SAP Licensing Pitfalls: Overlooking Engine Metrics

SAP Licensing Pitfalls for CIOs – Overlooking Engine Metrics

CIOs and CTOs often overlook SAP “engine” license metrics – the technical or business usage measures (like CPU cores, memory, or number of records) that limit how much of a module you’re allowed to use.

Failing to monitor these metrics can lead to silent non-compliance as usage outgrows the contract, exposing enterprises to substantial.

Read Top 10 SAP Licensing Pitfalls for CIOs.

SAP Engine License Metrics

SAP engine licenses (also referred to as package licenses) cover specific modules or components, which are licensed based on usage metrics rather than by the number of named users. Unlike user licenses (which are tied to individual people accessing SAP), engine licenses are measured against a quantifiable unit of usage.

Common engine metrics include:

• Technical Capacity: e.g., number of CPU cores the software runs on, or amount of memory (GB) used (especially for databases like SAP HANA).
• Business Transactions: e.g., count of sales orders, invoices, or transactions processed in a year.
• Master Data Objects: e.g, Number of business partners, materials, or records managed in a system.
• Employees or Users: e.g,. Number of employee records processed (for SAP Payroll) or users accessing a specific engine.
• Financial Metrics: e.g,. Annual revenue or spend volume processed through a module (common for industry-specific solutions).

These metric-based licenses come with a fixed allowance (a maximum usage included in the price). For example, you might license the SAP Payroll engine for up to 1,000 employees, or license SAP’s database for 8 CPU cores.

Compliance means your actual usage stays at or below these licensed quantities. If usage exceeds the entitlement, you are effectively under-licensed for that engine.

Why Overlooking Engine Usage Leads to Non-Compliance

The dynamic nature of business and IT can cause your SAP engine usage to quietly grow beyond the licensed metric:

• Business Growth: Positive changes, such as an increasing employee count, higher transaction volumes, or revenue growth, can all push usage over the licensed threshold (e.g., exceeding the licensed employee count or revenue band).
• IT Infrastructure Changes: Upgrades such as adding more CPU cores to servers, migrating to more powerful hardware, or scaling up memory for performance can inadvertently breach technical metrics. For instance, doubling the cores assigned to an SAP application server would double the required license count if that engine is licensed per core.
• New Implementations: Enabling additional functionality or modules can activate engines you didn’t realize needed separate licenses. If those engines start accumulating usage (documents, data, etc.) beyond a small test, you might unknowingly enter non-compliance territory.
• Indirect Usage: Even if you didn’t intend to use more, sometimes external systems or integrations generate additional SAP transactions (e.g., an e-commerce site creating SAP sales orders). If those are tied to an engine metric (like document counts) and aren’t licensed appropriately, it creates hidden liability.

Overlooking these factors means usage can surpass the licensed metric limit without immediate symptoms – the system won’t shut off automatically. The reckoning typically occurs during an SAP audit or annual license attestation:

SAP’s measurement tools (or your own usage reports) will reveal instances of overuse. The result is typically an unexpected bill to “true-up” the licenses, often at list price with back-dated maintenance fees for the period of overuse.

In worst-case scenarios, CIOs discover that a seemingly well-managed SAP environment is out of compliance by 20-30% on a pricey engine, translating to hundreds of thousands of dollars (or more) in unplanned expenses.

Read SAP Licensing Pitfalls for CIOs: Shelfware Maintenance on ECC and S/4HANA.

Common Engine Metrics and Pitfall Examples

It’s crucial to identify which SAP engines in your landscape utilize metric-based licensing and understand what could cause an overstep.

Here are a few high-risk examples CIOs should watch:

• SAP HANA Database (Memory Metric): Licensed by allocated memory (e.g., in 64 GB blocks). Pitfall: Adding data, setting up additional HANA instances, or increasing memory for performance can exceed your licensed GB. Example: A company licensed 256 GB of HANA, but an upgrade to accommodate growth raised actual usage to ~320 GB. This 64 GB overage would force an additional license purchase (often tens of thousands of dollars for that extra block), plus ~22% annual support on top.
• SAP Application Server or Platform (CPU Core Metric): Some SAP components (like SAP NetWeaver Foundation for 3rd Party, SAP Process Integration, or legacy engines from BusinessObjects) are licensed per CPU core. Pitfall: Virtualization changes or hardware refreshes add more cores to the environment. Example: A system initially licensed for eight cores is moved to a 16-core cloud instance. The 8-core discrepancy would be flagged in an audit – the firm would need to license those extra cores, potentially costing a substantial six-figure sum if, for example, each core license runs $15,000–$20,000.
• HR/HCM Modules (Employee Metric): Engines like SAP Payroll or Time Management are often based on the number of active employee records. Pitfall: Company growth or M&A increases headcount beyond the licensed number. Example: An organization licensed Payroll for 1,000 employees at a one-time fee of $250 per employee (=$250K). Following the expansion to 1,200 employees, an audit reveals that 200 unlicensed employees are being processed. The company must purchase the additional 200 licenses (~$50K list) and possibly pay back-maintenance for the period during which those users were unlicensed.
• SAP Industry Solutions (Revenue/Throughput Metric): Some industry engines (for example, SAP IS-Retail, SAP Oil & Gas) utilize annual revenue, number of consumers, or barrels produced as metrics. Pitfall: Hitting a higher metric tier than contracted. Example: A retail company licensed an engine with annual sales of up to $500 million, but its success ultimately drove sales to $ 600 million. They would trigger the next licensing band (say, a $500M–$1B tier), which could mean a renegotiation and a significant cost increase to cover the higher metric.
• Document and Transaction Engines (Count Metric): Engines such as SAP Global Trade Services (GTS) or SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM) may be licensed by document or year (e.g., customs declarations, delivery orders). Pitfall: Transaction volumes ramp up with business demands. Without monitoring, you might process more documents than you are licensed for. Example: If SAP GTS is licensed for 10,000 customs documents per year and the company processes 12,000, a 20% overrun would result in a true-up for the extra documents, often calculated in blocks or packs of documents with considerable cost.

Each of these scenarios underscores the importance of tracking actual usage vs. licensed allowances. Even a one-time spike or incremental growth over the years can put you out of compliance.

To visualize the potential impact of exceeding engine metrics, consider the following examples:

(Note: Digital Access is SAP’s document-based licensing for indirect usage – shown here as another metric-based compliance area.)

In all cases, the unplanned expenditure required to rectify the shortfall can be substantial.

Worse, these purchases are often at list price (negotiation leverage is low when you’re already out of compliance) and come with ongoing maintenance costs. For a CIO, such surprises can wreak havoc on IT budgets and strain relationships with suppliers.

Proactive Management of Engine License Usage

The good news is that these pitfalls are avoidable with a proactive management strategy. CIOs should institute a governance process around engine license metrics, including:

• Regular Usage Monitoring: Don’t wait for SAP’s annual audit – internally measure engine metrics on a quarterly or biannual basis. SAP provides tools such as USMM (User/System Measurement) and SLAW to capture engine usage data across various systems. Make it a routine to run these, and supplement with custom scripts or queries if needed (e.g., checking HANA memory usage, counting documents, etc.). Early warning signs of usage spikes are key.
• Assign Metric Ownership: For each engine metric, designate an owner in the organization responsible for tracking it. For example, HR can own the employee-count metrics for HR modules, Finance can monitor revenue-related metrics, and IT operations can track technical metrics such as cores and memory. These owners should be aware of the license limits and report their current usage to IT Asset Management regularly. This decentralizes oversight to the people closest to the source data.
• Maintain a License Usage Dashboard: Keep a simple dashboard or spreadsheet that tracks “Entitlement vs. Actual Usage” for all engine metrics. Update it quarterly with the latest figures. If you see any metric at, say, 85% or more of the licensed cap, flag it for management attention. This helps avoid creeping overuse. Modern SAM (Software Asset Management) tools can also automate such tracking and send alerts as thresholds are neared.
• Plan for Business Changes: Integrate license impact assessment into business planning. If the company is forecasting 20% growth in orders next year or planning a major hiring spree, evaluate whether your SAP engine licenses can support that growth. It’s far better to proactively purchase an expansion (possibly negotiating volume discounts or trade-in credits) than to be caught off guard later.
• Control Technical Changes: Establish a standard procedure that requires any change to infrastructure related to SAP (such as adding servers, increasing CPUs, or migrating to cloud instances) to trigger a license check. Architecture teams should consult the SAP license owner whenever scaling systems vertically or horizontally. For example, before provisioning a new 32-core server for SAP, confirm how it affects any core-based licenses. By baking compliance checks into change management, you avoid technical teams accidentally creating liability.
• Educate and Communicate: Ensure that stakeholders understand that SAP licensing isn’t just about user counts. Communicate the importance of engine metrics to both IT and business teams. When everyone is aware that, for instance, “adding a warehouse in SAP EWM” or “connecting a new third-party app” has licensing implications, they are more likely to involve the CIO/licensing team early. A culture of license awareness can prevent many inadvertent overuses.
• Audit Simulations: Consider running your own internal “mock audit.” At least once a year, have your team simulate the SAP audit process by running all measurement tools, consolidating the results, and checking if any engine is over the limit. This no-penalty dry run lets you address issues internally. If an engine is over-deployed, you can either reduce usage (if possible), purchase additional licenses on your terms, or negotiate a resolution with SAP before the formal audit.

By treating engine license metrics with the same rigor as financial metrics, CIOs can avoid compliance surprises. The investment in regular monitoring and governance is minor compared to the potential cost of a license violation discovered by SAP.

Contract and Negotiation Considerations

Beyond operational measures, there are contractual strategies to mitigate engine metric risks:

• Include Buffers or Tiered Allowances: When negotiating a new SAP contract or expansion, consider incorporating a buffer (e.g., a license for 10% more than the current need) or agreeing on pricing for the next tier of usage. A predefined pricing tier for additional usage is like insurance – you know the cost if you grow, rather than facing whatever SAP quotes in an audit.
• Periodic Rebalance Rights: Some agreements permit the swapping or rebalancing of licenses. For instance, if one engine is underused and another is overused, you might negotiate the ability to shift some value from one metric to another during a renewal. This flexibility can reduce wasted shelf licenses and cover shortfalls elsewhere.
• Audit Clause Negotiation: Review audit clauses carefully. While you can’t avoid audits, you may be able to negotiate terms such as a notice period or even a right to remediate before any penalties are imposed. In some cases, clients negotiate that if they purchase the needed licenses, SAP will waive back-maintenance fees for the period of overuse. Such concessions are easier to get agreed upon in front than when you’re already in breach.
• Cloud and Subscription Models: If you move to SAP’s cloud (such as RISE with SAP or SaaS products), many engine metrics become SAP’s responsibility to manage in the subscription. However, be cautious – even cloud contracts have usage assumptions (e.g., number of employees, storage, or API calls). Ensure the subscription terms align with your usage projections to avoid overage charges. The cloud can simplify compliance (no self-measurement needed), but it doesn’t eliminate the need to understand metrics; it just changes how you pay for them (often via recurring fees for higher usage).
• Price Protections: Given that engine purchases after an audit are at SAP’s list prices, try to negotiate price protections in your contract. This could be a discount locked in for a future purchase of additional metric units or caps on annual maintenance uplift. Having those in writing can make a true-up far less painful if it ever occurs.

The overarching theme is to anticipate growth and change. By aligning your contracts with forward-looking usage and maintaining transparency with SAP regarding evolving needs, you can turn a potential compliance pitfall into a planned investment, often at a more favorable price point.

Recommendations

• Maintain a Metrics Inventory: Keep a centralized list of all SAP engines in use, their licensing metrics, and current licensed limits. Update it whenever you add new SAP functionality or adjust infrastructure.
• Implement Quarterly Usage Reviews: Set a schedule (e.g., quarterly) to review engine usage against entitlements. Use automated tools or manual reports, and have owners certify their metric usage. Early detection of nearing limits is key.
• Establish Internal Alerts: Define threshold triggers (like 85% of license capacity reached) for each metric. Configure alerts via monitoring tools or simple emails from metric owners. React when thresholds are crossed – either by optimizing usage or initiating a license top-up discussion.
• Integrate License Checks in Change Management: Make it policy that any project that could affect SAP usage (new integration, major business expansion, hardware upgrade) must include a license impact assessment. Empower your SAP Basis team and enterprise architects to identify and flag these changes.
• Engage with SAP Proactively: If you foresee exceeding a metric, engage SAP or your reseller early. It’s often possible to negotiate an incremental license purchase or an adjusted contract before an audit forces it. SAP account teams prefer proactive sales over compliance battles – use that to your advantage.
• Educate Your Team: Conduct awareness sessions for IT and business leaders, explaining how SAP licensing works, particularly regarding engines. When departments understand that their data volume or user counts tie to license costs, they are more likely to collaborate on compliance.
• Leverage SAM Tools: If the budget allows, utilize third-party Software Asset Management solutions specifically tailored for SAP. These can automate measurement and provide a consolidated view of license consumption, helping CIOs manage complex environments with ease.
• Keep an Audit Trail: Document all measurements, internal audits, and compliance decisions. If an audit happens, showing SAP that you have diligent processes can sometimes lead to more cooperative discussions (and demonstrate good faith if negotiating any penalties).
• Negotiate Future-Friendly Contracts: During renewals or new purchases, incorporate terms that account for growth, such as fixed pricing for extra blocks of usage or flex allowances. This turns unpredictable compliance costs into planned capacity investments.

Read SAP Licensing Pitfalls for CIOs: Developer and Test User Oversights.

FAQ

Q1: What exactly are SAP “engine” licenses and metrics?
A1: An SAP engine (or package) license is for a specific module or component and is measured by a usage metric instead of per-user. For example, instead of buying 100 user licenses, you might license an SAP engine by something like the number of CPU cores, gigabytes of data, the number of employees, or transactions. The metric is the unit that defines how much of that SAP product you’re entitled to use.

Q2: How can an engine metric like CPU cores or memory lead to license non-compliance?
A2: If a technical metric licenses an SAP component (say 8 CPU cores or 256 GB of memory), using more than that – for instance, running it on 12 cores or using 300 GB of memory – means you’ve exceeded your purchased entitlement. SAP considers that unlicensed usage. This may occur if you upgrade hardware or allocate more resources without updating the license. In an audit, SAP will require you to pay for the excess usage retroactively.

Q3: How do we know if we are exceeding our engine license metrics?
A3: Regularly measure your usage. SAP provides the USMM transaction and LAW/SLAW tools to measure engines and consolidate results. You can also check specific indicators (like memory usage in HANA Studio, or employee counts via HR reports). Compare these figures to what your contract says you’re allowed. If, for example, your contract says “500 employees” and your HR system now has 550 active SAP users, you’re over the metric.

Q4: What happens if we exceed a licensed metric before we notice – will SAP shut it off?
A4: SAP software typically does not hard-stop when you go over a metric (it won’t disable the module automatically). Instead, the onus is on the customer to remain compliant. If you exceed the licensed amount, the software will continue to function, but you’ll likely be caught in the next audit or measurement submission. At that point, SAP will inform you of the shortfall and demand you purchase the additional licenses (often immediately, and sometimes with back-dated support fees). It’s essentially an unbudgeted bill that you’ll have to pay to become compliant.

Q5: Can we negotiate our way out if an audit finds we’re over?
A5: In an audit situation, your leverage is limited – SAP knows you’re using more than what you’re paid for. However, you can sometimes negotiate the terms of the settlement (for instance, waiving past maintenance fees or bundling the purchase with another deal). It’s far better to avoid that situation in the first place. If you anticipate growth, negotiate those licenses ahead of time when you have more negotiating power and possibly can secure discounts or concessions.

Q6: Are engine licenses one-time purchases, or do we pay annually?
A6: Traditional on-premise engine licenses are typically one-time perpetual purchases with an annual support/maintenance fee (usually around 20–22% of the license cost) for upgrades and support. So if you buy an extra block of capacity, you pay once for the license and then increased maintenance every year. If you’re on a subscription model or SAP’s cloud (RISE), the engine metric may be included in your subscription fee, which could increase if you exceed certain thresholds (akin to an annual rental based on usage).

Q7: What are some best practices to avoid engine license issues?
A7: Key practices include regularly monitoring usage, assigning owners to each metric, and conducting internal audits. Always assess the licensing impact when scaling systems or anticipating business growth. Maintaining open communication with SAP can also be beneficial. If you anticipate exceeding a certain threshold, addressing it proactively with SAP may lead to a more favorable outcome than waiting for an audit to occur. Essentially, transparency and planning are your best tools.

Q8: We use third-party systems that connect to SAP – could that affect engine metrics?
A8: Yes, indirectly. If a third-party or external system is creating extra load in SAP (for example, an e-commerce site feeding orders into the SAP SD module), it could increase transaction counts or document counts, which are tied to an engine license. This also touches on Indirect Access/Digital Access – if external users or systems generate SAP documents and you haven’t licensed them, it’s another compliance area. Always evaluate how integrations impact usage metrics (such as transactions and data volume) and ensure that these are accounted for in your licensing.

Q9: Does moving to SAP’s cloud (RISE or SaaS products) solve these metric problems?
A9: It changes the equation but doesn’t eliminate it. In SAP’s cloud offerings, you typically pay a subscription that covers a certain usage volume (users, storage, transactions, etc., depending on the service). If you exceed the contracted amounts, you may incur an overage charge or be required to upgrade to a higher subscription tier. The advantage is SAP monitors it for you, and it’s more of a capacity planning discussion than a compliance “audit.” But CIOs still need to track usage relative to what’s in the contract – cloud just shifts how you pay for extra usage (ongoing fees instead of a one-time purchase).

Q10: What if our usage fluctuates – do we need to license for peak or average?
A10: Generally, SAP licensing requires covering the peak usage. Many metrics (especially technical ones like cores or memory) are based on the maximum used. For example, if you occasionally scale up to 12 cores even for a short period, those 12 need to be licensed. Similarly, user counts are typically measured as peak counts during the audit period. There’s rarely an “average” usage allowance – it’s usually the highest point that matters. This is why understanding your usage patterns and perhaps negotiating provisions for temporary spikes (or scaling up slowly and licensing incrementally) is important.

Read about our SAP Advisory Services.

Schedule a meeting to discuss our SAP Advisory Services.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit