LocationsResourcesContact
๐Ÿ“… Book a Meeting
IBM Audit Defense ยท Case Study

IBM Audit Defense for a Leading Brazilian Retailer

How Redress Compliance reduced IBM audit liability by 95% for one of Brazil's largest retail chains โ€” bringing a BRL 50 million claim down to BRL 2.5 million through expert audit review, data validation, strategic negotiation, and enhanced compliance governance.

Case Studyโ€ขIBM Audit Defenseโ€ขRetail & E-Commerce ยท Brazilโ€ขJanuary 9, 2025
๐Ÿ“š Back to IBM Knowledge Hub โ€บ ๐Ÿ“– Read our IBM Audit guide โ€บ This Case Study ๐ŸŽฏ Free IBM Licensing Assessment
95%
Liability Reduced
From BRL 50M to BRL 2.5M
R$47.5M
Savings Achieved
Audit claim eliminated
Zero
Penalties Imposed
No retroactive fees
100%
Business Continuity
Uninterrupted operations

Engagement Snapshot

Client
One of Brazil's largest retail chains
Industry
Retail & E-Commerce ยท Brazil
Vendor
IBM
Engagement Type
IBM Audit Defense
Infrastructure
Inventory management, CRM, supply chain logistics, virtualised environments
Key Issues
Sub-capacity licensing errors, entitlement mismatches, virtualisation overages
Initial IBM Claim
BRL 50,000,000
Final Settlement
BRL 2,500,000 (95% reduction)

The Challenge

One of Brazil's largest retail chains, with hundreds of stores nationwide and a rapidly growing e-commerce platform, faced an IBM audit with claims of BRL 50 million in alleged non-compliance fees. The company's IT infrastructure supported critical operations including inventory management, customer relationship systems, and supply chain logistics.

IBM's audit findings highlighted discrepancies in sub-capacity licensing, entitlement mismatches, and overages in virtualised environments. Given the significant financial exposure and the need to maintain seamless operations across its entire retail network, the retailer engaged Redress Compliance to resolve the audit and safeguard its financial position.

IBM audits in Latin America frequently produce inflated claims that do not reflect actual licensing positions. Sub-capacity licensing in virtualised environments is one of the most commonly misinterpreted areas โ€” IBM's audit tools often overcount processor usage when ILMT is not fully deployed or properly configured. Entitlement mismatches between historical agreements and current deployments are another frequent source of inflated claims. For large retailers running complex, multi-site IBM environments, the gap between IBM's initial audit claim and the actual compliance position is typically 60โ€“90%.

The Process

1

Audit Review and Strategy Development

Conducted an in-depth assessment of IBM's audit report and developed a comprehensive defence strategy:

  • Reviewed IBM's audit report line by line, identifying overestimations and errors in licensing calculations
  • Analysed historical agreements and entitlement data to establish a clear compliance baseline
  • Mapped discrepancies between IBM's claimed usage and actual deployment data
  • Developed a prioritised defence strategy addressing the highest-value disputed items first
2

Data Collection and Validation

Gathered and validated accurate data to counter IBM's audit findings:

  • Partnered with the retailer's IT and procurement teams to gather accurate data from servers, virtualised environments, and cloud platforms
  • Validated sub-capacity metrics, uncovering significant inaccuracies in IBM's reported figures
  • Identified unused licences and misconfigurations that could be optimised to close compliance gaps
  • Built a comprehensive, evidence-based compliance report to present to IBM
3

Strategic Negotiations with IBM

Executed a data-driven negotiation strategy to achieve maximum claim reduction:

  • Presented IBM's audit team with a revised compliance report backed by validated data and clear licensing policy interpretation
  • Highlighted the retailer's proactive compliance measures and significant investment in IBM solutions
  • Challenged each disputed line item with specific evidence and contractual references
  • Secured major concessions, significantly reducing financial liability while avoiding penalties or retroactive fees
4

Optimisation and Governance

Implemented long-term compliance measures to prevent future audit exposure:

  • Reallocated underutilised licences across the organisation to address immediate compliance gaps without additional costs
  • Designed a compliance framework with automated monitoring tools and internal audits
  • Provided IT and procurement teams with training sessions on IBM licensing requirements and governance practices
  • Established ongoing governance processes to minimise risk of future audit challenges

The Results

MetricDetail
Initial IBM Audit ClaimBRL 50,000,000
Final SettlementBRL 2,500,000 (95% reduction)
Total SavingsBRL 47,500,000
PenaltiesZero โ€” no penalties or retroactive fees imposed
Business ContinuityUninterrupted retail and e-commerce operations maintained throughout
Compliance EnhancementsCentralised licence management and real-time monitoring systems implemented
Future ScalabilitySettlement covered additional licences required for planned growth
GovernanceAutomated compliance framework with internal audit processes established

Audit Outcome at a Glance

R$50M
IBM's Initial Claim
Alleged non-compliance fees
R$2.5M
Final Settlement
Including future scalability licences
95%
Liability Eliminated
Zero penalties, zero retroactive fees
"Redress Compliance turned a challenging audit into an opportunity to strengthen our compliance framework. Their expertise saved us millions and ensured our operations remained seamless. Their support was invaluable to our success."
CIO โ€” Leading Brazilian Retailer

IBM audit claims are opening positions, not final verdicts. For large retailers operating complex, multi-site IBM environments with virtualised infrastructure, IBM's initial audit figures routinely overstate actual liability by 60โ€“95%. The combination of expert audit report analysis, sub-capacity metric validation, entitlement reconciliation, and evidence-based negotiation consistently delivers dramatic reductions. Accepting IBM's initial audit claim without independent expert review is the single most expensive mistake an IBM customer can make.

How Redress Compliance Can Help

As a fully independent advisory firm, Redress Compliance provides expert IBM audit defence, licence optimisation, and compliance advisory โ€” with no commercial relationship with IBM.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ
IBM Audit Defense
Expert audit protection
๐Ÿ“‹
Licensing Assessment
Full licence review
๐Ÿ”„
ELA Renewal Service
Enterprise agreement advisory
๐Ÿ“
IBM Negotiations
Better deals and terms

Facing an IBM Audit?

Redress Compliance has defended enterprises worldwide against IBM audit claims totalling hundreds of millions in alleged non-compliance. Our team includes former IBM licensing specialists who understand IBM's audit methodology, pricing structures, and negotiation tactics from the inside. Early engagement typically produces the best outcomes.

๐Ÿ“š Continue Reading
๐Ÿ“– IBM Audit Settlement StrategiesRead our IBM Audit guide โ†’ ๐Ÿ“š IBM Knowledge HubBack to IBM Knowledge Hub โ†’ ๐ŸŽฏ Free IBM Licensing AssessmentRequest your complimentary review โ†’
FF

Fredrik Filipsson

Co-Founder @ Redress Compliance

Fredrik Filipsson brings over 20 years of experience in enterprise software licensing, having worked directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle before co-founding Redress Compliance. Over the past 11 years as an independent advisor, he has helped more than 500 enterprise clients โ€” including numerous Fortune 500 companies โ€” optimise costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favourable terms with major software vendors.

View all posts โ†’