CIO Playbook: Navigating Microsoft’s Shift to CSP and NCE Licensing

Introduction

Microsoft’s licensing landscape is undergoing a major transformation. Traditional agreements, such as the Enterprise Agreement (EA) and the Open License program, are no longer the only, or default, options for organizations.

Instead, Microsoft is steering customers toward the Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) program and a unified New Commerce Experience (NCE) for cloud subscriptions.

These changes promise simplified purchasing and more flexibility in some ways, but they also introduce new cost structures and planning considerations.

As a CIO or IT Licensing Manager, it’s critical to understand what these changes mean. This playbook — in the style of a senior Microsoft licensing advisor — will help you navigate CSP and NCE, compare them to legacy models (like EA and the newer Microsoft Customer Agreement), and plan proactively.

We’ll cover what CSP and NCE are, how the new subscription options work (monthly, annual, and 3-year terms), how pricing is affected (including a new 5% premium in 2025), and how to optimize costs under the new model. Clear guidance is provided on choosing the right licensing program for your needs, along with a practical renewal timeline and checklist to minimize cost exposure.

(Think of this as a Gartner-like report: structured, comprehensive, and actionable. Key points are organized with bold headings, bullet lists, tables, and examples for easy scanning.)

CSP and the New Commerce Experience (NCE)

Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) Program: CSP is Microsoft’s partner-led licensing program for cloud services. Instead of buying licenses directly from Microsoft under a large agreement, organizations purchase them through a qualified CSP partner, such as a reseller or provider. The CSP program was designed to offer flexibility and a streamlined purchasing experience, particularly for cloud subscriptions such as Microsoft 365, Azure, and Dynamics 365.

Under CSP, you typically have an “evergreen” arrangement – you can add or remove licenses as needed and be billed monthly for what you use. There is no minimum seat requirement to buy via CSP (even a very small business can use it), which makes it popular for small and mid-size organizations that don’t meet EA’s minimums.

Over the last few years, Microsoft has positioned CSP as the primary channel for cloud license procurement, effectively modernizing how customers of all sizes buy software. This shift means that many organizations approaching an EA renewal or coming from retired programs (e.g., Open License) are being offered CSP-based options instead. In summary, CSP is a partner-facilitated, subscription-centric model that emphasizes flexibility and cloud alignment.

New Commerce Experience (NCE): The NCE is Microsoft’s new licensing commerce platform and model, introduced to standardize how subscriptions are sold and managed across all channels, including CSP and direct.

Rolled out for Microsoft’s seat-based offers in 2022, NCE changed some of the fundamental rules of CSP subscriptions. Under the legacy CSP model, customers could often reduce seat counts or cancel subscriptions at any time, with billing prorated daily. NCE, however, introduced defined term commitments and a stricter cancellation policy to align with Microsoft’s broader commerce system. The goal of NCE is to simplify and unify the purchasing process for cloud products, whether you buy them through a partner or directly from Microsoft, while also offering customers cost incentives for longer commitments.

In effect, NCE brings CSP more in line with the EA in terms of offering price predictability for longer terms versus a premium for month-to-month flexibility. NCE is now the standard for CSP transactions and also applies to Microsoft’s direct web purchases under the Microsoft Customer Agreement, meaning the rules and pricing structures are consistent regardless of the channel.

How CSP/NCE Differs from Previous Models:

• Legacy CSP vs. NCE: In the pre-NCE world, CSP agreements were very flexible – a partner could “suspend” or reduce a subscription at any time, and billing would stop (licenses could be dropped mid-term with proration). Under NCE, if you commit to an annual term, you cannot reduce the seat count or cancel mid-term outside a short initial window. This is a significant change: NCE only allows cancellations or seat reductions within the first 7 days of a new term; after that, you’re locked in for the remainder. So while CSP still offers flexibility through short-term options (more on those below), the introduction of NCE means organizations must plan license quantities more carefully than before to avoid paying for unused licenses. On the positive side, NCE introduced new term options (such as 3-year subscriptions) and billing choices that weren’t previously available in CSP, and it standardized invoicing and renewal dates for consistency.
• Enterprise Agreement vs. CSP/NCE: A traditional EA is a 3-year contractual agreement directly with Microsoft, usually assisted by a Licensing Solution Provider as a middleman. It typically requires a commitment to a certain number of licenses (or a monetary commitment for Azure) with penalties if you drop below that level. In exchange, EA customers get volume discounts and price protection for the term. By contrast, CSP with NCE is subscription-based rather than contract-based – you subscribe to what you need, and each subscription can be renewed or adjusted at its anniversary. There is no organization-wide commitment or financial penalty for not renewing a subscription, aside from losing that service. CSP is available to customers of any size (no minimum seat count), whereas EAs typically have a minimum user or device count (traditionally around 500 seats for commercial organizations). We will compare these in detail later, but in short: EA is about large-scale commitment and discounted pricing; CSP/NCE is about flexibility and incremental buying, but often at list price (unless your partner gives a discount).
• Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA): The MCA is not so much a “program” as a general purchasing contract that every customer must accept when buying modern Microsoft services. It has come to represent Microsoft’s newer transactional approach: instead of time-limited contracts, the MCA is an evergreen agreement under which you can buy subscriptions as needed. If you purchase through CSP, you sign an MCA (with your partner facilitating), which covers those purchases. If you purchase directly from Microsoft (e.g., via the web or a Microsoft sales rep without an EA), you also operate under the MCA. The key shift is that Microsoft is moving away from bespoke agreements and toward a standard Master Customer Agreement (MCA) for all customers. In practical terms, an organization moving off an EA might be offered a transition to an MCA-based purchasing model, which could mean buying via a CSP partner (often referred to as the “breadth motion”) or, for very large customers, buying directly from Microsoft under the MCA (“enterprise motion”). We will include MCA in our comparisons, but note that MCA and CSP are closely intertwined. For mid-sized customers, MCA usually means buying through a CSP partner anyway, while for very large ones, it may mean a direct relationship without an LSP.

NCE Licensing Options: Subscription Terms and Pricing

Under the New Commerce Experience, Microsoft introduced three main subscription term options for cloud licenses, each with different flexibility and cost implications. It’s crucial to understand these, as they form the basis of cost planning under CSP/NCE:

• Monthly Term (Month-to-Month Subscription): This option offers maximum flexibility. You commit to the license for only one month at a time. At the end of the month, you can choose to renew for another month, cancel, or reduce the quantity. The trade-off is cost: monthly-term subscriptions are priced approximately 20% higher than the equivalent annual-term price. This premium is Microsoft’s way of charging for the flexibility of not locking into a longer term. For example, if a Microsoft 365 E3 license costs $20 per user per month on an annual plan, the monthly-term price might be around $24 per user per month for the same product. Organizations use monthly subscriptions for temporary or uncertain needs – for example, a project-based team that only needs licenses for 2-3 months, or a business that wants the option to quickly downsize licenses if needed. With a monthly subscription, you have the freedom to adjust every month without penalty. (Important: Month-to-month subscriptions will automatically renew each month unless canceled, so you still must actively cancel to stop billing.)
• Annual Term (12-Month Subscription): This is the standard subscription commitment in NCE. You commit to keep and pay for the license for a full year. In return, you get better pricing – the annual term is considered the “base” price, with no 20% premium. Annual term subscriptions give you a price lock-in for 12 months on that license. Even if Microsoft raises prices during the year, your rate for that subscription remains as initially purchased until renewal. You can choose to pay upfront for the whole year or be billed month-by-month for the annual term. However, starting in 2025, a significant change will take effect: Microsoft has announced that annual subscriptions paid monthly will incur an additional 5% premium compared to paying annually upfront. This means if you opt for the convenience of monthly billing on an annual-term commitment, you’ll pay slightly more overall (essentially a financing charge). Aside from that, annual subscriptions are the most cost-effective per-unit option for licenses you know you’ll need all year. The downside is reduced flexibility: once you purchase an annual term license, you can’t decrease the quantity or cancel it until the 12 months are over (barring that 7-day cancellation window at the start). You can increase quantities mid-term (e.g., add more users, which would co-terminate with the original term end date and usually be charged pro-rata), but you can’t scale down until renewal. An annual term is ideal for steady-state needs – e.g., your full-time employee base that is unlikely to change during the year.
• Multi-Year Term (36-Month Subscription): NCE also introduced the option for a 3-year commitment on select products. This 36-month term is currently available mostly for certain Dynamics 365 offerings and a few other specialized subscriptions. (Most Microsoft 365 plans do not yet offer a 3-year term via CSP, except possibly some special cases or future additions.) A 3-year term locks your pricing for the entire 36 months, protecting you from any price increases during that period. Payment for a 3-year subscription can typically be made either fully upfront or on an annual schedule. Monthly payments are usually not offered for 3-year terms, and, as noted in Microsoft’s announcements, if monthly billing were available, it would carry a similar 5% surcharge per year. The benefit of a 3-year term is maximum price predictability – useful if you anticipate that Microsoft will raise prices on a product, but you know your usage will remain constant. For example, some organizations locked in a 3-year term on Dynamics licenses to avoid yearly price hikes. The drawback, of course, is the commitment: you are bound for three years to those licenses, with no ability to reduce quantities after the initial 7-day period. It’s a long time in a fast-changing business environment, so this option is generally only recommended for core, unchanging needs. It’s often only recommended if there’s a compelling pricing reason, as renewing annually provides more flexibility to adjust each year.

2025 Pricing Change – 5% Premium on Monthly-Billed Annual Plans: Starting April 1, 2025, Microsoft is standardizing pricing across purchase channels to incentivize upfront billing. If you choose an annual commitment but opt to pay monthly (spreading the payments), the total cost will be approximately 5% higher than if you paid the full year upfront.

In practice, this means organizations have three broad choices for a given product:

1. Month-to-month term – about 20% price premium, but complete flexibility to cancel any month.
2. Annual term, paid upfront – base price (lowest cost, highest commitment).
3. Annual term, paid monthly – base price + ~5%.

To illustrate, suppose the base price for a license is $100 per year if paid upfront. If you want to keep it annual but pay monthly, it may cost around $105 per year (billed as roughly $8.75 per month instead of approximately $8.33 per month).

If you go through a month-to-month term, it would cost about $120 per year, equivalent (if kept all year). So the new 5% premium is relatively small, but it’s something to account for in budgets – essentially a convenience fee for not paying a lump sum. Microsoft introduced this to align with the fact that billing monthly creates more administrative overhead and risk for them. They are encouraging customers to either commit and pay upfront or, if they need monthly flexibility, to pay a bit more for that convenience.

Key Policies to Note: Under NCE, all subscriptions auto-renew with the same term and quantity unless you take action at renewal time. You have a brief window at the start of a term (7 days for commercial customers) to cancel or reduce your plan without penalty.

After that, you are locked in. This means planning is critical: if you realize two months into an annual subscription that you bought too many licenses, you generally cannot drop them until renewal. Likewise, if a project is canceled mid-year, you might be stuck holding those licenses.

You could repurpose them for other users, but you usually can’t get a refund. However, you can always add more licenses during a term or upgrade to a higher SKU. Any additions co-term with the same renewal date and are charged pro rata for the remainder of the term. The ability to mix different term subscriptions (e.g., some users on monthly, some on annual) gives flexibility – you’re not forced to put all licenses on the same schedule. We’ll discuss strategies to leverage that mix for cost optimization next.

CSP/NCE vs. Enterprise Agreement vs. Microsoft Customer Agreement – A Comparison

Choosing the right licensing vehicle requires weighing several factors. Below is a decision matrix comparing CSP/NCE, Enterprise Agreement (EA), and the Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA) across key dimensions that matter to CIOs and IT managers:

Choosing Between EA, CSP/NCE, and MCA: For mid-sized organizations (250–3,000 seats), the decision often boils down to EA vs. CSP. An EA might still make sense on the higher end of that range (or above) if you can leverage significant discounts and you’re comfortable committing to three years of roughly the same license volume. CSP (under MCA) is typically favored by organizations that value flexibility, have fluctuating needs, or fall below the EA size threshold.

Microsoft’s strategy is nudging many customers toward CSP/NCE unless they are truly large-scale. Additionally, some organizations adopt a hybrid approach: they retain an EA for certain products or a portion of their estate (to obtain discounts on core, stable licenses) and use CSP for other needs, such as smaller subsidiaries or new projects that weren’t included in the EA. This can be administratively complex, but it’s an option that allows you to capture the best of both worlds.

In any case, CIOs should assess their priorities. If cost per license and a direct relationship with Microsoft are most important, and you have the size to negotiate, EA is a good option. If agility, simplicity, and pay-as-you-go are higher priorities (or you’re not large enough to get meaningful EA discounts), then CSP/NCE is likely the better fit.

The Microsoft Customer Agreement is essentially the umbrella you’ll be under either way (EA uses a different contractual structure; CSP uses the MCA).

One thing to note: being under an MCA (especially direct) can require more self-reliance in licensing expertise, since you won’t have Microsoft’s contract specialists or an LSP guiding you as in an EA. Some mid-sized companies engage third-party licensing advisors to fill that gap when moving to CSP/MCA, ensuring they remain compliant and optimized.

Cost Optimization Strategies Under the New Model (CSP/NCE)

For organizations in the 250–3,000 seat range, controlling costs while adopting the CSP/NCE model is a top concern.

Below are several strategies to optimize your licensing spend under these new rules, with illustrative examples for clarity:

• Mix and Match License Terms for Flexibility vs. Cost: You do not have to put all users on the same term commitment. A smart approach is to commit the stable core of your workforce to annual licenses (to get the lower base price) and keep a portion of licenses on a monthly term for those users or situations that are variable. For example, imagine a company with 1,000 users, about 200 of whom are contractors or project-based staff who join and leave throughout the year. The organization could purchase 800 licenses on an annual term, ensuring that the bulk of their users are covered at a lower cost, and reserve 200 licenses for a month-to-month basis for the contractor pool. Those 200 monthly licenses cost around 20% more each month, but the company only pays for them in the months when they actually have contractors on board. If a project ends and 100 contractors leave, the company can drop those 100 monthly licenses the next month, avoiding further costs. Illustrative example: Suppose a yearly license (annual term) is $120, and the monthly term equivalent is $12 per month (which is 20% higher if annual is $10/month). For 100 users, an annual license would cost $12,000 per year. If those 100 users only need licenses for 6 months, using monthly terms would cost 100 users * $12 * 6 months = $7,200, versus $12,000 if they had been purchased on an annual basis and then gone unused for half the year. Even though the monthly rate is higher, the ability to drop it when not needed generates substantial savings. The key is to identify the minimum number of seats you will need throughout the year, versus those that are likely to be idle in some months, and allocate your licensing accordingly. This mixing strategy ensures you’re not paying a year-long commitment for users who might not be around all year, thereby optimizing cost while still taking advantage of lower rates for your permanent staff.
• Plan Around Microsoft’s Pricing Announcements: Microsoft occasionally announces price increases for certain products or introduces new premiums, such as the 5% monthly billing surcharge in 2025 or the Microsoft 365 price increases in March 2022. Keep an eye on these announcements and time your commitments strategically. For instance, if you know that on April 1, 2025, a new 5% premium or a product price hike will kick in, you could try to renew or extend your subscriptions before that date to lock in the current pricing. In CSP/NCE, if your renewal is due shortly after a scheduled increase, consider renewing a little earlier (if your partner allows adjusting the renewal date) or even switching from a monthly subscription to an annual subscription just before the increase. Another scenario: Microsoft often aligns price changes or incentives with its fiscal year (which starts in July) or calendar year. If you’re on a monthly term today but see that prices will rise in two months, moving to an annual term a month before saves you from that increase for a year. Essentially, treat Microsoft’s roadmap like a commodity price – lock in rates when they’re favorable, if you’re confident you’ll need the product for a long time. On the flip side, if Microsoft introduces a temporary promotion (as they did when NCE launched, offering discounts that offset the 20% premium for a few months), seize those opportunities – e.g., commit to a longer term during a promotional discount window to bank savings.
• Leverage Multi-Year Commitments Selectively: If your organization uses a product that is both mission-critical and expected to remain at a fixed or growing capacity for the long term, consider a 3-year NCE term (where available) to lock the price. Multi-year commitments can act as a hedge against future price increases. For example, some Dynamics 365 customers have used 3-year terms to avoid annual price escalations on their CRM or ERP licenses. Be cautious, however: only do this for products and user counts you are quite certain about. You don’t want to be stuck over-provisioned in year 2 of a 3-year term. A practical approach is to perhaps slightly under-commit on a 3-year plan and leave some buffer on annual or monthly terms. For instance, if you have 500 users on a Dynamics module and you know at minimum 400 will use it long term but 100 may fluctuate, you might commit 400 on a 3-year (secure the long-term price) and keep 100 on an annual plan that you renew yearly, giving you the ability to reduce if needed for that portion. Multi-year contracts can also simplify budgeting, as you receive the same bill each year for three years. Keep in mind that if Microsoft is currently offering a 3-year option only for limited products, it may expand over time. Stay tuned for new multi-year offerings, especially for Microsoft 365, if they become available.
• Optimize License Usage and Avoid Idle Subscriptions: This sounds obvious, but under NCE’s new restrictions, it deserves emphasis. Regularly audit your license assignments and usage to ensure compliance. Ensure you’re not paying for licenses that aren’t being used. In a mid-size organization, it’s common to have some user turnover or role changes that leave licenses unassigned or underutilized. Under the old CSP model, you might have been able to remove those immediately; under NCE, if it’s an annual subscription, you might be stuck with it until renewal, but at least you can decide not to renew it. A good practice is to set a reminder a month or two before each subscription’s renewal date to review if you still need all those seats. If not, schedule a reduction or cancellation during the renewal period.
  Additionally, right-size user plans: for example, if you have users on Microsoft 365 E5 but they don’t use E5’s advanced features, downgrading some of them to E3 at renewal can save costs. The new model doesn’t directly change that kind of optimization (that’s more general licensing hygiene), but with NCE’s rigidity, the cost of mistakes is higher – once you lock in, you pay for it. So, Proactive Monitoring is a key cost control strategy.
• Negotiate Value with CSP Partners: While CSP doesn’t have built-in volume discounts from Microsoft, partners have flexibility in pricing. Mid-sized customers can often get a small discount or additional value from their CSP provider. For example, a partner might offer a 3-5% discount off Microsoft’s list prices if you move your business to them, or they might bundle in services (like enhanced support, training, or migration assistance) that would otherwise cost extra. Don’t hesitate to shop around for a CSP partner that offers the best overall value, which is not just the raw price, but also the support and expertise they provide. One partner might charge the full list price but proactively help you optimize your licenses every year (saving you money indirectly), whereas another might offer a slight discount but provide no advisory help. Since mid-size organizations often don’t have a dedicated internal licensing expert, a partner who can act as a licensing advisor is valuable. Also, if you are on the upper end of mid-size (say ~2,000+ seats) and leaning toward CSP, use your size as leverage – let partners know you are considering an EA vs CSP decision; they may sharpen their pencil on pricing to win your cloud business, knowing that at that scale your account is significant. While partners have thin margins on Microsoft subscriptions, some may have rebates or other incentives, and they might be willing to pass some of the savings or provide services to secure your account. Bottom line: treat CSP partner selection as a way to optimize cost and service – the CSP model allows competition, unlike an EA, where you’re essentially single-threaded with Microsoft.
• Co-term and Simplify Renewals: A subtle way to save costs (or at least reduce the risk of overspending) is to simplify the management of multiple subscription renewal dates. If you have dozens of different end dates, there’s a risk that something auto-renews without your scrutiny, possibly at a higher price or for more licenses than needed. Try to align new purchases with existing terms where feasible. Many CSP partners can adjust a new subscription to end on the same date as your main renewal, charging pro-rated amounts for the first shorter term. For example, if you add 50 new users in June but most of your licenses renew every December, you could request that those 50 be on an initial 6-month term (June–December) so that you can renew everything together in December. This way, you do a thorough review once a year of all licenses, rather than piecemeal throughout the year. A consolidated renewal cycle makes it easier to negotiate any changes in bulk and ensures you don’t miss the 7-day cancellation windows scattered across the calendar. It can also give you a single point in time to potentially negotiate pricing (if you’re large enough, a partner might consider a discount on a big annual renewal order, whereas if things are fragmented, each piece looks small).
• Consider EA “Light” or CSP Hybrid Approaches: If your organization is in a gray zone – say, around 500 to 1,000 seats – you might evaluate both Enterprise Agreements and CSP quotes to see which yields a better outcome. Microsoft has introduced the “Microsoft Customer Agreement – Enterprise” (MCA-E), which is essentially a new commerce model tailored for larger accounts, sometimes positioned as an alternative to EA. One strategy could be: use CSP for most day-to-day needs, but if you have certain large stable workloads (for example, a big block of Windows Server or SQL Server licenses or a consistent 3,000 Microsoft 365 E3 users), you might negotiate an EA for those to get a discount, and put more variable or smaller products in CSP. Be cautious with this approach because it complicates management, and you must meet any EA commitments. However, cost-wise, it might optimize if, for instance, the EA gives you a 15% discount on 3,000 users – that’s meaningful savings – while you keep perhaps another 500 seats in CSP that are variable. Over 3 years, you could save money compared to doing all 3,500 at full CSP price, yet still have flexibility on the 500. If you do this, ensure you have clear internal governance in place to determine which licenses are procured via EA vs. CSP, to avoid confusion or double-buying. This kind of hybrid licensing strategy should be periodically re-evaluated, as your user count grows or shrinks, the balance might tip one way or the other.

In summary, the new CSP/NCE model requires a more proactive approach to license management. Gone are the days of “set it and forget it” annual true-ups that could course-correct. Now, you need to make smart choices up front (mixing terms and timing commitments) and stay on top of subscription renewals.

The good news is that if done right, a mid-size organization can achieve very efficient licensing: you’ll pay for exactly what you need, scale down when you don’t, and avoid the scenario of being locked into too many licenses. The strategies above, especially mixing term lengths and carefully planning around price changes, are key tactics in the CIO playbook for this new era.

License Procurement Planning Guidance to Minimize Cost Exposure

To further drill down, here are specific procurement planning tips and best practices to keep your licensing costs in check under NCE:

• Lock in Rates When You Can (and Need To): If you have knowledge of an upcoming price increase or if Microsoft has announced that a certain discount or promotion will expire, consider making an early renewal or a longer-term commitment just before the change takes effect. For example, suppose Microsoft announces that the price of Microsoft 365 E3 will rise by 5% in three months. In that case, you might renew your annual subscriptions a bit early to take advantage of the current price, or even switch some month-to-month users to an annual plan now to benefit from the lower rate for the next year. NCE allows new subscriptions to be added at any time, so you could overlap a new annual subscription with your existing one if needed, then let the old one lapse. While you don’t want to over-buy, locking pricing is a key hedge. Similarly, if you foresee needing a certain product for 2 years or more and it offers a 3-year term option, evaluate the price security it provides versus the risk of commitment. This is essentially financial planning – for example, locking in your’ interest rate” now if you expect it to go up later.
• Use Annual Commitments for Steady-State Needs: As a general rule, licenses for full-time employees and long-term roles should be on annual (or multi-year) commitments. This ensures you get the best pricing for most of your users. It’s generally safe to assume that your core staff will need their productivity tools all year, so there’s little reason to pay 20% extra for them on monthly plans. By maximizing the share of licenses on annual terms or longer, you minimize premium costs. Just remember to right-size the quantity – if you have 1000 employees but know you typically have a few vacancies or turnover, you might not need exactly 1000 annual licenses; maybe you keep 950 on annual and 50 on monthly to handle the ebb and flow of hiring. But the takeaway is: minimize use of month-to-month where you have predictability. The ~20% premium accumulates quickly at scale.
• Reserve Monthly (Flexible) Licenses for Uncertain Demand: Identify areas where your license usage might fluctuate – project teams, interns, contractors, acquisitions, seasonal workers, etc. Those are prime candidates for monthly-term licenses. The cost is higher per month, but if you only need those licenses for part of the year or you need the safety valve to reduce on short notice, then the monthly premium is far cheaper than paying for a full year that goes unused. Another use for monthly terms is during a trial or pilot of a new service: you might not be sure a new product will be rolled out company-wide, so start with a monthly subscription for a few months while testing. Once you commit to it as a permanent solution, you can switch to an annual plan. This way, you avoid overcommitting and wasting your budget on something that might not work out. The key is to regularly review whether those “flex licenses” are still needed. If an uncertain situation becomes stable (e.g., contractors are hired on full-time or a pilot becomes production), then move those users to an annual plan at the next logical opportunity, so you stop incurring the 20% premium on them.
• Take Advantage of Multi-Year Price Protection (Judiciously): If your budgeting process values long-term cost predictability, consider using 3-year NCE terms for select subscriptions. For example, some organizations have tight budgets, where knowing the exact cost of a service for the next three years is worth committing. If you’re certain about a set of licenses (like a critical system used by a fixed number of users), locking them in for 3 years simplifies your financial planning and shields you from Microsoft’s incremental annual price adjustments (which historically happen every few years for major products). Again, be cautious: it’s better to slightly undercommit than overcommit for multi-year projects. You can always add more licenses later (at the then-current price, of course), but you generally can’t reduce.
• **Mind the Renewal Dates and Auto-Renewal:** Keep a calendar of all subscription renewal dates and set reminders well in advance. NCE subscriptions will auto-renew on the same term length if you do nothing, which is convenient but can also lead to “cost creep” if not monitored. For instance, if you had 50 monthly licenses and forgot to cancel them, they will keep renewing each month. Or, an annual subscription for 100 seats might auto-renew for another year, even if your organization only needs 80 seats now, resulting in 20 excess licenses for another year. To avoid this, use any available tools (such as your CSP partner’s management portal or a simple spreadsheet) to track when each subscription is due to renew. Plan a review of needs about 1 month before each renewal. Microsoft’s 7-day cancellation and adjustment window means you should ideally make decisions before the renewal is due, not after. Some partners allow you to “schedule changes” at renewal. For example, you can input a seat reduction ahead of time so that when the renewal occurs, it automatically renews at the lower count. Utilize those features when possible. Essentially, treat each renewal like a mini EA negotiation – an opportunity to adjust and optimize, rather than a rubber-stamp. This diligence will ensure you don’t unknowingly roll into another costly term for something you could have trimmed.
• Coordinate Licensing Plans with Financial Planning: The introduction of the 5% premium on monthly-billed annual plans highlights the need for collaboration with your Finance team. Decide if it makes sense for your organization to pay upfront annually for major subscriptions to save that 5%. For example, on a $120/year license, 5% is $6 – maybe trivial per user, but at 1000 users, that’s $6,000/year in essentially financing cost. Some organizations prefer predictable monthly expenses and might accept the 5% cost; others will want to save money by paying once a year. Work with Finance to plan for larger lump sum payments if you intend to avoid monthly billing surcharges. This might involve timing your purchase so it falls in a quarter where you have budget, or even pre-paying a bit early.
  On the other hand, if cash flow is a concern, you might opt to pay monthly and budget for that premium. The key is to make it a conscious decision rather than an accidental cost. Additionally, ensure Finance knows that if you’re moving from EA (which might have had annual payments or even spread payments) to CSP, the billing frequency and invoicing will change. Aligning everyone on the expected outflow of funds helps prevent surprises and ensures you capture savings opportunities.
• Evaluate Support and License Management Needs: Under CSP/MCA, especially if direct, you won’t have Microsoft’s traditional EA support agreements like Software Assurance benefits or a unified support contract requirement (note: Microsoft now requires Unified Support for some large customers outside EA, too, but that’s another topic). However, consider if you need additional support from your partner or Microsoft. Sometimes, organizations opt to buy a premium support package from the CSP partner or Microsoft’s Premier or Unified Support separately. While this is an added cost, a good support plan can indirectly save you money by reducing downtime or providing faster resolutions to issues. The reason it’s in a cost optimization discussion is that you should weigh the cost of support against the risk or cost of not having it. Don’t overpay for support you don’t need, but don’t underinvest if lacking support would jeopardize your operations. Finding the right balance is part of optimizing your overall spend on Microsoft.
• Stay Informed and Adapt: Microsoft licensing is notorious for its frequent updates. Stay up to date with partner blogs, Microsoft announcements, and licensing news. For example, if Microsoft introduces a new type of license or makes changes to a program (such as new à la carte add-ons or future “NCE 2.0” updates), be ready to evaluate them. Sometimes new licensing models or programs can save money, other times they might increase costs if not proactively managed. By staying informed, you can adapt your strategy. As a CIO, you might delegate this research to a licensing specialist or a trusted partner, but ensure someone is watching the roadmap. A recent case in point: Microsoft’s announcement of a 5% billing premium could have been missed if you weren’t following partner news. Missing that might lead you to incorrectly budget or not realize you could avoid the cost by altering your payment method. In summary, treat Microsoft licensing as an ongoing discipline, not a one-time procurement task. This mindset will help contain costs year over year.

Renewal Timeline Strategy and Checklist for CIOs

Successfully navigating these licensing changes requires planning. Below is a recommended renewal timeline for your Microsoft cloud licenses, followed by a practical checklist to ensure nothing falls through the cracks.

Adhering to a timeline like this can help avoid last-minute scrambles and costly oversights:

Renewal Planning Timeline:

1. 6–9 Months Before Renewal: Begin internal discussions about your upcoming Microsoft subscription renewals. This is the time to assess current usage and forecast future needs. Gather data on how many licenses are actually in use compared to the number purchased. Engage with business unit leaders about any anticipated changes, such as layoffs, hiring sprees, acquisitions, new projects, or technology updates that could impact license counts. If you are on an Enterprise Agreement ending in the next year, start evaluating whether you want to renew it or consider transitioning to CSP/NCE. This is also a good time to reach out to your current partner or Microsoft representative to get initial quotes or program information for planning. They can inform you of any upcoming program changes or promotions. Basically, at 6+ months out, you’re doing your homework and gathering intel to inform decisions. No final decisions needed yet, but you want a clear picture of where you stand and where you’ll be in the next term.
2. 3–4 Months Before Renewal: By now, you should have decided on your broad strategy (EA vs CSP, annual vs monthly mix, etc.) for the coming term. If you plan to switch licensing programs (for example, move from EA to CSP), you should formally engage with the necessary parties. For an EA renewal, this is when you enter negotiations with Microsoft and your LSP, discussing product selection, any changes in user counts, and seeking discount improvements or concessions. (Especially if you have competitive offers or are considering leaving the EA, this is your leverage point.) If you are moving to CSP, this is when you will finalize which CSP partner you will use (if you haven’t already) and receive their pricing proposal. Request quotes for different scenarios: e.g., all annual vs some monthly, 1-year vs 3-year (if applicable), EA vs CSP comparison if you’re undecided. You may also ask about any promotions or bundle opportunities (sometimes partners or Microsoft offer promotions for moving to CSP or adopting new products that can offset costs). Internally, you should be narrowing down the exact products and quantities you’ll need. Consider hosting a meeting with IT, finance, and procurement stakeholders to review the plan. Ensure everyone is aligned on budget implications, especially if you plan to switch from monthly billing to annual billing – flag that cash flow change now. At the 3-month mark, give leadership a heads-up if any significant changes are planned (such as committing to a multi-year contract or switching providers) so there are no surprises later.
3. 1–2 Months Before Renewal: Now it’s time for execution and final adjustments. If you’re renewing an EA, around 1-2 months before the renewal date, you should have the final terms and pricing negotiated; you’ll then prepare the paperwork for signature. Double-check that the contract reflects what you expect, including correct quantities, pricing tiers, and any special terms promised. For CSP/NCE, this is when you’d work with your partner to schedule any changes in the portal. For example, if you plan to reduce 50 seats of a certain subscription at renewal, your partner can put in a future-dated change to make that effective on the renewal date. If you are adding new subscriptions or changing term lengths, coordinate those changes. Ensure that any monthly licenses you intend to cancel are queued to cancel at the end of their last needed month. It’s a good idea to ask for a pro forma or preview invoice from your partner for the post-renewal state, so you can verify that the monthly charges match your expectations. Internally, this is the time to secure financial approval for the renewal. Have all necessary sign-offs from finance and management for the spending, whether it’s signing the EA or the first CSP invoice of the new term. If moving from EA to CSP, also plan the logistics. EA will end on a specific date, and CSP subscriptions should ideally start immediately after to avoid service interruption. Coordinate with Microsoft or your partner to ensure a seamless transition with no gap in service. Also, ensure that all legal reviews of terms have been completed by now. The MCA is a standard agreement, but if you’re new to it, consider having a legal review of the terms. EA requires a legal review of any non-standard terms negotiated. Essentially, by 1 month out, you want zero ambiguity: you know what you’re going to have, and you’re ready to execute the plan.
4. Renewal Date (Day 0 of New Term): Whether it’s signing day for an EA or the date your CSP subscriptions renew, ensure you verify everything on this day. For CSP, verify that the new term lengths and seat counts have taken effect correctly in the admin portal. It’s not uncommon for minor errors, such as a requested change not being applied, to be caught within the first 7 days. This means you can still fix it. For an EA, ensure you’ve countersigned copies of the agreement and that Microsoft has provisioned any services/new licenses accordingly. Do a quick audit: did we get what we paid for? This might include verifying that any new license keys or entitlements (for on-prem software via EA) are accessible, or that your Microsoft 365 tenant reflects the new subscription terms. Since CSP auto-renewal is automatic, if you’ve done everything right, there may be nothing to “sign” on renewal day, but you still want to confirm that the bill of materials is as expected.
5. 1–2 Months After Renewal: This is an often-overlooked but important step. Review your first or second invoice of the new term carefully. Ensure the charges align with what was negotiated or planned. Any discrepancies, such as being overbilled for the wrong seat count or a discount not being applied, should be reported immediately to your partner or the Microsoft account team. It’s easier to fix issues retroactively if caught early. Also, if you moved to a new model (say from EA to CSP), gather feedback from your team on how the new process is working. Did the CSP partner deliver on expectations in the first month? Are there any administrative hurdles? Address those sooner rather than later. You might also take this time to document any lessons learned from the renewal cycle while it’s fresh – what would you do differently next year, what worked well, etc., and update your internal playbook accordingly.

Practical Planning Checklist: (Use this checklist as a quick reference to ensure you have all bases covered in your licensing strategy and renewal preparation.)

• ✅ Understand Your License Inventory: Maintain an up-to-date inventory of all your Microsoft licenses, including the following details: products, number of seats, term (monthly or annual), and next renewal date. This should include noting any licenses purchased through different channels, such as if you have both an EA and CSP. Having a clear inventory is the foundation for all planning and cost optimization.
• ✅ Monitor Usage and Needs: Implement a regular process (quarterly or biannually) to review license usage. Get reports on active users for each service. If using Microsoft 365, for example, check the admin center reports for inactive users or unassigned licenses. This practice will highlight where you can reduce counts or where you might need to reallocate licenses. Keep track of business events, such as a department downsizing or expanding, that may warrant a licensing adjustment at the next renewal.
• ✅ Stay Educated on Licensing Changes: Assign someone on your team (or your partner) to monitor Microsoft licensing news. This includes pricing updates, new product bundles, and changes to our programs. For example, announcements via the Microsoft partner center, blogs, or webinars can alert you to things like the new 5% premium or an upcoming retirement of a program. By knowing these well in advance, you can incorporate them into your planning rather than reacting at the last minute.
• ✅ Engage with a Trusted Partner or Advisor: If you operate under CSP, ensure your partner is proactive and knowledgeable. They should inform you of changes, help you optimize, and provide clear billing. If you feel that your partner is not providing enough value (e.g., they just resell with no guidance), don’t hesitate to evaluate other partners – you want one that acts as an advisor, not just a seller. If you are not using a partner (MCA direct), consider having an in-house licensing expert or contracting a licensing consultant for periodic reviews. The cost of a good advisor can be far less than the cost of a suboptimal licensing strategy.
• ✅ Align Licensing Strategy with IT Roadmap: Coordinate with your IT architects and application owners about plans. Are you planning to roll out a new Dynamics 365 module next year? Are you considering replacing a Microsoft solution with a third-party one, which may reduce the need for certain licenses? Such insights are crucial. For instance, if you know you might drop Exchange Online in favor of a third-party service, you wouldn’t want to commit those users to 3-year licenses of Microsoft 365 that include Exchange. Conversely, if a new Microsoft service is adopted widely, you might plan for a volume increase. This alignment ensures you’re not caught off guard by IT strategy changes after you’ve locked in licenses.
• ✅ Coordinate Budget Early: Talk to Finance well before renewals to sync on budget expectations. If you foresee an increase in licensing costs, possibly due to more users or a known price hike, prepare for it in advance. If you aim to save money, let them know your target and what assumptions that depends on (e.g., “we plan to save 10% by shifting 20% of users to a cheaper plan or by dropping unused licenses”). Also, clarify the payment structure: for example, “We will need $X in June for an upfront payment to save on the 5% premium.” Finance appreciates a heads-up, and it avoids a scramble for approvals at renewal time.
• ✅ Check for Compliance and True-Ups: In the new CSP model, compliance primarily involves ensuring you have a subscription for every active user who needs one, as it’s a pay-as-you-go model, and overuse is uncommon. However, if you still have any on-premises software under license agreements (such as Windows Server or SQL Server, possibly purchased through an EA or formerly via Open), ensure you are compliant and account for any potential growth. The EA true-up concept doesn’t exist in CSP; you simply add subscriptions as needed, but compliance remains your responsibility. Don’t drop necessary licenses in pursuit of cost savings and accidentally become underlicensed; that can lead to audit penalties that far outweigh the savings. Always maintain the proper number of licenses for actual usage.
• ✅ Document Decisions and Commitments: Keep a record of why certain licensing decisions were made. For example, if you decided to go 75% annual and 25% monthly for your Office 365 licenses, note the rationale (e.g., “200 seasonal call center agents on monthly due to turnover”). This is useful for continuity (in case personnel on your team change) and for reviewing whether those assumptions still hold. At the next renewal, you can refer to this document to see if your strategy needs any tweaks. Also, document any special terms or pricing you negotiated (e.g., “The partner gave 5% off for one year on the condition that we add Azure spend”) so that you can ensure they are applied and revisit them later.
• ✅ Use Tools for Management: Explore tools that can help manage licenses. Many CSP partners offer a customer portal where you can view all your subscriptions and make adjustments (in some cases, self-service). Microsoft’s admin center now also displays subscription information and has some scheduling capabilities for changes at renewal. Using these tools can reduce manual errors. Even a simple spreadsheet or calendar reminders system is better than nothing. The key is not to rely purely on memory or scattered emails – have a central place for license management information.
• ✅ Plan for Contingencies: Finally, have a contingency plan in place. Ask questions like: What if our company suddenly has to cut costs mid-year? Do we know which subscriptions could be dropped or scaled down quickly? What if our CSP partner went out of business, or we had to change partners? Do we know the process and timeline to do that? What if Microsoft announced a mandatory change, like retiring a product we use? Are we prepared to find alternatives? While unlikely, thinking these through ensures you’re not caught off guard if something unexpected happens. For example, knowing that you can transfer your CSP subscriptions to a new partner in a few days if needed might be good resilience planning. Or knowing that if you had to terminate an annual subscription mid-term, you’d still be on the hook financially (perhaps you could repurpose that spend elsewhere in the organization to get value from it). Essentially, risk management is part of license management.

By following the timeline and checklist above, CIOs and IT managers can approach the new CSP/NCE model with confidence. The key is proactive management and strategic planning – doing so turns what could be a complex licensing shift into an opportunity to optimize costs and streamline your software asset management.

Microsoft’s cloud licensing will likely continue to evolve, but with these practices in place, you’ll be well-positioned to adapt and make the best decisions for your organization.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Advisory Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit