Uncategorized

Case Study – OpenAI Advisory Services – European Bank – Regulatory-Compliant AI Contract & Zero Data Exposure

Case Study – OpenAI Advisory Services – European Bank – Regulatory-Compliant AI Contract & Zero Data Exposure

Case Study – OpenAI Advisory Services – European Bank EU – Secured IP Protections & Cut AI Consultin

Background

A European bank, subject to strict EU data privacy and financial regulations, was piloting OpenAI’s technology to enhance customer service and internal research. A multilingual GPT-based assistant had shown promise in answering customer inquiries and aiding analysts with data summaries.

Eager to deploy these AI capabilities across the organization, the team began negotiating an enterprise OpenAI services agreement.

However, the bank’s compliance officers were on high alert: any AI vendor contract would need to satisfy GDPR, banking laws, and internal risk controls before it could be approved.

Challenges

The standard contract from the AI provider revealed several compliance and risk gaps. There was no assurance of EU-only data processing, raising concerns that customer information might be handled in non-EU data centers and break GDPR.

The draft lacked provisions for data deletion or audit rights, leaving the bank unable to verify data usage or the quality of AI outputs. Liability terms were insufficient – if the AI service failed or produced harmful errors, the contract gave the bank little recourse.

Additionally, intellectual property ownership was vague, creating uncertainty over who would own custom AI models or outputs derived from the bank’s data.

With no precedent for a GenAI deal like this, the bank turned to an expert contract risk review to close these gaps and meet regulatory requirements.

How Redress Compliance Helped

Redress Compliance conducted an OpenAI Contract Risk Review for the bank.

With expertise in European banking rules and AI contracts, Redress quickly identified each problematic clause and formulated solutions.

Data governance was the priority: Redress added a strict data residency clause requiring all bank data to be processed and stored within the EU.

They also built in deletion requirements, ensuring that any customer data would be purged from the vendor’s systems on a strict schedule.

To provide the bank with oversight, Redress secured audit rights, allowing the bank to verify compliance with these obligations. Next, Redress strengthened liability and service-level protections.

They negotiated SLA terms with penalties for downtime and ensured the vendor must quickly correct any AI errors that could cause regulatory or customer harm.

Regarding intellectual property, Redress clarified that any custom models or configurations developed using the bank’s data would remain under the bank’s control, thereby preventing vendor lock-in.

Redress backed each change with references to GDPR and industry standards, making it difficult for the vendor to object. Ultimately, the vendor accepted most of the key revisions.

Outcome and Impact

Armed with Redress Compliance’s guidance, the bank secured an AI contract that satisfied its regulators and risk team.

The finalized agreement mandated EU-only data processing and strict deletion protocols, thereby eliminating the risk of GDPR violations or data leaving the European Union. It also granted the bank audit rights, reassuring auditors and regulators that compliance would be monitored.

Importantly, the new terms dramatically reduced the bank’s operational risk. With strong SLAs and liability clauses, the bank isn’t left solely responsible if the AI service fails or makes an error – the vendor must compensate or fix the issue.

By clarifying IP ownership, the bank ensured that it retains control over AI models derived from its data, thereby preserving its valuable insights and intellectual property.

After the contract overhaul, internal compliance approved the project, and the bank proceeded with its AI rollout confident that a regulator-approved agreement backed it.

Client Testimonial

“Redress Compliance understood our regulatory world instantly,” said the Chief Risk Officer at the bank. “They transformed a generic AI contract into a tailor-made agreement that our regulators even smiled upon. We now have full control over data location, auditability, and IP – exactly what we needed to deploy AI at scale. Redress turned a potential compliance nightmare into a model solution for us.”

Call-to-Action

Operating in a highly regulated environment, but want to leverage AI? You don’t have to compromise. Redress Compliance ensures that your AI vendor contracts are airtight in terms of data security, privacy, accountability, and governance.

Before signing an AI deal, especially in finance or other regulated sectors, have our experts review and negotiate the terms. Contact Redress Compliance to integrate GenAI confidently, with all necessary safeguards in place.

Read about our GenAI Negotiation Services.

Read about our other GenAI Negotiation Case Studies.

Would you like to discuss our GenAI Negotiation Services with us?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizations—including numerous Fortune 500 companies—optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts

Redress Compliance