Why this assessment exists

AWS EDP shortfalls and over-commits are both expensive. Shortfall triggers on-demand retroactive pricing; over-commit is shelfware. Customers who only check commit position annually typically discover problems too late to act — monthly forecasting and burn modelling is the only durable defence.

This assessment maps your commit risk against the patterns that drive real EDP / PPA shortfalls and over-commits. Built on 60+ AWS commit risk reviews.

Your progress 0% complete
Question 1 of 8

Do you track actual burn against commit monthly (with forecast to year-end)?

Monthly burn + forecast-to-year-end is the minimum discipline. Quarterly-only misses the window to act.

Question 2 of 8

Is commit forecast updated with every material workload change?

Workload migrations, divestments, and product launches all affect commit burn. Forecast must follow.

Question 3 of 8

Do you understand EDP true-up / shortfall mechanics (exact trigger, penalty, on-demand retroactive pricing)?

True-up mechanics are often asymmetric. Understanding them precisely enables defensive action.

Question 4 of 8

Is commit ramp designed with explicit overshoot / shortfall scenarios?

Ramp should be designed to survive realistic up- and down-side scenarios, not just the base case.

Question 5 of 8

Is workload migration / divestment risk modelled against commit coverage?

Migration off AWS or divestment of business units can leave commit stranded. Modelling early enables action.

Question 6 of 8

Is marketplace spend included in commit forecast (not just on-demand AWS services)?

Marketplace spend that counts toward commit must be in the forecast. Exclusion is a common source of false shortfall signals.

Question 7 of 8

Is a dedicated FinOps / cloud economics team engaged with commit position?

FinOps discipline provides monthly cadence, tooling, and cross-function co-ordination. Absence is the most reliable predictor of commit problems.

Question 8 of 8

Is executive escalation triggered when commit variance exceeds threshold (e.g., > ±10% from plan)?

Explicit escalation thresholds prevent late-stage surprises. Absent thresholds let variance accumulate unchallenged.

0 of 8 answered

What happens next

When you click View your results, we'll ask for your name, work email, and company. We only accept corporate email addresses — no Gmail, Outlook.com, or other free providers — because this report is written for enterprise buyers and we use the domain to tailor the recommendations. Your email is never sold, shared, or used for anything other than delivering your report and (if you opt in) related AWS research.

Once you submit, you'll be redirected to a personalised report showing your overall score, risk band, the specific findings for each question where you scored 2 or higher, and the three most important actions to take before you sit down with AWS.

Prefer to walk through this with an expert?

Our AWS practice will run the full diagnostic with you in a 2-hour working session.
Book a session →