sap licensing

SAP License Compliance: Best Practices for Internal Audit

SAP License Compliance involves:

  • Adherence to Contract Terms: Following the terms and conditions outlined in the SAP software license agreement.
  • Proper License Utilization: Ensuring that the use of SAP software aligns with the purchased licenses in type and scope.
  • Regular Audits and Monitoring: Conducting regular internal audits and monitoring usage to maintain compliance with licensing agreements.
  • Stay aligned with SAPโ€™s policy changes and adjust license management accordingly.

SAP License Compliance: Best Practices for Internal Audit

SAP License Compliance Best Practices for Internal Audit

SAP software is mission-critical for many enterprises, but with great power comes the responsibility of managing licenses properly.

Staying compliant with SAPโ€™s complex licensing agreements is not optional; avoiding hefty penalties is mandatory. SAP reserves the right to audit customers (often annually) to ensure the number of licenses purchased matches actual usageโ€‹.

Therefore, organizations need to be proactive. Conducting regular internal license audits helps identify and fix compliance issues on your terms, long before SAPโ€™s official auditors come knocking.

For Software Asset Management (SAM) managers and licensing professionals, establishing robust internal audit practices ensures that your company retains its SAP licensing, optimizes costs, and prevents surprises.

Read SAP License Compliance: Best Practices for Indirect and Digital Access.

Key Components of SAP License Compliance

Before diving into the audit process, itโ€™s important to understand the key areas that internal audits should cover.

Effective SAP license compliance management in both ECC and S/4HANA environments involves focusing on:

  • License Usage Monitoring: Continuously track the number of users and which systems are in use. This means identifying all active SAP user IDs, their roles, and license types to verify each user is assigned the correct license for their job duties. Regular monitoring helps catch any overuse or unauthorized use earlyโ€‹. In S/4HANA or ECC, tools like SAPโ€™s User Measurement (USMM) and License Administration Workbench (LAW) are invaluable. Companies can spot compliance issues in advance by using USMM and LAW regularly (not just during official audits)โ€‹. For example, LAW can consolidate user counts across ECC, S/4HANA, BW, and other systems to ensure that a single individual with multiple accounts is not counted multiple times.
  • User Classification Accuracy: A common compliance pitfall is misclassifying users. SAP offers various user license types (Professional, Limited, Employee, Self-Service, etc.), and each user should be categorized based on their actual usage. Internal audits must verify that each userโ€™s activities (transactions executed, data accessed) align with their assigned license typeโ€‹. Someone with only display-level duties shouldnโ€™t be assigned an expensive Professional license. Conversely, a โ€œpower userโ€ performing broad transactions shouldnโ€™t be on a low-level license. Itโ€™s wise to define clear license classification policies upfront โ€“ map job roles to the appropriate license types and adjust classifications based on actual usage data. For instance, you might downgrade users who only need basic self-service access and upgrade those who exceed the limits of their current licenseโ€‹. Also, ensure that each person hasย a single license designation enterprise-wide, even if they have accounts in multiple systems, so that SAP doesnโ€™t count them twice at the highest license level.
  • Inactive Users and Cleanup: Internal audits should identify dormant or duplicate user accounts. SAPโ€™s named user licensing counts any active user ID, even if that user hasnโ€™t logged in for monthsโ€‹. Old accounts for former employees, contractors, or test IDs can needlessly inflate your license count and put you over your entitlements. The best practice is to implement strict user lifecycle management: regularly purge or lock users without access. For example, if 10-15% of accounts havenโ€™t been used in a year, deactivating them can immediately reduce license consumption and riskโ€‹. Make this cleanup part of the offboarding process and conduct it quarterly as part of your audit routine.
  • Indirect Access and Digital Access: One of the trickiest areas of SAP compliance is indirect usage, which occurs when third-party systems or external users interact with SAP data without logging in directly. In ECC days, SAP often required a named user license for anyone indirectly using SAP. This led to high-profile disputes, such as the well-known Diageo case, over unlicensed third-party integrations. Now, SAP provides the Digital Access model (available for S/4HANA and ECC customers via contract update) that licenses indirect use based on documents created (such as Sales Orders and Invoices) by external systems. Internal audits must account for all scenarios where data flows into SAP from external sources, such as e-commerce platforms creating sales orders, CRM systems reading customer data, or shop-floor devices posting production entries. Every interface needs a licensing strategy: either an appropriately named user license must cover the external users, or you must adopt SAPโ€™s Digital Access document licensing for those document typesโ€‹. During an internal audit, all integrations are inventoried, and SAP tools, such as the Digital Access Estimation Note or Passport tool, estimate document counts from indirect use. This proactive approach will reveal any โ€œhiddenโ€ usage that might otherwise cause compliance gaps. If you find high volumes of documents generated indirectly, consider negotiating a digital access license package with SAPย beforeย an official audit forces the issue.
  • Engine and Package Metrics: Besides user licenses, SAP offers manyย package licensesย (also known as engines), which are licensed based on metrics such as transactions, revenue, employee count, or system size. Examples include SAP Payroll (number of employees processed), SAP WM (warehouse metrics), or HANA database (GB of memory). Internal audits should verify usage of these metrics against what youโ€™ve purchasedโ€‹. If your contract allows for 1,000 employees on SAP Payroll and your HR system now has 1,100 active employees, youโ€™re technically underlicensed โ€“ an audit would flag this and require an immediate true-up. Regularly monitor such metrics (SAP systems often provide usage reports) and set thresholds when usage nears licensed limits. Itโ€™s far better to spot and address a growing usage trend (by optimizing usage or purchasing additional capacity) than to be caught over the limit in an auditโ€‹.

Read SAP License Compliance: Best Practices for SAP Engines and Package Licenses.

Best Practices for Conducting Internal License Audits

Performing an internal SAP license audit involves systematically reviewing your entitlements and your actual usage.

Below are best practices to ensure these self-audits are effective:

  • Establish a Regular Audit Cadence: Treat internal license audits as a routine part of IT governance, not a one-off event. Many experts recommend quarterly internal audits or at least biannual audits to stay on top of changes. Frequent reviews mean fewer surprises. For instance, you might review user lists, license assignments, and usage logs every quarter across all SAP environments, including ECC, S/4HANA, BW, CRM, etc. This schedule allows you to catch compliance drift (like a team quietly adding 50 new users or a new interface going live) within a few months, rather than years later.
  • Preparation โ€“ Gather Contracts and Data: Review your SAP contracts and license entitlements. Know exactly what types and numbers of licenses your organization owns, including any industry solution or engine licenses. Then, data on actual usage will be pulled from user lists from SAP (SU01 user export or using USMM), activity reports (ST03N transaction stats can show how intensively users are using the system), and engine usage reports. Itโ€™s also important to involve the right stakeholders at this stage. A SAM team or designated License Compliance Officer should coordinate with IT and business unit leads to understand any changes in system usage, such as a new warehouse module implementation or a spike in SAP users due to a projectโ€‹.
  • License Inventory and User Analysis: Reconcile the list of purchased licenses with the list of active users in each system to ensure accuracy. Check that the sum of all users assigned to each license type doesnโ€™t exceed what you bought. More importantly, analyze whether each userโ€™s classification is appropriate. This is where you compare roles or transactions against the license type. Many organizations maintain a role-to-license mapping โ€“ for example, any user with broad create or update permissions in finance must be at least a Functional or Professional user. Use such mappings to spot misclassified users. If someone is classified as a Limited Professional but is executing transactions reserved for Professional licenses, thatโ€™s a compliance issue that needs to be addressed. Similarly, look for any user accounts that have no license type assigned. By default, SAP will count those as the highest type (Professional), which could inflate your audit results. Itโ€™s crucial to clean up these ambiguities.
  • Use SAPโ€™s measurement tools:ย leverage the same tools SAP auditors use. Run USMM (User Measurement) in each system to gather user counts by license type. Then, SAP LAW (License Administration Workbench) will consolidate results across systems and eliminate duplicate user counting. These tools will produce measurement logs similar to those you submit in an official audit. By reviewing them internally, you can see exactly where you stand. If LAW shows that some users are duplicated across ECC and S/4, you can ensure theyโ€™re properly linked with the same License ID to count as one user. If it reports more category users than you expected, investigate why. Regular internal use of USMM/LAW dramatically reduces last-minute audit scramblingโ€‹. Many companies perform a full โ€œmock auditโ€ annually using these tools to simulate an SAP audit result and address any gaps found.
  • Involve Technical and Functional Teams: An internal audit isnโ€™t just a spreadsheet exercise; it requires cross-team collaboration. The Basis or SAP security team can help extract the data, including user lists, roles, and system configurations. Business process owners can explain how certain high-level users use the system (to verify license category). Integration architects should provide insight into any third-party interfaces so that you can quantify indirect usage. By involving these teams, you ensure the audit captures a complete picture of SAP usage, including behind-the-scenes processes such as automated jobs or integrations that may create documents.
  • Document Everything: Maintain clear documentation throughout the audit. Keep an updated license ledger that lists each SAP system, the licenses allocated to it, and evidence of compliance (e.g., last login dates for users, or the method used to determine indirect document counts). During an internal audit, document any assumptions or decisions โ€“ for example, โ€œInterface X uses a technical account which is covered by a named user license Y.โ€ This documentation will be extremely valuable if and when you need to defend your license position to SAP or if new team members take over compliance managementโ€‹.

Ongoing Compliance Optimization

After each internal audit, the goal is not just to fix immediate issues but also to optimize and strengthen your license management in the future:

  • Remediation Actions: For any compliance issues found (e.g., too many users for a certain license type, or unlicensed indirect usage), create a plan to address them. This could mean purchasing additional licenses or reassigning existing ones, cleaning up accounts, or restricting certain activities to properly licensed users. Addressing under-licensing proactively is always preferable to scrambling during a formal audit or paying back-maintenance and penalties.
  • License Reallocation and Recycling: Optimize license utilization by reallocating licenses you already have. If your audit identified 100 unused professional licenses, you might reassign them to new users rather than buying more. Consider implementing a process where departing usersโ€™ licenses are added to a pool for reuse. On the other hand, if you find users who never use the advanced capabilities of their assigned license, you can potentially downgrade them to a cheaper license type and free up the higher-level license for someone else, saving costs.
  • Continuous Monitoring & Alerts: Donโ€™t wait until the next audit cycle to spot problems. Leverage tools or scripts that continuously monitor license consumption. Some organizations use third-party SAP license management tools, such as Snow Optimizer for SAP, Flexera, or ServiceNow SAM, to gain ongoing visibility into user activity, engine usage, and even indirect usage patterns. These tools can alert you if, for example, a new user is created without a license assignment or if a specific metric (such as users or SAPS usage) suddenly increases. Continuous monitoring feeds into your internal audits, making them faster and more accurate.
  • Stay Informed on SAP Policy Changes: SAP licensing rules are not static. SAP occasionally revises license definitions, user categories, or introduces new models, such as the Digital Access model, which was introduced to address indirect usage. The SAP naming convention for user licenses in S/4HANA (e.g., Professional vs. Functional user) and the availability of new license types can evolveโ€‹. Licensing professionals should stay current by reviewing SAPโ€™s official updates, attending user group webinars, or consulting with advisors. For example, SAPโ€™s move to S/4HANA comes with new licensing options and potentially different rules for certain industry solutions. Knowing these changes can help you adjust your compliance approach. Ensure that any changes, such as a newly defined document type for digital access or a deprecated user type, are reflected in your internal policies and audits.
  • Training and Awareness: License compliance is not just the responsibility of the SAM team โ€“ end-users and IT staff also play a role. Conduct periodic training or awareness sessions for administrators and business power users about the importance of license compliance. For instance, train the helpdesk or user provisioning team on the necessity of assigning the correct license types during user onboardingโ€‹. Educate project managers that integrating a new third-party tool with SAP requires a check for licensing impacts. When the broader organization understands why you might ask, โ€œDoes this new interface create SAP documents?โ€, they are more likely to cooperate in compliance efforts. Creating a culture of compliance can prevent issues, such as creating a generic shared account to save licenses โ€“ a big no-no – from arising in the first place.

Recommendations

To wrap up, here are actionable recommendations for SAP license compliance internal audits:

  • Assign Ownership: Designate a responsible person or team (e.g., a License Compliance Officer or the SAM team) to manage SAP licenses and internal audits. Clear accountability ensures ongoing attention to compliance.
  • Audit Early and Often: Donโ€™t wait for SAPโ€™s official audit. Conduct regular internal audits (e.g., quarterly) to review user counts, license classifications, and usage metricsโ€‹. Frequent check-ups make compliance management a continuous process rather than a last-minute scramble.
  • Use the Right Tools: Utilize SAPโ€™s built-in measurement tools (USMM and LAW) to get an accurate picture of license consumption. Consider third-party license management solutions for continuous monitoring.
  • Clean House: Immediately address inactive or duplicate user accounts and reclaim the associated licenses. Implement procedures to keep the user list clean, tying them into HR offboarding so that departing employees are promptly removed from SAP systems.
  • Validate User Classification: Regularly verify that each user is assigned the correct license type based on their role and activities. Update classifications when roles change, and maintain a mapping of roles to license types to guide this processโ€‹.
  • Watch Indirect Use: Monitorย indirect access closely. Document all interfaces to SAP and ensure you have a licensing strategy for each, either covering named users or via Digital Access. Proactively measure document usage from external systems so you know your exposure and can negotiate terms with SAP if neededโ€‹.
  • Monitor Engines & Metrics: Continuously track engine metrics consumption against your entitlementsโ€‹. Set internal alerts if you approach limits (e.g., user count or SAP HANA memory usage at 90% of the licensed amount) so you can take action before an audit forces you to.
  • Stay Audit-Ready: Maintain organized documentation of licenses, user assignments, and compliance decisions. This โ€œaudit binderโ€ will be invaluable if SAP initiates an audit; you can respond confidently with evidence to back up your license position.
  • Keep Current on Licensing: Stay informed about SAPโ€™s licensing changes (for ECC, S/4HANA, cloud offerings, etc.) and adjust your compliance practices accordingly. Licensing professionals should treat this as an ongoing learning process โ€“ what was compliant last year might need tweaks as SAP evolves its models.

Organizations can significantly strengthen their SAP license compliance posture by following these best practices and recommendations.

An effective internal audit program helps youย pass an official SAP audit with flying colorsย and often uncovers opportunities to optimize licenses and reduce costs.

In summary, be proactive, thorough, and treat SAP license compliance as an integral part of your IT governance.

Your diligence will pay off by avoiding penalties and maximizing the value of your SAP investments.

FAQs

What is SAP license compliance?
Ensuring that all SAP software usage adheres to the terms and conditions set out in your licensing agreements.

How often should internal audits be performed?
Ideally, internal audits should be conducted quarterly to maintain compliance and catch issues early.

What tools are essential for internal SAP audits?
Tools like SAP License Administration Workbench (SLAW) and USMM are vital for monitoring license use and ensuring compliance.

Why is keeping license records important?
Up-to-date license records are crucial during audits to verify that all licenses are being used correctly and detect unauthorized usage.

How can indirect access impact SAP compliance?
Indirect access occurs when third-party applications interact with SAP software. These applications must be licensed correctly to avoid non-compliance penalties.

What is the difference between direct and indirect access?
Direct access occurs when named users interact directly with SAP, while indirect access involves third-party systems accessing SAP data.

Why is license reallocation necessary?
Reallocating licenses can prevent over- or under-licensing, save costs, and ensure that licenses are correctly used based on current roles.

How can user classification affect compliance?
Assigning incorrect user roles can lead to excessive costs or non-compliance due to unauthorized usage.

How does staying updated on SAP policies help?
SAP often changes licensing rules. Being updated ensures you adjust your license allocation strategy accordingly and stay compliant.

How can an internal audit help reduce costs?
Internal audits can help reallocate licenses by identifying unused or incorrectly assigned licenses, saving on unnecessary license purchases.

What documentation should be kept for audits?
Maintain user license assignments, system measurement reports, access logs, and integration documentation for a complete compliance record.

Is it necessary to deactivate unused accounts?
Yes, deactivating unused accounts can help free up licenses that can be reallocated, reducing compliance risk and saving costs.

Why are internal audits important before SAP audits?
Internal audits help you identify and correct issues before an official SAP audit, reducing the risk of non-compliance penalties.

Can third-party tools be used for SAP audits?
Yes, third-party tools like Snow Optimizer can help provide detailed insights into license utilization and compliance status.

How do system integration assessments help in compliance?
By reviewing all third-party integrations, you can ensure that all indirect access is properly licensed and avoid unintentional non-compliance.

What are the consequences of SAP non-compliance?
Non-compliance can lead to significant financial penalties, legal consequences, and disruptions to SAP services.

What role does SAP LAW play in audits?
SAP LAW consolidates measurement data from different systems to accurately calculate license usage for audit purposes.

How can user activity monitoring help in compliance?
Monitoring user activity can identify whether current license allocations are appropriate, helping to avoid misuse or under-utilization.

How should you prepare for an SAP-enhanced audit?
Gather all documentation, conduct a detailed internal review of system integrations, and ensure user roles align with license requirements.

What are the key areas to focus on during an internal audit?
Focus on license allocation, system integration points, user roles, documentation, and adherence to SAP’s latest licensing terms.

Read about our SAP License Management Services.

Do you want to know more about our SAP License Management Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Author
  • Fredrik Filipsson has 20 years of experience in Oracle license management, including nine years working at Oracle and 11 years as a consultant, assisting major global clients with complex Oracle licensing issues. Before his work in Oracle licensing, he gained valuable expertise in IBM, SAP, and Salesforce licensing through his time at IBM. In addition, Fredrik has played a leading role in AI initiatives and is a successful entrepreneur, co-founding Redress Compliance and several other companies.

    View all posts
Redress Compliance