utilize the attach model to manage costs, rather than the limited Professional tier.

By leveraging the base/attach model, a CIO can significantly optimize licensing spend. Next, we will examine recent pricing changes and new licensing developments that must be factored into your strategy, as well as how to calculate total cost scenarios for these licenses.

2025 Updates: Pricing Changes and New Licensing Options

The Dynamics 365 licensing landscape is not static – Microsoft updates pricing and occasionally introduces new license types or bundles.

As of 2025, here are the key changes and trends to be aware of:

• Price Increases (Oct 2024): Microsoft implemented a major price adjustment in October 2024 for many Dynamics 365 products. Most base license prices increased by 10-15%. For example, Sales Enterprise and Customer Service Enterprise rose from $95 to $105 per user/month. Field Service also increased to $105. On the ERP side, Finance, Supply Chain, and Commerce rose from $180 to $210 per user/month (about a 17% jump). Human Resources and Project Operations increased from $120 to $135. These changes reflect Microsoft’s continued investment in the platform (adding features, AI, etc.) and market inflation adjustments. Attach license prices remained unchanged during this increase, meaning the value of using attach licenses is arguably even greater now (the gap between a $105 base and a $20 attach is larger than it was at $95 vs $20). CIOs should update their cost projections and budgets for these new prices if they haven’t already done so. A positive note: Dynamics 365 Business Central (the SMB ERP product) remained unchanged, and some add-ons, such as Team Member licenses and certain Insights add-ons, continued to be offered at the same price. However, any organization with older pricing needs to plan for an increase at the time of renewal.
• New Bundled License Offers: Microsoft has introduced a few bundled license options to provide more value:
  • Dynamics 365 Sales Premium—This bundle includes Sales Enterprise plus advanced AI-driven features (like Sales Insights or predictive forecasting). Its price was $135 and increased to $150 per user. If an organization were separately buying Sales Enterprise ($105) and the Sales Insights add-on, Sales Premium could be a simplified, potentially cost-saving bundle.
  • Microsoft Relationship Sales (MRS) – This bundle combines Dynamics 365 Sales with LinkedIn Sales Navigator. It’s designed for enterprises seeking a comprehensive relationship management solution. The list price (post-increase) is around $177 per user (up from $162). If you need both CRM and LinkedIn tools, purchasing the bundle is more cost-effective than buying them separately. As a CIO, consider these bundles if your sales team heavily uses LinkedIn or advanced sales AI features – Microsoft often prices bundles attractively to drive adoption of the add-ons.
  • Digital Contact Center / Customer Service Bundles: Microsoft has enhanced the Customer Service module with digital contact center capabilities (integrating voice, chat, and Teams as a calling platform). For instance, there are add-ons for omnichannel chat and voice or an SKU that bundles Customer Service Enterprise with the Digital Messaging add-on. Keep an eye on new Customer Service offers if you plan to modernize your call center—bundling voice, chat, and case management in one license might be more cost-effective than third-party solutions.
• Emerging AI and “Copilot” Add-Ons: A big theme into 2025 is the introduction of AI assistants (Copilots) across Dynamics 365. Microsoft’s Copilot features for D365 (e.g., AI that helps write emails to customers, or analyzes data for insights) may be included on a trial basis but are likely to be monetized as separate add-ons or in higher-tier licenses. For example, Viva Sales (an AI-powered seller tool that integrates with Dynamics 365 Sales) is included in some Dynamics licenses but is also available for purchase separately. Microsoft may bundle certain AI capabilities into “premium” editions or charge an additional fee per user for Copilot. When planning your licensing, inquire about the roadmap for AI features. Adopting a bundle like Sales Premium might automatically include some AI features, whereas sticking to base licenses might mean needing an additional SKU for those features later.
• Customer Insights & Marketing Changes: Dynamics 365 Marketing has evolved into Dynamics 365 Customer Insights – Journeys (for marketing automation) and Customer Insights – Data (for customer data platform analytics). These licensing models differ significantly (often based on environment and contact counts rather than per user). As of 2024, Microsoft split the marketing application into these two pieces:
  • Journeys (Marketing) is often licensed as an attachment if you have 10 or more base licenses of other apps, or as a standalone tenant-based license ($1,500+/month per environment, with a specific contact quota, etc.).
  • Customer Insights (Data) is also tenant-based. If your enterprise needs marketing automation or a customer data platform, factor these into negotiations – they may be bundled in promotions, or you might be able to leverage other D365 modules to secure better pricing. For mid-sized firms, Microsoft has also offered some simplified marketing bundles (or free trial entitlements) to encourage adoption.
• Capacity-Based Licensing (Planned Changes): Microsoft announced upcoming shifts towards capacity-based licensing for certain Dynamics 365 services, particularly in the Finance & Operations realm. Starting in 2025, they plan to allocate base storage and environment capacity with the licenses, and allow organizations to purchase extra capacity as needed. This is partly a move to unify D365 administration with the Power Platform (managing D365 environments in the Power Platform Admin Center) and to ensure that large data usage is accounted for. What this means for CIOs: Shortly, you may not only pay per user, but also consider the data/storage footprint of your D365 environments. If your implementation stores large volumes of data or you require multiple sandbox environments, Microsoft may adopt a model where you purchase additional capacity beyond a certain allotment (similar to how Salesforce and others charge for extra storage). Watch for announcements on capacity-based pricing – ensure your strategy covers not just user licenses but also the cost of any additional environments, databases, or file storage your teams require. (The standard licenses include some default storage, and you get more as you add users, but heavy users of D365 might exceed those.)
• License Management Updates: Microsoft is enhancing its license management tools and pricing. By April 2025, the Power Platform Admin Center will give clearer reports on D365 license assignments and usage. This isn’t a cost item, but it helps you as a CIO to track who has what license and if they’re using them, which can inform optimization and renewal negotiations (e.g., identifying unused licenses or opportunities to downgrade some users to cheaper licenses).

Summary of 2024/2025 Licensing Climate:

Microsoft is slightly raising costs and adding more value (AI features, integrations). They encourage broader adoption of Dynamics by packaging capabilities (e.g., linking LinkedIn, adding Copilot). For a global enterprise, these changes mean you should:

• Budget for the new prices (ensure your multi-year financial plans incorporate the ~10-15% increase on core modules).
• Consider new bundles or editions if they align with your needs (maybe Sales Premium is worth it if AI is on your roadmap).
• Keep an eye on new license types (like any forthcoming capacity-based elements or special promotion SKUs). Mid-sized companies should also review whether the higher cost of Enterprise licenses is justified or if some Professional licenses could suffice, especially after the price hike; the gap between Sales Pro ($65) and Sales Enterprise ($105) is wider. The advanced functionality is often necessary, but smaller teams might save by choosing a professional edition for a simpler CRM deployment.

Next, we will demonstrate how to calculate the total cost of ownership under different licensing mixes using these prices and the base/attach model so that you can quantify the impact on your organization.

TCO Scenarios and Sample Cost Calculations

A sound licensing strategy requires understanding the total cost of ownership (TCO) under various scenarios.

This involves calculating the cost of your Dynamics 365 licenses every month and over a multi-year period, considering different module and user combinations.

Below, we present illustrative scenarios and a sample calculation methodology.

Example Scenario: 500 Users Needing Sales + Customer Service

Consider a company with 500 users on Dynamics 365. Let’s say all 500 need access to the Sales and Customer Service modules (a common scenario for organizations where employees handle sales and support functions).

We’ll calculate the licensing costs for two approaches:

1. Option A: Each user has two standalone licenses (no attached usage).
2. Option B: Each user uses base + attach (optimized usage of attach pricing).

For simplicity, we use post-Oct 2024 Enterprise pricing: Sales = $105, Customer Service = $105, and the attach price for an additional Customer Engagement app = $20.

Result: In this scenario, using the base and attach model (Option B) would save the company $42,500 per month in licensing costs compared to buying full licenses for both apps (Option A).

Over a year, that saves $510,000, and over a typical 3-year agreement, about $1.53 million lessis spent. The attached model cuts the application licensing cost by 40%.

Even if not all 500 users need both apps, the savings per user who needs multiple modules is substantial.

CIOs should identify how many users fall into multi-app categories and ensure those users are licensed with the base/attach structure to reap these savings.

Mixed App Scenario: Role-Based Licensing Mix

Often, not everyone needs every app. Let’s illustrate a more mixed scenario:

• Three hundred users require only Sales, 100 users require only Customer Service, and 100 users require both.
  • The 300 Sales-only users cost $105/mo (total $31,500/mo).
  • The 100 CS-only users cost $105/mo (total $10,500/mo).
  • The 100 dual-role users we license via base/attach: Perhaps assign sales as base and customer service as attachments to each. That’s $125/mo per dual user (total $12,500/mo for those).
  • Overall monthly cost = $31,500 + $10,500 + $12,500 = $54,500. Annualized ~$654,000.

If, instead, we mistakenly gave those 100 dual-role users two separate licenses each, that portion would be $21,000/mo instead of $12,500 – adding $8,500/mo extra, or $102,000 per year of unnecessary spending.

This example underscores the importance of mix optimization. You should map user roles to license needs and then sum up costs:

1. Identify user counts for each combination of modules (use functional roles or use cases to cluster this).
2. Apply the base license cost for one app and attach costs for additional apps for users needing combos.
3. Add any users with single-app needs at full price for those apps.
4. Include any other license types (e.g., if you have 50 light users on Team Member licenses at $8 each, that’s $400/mo added).
5. Multiply monthly totals by 12 or 36 for annual or 3-year TCO.

Remember to include any one-time costs (some modules may require implementation or ISV add-ons—although these aren’t Microsoft license fees, they impact project TCO). Also, consider any available discounts (if you negotiated, for example, a 15% reduction from the list price, apply this discount in your calculation accordingly).

TCO Considerations:

• Multi-year Perspective: Enterprise Agreements (EA) or other volume deals are typically 3-year commitments. Always project your Dynamics 365 licensing costs over that term. If Microsoft has announced price increases, factor those in for years beyond the effective date of the increase. (In the above table, if you had locked prices pre-Oct 2024 via an EA, your 3-year cost might be lower due to the price lock. Conversely, if expecting another price change in 2025–2026, bake in a contingency or ensure price protections in your contract.)
• User Growth or Contraction: Plan for how user counts might change. If you anticipate adding 200 users next year due to an acquisition or scaling down a team, include that in the TCO scenario or as a separate scenario. Dynamics licensing costs scale linearly with user counts (absent volume discount tiers), making it straightforward to adjust, but you need to budget for this accordingly.
• Mix of License Types: Calculate separate totals for different license types: Enterprise vs Professional editions, Team Members, devices, etc. For example, a Team Member license costs around $8 – if you have 100 Team Member users, that’s $800/mo, which is relatively small, but it allows those users to query data without needing a $105 license. Using a few Team Member licenses where appropriate can slightly reduce TCO, but be careful. The license agreement limits those users’ functionality (only basic read and minimal write in core tables).
• Cloud vs. On-Prem TCO: When comparing Dynamics 365 (cloud SaaS) licensing to an on-premises alternative (such as Dynamics on-premises or another system), remember that the SaaS license includes infrastructure hosting, updates, and some support. On-premises software may have a different cost structure (e.g., server hardware). The TCO for Dynamics 365 cloud is purely in the subscription fees (plus implementation). Microsoft sometimes provides TCO tools or calculators to compare on-premises vs. cloud solutions – consider using them if making a business case for moving to Dynamics 365 online.

In summary, create a spreadsheet model tailored to your organization’s needs, incorporating the license counts and corresponding prices. The above examples show how dramatically costs can swing based on licensing strategy.

Next, we will discuss how to approach negotiations with Microsoft (whether via an Enterprise Agreement or Cloud Solution Provider) to further optimize these costs and secure favorable terms.

Negotiating Dynamics 365 in Enterprise Agreements (EA/MCA-E)

Licensing costs can often be negotiated down from the raw price list, especially for larger enterprises. Microsoft expects customers, particularly those entering Enterprise Agreements, to negotiate.

Dynamics 365, as a significant investment (especially in enterprises with hundreds or thousands of users), should be a key focus of your negotiation strategy.

Below are strategic guidelines for CIOs when negotiating Dynamics 365 as part of a broader Microsoft agreement, such as an Enterprise Agreement (EA) or the newer Microsoft Customer Agreement for Enterprises (MCA-E):

• Bundle Dynamics 365 into Your Enterprise Agreement: If you’re adopting Dynamics 365 and buying Microsoft 365 (Office 365) or Azure, combining these in a single EA can increase your leverage. Microsoft rewards larger total commitments. Adding Dynamics 365 to your EA may unlock bigger volume discounts. For example, reaching a higher spend tier might yield an extra few percentage points off all licenses. Additionally, Microsoft sellers have quotas for “business applications.” Showing interest in a full platform (Dynamics, Office, and Azure) incentivizes them to offer introductory discounts on Dynamics to close the deal. Tip: Signal to Microsoft that Dynamics 365 is part of a long-term digital transformation in your company; they may provide one-time price concessions or bonus services (such as deployment funding) to secure that footprint from competitors.
• MCA-E vs EA: Microsoft is transitioning some customers to the Microsoft Customer Agreement for Enterprise (MCA-E), a modernized contract. For very large organizations (usually 2,400+ users) Microsoft might prefer MCA-E, which is more direct (less reseller involvement) and can be more flexible. From a negotiation standpoint, demand the same or better discounts on an MCA-E as you would under an EA. Microsoft often matches EA-level pricing if it prompts you to switch to the new agreement format. One difference: MCA-E might not have a fixed 3-year price lock; similarly, you may need ongoing management to ensure costs don’t rise unexpectedly. Ensure any pricing commitments or discounts are documented in the MCA-E, and seek clauses that protect you from arbitrary price hikes (e.g,. “Microsoft will not increase pricing for these licenses by more than X% annually during the term”). If you are a mid-sized company and below the EA thresholds, you’ll likely purchase via the Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) program or direct subscriptions. CSP partners sometimes offer slight discounts or value-added services, but large discounts are typically negotiated in EA/MCA agreements.
• Negotiate Discounts and Concessions: Enter negotiations with a clear and specific discount request. Depending on your size and the competitiveness of the deal, discounts of anywhere from 10% to 30% on Dynamics 365 licenses are possible. Microsoft rarely advertises this – it comes out in the sales negotiation. Use competitive pressure: if you evaluate Salesforce, SAP, Oracle, etc., let Microsoft know. If Microsoft believes there’s a risk that you might choose a competitor or not migrate from a legacy system to Dynamics, they will be more flexible with pricing. Also, use the fact that Dynamics 365 is modular to your advantage: you can threaten to deploy only Sales now and hold off on other modules, unless they make it attractive to roll out the whole suite. They want you on as many workloads as possible (stickier and higher revenue), so they might discount one module heavily if it means you adopt others.
• “Full Dynamics” Adoption Incentives: Microsoft often runs promotions to encourage full suite adoption or switching from competitors. Examples:
  • Promotional pricing for Salesforce or SAP replacements: If you can show you’re replacing Salesforce with Dynamics 365 Sales, ask Microsoft about competitive offers. They have been known to offer, for instance, six months free or a percentage off the first year to customers migrating from a major competitor to offset the switching costs. They may also include free migration tools or services via partners.
  • Bridge to the Cloud discounts: Organizations coming from Microsoft on-premises solutions (like Dynamics AX, CRM, or NAV on-prem) may qualify for “Bridge to Cloud” promotions (at one point, a 40% discount for 3 years for on-prem license holders moving to cloud). If you’re in this scenario (ERP modernization from old AX or CRM modernization from on-premises), inquire about transition discounts to avoid paying full price during the overlap.
  • Preview and trial credits: If you are interested in new modules (such as a new Marketing package or AI add-on), you may be able to negotiate a free trial period or a reduced cost for year 1, with the option to ramp up in years 2-3. Microsoft sometimes offers the first year at a steep discount if you commit to standard pricing later—this is useful for lowering initial TCO and proving value before full spending.
• Base vs Attach – Ensure Quoted Properly: Surprisingly, a common pitfall is that initial quotes from Microsoft or resellers might inadvertently quote all licenses at full price. During negotiation, explicitly ensure that the attached licenses are used where applicable. For instance, if you say you need 500 Sales and 500 Customer Service, clarify that this should be priced as 500 base + 500 attach, not 500 + 500 base. The Microsoft sales team should be aware of this, but it would be beneficial to have it in writing that they are providing you with the benefit of the attached model. Essentially, you want the contract to list the attached SKUs (at the lower price) for those secondary licenses. This will lock in the attached pricing through your term and avoid confusion. It sounds basic, but in an enterprise that deals with many moving parts, mistakes happen – a customer could overpay because the order was placed incorrectly.
• Negotiating as Part of a Broader Deal: If Dynamics 365 is one component of a larger Microsoft agreement (which often also includes Microsoft 365 (Office) or Azure cloud spend), use the total relationship as leverage. For example, if you also commit to Azure growth, you could push for an extra discount on Dynamics in exchange. Microsoft considers the “Annual Contract Value” (ACV) of the entire deal. A trick: sometimes you can get Microsoft to apply a larger discount to the Dynamics portion if you are near a threshold on the Microsoft 365 side or vice versa. Work with your procurement and Microsoft account teams to identify areas where flexibility is needed. Microsoft might also offer Service Credits or Consulting vouchers if they can’t budge on price – e.g., providing free advisory hours or FastTrack services for Dynamics deployment. These have real value, as they require less spending on partners. Don’t hesitate to ask for those extras if the pure license discount hits a wall.
• Enterprise Agreement Timing and Renewal:
  • Leverage Year-End and Quarter-End: Microsoft has heavy sales targets by quarter (especially Q4, which is April-June for Microsoft’s fiscal year). Align your negotiations or renewal to hit those crunch times. At the end of June (fiscal year close), Microsoft is often most eager to close deals – you might secure an additional concession if you sign by that date. Similarly, Dec or March quarter-ends can be leverage points. As CIO, you can coordinate purchase timing with the CFO/procurement to maximize this leverage.
  • Long-Term Price Lock: In an EA, you typically get a price lock for a 3-year term (no price increases for that quantity during the term). Confirm this is the case for Dynamics 365 in your EA. With the known Oct 2024 increase, companies that signed EAs before that date were shielded until renewal. Try negotiating price protection against future increases (e.g., “if Microsoft raises Dynamics 365 list prices during our term, our price stays at pre-increase” or at least cap the increase). This is important given Microsoft’s clear signals of continued price adjustments as they add more to the product.
  • Ramp Agreements: If you are rolling out Dynamics gradually, negotiate a ramp-up in licenses. For example, you might only need 200 licenses in the first year as you implement, then 500 in the second year when fully deployed. Rather than paying for all 500 from day one, ask Microsoft to structure the EA such that you commit to 500 by year two, but only pay for 200 in year one. This avoids paying for shelfware during deployment. Microsoft may achieve this by displaying the annual quantities in the contract or by offering some licensing as “free for the first 6 months,” etc. The key is to align payment with user adoption.
• Negotiating via CSP or MCA for Mid-Sized Organizations: If you are not using an EA (perhaps you have fewer than 500 seats or prefer annual subscriptions through a partner), you can still negotiate to some extent. CSP providers might offer small discounts (2-5%) or at least bundle their services (like admin support or minor add-ons at no charge). Microsoft’s pricing is more standardized in CSP, but if you’re a valuable customer, switching CSP resellers can introduce competition. Additionally, mid-sized companies can sometimes catch Microsoft’s attention for a direct deal if it’s strategically important (e.g., you are a key player in a vertical Microsoft wants to target). In that case, don’t be shy to ask Microsoft if an MCA-E is available to you – they might have a path to sign you directly with some incentive, especially if it’s an all-Dynamics deal. However, typically, the largest enterprises receive the biggest discounts.
• Document Every Concession: Ensure that any discount, special pricing, or incentive is written into the agreement or an addendum. Verbal promises (e.g., “We’ll give you 20 free sandbox instance licenses” or “You can add more users at the same discount next year”) must be officially documented. Before signing, check that the final quote or order form reflects the base and attach license counts you expect, the unit prices agreed, and any free-of-charge items. Also, ensure that those are in the contract if you negotiated special rights (like the ability to swap certain license types later, or a flexible transition of on-prem licenses to cloud). As a CIO, you may not handle the procurement minutiae, but you should double-check this because it directly affects your budget and compliance in the long run.
• Align Licensing with IT Roadmap: Communicate during negotiations that your licensing commitments will align with your digital transformation roadmap. If you plan to roll out CRM this year, ERP next year, mention that. Microsoft may offer a deal contingent upon your adoption of both. For example, “We will purchase Sales and Customer Service in Year 1, and we intend to evaluate Finance and SCM in Year 2” – Microsoft might include provisional discounts or at least agree to preserve pricing for those ERP modules for you. They might even bundle some preview licenses or workshops to assist your evaluation. Use your roadmap as a bargaining chip: you’re offering Microsoft future business in exchange for better terms now.
• Negotiation Pitfall to Avoid – Separate Sales Teams: One nuance with Microsoft: Dynamics 365 sales are sometimes handled by a specialist team separate from Microsoft 365/Azure sellers. Ensure your negotiation is coordinated. Insist on a unified negotiation table where all product discounts are considered together. Otherwise, Microsoft might internally silo the deals (“the BizApps team can only give X% and the Modern Work team Y%”). By bringing it together, you, as the customer, can say, “I need the overall deal to hit $Z budget, allocate the discount where it makes sense.” The internal Microsoft organization structure should not dictate your cost – push your account manager to bring all stakeholders on a single call to hash it out if needed. As a CIO, making one comprehensive agreement that covers everything is usually better than separate agreements for Dynamics vs Office, etc., because you can trade across them (and you reduce administrative overhead).

Negotiation Bottom Line: Treat Dynamics 365 licensing as a major investment akin to any big software project – you have alternatives and leverage. Be assertive: ask for discounts, request complimentary additions (such as trial periods, extra support, or training credits), and leverage timing and competition to your advantage.

Microsoft is often willing to negotiate, especially if it perceives a long-term partnership and demonstrates a savvy understanding of its licensing (it’ll take you seriously if you know about base/attach, promotions, etc., as covered in this playbook).

Combine this with the technical plan (CRM/ERP rollout schedule) to ensure the contract supports your deployment plan.

Common Licensing Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Even with the best-laid plans, organizations can stumble into licensing pitfalls that cause overspending or compliance issues.

Here are some common Dynamics 365 licensing pitfalls, along with advice on avoiding them:

• Over-Licensing (Paying for Unused Modules): This occurs when companies purchase more functionality than they need or use. For example, purchasing separate Sales and Customer Service licenses for all users when only a subset needed both. Or buying the Marketing module for dozens of users when only a small marketing team uses it (since Marketing is often tenant-based, a single license might cover all needed users). Avoid it: Conduct role mapping – align each user or role with the minimum licenses required. Start with a smaller number of specific modules if you’re unsure; you can always increase them later. Regularly review usage metrics (Microsoft’s admin center can show active users per app) and remove licenses that aren’t being used (“shelfware”).
• Not Utilizing Attach Licenses: Perhaps the most costly mistake is failing to use attach licenses where eligible. We’ve stressed this, but it bears repeating: if a user has two full licenses, flag it. Sometimes this happens because different departments provisioned licenses in silos (e.g., the sales department gave someone a Sales license, and IT later separately gave them a Customer Service license, not realizing they already had Sales). Avoid it: Centralize license assignment and review a user’s existing licenses before adding another. Use a licensing worksheet or system report to catch any user with multiple base licenses. If found, convert one to attach at next renewal or through your partner – Microsoft typically allows adjustments to correct such issues mid-term.
• Misjudging License Edition Needs: Choosing Professional vs Enterprise incorrectly can be a pitfall. For instance, a mid-size business might opt for Sales Professional to save money, but later find it lacks key functionality (like customizations or advanced analytics), forcing a disruptive (and more costly) mid-stream switch to Enterprise. Avoid it: Evaluate feature differences carefully up front. Lean towards Enterprise if you plan to grow or heavily customize your application. Use Professional only if you are certain the limited feature set meets your needs. Remember, you can’t mix editions for the same app in one environment, so this is an all-or-nothing choice for that module.
• Ignoring Team Member and Device License Opportunities: On the other hand, some organizations provide full licenses to users who only require limited access. For example, a warehouse clerk who just needs to update inventory status might not need a full Supply Chain license – a Team Member license could suffice. Or a retail store with shift workers might buy 10 individual Commerce licenses when they could have bought two device licenses (one per register) for less. Avoid it: Analyze your user personas. Identify if there are “view only” or “light touch” users who could use the $8 Team Member license (which allows read access across all Dynamics 365 and basic writes like notes or minimal data entry). Use Team Member for executives wanting to view dashboards or occasional users. Just be cautious: Team Member licenses have strict limitations (e.g., they can only update a limited set of core tables and can’t perform key transactions, such as creating opportunities or orders – Microsoft enforces this technically with special Team Member apps). Similarly, use device licenses in scenarios where they are applicable (common in retail stores or factory kiosks). These alternatives can help trim costs, but it is essential to ensure that users adhere to the limited usage patterns to remain compliant.
• License Compliance Issues (Under-Licensing): The opposite of over-licensing is under-licensing – giving users access to features they aren’t licensed for. Because Dynamics 365 trusts administrators to assign proper licenses, it’s possible (though against terms) for a user to use a module without a license if security roles are misconfigured. Microsoft will strengthen technical enforcement (particularly in Finance & Operations apps) by 2025 to prevent unlicensed use. For instance, they plan to enforce that each user in a Finance/SCM environment has a valid license or the system will flag it. Avoid it: Maintain proper license assignments for every Azure AD/Office 365 admin user. Periodically audit that every active user in Dynamics has a corresponding license. Remove access for external or inactive users promptly to avoid compliance drift. If you have integration accounts or service accounts that access Dynamics, consult the licensing guide – sometimes those need a license or a special non-interactive license. Being proactive here avoids potential true-up costs or compliance penalties.
• Not Accounting for Add-On Costs (Storage, AI, etc.): You might license all your users correctly, but overlook ancillary costs: for example, Dynamics 365 has a certain storage capacity for your databases and files. You’ll incur additional storage charges if you exceed that limit (common when attaching numerous documents to records or having millions of rows of data). Similarly, features like Customer Voice (a survey tool) or Omnichannel chat for Customer Service require additional licensing if used heavily (sometimes based on capacity or volume of interactions). Avoid it: Review the included capacities in your license (the licensing guide details how many GB of database storage is required per user, etc.). If your implementation is data-intensive, consider negotiating extra storage in your agreement or be prepared to purchase additional capacity. Monitor usage through the Power Platform Admin Center. Watch announcements and plan accordingly for new AI features that may be metered (e.g., a certain number of AI-generated contacts or GPT-powered conversations might have a limit). Including a buffer for add-ons in your budget can prevent surprises.
• Overlooking License Reassignment Rules: Dynamics 365 licenses are assigned per named user and can generally be reallocated if someone leaves and a new person takes their place. However, Microsoft has rules to prevent abuse (e.g., you can’t frequently rotate one license among multiple people to evade fees). Additionally, if you downgrade a user’s license (for example, from full to Team Member), ensure they aren’t using functionality that is now restricted. Avoid it: When deprovisioning users, free up and reassign licenses rather than assign them to former employees (“recycle licenses”). However, do so in compliance – occasional reassignments are acceptable, but constant daily swapping is not. Also, use “grace periods” wisely – if an employee is on long leave, you might temporarily reclaim their license and reassign later. Establish a tracking process to ensure compliance with the licensing agreement’s terms regarding reassignment frequency, which are generally reasonable (e.g., don’t reassign the same license more than once within 90 days, except for permanent departures).
• Staying on Legacy Licensing Plans: Some organizations that adopted Dynamics 365 early (before 2019) were on old “Plan” licenses or mixed-and-matched SKUs that have since been retired. If you haven’t revisited your licensing in a while, you might be grandfathered on something that isn’t optimal. For example, the old Customer Engagement Plan offered multiple apps for one price, but it’s no longer available. If your contract has expired, you may now be paying for individual licenses instead of leveraging attachments. Avoid it: Always use the latest licensing model at renewal; it usually offers the best value or at least aligns with current rules. Don’t assume that what worked 3 years ago is still the best approach – Microsoft’s changes could mean a different mix saves money now. Engage a Microsoft licensing specialist or partner to review your current licensing against current offerings each year.
• Forgetting to Involve Stakeholders: Licensing is not just an IT or procurement issue – it affects operations, finance (budget), and end-user experience (if you pick too limited a license, users might complain they can’t do something). Avoid it: In your licensing strategy committee, include business unit leaders or power users to ensure the chosen license mix meets actual needs. It’s a pitfall to solely opt for the cheapest route if it compromises functionality for a team; balance cost optimization with operational requirements.

By being mindful of these pitfalls, you can avoid unpleasant scenarios, such as sudden budget overruns, compliance audits, or users being unable to perform their jobs due to license restrictions.

Now, we’ll conclude with actionable recommendations for CIOs to successfully navigate Dynamics 365 licensing.

CIO Recommendations

In light of the information above, here are clear, actionable recommendations for CIOs to craft and maintain an effective Dynamics 365 licensing strategy:

1. Perform a Role-Based License Audit: Start by mapping out all user roles in your organization and the Dynamics 365 functionality they require. Conduct a detailed license audit at least annually (if not continuously). Ensure each role has the appropriate license type (e.g., Enterprise vs. Professional, Full User vs. Team Member) and identify users with more licenses than needed or those lacking licenses. This role-based approach will highlight opportunities to optimize (e.g., switching some users to attach licenses or to Team Member where suitable).

2. Leverage the Base/Attach Model to the Fullest: Make it policy that no user should have two full-price Dynamics 365 licenses. Train your IT licensing admins on the base/attach concept so it’s consistently applied. Implement checks in your ITSM processes – for example, when a manager requests access to an additional module for an employee, the IT team should automatically assign an attach license if that user already has a base license. Design your Dynamics security roles and user provisioning to ensure that multi-app users are known and managed centrally.

3. Stay Informed on Licensing Changes: Assign someone in your team (or a partner/licensing advisor) to monitor Microsoft announcements, licensing guide updates, and pricing changes. For instance, as a CIO, you should know that in 2024 prices went up and why, and what’s on the roadmap for 2025 (capacity-based licensing hints, new product bundles, etc.). Being up-to-date allows you to anticipate changes – for example, if you know Microsoft will enforce license compliance more strictly in Finance modules in 2025, you can pre-emptively clean up any access issues in 2024. If available, subscribe to Microsoft’s licensing updates and engage in user groups or advisory councils.

4. Optimize Total Cost of Ownership: Build a multi-year TCO model for Dynamics 365 in your organization. Include license costs (with growth assumptions), add-on costs (storage, etc.), and implementation/support costs. Use this model to find cost drivers: Is most of your expense in CRM licenses? ERP licenses? Could some users be transitioned to more affordable licenses without a loss of productivity? Use scenario planning (as we demonstrated) to see the impact of different strategies (for example, “What if we move 100 infrequent users to Team Member – how much would we save and can they still do their work?”). This analysis should feed into negotiation strategy and budget planning.

5. Integrate Dynamics Licensing into EA Negotiations: If you have an Enterprise Agreement or large Microsoft contract, plan the Dynamics 365 portion alongside Office 365, Azure, etc., rather than as an afterthought. Negotiate Dynamics 365 vigorously – Microsoft’s sales incentives for Dynamics are high (they want to grow that business). Push for volume discounts, lock in attach pricing, and request any available promotions. Ensure you time major license purchases to maximize Microsoft’s year-end/quarter-end flexibility. Always ask: “Is this the best you can do? Are there any programs or bundles that could reduce our cost?” Often, Microsoft might come back with a slightly better offer if it knows you’re scrutinizing every line.

6. Align Licensing Strategy with Deployment Phases: Your licensing should scale with adoption. If you’re in the middle of a CRM rollout to a global sales team, you might not need all licenses on day one. Consider phased purchasing – negotiate to add licenses in tranches as you roll out to regions or departments. Conversely, if decommissioning a legacy system in favor of Dynamics, plan to remove those old costs as Dynamics ramps up, so you’re not double-paying longer than necessary. Communicate the plan clearly to Microsoft – you may secure “ramp discounts” if they see a clear trajectory of increased use (they might treat it like a guaranteed future sale, which can improve terms now).

7. Use a Licensing Center of Excellence: Given the complexity, some enterprises set up a small “Licensing CoE” or designate the software asset management (SAM) team as experts in Microsoft licensing. This team would maintain knowledge of licensing rules, ensure compliance, and continuously look for opportunities to optimize. As CIO, empower this team to make recommendations. For a mid-sized company, this might be one savvy IT asset manager working with your Microsoft partner – ensure they have access to the latest licensing guides and consider attending Microsoft or partner-led licensing workshops.

8. Engage a Trusted Microsoft Advisor: Microsoft partners specialized in licensing (or licensing advisory firms) can provide insights and benchmarking. They might know, for example, typical discount ranges for companies of your size, or clever licensing combinations others have used. They can also help navigate the specifics (such as how to properly license a user who only needs to approve invoices in the system – perhaps a Team Member license is sufficient instead of a full Finance license). Don’t hesitate to leverage this expertise; it can pay for itself in savings. However, ensure any advice aligns with official licensing documents – always double-check, since ultimate compliance is your organization’s responsibility.

9. Monitor License Usage and Adjust Regularly: Use the available admin analytics to monitor usage post-deployment. If certain Dynamics modules are underutilized, you might trim licenses at the next renewal or find ways to improve adoption (so you get your money’s worth). If adoption is higher than expected in certain areas, allocate a budget for growth. Encourage department heads to flag if employees no longer need a license (e.g., a project ends, and some users can be removed). Cloud subscriptions are relatively flexible – use that to your advantage by not letting unused licenses linger. On the other hand, if you find a team hacking a solution because they lack a module (maybe using Excel exports because they aren’t licensed for a piece of D365 functionality), that might be a sign you should license them for it – improving productivity may outweigh the cost.

10. Plan for Future State – Digital Transformation Alignment: Align your Dynamics 365 licensing strategy with your broader digital transformation goals. If you plan to integrate Dynamics with other systems or expand functionality (like adopting Power Platform apps or AI capabilities), factor those into your licensing conversations. For example, if building custom apps on Dataverse (the database underlying D365), consider whether a Power Apps license or a Dynamics license is more appropriate for certain users. Ensuring that your licensing model supports agility (scaling up for a new initiative or adding a new Dynamics 365 module like Field Service if your business launches a field team) is key. Ideally, your Microsoft agreement should include new products with predetermined discount terms, so you’re not starting from scratch each time.

11. Keep an Eye on ROI: Finally, as CIO, regularly evaluate the ROI of your Dynamics 365 investment. Licensing is a major part of cost – tie it back to value delivered. This isn’t directly about licensing rules, but it influences them: if a module isn’t delivering value, you might drop it at renewal; if a module is mission-critical, you’ll ensure its users have the right licenses and maybe even redundancy (e.g., a spare license or environment for testing). When you can demonstrate high user adoption and business value from Dynamics, it also strengthens your hand in negotiation (Microsoft account teams love to reference business value as justification for their product – you can counter that by saying “Yes, we are getting value, which is why we plan to grow – so give us a better rate to expand further”).

By following these recommendations, CIOs of both global enterprises and mid-sized companies can effectively manage their Dynamics 365 licensing. The goal is to balance cost optimization and empowering your users with the necessary tools. With proactive management and informed strategy, your organization can avoid common pitfalls and ensure that your Dynamics 365 licensing supports your business objectives now and in the future.

Read more about our Microsoft Optimization Services.

Would you like to discuss our Microsoft Optimization Services with us?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit