Avoiding the Oracle Verified SAM Program: Six Key Reasons

Avoid Oracle Verified SAM Program: Six Key Reasons

The Oracle Verified SAM Program is marketed as a helpful way for enterprises to manage Oracle software licenses with confidence.

However, what appears to be a friendly compliance initiative can compromise your control and increase costs.

This advisory outlines six key reasons IT Asset Management professionals at global enterprises should think twice before signing up, and provides actionable recommendations, a checklist, and answers to common questions.

1. Oracle-Approved Partners Are Not Independent

Oracle’s verified SAM partners may seem like external advisors, but they operate under Oracle’s oversight and guidance. These partners utilize Oracle-provided scripts and report their findings directly to Oracle.

In essence, enrolling in the program is like inviting Oracle’s audit team to pre-inspect your environment under the guise of assistance.

This conflict of interest means that the SAM partner’s primary loyalty is to Oracle’s licensing rules and revenue goals, rather than to your organization’s bottom line.

Example: If your organization has been leveraging a contractual gray area to save on licenses (for instance, using certain virtualization configurations or not counting some test installations), a verified partner is obligated to follow Oracle’s strict policies.

They will flag any non-compliance according to Oracle’s standards, even if those standards aren’t part of your contract.

You lose the benefit of an impartial advisor who might have advocated for your interpretation or found creative compliance solutions.

Takeaway: With the Oracle Verified SAM Program, you’re effectively handing Oracle a detailed map of your software usage.

An independent SAM advisor, by contrast, works for you – helping you identify and resolve compliance issues internally without automatically escalating everything to the vendor.

2. The “No Audit” Promise Is Short-Lived

Oracle often touts an audit reprieve as a benefit of the verified program – implying you won’t face formal audits while participating.

In reality, this no-audit promise is limited and conditional. Typically, Oracle agrees not to audit you during the active assessment period (often around 90 days to a year), and only for certain product categories.

After that period, all bets are off. Oracle can use the collected data to initiate a formal audit or force a true-up if it believes issues persist.

Moreover, the audit waiver isn’t automatic or guaranteed – it requires Oracle’s approval each cycle and applies only to specific Oracle product families (e.g,. Database, Middleware, E-Business Suite).

Notably, areas such as Java or cloud services are not covered, meaning you could still be audited for these even while in the program. This partial coverage gives a false sense of security. You might avoid one audit in the short term.

Still, you’re essentially on a timer: once the agreed period ends (usually 12 months, unless you renew the engagement), Oracle regains full audit rights – now armed with all the detailed deployment data you provided.

Bottom line: The Verified SAM Program delays the audit, not eliminates it.

You remain under Oracle’s watch, and if any compliance gaps aren’t fully resolved to Oracle’s satisfaction, you could be facing an audit or pressured purchase soon after the “honeymoon” period.

3. Exposure of Costly Compliance Traps (Java, VMware & More)

A major risk of inviting Oracle’s verified review is shining a spotlight on the most expensive licensing traps in your IT environment.

Oracle’s SAM partners are trained to uncover scenarios that commonly lead to hefty license fees, such as:

• Unlicensed Java installations – e.g,. developers or end-users running Oracle Java SE without a paid subscription.
• Oracle databases on VMware or other virtual platforms – Oracle’s hardline policy can require licensing all physical hosts in a cluster, a hugely expensive surprise.
• Activated but unlicensed options or packs – like Oracle Database Partitioning, RAC, or Security features turned on without proper licenses.
• Stale or temporary deployments – even if you ran an Oracle product briefly (for a migration, test, or by accident), it’s contractually considered usage that requires a license.

By participating in the program, these issues will be definitively documented and reported to Oracle. There’s no buffer or benefit of the doubt.

For instance, if your team innocently installed Java on 1,000 machines, the verified report will list it, and Oracle can insist you purchase subscriptions or a Java license agreement for those installations.

Or suppose you’ve been using Oracle on VMware in a contained way. In that case, the review will apply Oracle’s broad licensing policy, potentially tagging an entire data center’s worth of processors as non-compliant.

Why it matters: Many of these gaps are avoidable or manageable on your terms.

An independent review could help you remove or remediate them discreetly (e.g., uninstalling unused Java, correcting virtualization configurations, disabling unneeded features) before Oracle becomes aware of the issue.

In the Oracle Verified SAM Program, by contrast, you’re effectively volunteering any hidden compliance liabilities, and each one is a revenue opportunity for Oracle.

4. Double Payment: You Fund the Audit and the True-Up

Participating in the Oracle Verified SAM Program can hit your budget twice. First, there’s the cost of the program itself. Enterprises typically must invest in annual baseline assessments conducted by an Oracle-verified partner.

These are not free services – you’ll pay consulting fees or subscription costs for the SAM partner to gather and analyze your deployment data every year. Over time, those fees add up (think in terms of yearly audits on demand).

Then comes the second hit: the cost of compliance gaps the assessment uncovers. Unlike a traditional audit, where Oracle bears the cost of discovery, here you’ve paid to expose your shortcomings.

If the report finds you need 100 extra licenses, you’ll be expected to purchase them – possibly at Oracle’s list price or a modest discount – to “remediate” the findings. You may also owe back support for those licenses dating back to their first use.

In cases of Java findings, Oracle may pressure you into a Java ULA (Unlimited License Agreement) with a high upfront price tag based on their metrics. If databases are unlicensed, you’ll need to purchase those licenses retroactively.

In short, the program often leads to unplanned spending that exceeds any fees paid for the assessment. It’s not unusual for a verified SAM engagement to conclude with a seven-figure purchasing recommendation.

Oracle’s strategy is clear: you effectively finance the evidence collection and then pay again for the licenses to cure the non-compliance.

To illustrate some typical outcomes, here’s what enterprises often face after a verified SAM review:

As the table shows, the findings from the SAM engagement directly translate into new purchase requirements.

Any “savings” from avoiding a formal audit fee or penalty are offset by the direct revenue Oracle gains through compliance remediation. You pay the partner to generate the report and pay Oracle to address the report.

5. Surrendering Negotiation Leverage

One of the less obvious drawbacks of sharing your Effective License Position (ELP) with Oracle is the loss of bargaining power.

In a normal situation, if you discover you are under-licensed, you have some strategic choices: you might delay approaching Oracle until you can budget for it, you might only reveal part of your needs, or negotiate a bundle deal during Oracle’s end-of-quarter sales rush.

Once Oracle has your detailed ELP from the Verified SAM Program, they know exactly what you need and how badly you need it – eliminating any information asymmetry that could have benefited you.

For example, suppose your annual self-assessment (under the program) shows you’re short 50 database licenses. In that case, Oracle’s sales team can proactively reach out with a quote before you even ask, likely at a lukewarm discount.

They’re aware you must resolve the shortfall and that you’re effectively committed to staying compliant.

Historically, enterprises that kept Oracle at arm’s length in negotiations often secured better discounts (sometimes dramatically better) by creating competitive tension or timing purchases strategically.

That advantage disappears when Oracle has a continuous window into your usage and compliance gaps.

Additionally, being in the program means Oracle knows you’re dedicated to full compliance (you’ve opted in to be monitored), which may make them less inclined to offer concessions.

The pressure of Oracle’s timeline further weakens your negotiation leverage.

If an Oracle account manager needs to hit a quarterly quota, they can use your latest SAM report to push for a quick sale (“we see you’re out of compliance in these areas, let’s get that sorted now”).

This dynamic puts your organization at a disadvantage, often resulting in rushed, vendor-favorable deals.

6. Continuous Oracle Oversight Limits Flexibility

Joining the Oracle Verified SAM Program isn’t a one-time cleanup – it’s an ongoing relationship of oversight that can constrain how you manage your IT assets.

You’ll be committing to annual or periodic compliance checks dictated by Oracle’s framework.

With Oracle effectively looking over your shoulder year-round, your ability to make flexible licensing decisions diminishes.

Organizations often employ pragmatic tactics to optimize costs, such as quietly sunsetting underutilized systems, holding off on licensing certain disaster recovery environments until they are needed, or utilizing third-party support for legacy versions. Under the verified program, such moves could be frowned upon or reported.

Oracle’s involvement means you are expected to adhere strictly to their licensing practices (even those “policies” not explicitly written in your contracts).

For instance, if Oracle’s policy says you must license all processors in a cloud cluster for a database, the SAM partner will enforce that stance in your environment even if your contract is silent on it. You lose the flexibility to interpret ambiguous terms in your favor.

It’s essentially a trade-off: in exchange for the promise of fewer audits, you accept Oracle’s continuous audit-like scrutiny.

The confidentiality agreement in the program is a three-way agreement (you, the partner, and Oracle), enabling the open exchange of information. This can feel like being perpetually audited, just without the formal “audit” label.

Your ITAM team may spend significant effort preparing reports for Oracle every year rather than innovating license optimizations.

Any time you make an infrastructure change, you’ll need to consider how and when it will be disclosed to Oracle.

Finally, being under Oracle’s watch can discourage cost-saving initiatives, such as reducing support contracts.

For example, if the SAM process reveals you have 500 licenses but only actively use 300, an independent strategy might be to terminate support on the 200 shelfware licenses to save money. Oracle, however, would prefer that you keep everything fully supported (for revenue preservation).

In the verified program, there will be implicit pressure to remain fully licensed and supported across the board.

In short, the program shifts control of your asset management strategy to Oracle, limiting your freedom to make cost-driven decisions.

Recommendations (Expert Tips)

• Perform Independent License Audits: Regularly audit your Oracle deployments using internal teams or truly independent consultants. Identify and address compliance gaps on your terms, before Oracle does.
• Strengthen Internal SAM Processes: Invest in Your Own Software Asset Management Capabilities. Maintain accurate records of Oracle entitlements and usage, and train staff on Oracle’s complex licensing rules to avoid accidental shortfalls.
• Be Cautious with Vendor Programs: If Oracle or any vendor offers a “free” or “friendly” compliance review, approach with skepticism. Always ask what data will be shared and how it might be used. You are never obligated to volunteer for such programs.
• Address High-Risk Areas Proactively: Tackle the known trouble spots – e.g., replace unauthorized Java installs with approved open-source versions, review virtualization deployments against contractual terms, and disable any database options you aren’t licensed for. Proactive remediation removes the bait that Oracle’s SAM program would latch onto.
• Leverage Third-Party Advisory: Consider hiring an independent Oracle license management firm (one not verified by Oracle) to help optimize your licenses. They can offer guidance aligned with your interests – like negotiating better deals or finding technical ways to reduce license needs – without reporting you to Oracle.
• Plan Negotiations Strategically: If you discover you need additional Oracle licenses, plan the timing and scope of your approach to Oracle. Bundle where possible and seek competitive bids (for example, consider alternatives such as cloud services or different vendors to enhance your leverage when negotiating with Oracle).
• Stay Informed on Policy vs. Contract: Keep abreast of Oracle’s public licensing policies (partitioning, licensing in cloud, etc.), but also know that those are often not in your contract. Resist any pressure to blindly conform to non-contractual policies; use legal counsel or licensing experts to assert your contractual rights.
• Escalate Concerns to Leadership: Make sure CIOs and procurement leaders understand the implications of the Verified SAM Program. Often, high-level executives see “Oracle-approved compliance help” and assume it’s benign. Present these key reasons and risks so that informed decisions are made at the top.

Checklist: 5 Actions to Take

1. Decline the Invite (or Pause): If approached about joining the Oracle Verified SAM Program, do not commit immediately. Communicate that you need to review the terms and implications. It’s okay to say “no, thanks” – there’s no contractual requirement to join.
2. Conduct a Self-Assessment: Initiate an internal review of Oracle licenses. Gather your entitlements and deployments to build your Effective License Position. This internal ELP should remain internal – use it to quietly pinpoint any compliance gaps.
3. Consult an Independent Expert: Engage a third-party Oracle licensing specialist (one not tied to Oracle) to validate your findings and advise on remediation. Their expertise can help you resolve issues in a way that minimizes costs (for example, by terminating unused licenses or identifying license-efficient architectures).
4. Remediate on Your Terms: For any compliance issues identified, execute a plan to resolve them before Oracle’s involvement. This may involve uninstalling software, reallocating licenses from unused areas, or purchasing necessary licenses in a planned and negotiated manner. Aim to resolve high-risk gaps (like unlicensed Java or virtualization issues) proactively.
5. Monitor and Repeat: Make Oracle license compliance an ongoing part of your ITAM program without Oracle’s direct oversight. Schedule periodic internal audits (e.g., every 6 or 12 months) to ensure new projects or changes remain in compliance. Keep leadership informed of your Oracle license position and any emerging risk that may affect its. By staying on top of it internally, you reduce the temptation or need to ever let Oracle’s SAM program in.

FAQs

Q1: What is Oracle’s Verified SAM Program, in simple terms?
A: It’s an Oracle-sponsored Software Asset Management initiative where selected Oracle-approved partners review your Oracle license usage and report the findings to Oracle. The idea is that if you agree to regular compliance checks and share data, Oracle may grant you a reprieve from audits for those products. Think of it as a vendor-run license audit with a friendly label.

Q2: Does joining the program mean Oracle will never audit us?
A: Not exactly. Oracle typically agrees not to audit you during the period you’re in the program (for the specific products covered, and as long as you comply with the process). However, this “audit immunity” is conditional – it usually lasts around a year at a time and must be renewed. After that, or if Oracle finds major issues, they can audit you like any other customer. Also, any Oracle products not covered by the program (for example, Java or certain cloud services) remain subject to standard audits.

Q3: Why would a program designed to improve compliance end up costing us more?
A: Because the program’s primary aim is to identify any license shortfalls in your environment – and then have you remediate them (often through purchases). While it’s pitched as helping you stay compliant, it’s also a revenue opportunity for Oracle. You pay for the partner’s assessment, and if they find gaps, you’re expected to spend on licenses or subscriptions to fill those gaps immediately. In contrast, outside the program, you may have more flexibility to negotiate timing, bundle purchases, or even avoid buying licenses by reallocating existing ones.

Q4: How is using an independent SAM advisor different from Oracle’s verified partner?
A: An independent software asset management advisor or licensing consultant works for you, not Oracle. They keep your data confidential and focus on minimizing your costs and risks. They can help interpret Oracle’s contracts to your advantage, suggest architectural changes to reduce licensing, and only involve Oracle when necessary (for example, when you decide to purchase licenses under optimal conditions). In the Oracle Verified Program, the partner must follow Oracle’s rules strictly and share all findings with Oracle, which means you lose that independent advocacy.

Q5: What’s the best way to stay compliant with Oracle without joining this program?
A: The best approach is to cultivate strong internal license management practices. Keep an up-to-date inventory of Oracle deployments, train your IT teams on license use policies (to prevent accidental usage of unlicensed features or products), and do periodic internal reviews. If necessary, utilize reputable SAM tools or engage outside experts to validate your compliance. When you do find a shortfall, address it proactively – either by correcting the usage or by planning a purchase with negotiation. By managing compliance continuously on your schedule, you can avoid the “gotcha” scenarios of audits while maintaining control over how and when to involve Oracle.

Read more about our Oracle License Management Services.

Do you want to know more about our Oracle Advisory Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit