Implementing and Configuring FlexNet Manager Suite

Implementing and Configuring FlexNet Manager Suite

1. Introduction to FlexNet Manager Suite

FlexNet Manager Suite (FNMS) is Flexera’s flagship Software Asset Management (SAM) solution designed to help organizations gain control over their software and hardware assets across the enterprise.

It provides a comprehensive set of tools to discover and inventory IT assets, track software usage, manage license entitlements, and optimize software spending throughout the asset lifecycle​. Organizations adopt FlexNet Manager Suite to replace ad-hoc asset tracking (like spreadsheets) with an automated, centralized SAM system that reduces costs and mitigates compliance risks​.

Why use FlexNet Manager Suite? Software is a major component of IT spending (often 20–35% of the total IT budget), and managing it manually is inefficient and error-prone​. FlexNet Manager Suite addresses this by automating the discovery and normalization of software installations and reconciling them with purchase data, giving IT Asset Managers an accurate view of what software is deployed and how it’s licensed.

This visibility helps organizations control costs, reduce audit exposure, and improve operational efficiency​. For example, FlexNet Manager can automatically identify unused or under-used software (shelfware) so that licenses can be reclaimed or not renewed, directly reducing wasteful spending​. It also continuously tracks license compliance, which minimizes audit risk and avoids unbudgeted true-up fees by alerting managers to shortfalls or overspending before auditors do​.

Key benefits for IT Asset Managers: FlexNet Manager Suite delivers numerous benefits that assist IT asset managers in strategic decision-making:

• Continuous License Compliance: The system maintains an up-to-date, effective license position for all software, helping you stay compliant and significantly reducing audit risks and costs​​. IT asset managers can generate compliance reports on demand, confident that data is current and normalized.
• Optimized License Usage and Cost Savings: FlexNet Manager Suite includes license optimization intelligence that can reduce software spending by up to 25% per year​. It optimizes license consumption (applying product use rights like upgrade, downgrade, license mobility, etc.) and reclaims unused licenses. This ensures you only purchase the licenses truly needed​​. Organizations can maximize the value of software portfolios and redirect savings to strategic initiatives​.
• Comprehensive Vendor Coverage: The suite supports thousands of software publishers and many license models out of the box – from Microsoft, Adobe, and VMware to heavy hitters like Oracle, IBM, and SAP​. It can manage complex data center licenses (per-core, virtual capacity, etc.), client software, and even engineering applications. This broad coverage means IT asset managers have a single source of truth for hundreds of vendors and license types​​.
• Automation and Efficiency: By automating data collection, license calculations, and routine SAM processes, FlexNet Manager Suite frees up IT and procurement staff from tedious manual tasks. It automatically reconciles installations with entitlements to produce an accurate compliance position​​. License management workflows are streamlined, reducing the manual effort needed and improving operational efficiency​.
• Better Decision Support: The tool provides powerful analytics, reports, and dashboards that give stakeholders insight into software usage, license consumption trends, and opportunities for optimization. With forensic-level data on license utilization (including on-premises, SaaS, and cloud), IT asset managers can make informed decisions about renewals, contract negotiations, and future needs​​. Reports can highlight unused software to target for removal or identify where moving to different license models could save costs​.
• Improved Governance and Audit Readiness: All relevant asset data (discovery information, purchase records, contracts, license evidence) is centralized, making it easier to govern the software estate and respond to vendor audits. Audit reports can be generated easily, and historical data is available to demonstrate compliance. As one customer noted, FlexNet Manager “has given us the data and confidence to know exactly what software we have and what we use,” empowering them to push back on unfair audit claims​​.

In summary, organizations use FlexNet Manager Suite to reduce software spending and compliance risk through license optimization​. IT Asset Managers value their ability to provide a single, normalized view of all IT assets and licenses, automate complex licensing calculations, and integrate with other IT systems for end-to-end asset management. The following sections of this white paper will guide you through deployment options, configuration steps, and best practices to get the most out of FlexNet Manager Suite across various industries and environments.

2. Deployment Options

FlexNet Manager Suite for Enterprises can be deployed to suit an organization’s needs and infrastructure: on-premises, in the cloud (Software as a Service), or a hybrid approach combining elements of both. Each deployment model has its requirements, advantages, and considerations.

On-Premises Implementation

Deploying FlexNet Manager Suite on-premises means the application and database are installed in your organization’s IT environment (typically on Windows Server and SQL Server). This option is chosen by organizations that require full control over the application environment or must meet strict data residency and security requirements by keeping asset data in-house.

Key points for on-premises deployments include:

• System Requirements: Ensure your servers meet the specifications for an FNMS installation. Generally, you’ll need a Windows Server (modern versions such as Windows Server 2016/2019) with sufficient resources (e.g., at least 8 GB RAM, 60+ GB storage for the application, plus space for the database) and a supported database (Microsoft SQL Server). The application tier runs on Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) with .NET framework, so those components must be present​​. Other prerequisites include enabling services like Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) and Microsoft Transaction Server (COM+), which the suite uses for certain processes (these are typically configured during setup).
• Architecture and Components: An on-premises FNMS implementation can be scaled across multiple servers for performance and redundancy. The core components typically include:
  • Application Server / Web Interface: This hosts the FlexNet Manager web portal (and web services/API) with which users interact.
  • Batch Server: This handles scheduled tasks such as nightly reconciliation, import jobs, and other background processing.
  • Inventory Server: Processes incoming inventory data from agents and connectors.
  • Database Server: Stores the FNMS databases (compliance data, inventory data, etc.).
    These roles can be combined on one server for smaller deployments or split across separate servers for larger environments. Flexera’s installation guide outlines steps to install each component (e.g., “Install the Web Interface,” “Install the Inventory Server,” “Install the Batch Server”), which can be done on one or multiple machines as needed​.
• Installation Steps: Installing FNMS on-prem involves several stages:
  1. Prepare the Environment: Configure required Windows Server roles/features (IIS with ASP.NET, MSMQ, etc.) and create service accounts (with appropriate permissions for running services and accessing the database) before installation.
  2. Database Setup: Create the FNMS databases (usually a compliance DB and an inventory DB) on your SQL Server. Flexera provides scripts or a wizard to set up these schemas​. Assign the database user roles or service accounts for database access.
  3. Application Installation: Run the FlexNet Manager Suite installer on the application server. You may be prompted to provide database connection info, service account credentials, and other configuration details. If scaling across multiple servers, install the relevant components on each (for example, run the installer separately on the batch server and inventory server, pointing each to the central database).
  4. Post-Install Configuration: Configure any additional options (like enabling HTTPS/TLS on the web interface, configuring email settings for alerts, etc.). Securing the FNMS web interface with SSL/TLS is recommended, especially in production environments​. Also, install and integrate that component separately if using Flexera Analytics (Cognos-based reporting).
  5. Deploy Inventory Beacon(s): Inventory Beacons are lightweight services that gather and feed inventory from your network to FNMS. For on-premises, at least one beacon is installed (often on the same server or separate ones strategically placed in your network). Beacons will be configured to collect data from various sources (FlexNet agents, SCCM, etc. – more on this later) and upload it to the FNMS application server.
• Maintenance: With on-prem deployment, your team is responsible for maintaining the system – applying updates or patches from Flexera, monitoring performance, and backing up the databases. Flexera typically releases updates (like 202X R1/R2 versions) that you can install to gain new features and bug fixes. Regular maintenance tasks include monitoring the scheduled reconciliation jobs and inventory imports, ensuring the servers have enough storage (inventory logs can grow), and verifying that beacons and agents are functioning. Maintaining the Application Recognition Library (ARL) and SKU/PURL updates Flexera provides (usually, these can be downloaded via the beacon). Keeping these knowledge bases up-to-date ensures the latest software titles and license rules are recognized (more on ARL/PURL in Section 3). Many on-prem customers schedule periodic updates of these libraries and perform test upgrades in a dev environment before updating production.

On-premises implementation offers maximum control and integration freedom (you can directly connect FNMS to internal data sources and customize it extensively). Still, it requires internal expertise to install and manage. On-prem is often suitable for companies with strict security or custom integration needs.

Cloud Implementation (SaaS)

Flexera also offers FlexNet Manager Suite as a cloud-based SaaS solution (often referred to as FlexNet Manager Suite On-Demand or as part of Flexera One ITAM in newer offerings). In a cloud deployment, Flexera hosts and manages the central application and database in their cloud environment, and the customer accesses the web interface over the internet.

This model attracts organizations looking to reduce internal infrastructure overhead and start quickly. Key considerations for the cloud implementation:

• Setup and Provisioning: Flexera will provision an instance of FlexNet Manager Suite for your organization in their cloud. You typically receive a URL for your FNMS tenant and admin credentials to log in. The initial setup on your side mainly involves configuring data collection: you’ll install one or more Inventory Beacons in your network to bridge your environment and Flexera’s cloud. These beacons securely upload inventory data to the cloud instance​. Because Flexera hosts the core application, you do not need to install the FNMS application or maintain a database server – Flexera handles the application maintenance, patches, and backups as part of the service.
• Infrastructure and Maintenance Benefits: SaaS deployment shifts the burden of infrastructure management to the vendor. This means reduced hardware to manage, faster deployment times, and always up-to-date software (Flexera will roll out updates/upgrades in the cloud environment)​. It typically lowers capital expenditure since you’re not running additional servers; instead, you have a subscription fee (operational expense). Flexera ensures the high availability and security of the platform, though you should review their compliance certifications if required (which are important for industries with data regulations).
• Security and Connectivity: A critical aspect of cloud FNMS is how it connects to your IT environment to gather data. Inventory Beacons are used to perform discovery and inventory within your network (they can scan subnets, query AD, or interface with tools like SCCM) and then securely transmit that data to Flexera’s cloud via HTTPS​. The communication is outbound from the beacon to Flexera, typically over TLS, which minimizes firewall complications. You must allow the beacon servers to reach the Flexera cloud endpoints. All data in transit is encrypted (and the platform likely uses encryption at rest on the back end as well). For integrations with other systems (e.g., ServiceNow, AD, etc.), connectors can be run via the beacon or through Flexera’s Integration services. Security considerations should include managing beacon authentication (each beacon is registered with your tenant via an activation code or certificate) and possibly whitelisting Flexera cloud IPs if your policy requires.
• Functionality: The cloud version of FNMS provides essentially the same functionality as on-premises, accessible through a web UI. Users get “anytime, anywhere” access via the browser​. One difference is how back-end access is handled – in on-prem, you might query the database directly or run custom SQL, whereas in the cloud, you’d use provided APIs or data export features since you won’t have direct DB access. Also, some advanced customizations (like custom reports in Cognos or modifying config files) might be limited or require Flexera support in SaaS mode. However, the SaaS offering usually includes built-in analytics and reports.
• Updates and Support: Flexera will update the cloud environment regularly. You should watch release notes as an admin to understand new features or changes. Testing new features in a sandbox (if provided) or understanding their impact is advisable. Flexera’s support will assist with issues on the platform. One best practice is to maintain good communication with Flexera regarding any scheduled maintenance windows or data upload schedules to align them with your operations (e.g., know when the nightly reconciliation runs in the cloud and avoid heavy data loads then).

In summary, a cloud implementation offers rapid time-to-value, reduced maintenance effort, and scalability for large environments without you needing to provision database or application servers. “Many organizations see OPEX and CAPEX benefits in a SaaS model – enjoying reduced infrastructure requirements, accelerated deployment, and a lower initial investment,” as Flexera noted when launching the FNMS cloud service​. The trade-off is less direct control; nonetheless, for many companies, the cloud option provides a robust, up-to-date SAM solution with minimal IT footprint.

Hybrid Deployment

A hybrid deployment can refer to two possible scenarios: (1) a transitional or combined approach to deploying the FlexNet Manager Suite itself (part on-premises and part cloud) or (2) using the FNMS platform to manage hybrid IT environments (a mix of on-premises and cloud assets).

In this context, we focus on the deployment model of FNMS:

• Hybrid Model Definition: In practice, FlexNet Manager Suite is generally run either fully on-prem or fully as SaaS. However, “hybrid” could describe an organization migrating from on-premises to cloud in phases or maintaining separate instances (one on-prem, one in cloud) for specific reasons. Another interpretation is using on-prem components (like Inventory Beacons or integration adapters) in conjunction with a cloud FNMS backend, which is the standard architecture for the cloud, effectively making it a hybrid of local data collectors and cloud processing. Almost all cloud deployments are hybrid: your inventory beacons, agents, and possibly integration scripts run on-premises, while the core FNMS application runs in the cloud​.
• When to Use a Hybrid Approach: A hybrid deployment might be used during migration. For example, a company with an existing on-prem FNMS might set up a cloud instance and gradually transfer data and processes. Some data might be managed in the on-prem system during this period while new data goes to the cloud. Another use case is if certain sensitive data or functions must remain on-prem (an organization may keep hardware asset info internally but use the cloud for software management). Also, large multinationals might deploy FNMS so that some regional instances are on-prem (for specific local requirements) while the central SAM team uses a global cloud instance. This is uncommon, but it can happen if a phased adoption is needed.
• Integration Challenges: Running a hybrid FNMS environment can introduce complexity. Data synchronization becomes an issue – ensuring inventory and entitlement data are consistently maintained between on-prem and cloud instances if both are in use. There’s a risk of duplicated effort or confusion over which system is authoritative. If using a single FNMS instance but calling it “hybrid” because of on-prem data collectors, then the main challenge is just the connectivity and integration of those collectors. One must ensure beacons can communicate with the cloud (as discussed) and possibly use a Flexera Service Gateway for certain integrations (Flexera provides a Service Gateway component to facilitate communication between on-prem enterprise apps like App Portal/App Broker and either cloud or on-prem FNMS)​. Another challenge is network performance if your FNMS is in the cloud. Still, you have slow links from some environments, so you may need additional beacon servers in those networks to cache and forward data efficiently.
• Best Practices for Hybrid: If transitioning to the cloud, plan a phased migration – inventory first, then license data, etc.- while running parallel audits to ensure the new system matches the old. Define clearly which system is the source of truth during the transition to avoid confusion. For permanent hybrid setups, consider scoping (e.g., use the on-prem FNMS only for a subset of data or as a backup. Leverage FNMS’s import/export or Business Adapter Studio to transfer data. Always keep ARL/PURL libraries in sync between environments if both are used. In general, Flexera and industry experts recommend consolidating to one SAM platform where possible to get a single source of truth, so hybrid should be a stepping stone rather than a long-term strategy unless required.
• Managing Hybrid IT Assets: On a related note, one strength of FlexNet Manager Suite is managing assets in a hybrid IT environment (spanning on-premises infrastructure, cloud IaaS/PaaS, and SaaS applications)​. FNMS has connectors for cloud platforms (like AWS, Azure) to inventory cloud VMs and track their usage, and it can handle license models for cloud (like BYOL or cloud-specific licenses). It can also track SaaS subscription usage through its SaaS Manager module or specific adapters. This means your SAM practice can be unified even as the underlying environment is hybrid. Ensuring your deployment (on-prem or cloud) is configured to discover both traditional on-prem assets and cloud resources is crucial for full coverage.

A hybrid deployment of FlexNet Manager Suite is less of a distinct third option and more of a bridge between on-prem and cloud. Many organizations start on-premises and later move to SaaS to take advantage of easier maintenance. FlexNet Manager Suite’s design facilitates this by allowing data to be imported/exported and using beacons that work with either model.

When done properly, a hybrid approach can provide flexibility; just be mindful of the integration and data management challenges and follow best practices (such as clear migration plans, connectivity testing, and stakeholder training on any new system).

3. Initial Configuration

After deploying FlexNet Manager Suite (either on-prem or getting your cloud instance), proper initial configuration is critical to start managing assets effectively.

This section covers the early setup tasks: defining user roles, connecting to your IT infrastructure for data feeds, and importing & normalizing asset data.

Setting Up User Roles and Permissions

FlexNet Manager Suite supports role-based access control to ensure that users have appropriate permissions for their job functions. The system includes predefined roles (such as Administrator, Asset Manager, License Manager, End User, etc.), and you can customize roles as needed. Configuring these roles at the outset will help maintain governance and security:

• User and Role Management: You can import or sync user accounts and assign roles if integrated with Active Directory. An Administrator role typically has full access to all features (including system configuration). Other roles can be set up to restrict access to certain data or functions. For example, a “License Manager” role might allow managing entitlements and running compliance reports but not altering system settings; a “Read-Only” role could let executives view dashboards without editing anything. In FlexNet Manager, permissions are quite granular – you can allow or deny abilities like creating licenses, managing purchases, viewing cost data, etc. – but these are grouped into roles for easier assignment​.
• Mapping to Responsibilities: Work with your SAM and IT teams to map who will use the system and what they should be able to do. Common personas:
  • IT Asset Manager: likely needs broad access to manage hardware and software records and run reports.
  • Software License Manager or Compliance Manager: This person needs to create license records, enter contracts, allocate licenses, and view compliance status.
  • Procurement or Sourcing: Procurement or sourcing might need access to input purchase orders, contracts, and run spend reports.
  • Help Desk or End Users: Possibly a limited role to request software or view their assets (if such self-service is enabled via portal).
  • IT Security or Compliance Auditors: Perhaps view access to verify installations vs licenses.
• Implementing Roles: In the FNMS web UI, you (as an admin) will go to the Account/Permissions section and create or modify roles. Assign users (or AD groups, if supported) to those roles. For cloud implementations using Flexera One authentication, user management might be handled through Flexera’s Identity management and linked to your SSO/AD. On-prem, you can integrate with AD so users can log in with domain credentials and automatically get roles based on AD group membership – this is often done by mapping AD groups to FNMS roles.
• Verification: After setup, test by logging in as test users of each role to ensure they see the correct menus and data. For example, a user who is not an admin should not see the System Settings or be able to delete licenses. Tuning roles early prevents unauthorized changes and declutters the interface for users who don’t need every feature.

Setting up roles and permissions properly ensures that sensitive functions (like altering license entitlements or viewing the financial details of contracts) are only available to authorized personnel. It also enables delegation – e.g., regional asset managers can control their region’s assets without affecting others if you configure scopes (using Enterprise Groups like location or business unit to segregate data access).

Connecting to IT Infrastructure and Data Sources

One of the most important configuration steps is integrating FlexNet Manager Suite with your existing IT infrastructure so it can collect the data it needs. FNMS’s value comes from the data it aggregates: inventory from devices, user information from directories, purchase information from procurement systems, etc.

Key integrations to set up include:

• Active Directory (AD) Integration: FlexNet Manager can connect to Active Directory to import a list of users, computers, and organizational units. This helps in a few ways: (1) It provides user details (username, department, etc.) that can be linked to installations for user-based licensing or allocation; (2) It provides an inventory of known computers which can be reconciled with discovered devices; (3) It can populate organizational hierarchies (locations, business units) if you use AD structure for that. Typically, an inventory beacon is configured to read from AD periodically​. You’ll supply an AD domain service account for the beacon to query AD (LDAP) and schedule an import. Ensure you include all relevant domains. After importing AD data, you might see unmanaged assets in FNMS, which can later be matched to inventory or marked accordingly.
• Systems Management Tools (e.g. SCCM/MECM): Many organizations already use Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM) for device management and have rich inventory data. FlexNet Manager provides a connector for SCCM to import hardware and software inventory from SCCM’s database​. Setting this up usually involves configuring a beacon to connect to the SCCM SQL Server (using an ODBC or direct SQL connection with appropriate credentials) and running an import job. The SCCM adapter will pull data like installed software, add/remove programs, hardware specs, usage data (if SCCM Software Metering is enabled), etc. This way, you can leverage existing inventory sources instead of deploying the FlexNet agent everywhere. Similarly, connectors exist for other inventory systems like Altiris, ILMT (IBM’s tool), Jamf (for Mac), etc. Each requires configuration (often on a beacon or the application server) to fetch and transform the data into FNMS. Schedule these imports (e.g., nightly after SCCM finishes its discovery) so that FNMS stays up-to-date.
• ServiceNow and ITSM Integration: Many organizations integrate FNMS with IT Service Management tools like ServiceNow to exchange asset and license information. For example, FlexNet Manager Suite’s integration with ServiceNow can export hardware and software data into the ServiceNow CMDB and import IT asset records or contracts from ServiceNow into FNMS​​. This bidirectional sync ensures consistency between the SAM tool and ITSM records. Typically, Flexera provides an integration application for ServiceNow: you would install a Flexera-provided update set in ServiceNow and configure FNMS (via a business adapter or built-in integration) with connection details (ServiceNow API endpoint, credentials). Once connected, you choose what data to transfer. For instance, FNMS might send discovered software installations and calculated license compliance info to ServiceNow and get back information like asset lifecycle status or ownership that ServiceNow manages​​. If ServiceNow is used for managing software requests (see section 5), integration also means FNMS can feed into the approval process by providing info on license availability.
• Other Inventory and Asset Repositories: Identify any other sources of inventory or asset data in your environment:
  • Virtualization platforms (VMware vCenter, etc.): FNMS can connect to vCenter to get VM and host information to help with license calculations (especially for IBM and VMware licenses). Configuration involves providing vCenter credentials/URL to a beacon.
  • Cloud platforms: If you have IaaS resources, set up connectors for AWS, Azure, etc. For example, an AWS connector would use AWS API keys to import a list of EC2 instances, their specs, etc. FlexNet’s Inventory Adapters and Connectors reference can guide you through the prerequisites for each (such as enabling certain AWS services)​​.
  • Procurement or ERP systems: If you have purchase records in systems like SAP, Oracle ERP, Ariba, etc., you may import that data (software purchase orders, license entitlements) using Business Importers or adapters. If direct integration is not set up yet, entitlements can often be initially loaded via spreadsheets.
  • HR systems: Some data, like user department or employee status, might come from HR databases; integrating that can help determine when to reclaim licenses (e.g., if an employee leaves, HR data can flag that, and FNMS can then mark their software for reclaim).
• Inventory Agents and Beacon Configuration: If you choose to deploy FlexNet Manager’s Inventory Agent on endpoints (or run agentless scans), those need configuration. Agents can be installed on Windows, Linux, Mac, etc. They will collect hardware and software evidence and report to a beacon. In the FNMS UI under Discovery & Inventory rules, set up schedules for scanning IP ranges (for agentless discovery) and for agent check-ins. The beacon should be configured with the list of target subnets and protocols to scan (WMI for Windows, SSH for Unix, etc.) if using agentless inventory. If using agents, you’ll either bake the beacon address and tenant info into the agent installer or deploy an initial configuration so they know where to upload inventory. This initial setup ensures that within the first inventory cycle, FNMS starts receiving data from all intended sources.

During initial configuration, getting all relevant data into FNMS is prioritized. Many implementation challenges arise from missing data feeds. For example, forgetting to import all purchasing records could later show compliance gaps that aren’t real, or not capturing a subset of devices (like Macs) could skew your license consumption. It’s often wise to configure and validate one integration at a time: e.g., connect AD and verify you see users/computers, then SCCM import and verify inventory counts, then ServiceNow, etc.

One practitioner noted, “It can be challenging to set up all the data feeds into the product. At a minimum, you’ll need feeds from your inventory system, purchasing system, and HR systems – all those feeds will need to be set up, which can be challenging depending on data quality.”. Planning and testing each connection thoroughly will pay off in data quality later (see Section 7 on data quality).

Importing and Normalizing Asset Data

Once data sources are connected, FlexNet Manager Suite will begin importing raw asset data, but “raw” data alone isn’t enough. The system’s power lies in normalizing and reconciling that data into useful asset records, license records, and actionable information. Initial data load and normalization involves:

• Hardware Asset Import: The inventory data coming in (from SCCM, agents, etc.) will create records of computers, VMs, network devices, etc., in FNMS. You should review these and ensure they are categorized correctly. For instance, servers vs desktops can be distinguished (FNMS can classify based on OS or other attributes). If you have existing hardware asset registers, you might import those via a spreadsheet to enrich the records with asset tags, owners, or lifecycle status. FlexNet Manager can merge data from multiple sources – e.g., a computer discovered via SCCM could be matched to a record imported from a CMDB by serial number or name. The goal is to avoid duplicates and have one record per physical or virtual device.
• Software Inventory Normalization: This is a crucial step. Inventory tools will provide data like installed software evidence (file names, installer entries). FlexNet Manager Suite uses its Application Recognition Library (ARL) to translate this raw evidence into standardized application titles and versions. The ARL is a massive database (hundreds of thousands of application definitions) that Flexera regularly updates. When you first import inventory, run a reconciliation or normalization job, which will take all the discovered evidence and match it against the ARL to produce a list of recognized software installations. This process yields a normalized software inventory – a clean list of products (with publisher, version, and edition), rather than raw file names. For example, it might take an Add/Remove entry “MS Visio Pro 15.2” and recognize it as “Microsoft Visio Professional 2013”. As the FNMS datasheet explains, Normalization combs through inventory data (files, registry info, etc.) and produces a consistently named list of applications per device, using an Application Recognition Library​. This standardized inventory is the foundation for license management.
• License Entitlement Import: In parallel to bringing in installation data, you need to load your software license entitlements (purchases, contracts, agreements). The initial configuration often involves bulk importation of purchase records from procurement. FlexNet Manager has a SKU library of hundreds of thousands of software SKUs. If your purchase orders contain SKUs, FNMS can automatically recognize them and create license records with the correct metrics and usage rights. For example, if you bought “Microsoft Office 2019 Professional Plus – 100 licenses”, entering that SKU will let FNMS know it’s per-device, includes downgrade rights, etc., without manually configuring every detail. Using the SKU and Product Use Rights Library (PURL) is a best practice to speed up entitlement loading. You might import purchase data via a spreadsheet template or directly integrate it with a procurement system. After import, verify the created license records for accuracy (quantities, maintenance dates, etc.). If SKUs aren’t available, you can manually create license records and assign purchases to them.
• Linking Inventory to Licenses: Once you have software inventory and license entitlements in the system, FlexNet Manager will start reconciling them (usually as part of a nightly process or when triggered). This is where the normalization shows its value: the normalized application names from the inventory are linked to products in license records. For example, the inventory might list “Adobe Acrobat Pro DC” installations, and you have a license record for “Adobe Acrobat Pro DC – 50 seats”. The system will automatically relate the two because the application is recognized as Adobe Acrobat and can consume from that license. Sometimes manual intervention is needed to align applications to licenses (especially if there are custom applications or complex bundling). The FNMS interface allows you to map discovered applications to license records if they weren’t auto-linked.
• Initial Compliance Check: Run a full license reconciliation after the initial data load. FlexNet Manager will calculate whether you comply with each license (entitlements vs. consumption)​. The result is often presented in dashboards or “license summary” views with compliance statuses (compliant, overused, etc.)​​. At this stage, don’t be surprised to see many licenses red (over-utilized) or orange (incomplete) – initial data might be missing some entitlements or have inaccuracies. Use this as a baseline to start cleanup: for example, if Microsoft Office shows over-installed, verify if all purchase records were input or if some installs are misidentified. This process will help identify data gaps.
• Normalization of Contracts and Lifecycle Data: You should also initially configure the Contracts module in FNMS. Input your active software contracts (enterprise agreements, maintenance contracts, etc.) and link licenses to them. This helps track renewal dates and can later be used for automated alerts. Set corporate identifiers like cost centers, locations, and vendors in the system so they can be assigned to licenses and assets (often, these can be imported from AD or a financial system). Essentially, you are establishing the “metadata” around your assets so that reporting and responsibilities can be clearly defined.

During initial configuration, much focus is on data normalization and validation. The FlexNet Manager Platform’s built-in libraries (ARL for applications, SKU, and PURL for license rights) greatly assist in turning raw data into actionable intelligence by automatically applying recognition and product use rights​. It’s important to update these libraries to the latest version after installation and set them to auto-update (the system can update ARL/PURL content typically every week from Flexera).

By the end of the initial configuration phase, you should have user access, integrations pulling in data from all key sources, an inventory of all IT assets (hardware and software) normalized and visible in FNMS, and initial license compliance results. From here, you can proceed to steady-state license management and process integration, which we will discuss next.

4. Software License Management

Software license management is the core of FlexNet Manager Suite’s functionality. In this phase, you leverage the data collected and normalized in the system to actively manage license entitlements, monitor consumption, optimize usage, and ensure compliance.

This section covers handling license records in FNMS, automating reconciliation, managing complex vendor license models, and preparing for compliance reporting and audits.

Managing License Entitlements and Consumption

In FlexNet Manager, each software title or suite you manage licenses for will have a License record representing your entitlements (the rights to use the software, typically derived from purchases or agreements).

Managing these effectively involves:

• Recording Entitlements: Ensure that each license record in FNMS reflects the correct number of entitlements (rights to install or use). Entitlements are usually added via purchase orders (as line items attached to the license) or manually inputting a license count. You should also capture related info like the license metric (per device, per user, per core, concurrent, etc.), the scope of use (which users or machines it covers), and any special product use rights (e.g., upgrade/downgrade rights, second-use rights). FlexNet’s Product Use Rights Library (PURL) automatically populates many of these details for common licenses, which helps in accurate tracking​​.
• Allocations and Reservations: FNMS allows the allocation of licenses to specific devices or users. For instance, you might allocate a Microsoft Visio license to a particular user to ensure their usage always draws from that entitlement (and is not given up to someone else). Allocations are useful for tying licenses to critical users or devices so that compliance calculations know those entitlements are spoken for​​. You can also reserve licenses for a pool or project if needed. Conversely, if certain machines should not consume a particular license (maybe covered by a different agreement), you can exempt them.
• Tracking Consumption: “Consumption” is the number of license units used based on inventory. FNMS calculates consumption by matching discovered installations or usage to the license entitlements. For example, if you have a per-install license, consumption equals the count of installations (after accounting for any allocations or policies). For a user-based license, consumption might equal the count of unique users running the software. In the interface, each license record will show Entitlements (how many you have) vs Consumed (how many are used) and whether there is a surplus or deficit. Regularly monitor these figures. FlexNet Manager updates consumption counts at each reconciliation (often nightly)​​. You can also trigger a manual reconciliation if you just made changes and want to see the impact immediately.
• Optimizing Use of Entitlements: Good license management isn’t just about avoiding overuse, but also about avoiding under-use (over-purchase). If FNMS shows you have far more entitlements than installations (perhaps you’re “over-licensed” or have shelfware), that’s an opportunity to save cost – maybe you can reduce renewal counts or re-harvest licenses. FNMS has features to identify unused software (e.g., through usage metering data or last used dates) so you can uninstall and reuse those licenses elsewhere. Continuously review the “Available” entitlements field on licenses (Entitled minus Consumed)​ – a high positive number might mean you are over-buying or not deploying as expected. On the other hand, a negative number or “At Risk” status indicates you’re under-licensed and need to be addressed​​.
• Maintaining License Records: License entitlements are not static. As you purchase more, true-up, renew maintenance, or retire licenses, update FNMS accordingly. Many organizations establish a process where procurement notifies the SAM team of new software purchases, which are entered into FNMS (or integrated if possible). Likewise, if licenses are terminated or expired, remove or adjust those entitlements. FlexNet Manager can also track maintenance expiration dates on licenses – leverage this to get alerts on upcoming renewals. Ensuring that license data remains current is crucial for trustable compliance positions.

In short, managing entitlements in FNMS involves keeping the inputs (license counts and rights) accurate and up to date and monitoring the outputs (consumption and availability) to govern usage.

A well-maintained license repository in FNMS becomes the definitive record that can answer “what do we own for software X” and “are we using it efficiently?” at any time​. FlexNet Manager’s interface (Licenses page) and reports will provide ongoing visibility into these metrics for each software publisher or title.

Automating License Reconciliation

License reconciliation is the process of comparing entitlements versus consumption to determine license compliance status. FlexNet Manager Suite automates this process extensively, saving IT asset managers from manual reconciliation (which can be incredibly complex for enterprise agreements).

Key points about reconciliation in FNMS:

• Reconciliation Process: By default, FlexNet Manager performs a reconciliation as a scheduled task (often nightly). During reconciliation, the system reviews each license record, recalculates consumption based on the latest inventory, and then applies entitlements, allocations, and usage rights to see if you’re compliant. The result of the last reconciliation is what’s displayed in compliance reports and dashboards​. You can also initiate a reconciliation on demand (there’s usually a “Reconcile” button or menu) if you have just made changes, such as adding new purchases or importing new inventory data.
• Automatic Calculations: The tool takes into account various factors automatically:
  • Product Use Rights (upgrade, downgrade, secondary use, etc.): If you have, say, an entitlement to Microsoft Office 2019, but you installed Office 2016 on a machine, FNMS knows that downgrade rights cover it and will count that install against the 2019 license. This prevents you from being marked non-compliant for valid downgrade scenarios. Similarly, rights like “two installs per user” are recognized (for instance, some Adobe licenses allow a user to install on two machines; FNMS would count both installs as one user-based consumption if properly configured).
  • Bundles/Suites: If software is part of a suite (e.g., Adobe Creative Suite or Microsoft Office, which includes Word, Excel, etc.), FNMS can recognize that installing Word and Excel on the same device consumes one Office suite license, not two separate licenses. The ARL and PURL define these bundle relationships. The reconciliation logic ensures that components of a suite don’t double-count.
  • Device vs User metrics: The system handles summing up appropriately. For device-based licenses, each device with the software = 1 consumption. For user-based, each user (with potentially multiple devices) = 1 consumption (FNMS sees the same user across devices and counts once if the license is user-scoped). Concurrent or network licenses might use different data (like peak usage counts).
  • Idle or Ignored Installs: You can set certain installs to be ignored (e.g., if on a discovery device that’s not in use) or set policies like not counting retired machines, etc. The reconciliation obeys those flags.
• Performance and Schedule: In large environments, reconciliation can be resource-intensive. The “Batch Server” component in an on-prem deployment handles this. Ensure the schedule is set to a time that doesn’t conflict with other heavy operations (like inventory imports) for optimal performance. If needed, the reconciliation frequency can be adjusted (some might run weekly if nightly is too much, but then risk being out-of-date; most aim for nightly). Monitor reconciliation logs for errors – e.g., if certain license calculations fail due to missing data.
• Validation of Results: After the initial setup, carefully validate the reconciliation results. Spot-check some licenses: e.g., if you know you purchased 100 and installed 80, does FNMS show 80 consumed, 100 entitled, and compliance? If not, figure out if some installations weren’t recognized or if some purchases weren’t linked. FlexNet Manager provides detailed drill-downs: you can open a license record and see which devices/users are consuming from it. You can also see if any installations are unlicensed (i.e., FNMS sees an application installed that isn’t linked to any license record). Those will appear as “unlicensed installations” in the system, which means you might need to create a license record or categorize that software as freeware if appropriate.
• Alerts and Exceptions: Use FNMS’s alerting features to notify you of issues post-reconciliation. For example, it can flag over-utilized licenses (usually highlighted in red)​or those approaching full use so you can act (either true-up or uninstall some copies). It also flags “incomplete” licenses in orange, meaning some info is missing (perhaps no license metric chosen or inconsistent data)​. Address those to ensure the reconciliation is accurate.

Overall, the reconciliation automation in FlexNet Manager ensures that every time new inventory or purchase data comes in, your compliance position is recalculated without manual effort​. This continuous license position is crucial for staying on top of compliance. It allows IT asset managers to move to exception-based management – focusing on the red and orange flags where there are issues instead of manually crunching numbers for everything.

One Flexera user guide describes the outcome: “The overall compliance position for each license is based on the last license reconciliation, and represented by a colored card” indicating compliant, over-licensed, or under-licensed status​. This gives a quick visual cue after each reconciliation cycle. By automating reconciliation, FNMS frees SAM managers to spend time on analysis and remediation rather than number-crunching.

Handling Complex License Models (Oracle, Microsoft, IBM, etc.)

Enterprise software from vendors like Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM often has complex licensing models and rules. FlexNet Manager Suite is designed to accommodate these complexities with specialized product modules and recognized best practices for each vendor.

Here’s how FNMS helps manage some of the most challenging license models:

• Oracle Licensing: Oracle software (databases, middleware, etc.) uses metrics like Processor and Named User Plus, with intricate rules about counting cores and minimums. FlexNet Manager includes FlexNet Manager for Oracle, an Oracle-verified solution for tracking Oracle Database and other products​​. FNMS can discover Oracle installations and even integrate with Oracle’s LMS data collection tools to get usage details (like options and packs used). For Processor licenses, FNMS has the Oracle Processor core factor table built-in​– it knows, for example, that an Oracle DB on an 8-core Intel CPU with a 0.5 core factor counts as 4 Processor licenses. For Named User Plus, it tracks the number of distinct users (and applies Oracle’s rule of a minimum of 25 Named Users per processor for databases)​. All these rules are applied during reconciliation so that the consumption for Oracle licenses is accurate. Example: If an Oracle Database enterprise edition is running on a 16-core server, FNMS will apply the core factor and any virtualization partitioning info to calculate the number of licenses consumed and compare it with your entitlements. Oracle Option usage: FNMS can also detect if optional Oracle features (like Partitioning, Advanced Security, etc.) are being used, which is important since those often require separate licenses. By automating Oracle license calculations and being an Oracle-approved tool, FlexNet Manager Suite greatly simplifies Oracle compliance management, ensuring you don’t inadvertently run afoul of Oracle’s strict policies.
• Microsoft Licensing: Microsoft has a variety of license models – from user and device CALs to per-core licenses for servers to SaaS subscriptions for Office 365. FlexNet Manager for Microsoft module provides a Product Use Rights Library for Microsoft server products, encoding rules from Microsoft’s licensing agreements​. For example, Microsoft SQL Server changed from per-processor to per-core licensing; FNMS supports both models. It includes specific support for:
  • Server Core licenses: FNMS knows Microsoft’s rules, such as requiring a minimum number of cores per CPU and VM, and the core factor (for older systems)​. It will automatically apply the 16-core minimum per server (for Windows/SQL servers) or the per-VM minimum if applicable​.
  • Server + CAL models: For products like Windows Server that need CALs, FNMS can track the servers and then manage CAL entitlements separately (e.g., number of User CALs purchased). It won’t automatically know how many users or devices are accessing each server so that some input might be needed, or you can handle CAL compliance outside the tool. But FNMS will maintain the CAL entitlements and consumption count if usage is provided or allocations are done.
  • Client Software Suites: It handles Microsoft Office, Visio, Project, etc., including device vs user license distinctions. If Office is installed on a device, it counts appropriately, and if you have Office 365, that’s different (see SaaS below).
  • Enterprise Agreements and SA: FNMS can model Microsoft Enterprise Agreements by grouping the licenses under a master contract. It also understands Software Assurance benefits – for instance, new version rights or the fact that you might have a pool of upgrades available. Those are part of the PURL content.
  • Microsoft Office 365 (SaaS): FlexNet Manager can integrate with Office 365 (now Microsoft 365) to pull subscription and usage data​. It offers capabilities to manage O365 subscriptions by identifying when a user has an Office 365 license and a perpetual Office installed – highlighting potential overlap​. FNMS can retrieve information from the Microsoft 365 admin portal on who is assigned, what license plan is assigned, and even last login or usage info. This allows for optimizing SaaS spending by reclaiming unused subscriptions or downgrading users to more appropriate plans (more on SaaS in section 6).
  • Cloud Infrastructure: If you use Azure or AWS, Microsoft’s BYOL (bring your own license) rules or hybrid use benefits can be tracked. For example, Windows Server in Azure under Hybrid Benefit could be marked as not consuming a license if covered by Software Assurance – FNMS can help track how many of your Azure VMs are using that benefit versus your on-prem entitlements.
• IBM Licensing: IBM has notoriously complex licensing, especially with its Processor Value Unit (PVU) metric for many IBM software products. FlexNet Manager for IBM is a specialized component that encapsulates IBM’s licensing rules, including PVU tables, Resource Value Unit (RVU), User Value Unit, and more​. Key IBM-related capabilities:
  • PVU Sub-Capacity: IBM allows customers with virtualized environments to license less than full capacity (sub-capacity) only if they use an approved tracking tool. FlexNet Manager for IBM is an IBM-approved alternative to IBM’s ILMT for sub-capacity tracking​. FNMS has IBM’s PVU per-core metrics built in, and it collects needed data like processor models, core counts, and VM hosting relationships. It correlates VMs to physical hosts and calculates PVU consumption based on allocated cores rather than total cores, following IBM’s rules​​. If a VM moves across hosts (vMotion, etc.), FNMS can compute the high-watermark of resource usage in a cluster to ensure you license the peak usage in a period, as IBM requires​. Using FNMS can save a lot on IBM licensing by accurately reflecting usage and ensuring compliance. It also produces audit reports accepted by IBM (with proper agreement in place).
  • Other IBM Metrics: FNMS supports IBM’s other models, such as RVU, UVU, Authorized User, Concurrent User, etc.​ For each, the tool will count usage appropriately. The formula for RVU (Resource Value Unit) is in the system, and the formula might depend on specific hardware attributes.
  • IBM Contract Use: IBM often has custom terms (like certain products can be traded via a “value bucket”). The FlexNet Manager for IBM module can help track these by providing a way to decrement from a pool of points or licenses when traded in​. While some of these scenarios might need manual processing, having all IBM entitlements in one place and updated with IBM-specific data (like D-part numbers or IBM SKU) helps when IBM auditors come knocking.
  • FNMS was updated over years to incorporate IBM’s evolving metrics. It has reporting that directly compares FNMS’s calculations to ILMT’s, giving confidence in the numbers​.
• SAP and Others: Though the question highlighted Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM, it’s worth noting FlexNet Manager also has modules for SAP (user license optimization for SAP named user licenses) and for engineering software (like concurrent licenses for Autodesk, MathWorks, etc.). SAP license management is a niche – FNMS can import SAP USMM and license data if you have the FlexNet Manager for SAP tool, helping classify SAP users into optimal license types. FNMS can interface with license servers (FlexLM, etc.) for engineering applications to monitor concurrent license usage and optimize those. Each of these complex areas has dedicated functionality in the suite.
• Custom License Models: If you have software with a unique licensing model, FNMS provides a variety of license type templates (dozens of types are available out-of-box). Choose the closest match and adjust the parameters. For instance, Oracle’s Named User Plus is essentially a “Named User” license type with some custom restrictions; IBM’s PVU is a “Processor Points” license type with a specific points table. If needed, you can create custom metrics using the points-based license in FNMS (where you define how many points a certain hardware attribute is worth). This flexibility covers edge cases not explicitly supported by default.

By leveraging these capabilities, IT asset managers can handle “difficult” licenses in the same system as everything else. For example, instead of maintaining a separate spreadsheet to calculate Oracle core factors or an IBM ILMT deployment for PVUs, they can rely on FNMS to do the heavy lifting.

DBS Bank’s case study requirement was that the SAM tool be “approved by Oracle and IBM to accept that solution’s data during an audit or true-up.”​ FlexNet Manager Suite met this need, giving confidence that its calculations for those vendors would be audit-proof.

In practice, when implementing FNMS, you’ll want to prioritize setting up those complex licenses correctly:

• Import the latest license entitlements and contracts for Oracle, IBM, and Microsoft.
• Use Flexera’s license templates (e.g., “Oracle Database Enterprise – Processor”), which come pre-configured with known use rights.
• Deploy the Flexera agent on key servers if required (IBM sub-capacity requires the Flexera agent on all relevant VMs or ILMT data import).
• Update the ARL and PURL libraries regularly because they contain the definitions for these big vendors, including updates for new Oracle options or Microsoft product editions.
• Consider a “what-if” analysis (FNMS provides a feature to simulate changes): e.g., simulate upgrading hardware or changing VMware affinity and see how IBM PVU consumption would change​​. This is extremely useful for planning and avoiding compliance issues.

By carefully configuring FNMS for these complex models, you transform a potential administrative nightmare into an automated process. For instance, FlexNet Manager will accurately calculate IBM PVU license consumption in both full capacity and sub-capacity environments without requiring ILMT​, and it can produce a side-by-side comparison with ILMT’s numbers for assurance.

For Oracle, it can list all Oracle installations and whether they are correctly licensed, which was historically very hard to maintain manually. The result is that at any given moment, you can trust FNMS to tell you where you stand with these major vendors and avoid last-minute surprises during audits.

Compliance Reporting and Audit Readiness

One of the ultimate goals of implementing FlexNet Manager Suite is to always be audit-ready—to have confidence that you can face a software vendor audit with accurate data and be in compliance (or at least know exactly where you are non-compliant and by how much).

FNMS provides robust compliance reporting capabilities to support this:

• Compliance Reports and Dashboards: FlexNet Manager comes with various pre-built reports focused on compliance. For example, a “License Compliance Summary” report might list every license with its installed count vs purchased count and indicate compliant/non-compliant status. There are also publisher-specific reports (like an IBM compliance report showing sub-capacity details, an Oracle summary, etc.). Executive dashboards can show high-level compliance percentages and risk exposure in dollar terms. Many companies create a Compliance Dashboard as a landing page for CIOs, with metrics like “% of licenses in compliance, total potential audit risk ($) if all non-compliance had to be purchased,” etc. You can achieve this via Flexera Analytics (which uses Cognos) or the web UI custom reports. Ensure these reports are reviewed periodically (at least quarterly, if not monthly).
• Detailed License Position Reports: For audit preparation, you often need to provide an Effective License Position (ELP) for a vendor – essentially a detailed listing of entitlements and deployments. FNMS can generate these. For Microsoft, you might have a report by product (e.g., Windows Server, SQL Server, Office, etc.) showing entitlements, consumed, and delta. For Oracle, you could report on each Database installation and whether a license covers it. Because all data is centralized, you can quickly assemble the evidence: installation evidence, proof of purchases, and reconciliation calculations.
• Audit Trail and Documentation: FlexNet Manager keeps historical data (as long as you don’t purge it), which is useful in audits to demonstrate trends and that you’ve been in control. You can often export data from FNMS in the format auditors require. For instance, IBM auditors might want a CSV of PVU consumption by machine; FNMS can provide that with one of the IBM reports. Oracle’s License Management Services might want a list of all Oracle instances and options usage – the FNMS Oracle module can output an Oracle Server Worksheet equivalent. For Microsoft true-ups, you might need to provide current counts of all products – again, an FNMS report or pivot can be used.
• Compliance Exceptions and Notes: In some cases, FNMS will show non-compliance that you know is covered by some exception (e.g., a special agreement with the vendor or a timing issue). It’s good to use FNMS’s data as a basis but overlay your notes. FlexNet Manager allows adding custom properties or notes on licenses where you can document assumptions or agreements. For instance: “We have an extra 100 licenses provided by vendor at no cost via ELA – not in purchases, but see contract #123.” You can reflect that by adjusting entitlements or just noting it. Being able to produce this info during an audit is important. FlexNet’s Contracts module also helps – you can attach documents (like the purchase agreements and proofs of entitlement) to license records. Having those on hand in FNMS means that you can quickly retrieve the necessary documents when an auditor asks for proof at audit time.
• Responding to Audits Proactively: A best practice is to treat FNMS’s output as if you were auditing yourself. Identify any compliance gaps and remediate them before an official audit. Remediation can mean purchasing additional licenses (FNMS can tell you exactly how many you’re short), uninstalling software to fall into compliance, or reallocating licenses differently. By doing this continuously, you should have zero surprises if an audit letter arrives. One customer case study highlighted that after implementing FNMS, their annual true-up with a major vendor came in at $0 additional cost, in contrast to millions in prior years​​ – meaning they were perfectly licensed according to FNMS, and it matched what the vendor found.
• Audit Simulation: Some organizations run internal audit simulations. They use FNMS data to simulate what an auditor from, say, Microsoft would find. This can involve running the same scripts or tools auditors use and comparing them to FNMS, but using FNMS’s advanced reports often suffices. FlexNet Manager’s “at risk” calculations already quantify the shortfall (if any) for each license​, effectively telling you the financial exposure. For example, if FNMS shows you are under-licensed by 10 Oracle DB processor licenses, you can estimate that cost and either plan the budget or adjust deployments.
• Continuous Compliance vs. Point-in-Time: It’s worth noting that FNMS can track compliance over time. Every reconciliation provides a snapshot. You can keep a record (archive the reports or use the history features) to show improvement over time. If an auditor challenges a past period, you might have data to return to that date (assuming you didn’t purge old inventory). Some SAM managers produce a quarterly compliance package for internal stakeholders, a good cadence to ensure things stay on track.

FlexNet Manager Suite becomes your “single source of truth” for license compliance. When configured and maintained properly, you can confidently use it before auditors. For example, one financial services organization implementing FNMS could “use data from Flexera to defend usage and avoid a significant fee” during a major vendor audit​. This is a powerful testament – the data was solid enough to stand up in an audit negotiation, saving them potentially large penalties.

In preparation for an audit, you would typically:

1. Do an up-to-date reconciliation
2. in FNMS for the vendor’s products.
3. Run specific reports (like “installed software by device/user” and “purchases and licenses”).
4. Verify all entitlements are entered (sometimes true-up purchases may lag, so check if anything new needs adding).
5. Generate the vendor-specific report pack from FNMS.
6. Engage with the vendor auditors, providing the output as required. Since FNMS is well-known in the industry, auditors often recognize the format or at least see that you have a professional system, which may make them more likely to trust your data or not dig as aggressively.

In summary, compliance reporting in FNMS gives IT asset managers the insight and evidence needed to stay audit-ready at all times. By continuously monitoring and leveraging the tool’s detailed reports, organizations can turn the daunting audit process into a routine check. The next section will discuss integrating these processes further into ITSM workflows, which can further improve responsiveness and governance.

5. Integration with ITSM and Other Tools

FlexNet Manager Suite can be integrated with IT Service Management (ITSM) tools and other systems to fully embed software asset management into an organization’s IT operations. These integrations enable end-to-end processes like requesting software, approving and deploying it, updating the CMDB, and retiring assets while maintaining compliance.

We will examine integration with ServiceNow (a leading ITSM platform), Microsoft SCCM (a deployment/inventory tool), and other ITAM or procurement systems, as well as how these integrations help manage software requests and automate workflows.

Integrating with ServiceNow, SCCM, and ITAM Systems

ServiceNow Integration: ServiceNow is a common integration target for bridging SAM and ITSM processes. Flexera provides a ServiceNow Integration application that allows data exchange and UI embedding between FlexNet Manager Suite and ServiceNow​.

Key integration features:

• CMDB Data Synchronization: FNMS can export hardware and software inventory data into the ServiceNow CMDB. This ensures the CMDB has up-to-date info on installed software, discovered devices, and contracts from FNMS​​. Conversely, ServiceNow can send asset records (like a list of authorized assets or lifecycle status) to FNMS​. This two-way sync creates a consistent asset view. For example, if FNMS discovers a new software installation, it can create or update a CI in ServiceNow for that software on that device. If an asset is retired in ServiceNow, that status could flow to FNMS to ignore that device’s inventory.
• Single Pane of Glass: The integration allows FNMS’s web interface to be embedded within ServiceNow’s UI​​. In practice, this means a ServiceNow user (with appropriate role) can navigate a section of ServiceNow and actually see FlexNet Manager’s screens (like license compliance dashboards) without separate login. Menu items for FNMS can appear in ServiceNow. This is convenient for IT managers who primarily live in ServiceNow but need SAM data – it brings SAM into their workflow.
• Software Catalog and Request Fulfillment: If ServiceNow’s Service Catalog is used for software requests, FNMS can tie in by providing data on whether a license is available for a requested software. While ServiceNow’s SAM Pro module offers similar capabilities, an organization using FNMS may prefer FNMS to remain the license source of truth. In such cases, a request for software could trigger a check in FNMS via API or data sync: “Do we have a license for this? Are we within limits?”. ServiceNow can call FlexNet (through a scripted REST API call, for instance) to get current availability. If available, the request can proceed to deployment (e.g., via SCCM); if not, it could route to purchasing or management approval.
• Incident/Change correlation: Having FNMS data in ServiceNow can help with incident or change management. For instance, if a change ticket involves installing software on a server, ServiceNow can automatically check FNMS to see if that server has available license capacity. Or, when an incident regarding software performance arises, the support team sees in the CI record which licenses or installations are present, fed by FNMS.
• Setting up the integration typically involves installing Flexera’s scoped app in ServiceNow and generating an API token from ServiceNow to use in FNMS or vice versa​. You would schedule regular exports (maybe daily) of data like device info, application installations, and contracts from FNMS to ServiceNow. The integration can be fine-tuned to include or exclude certain data classes to avoid overload. Always test in sub-prod first, as mapping fields between systems requires attention (e.g., ensure software names match or decide how to handle normalization differences).

SCCM Integration for Deployment: We already discussed SCCM integration for inventory, but SCCM (Microsoft Endpoint Manager) is also usually the deployment tool that installs or uninstalls software. While FNMS does not deploy software itself, it can work in tandem with SCCM and ITSM for a closed-loop process:

• A user requests software (via ServiceNow or another portal).
• FNMS (or an integrated process) checks for license availability.
• SCCM is triggered to deploy the software package to the user’s machine if approved.
• SCCM reports installation success, and in the next inventory cycle, FNMS will see the installation and update license consumption.
• If a license needs to be reclaimed, FNMS can identify it (unused for 90 days, for example) and, through integration, trigger SCCM to uninstall the software from that machine and then update the records.

This kind of workflow can be achieved with a combination of FNMS’s data, ServiceNow workflows, and SCCM automation (either via ServiceNow Orchestration or SCCM’s native capabilities). Some organizations use Flexera’s App Broker / App Portal product, which is specifically designed to integrate FNMS, SCCM, and ITSM for software request automation. Flexera’s App Broker will check FNMS for license availability and can create ServiceNow requests, which acts as glue. A case in point: AstraZeneca implemented an “AZ SoftwareStore” using App Broker + FlexNet Manager + their ITSM, which automated software delivery and saved a lot of labor​.

Other ITAM/ITSM Tools: If you use a different ITSM like BMC Remedy/Helix, FlexNet Manager also has integration adapters (as indicated by the content listing for BMC Atrium)​. Similarly, for IT asset databases or discovery tools like Micro Focus uCMDB or ServiceNow’s own Discovery,

FNMS can integrate to either import data or export to them. The principle remains: eliminate silos and double-data-entry by integrating systems:

• Import from ITAM tool: If an organization maintained a hardware asset repository separately, it might import that to FNMS to enrich the data. However, FNMS becomes the central or ties directly to procurement for assets more often.
• Export to IT Finance or Chargeback Tools: Some integrate FNMS data (like actual license consumption and costs) into IT financial management tools to do chargeback or showback to business units. FlexNet has integration capabilities with ITFM (IT Financial Mgmt) systems, and in fact, one of the FNMS benefits is “share insights by integrating with procurement, ITSM, and ITFM”​.
• Cloud management platforms: With more software moving to the cloud, integrations with cloud monitoring or management tools might be considered to feed cloud usage into FNMS or vice versa. (Flexera’s integration with Turbonomic, for example, was noted to help with cost optimization.)

The net effect of these integrations is a more cohesive IT ecosystem in which asset data is entered once and flows to where it’s needed. This reduces discrepancies (for example, CMDB vs. SAM tool differences) and improves efficiency (e.g., automatically updating license counts when software is deployed or removed).

Managing Software Requests and Approvals

Software Asset Management doesn’t live in isolation – users will be constantly requesting new software, and part of SAM’s job is to control this flow (to prevent non-compliant installs or excess spending). FlexNet Manager Suite, integrated with ITSM, can facilitate a structured software request and approval process:

• Software Catalog: Establish a catalog of available software titles users can request. This might live in ServiceNow’s Service Catalog, a custom portal, or Flexera’s App Portal if you have it. Each catalog item (software title) should be linked to a workflow that checks FNMS data. For instance, the catalog could query FNMS for the licenses available or current compliance status. If the software is already over-allocated (compliance risk), you might decide to route the request differently (e.g., to purchasing for approval of a new license purchase before deployment).
• License Checks in Approval Flow: When a user requests an application, an automated check via FNMS can attach info for the approver, such as “We have five licenses remaining; this installation will make it four remaining” or “No licenses available – would require purchase”. This information is vital for approvers to make informed decisions. Many organizations implement a rule that if no license is available, the request goes to a higher-level approval or to procurement.
• Automated Approval for Free/Whitelisted Software: If FNMS classifies a software as freeware or if you have an unlimited enterprise license, the workflow can auto-approve and deploy without manual steps. Conversely, restricted software can require multiple approvals (manager, IT, compliance).
• Fulfillment via Deployment Tools: Once approved, the request triggers the actual installation (for example, ServiceNow can create a task for the SCCM team or directly call SCCM to install). Integration tools (like ServiceNow Orchestration or App Broker, which talks directly to SCCM) can make this silent. The user then gets the software installed and may be notified.
• FNMS Update: After installation, ensure that FNMS inventory updates so the license count is decremented. With SCCM integration, FNMS might get that data on the next scheduled import, but you could expedite an inventory collection on that device if needed.
• Software Removal (Reclamation): Some requests could involve returning software. Some organizations allow users or managers to request software removal when not needed, which frees up a license. SAM managers proactively use FNMS data to identify candidates for removal (e.g., not used for 90 days) and then initiate an automated reclaim process via ITSM. For example, Flexera’s tools can integrate with email or Slack to ask a user, “You haven’t used Visio in 3 months; do you still need it?” If the user says “No,” a removal can be triggered through SCCM, and the license is recouped​.
• ServiceNow SAM vs FlexNet: It’s worth noting that ServiceNow has its own SAM module that performs some of these tasks. If using FNMS, you typically decide which system is the authority for what. Many use ServiceNow for front-end request workflow and FNMS for backend license entitlement tracking. The integration between them (as described) is what keeps it seamless. So a ServiceNow fulfillment team might see a task “Install Adobe Acrobat – license available per Flexera = Yes” and they trust that info.

You achieve governance at the demand point by tightly integrating the request process with SAM. Instead of discovering after the fact that users installed software they shouldn’t, you enforce controls up front. This also gives end-users a smoother experience: a clear way to get the software they need with appropriate speed and approvals rather than ad hoc installations.

In summary, managing software requests through integration means:

• Users request in a portal (ServiceNow, etc.).
• Approvers get visibility into license availability via FNMS.
• Approved installs are automatically delivered (if integrated with deployment tools).
• FNMS is updated with the new deployment to keep compliance data current.
• Unused software can be identified via FNMS, and removal can be fed back into ITSM as a request or task.
• All this ensures that software provisioning is efficient while staying within license entitlements.

Automating Workflows for Software Procurement and Retirement

Beyond individual user requests, integration and configuration of FNMS can automate broader asset lifecycle workflows, particularly procurement of new software and retirement of assets:

• Procurement Workflows: When FNMS indicates additional licenses are required (for example, a license is at risk of going over), it can trigger a procurement process. This could be an automatic creation of a purchase requisition in your procurement system or a notification to the sourcing team. Some organizations set threshold alerts – e.g., if available licenses drop below 5, generate an email or ServiceNow ticket to procurement. While FNMS doesn’t directly place orders, its data can feed the procurement decision. Additionally, when procurement does acquire new licenses, integration back to FNMS (via import of the PO) closes the loop so that entitlements are updated. If your procurement system (SAP, Oracle, Coupa, etc.) can export data, schedule that feed into FNMS. Over time, this creates a near real-time reflection of entitlements as they grow. KPMG’s guidance on SAM-managed services underscores that understanding license position allows organizations to negotiate with vendors from a position of strength and avoid unbudgeted true-up costs​ – having FNMS integrated with procurement means you go into negotiations armed with precise data.
• Contract & Renewal Alerts: Use FNMS contract management to set reminders for renewals. These alerts can integrate with email or ITSM (like opening a ServiceNow task 90 days before a major contract expires). This workflow ensures you never miss a renewal or termination date, preventing either lapses in licenses or auto-renewals you didn’t want. The asset manager can proactively plan and get approvals for renewal spending.
• End-of-Life and Retirement: When an asset (hardware or software) is being retired, FNMS should be updated so it no longer counts in compliance (or so you reclaim the license). Integration can help here: for hardware, if a disposal ticket in ServiceNow is completed, it can notify FNMS (perhaps via the same data import that marks that device as retired). FNMS can then exclude that device’s software from license counts or free up user-based licenses tied to that user. For software retirement (say, a product is decommissioned enterprise-wide), you can bulk uninstall via deployment tools and then remove the license records or mark them as inactive in FNMS. Having a workflow ensures this is documented – e.g., a change request for “Remove Software X from all servers” gets linked to a plan in FNMS that those licenses will be freed or terminated.
• Financial Chargeback: Automated workflows can also extend to cost allocation. For instance, if FNMS is integrated with an ITFM tool or even a simple export, it can provide data like “Department A is using 50 licenses of Oracle DB, Department B 30 licenses,” and a monthly job can multiply that by unit cost and send to finance or a chargeback system. Without integration, this would be a manual report and email; with integration, it could be an automated data feed.
• Unified Dashboarding: One can create unified dashboards that combine data from FNMS and other systems through integrations. For example, an executive dashboard might show not only license compliance (from FNMS) but also service ticket volumes (from ITSM) or cost savings achieved (from a FinOps tool). Flexera’s vision of Technology Intelligence often involves combining ITAM and FinOps data. We saw mention that a company moved from FNMS to Flexera One and could link IT Visibility and SaaS Manager, giving a unified view​. Even without Flexera One, you can integrate FNMS data into a BI tool or ITSM dashboard for a holistic view.

The ultimate aim of these automated workflows is operationalizing SAM – making it a seamless part of IT processes rather than a separate silo. By automating the interactions between FNMS and other tools:

• Compliance is maintained not by after-the-fact audits but by process design (e.g., no install without a license).
• Efficiency is gained (less manual data entry, quicker fulfillment).
• Accuracy improves (one source of truth feeding all systems).
• The SAM team can focus on higher-level analysis instead of firefighting each license request or procurement.

When implementing these integrations and workflows, consider involving cross-functional stakeholders (SAM, ITSM admins, SCCM admins, procurement, finance) early so the processes are well-aligned and responsibilities are clear. Document and maintain the integrations (e.g., if ServiceNow is upgraded or FNMS changes, test the integrations).

In summary, FlexNet Manager Suite doesn’t operate in a vacuum—it becomes significantly more powerful when integrated into your IT ecosystem. It enables automated, policy-driven control over the software lifecycle from request to retirement, reducing the manual workload on IT asset managers and ensuring consistent enforcement of asset management policies.

6. Best Practices for Ongoing Management

Implementing FlexNet Manager Suite is not a one-time project; it’s establishing a capability that needs ongoing management to deliver value continuously. This section outlines best practices for the ongoing operation and optimization of FNMS and your software assets.

This includes continuous monitoring, managing the growing footprint of SaaS and cloud applications, and leveraging reporting and dashboards for cost optimization and decision support.

Continuous Monitoring and Optimization

Adopt a Continuous SAM Cycle: Treat software asset management as a cycle of Monitor -> Analyze -> Optimize -> Reconcile -> Report and repeat. FlexNet Manager Suite provides automation, but you need to regularly monitor the outputs:

• Daily/Weekly Monitoring: Check the import and reconciliation jobs daily to ensure inventory is coming in as expected (no beacon failures or data gaps). Examine any newly discovered installations that might need attention (e.g., unauthorized software or software nearing the end of support). On a weekly or bi-weekly basis, review the compliance positions of key licenses; don’t wait until quarter-end to discover a compliance issue.
• License Position Reviews: Hold periodic (e.g., monthly) reviews with application owners or business units to discuss their license usage. FNMS data can show them what they have and prompt discussions on whether they still need all of it. This fosters shared responsibility. For instance, present a department with a report of their top 10 software costs and whether they are under- or overutilizing them.
• Optimization Efforts: Use FlexNet Manager’s data to drive optimization projects:
  • Reclaim Unused Software: Identify installations that have not been used in the last 30/60/90 days (FNMS can collect usage data from its agent or via integrated sources like SCCM’s Software Metering). Harvest those by uninstalling and reassigning licenses. This directly saves money on renewals. As noted earlier, tracking application usage to reclaim licenses can significantly reduce denials of service and optimize renewals​.
  • Rightsizing Licenses: If you have software with different editions or bundles, ensure that users have the right edition for their needs. For example, maybe some users have a Pro edition but only need Standard—consider downgrading to cheaper licenses if possible. Or, if using cloud resources, maybe an instance size can be reduced if usage is low (though that’s more in the cloud management realm; it ties to licensing for BYOL).
  • Negotiation Prep: Many optimization steps happen around renewal time. A best practice is to start preparing 3-6 months before a big contract renewal. Use FNMS to see actual usage vs entitlements – this gives you leverage. If you only use 70% of a subscription, you can negotiate a lower renewal count. If you’re at 120%, you know to budget for a true-up or look for alternatives. KPMG’s service notes that organizations that optimize their software estate “gain high ROI while optimizing ongoing costs for software”​.
• Policy Compliance: Continuously monitor for policy violations, such as blacklisted software. FNMS can be configured with a list of disallowed applications; if any appear in the inventory, alerts can notify security or IT. Also, track license usage against contracts – e.g., if a contract says you can only install software in certain countries or on certain systems, monitor that with FNMS data filters.
• Keep the Data Healthy: Regularly cleanse and update data. Retire old devices from FNMS that are decommissioned (to avoid clutter and potential ghost usage). Merge duplicate records if any appear. Ensure new software titles are properly recognized (if something shows up as “Unrecognized”, submit it to Flexera or create a custom entry so it’s accounted for).
• Training and Awareness: Train stakeholders (IT, procurement, and business users) on using FNMS outputs. The more people understand the data, the more they can self-service some needs (like running reports for their area), and the more they’ll contribute to data quality. Also, stay updated on new FNMS features through Flexera’s release notes – new versions often add capabilities that improve efficiency (for example, improved cloud management features or easier reporting).

Continuous monitoring and optimization mean shifting from reactive asset management to proactive optimization. Use FNMS to not just keep score but actively find ways to reduce waste and improve compliance every cycle.

As a benefit, this practice often pays for itself—organizations can see substantial year-over-year savings (one metric mentioned is up to 25% of software spend saved per year by mature optimization processes)​.

Managing SaaS and Cloud-Based Applications

The IT landscape increasingly shifts to SaaS (Software as a Service) and cloud services. Traditional SAM focused on on-prem licenses, but now managing SaaS subscriptions and cloud usage is a critical part of asset management. FlexNet Manager Suite (especially when combined with Flexera’s SaaS Manager or cloud modules) provides ways to handle this:

• Discovering SaaS Applications: An ongoing challenge is “shadow IT” – departments signing up for cloud applications without IT’s knowledge. Tools like Flexera’s SaaS Manager (which can integrate with FNMS) can automatically discover SaaS applications in use by analyzing finance accounts (to find spending) or SSO logs/browser extensions (to find usage). Even without SaaS Manager, some discoveries can be made by looking at installations of SaaS-related agents or simply surveying users. Once identified, bring these apps under management.
• SaaS Subscription Tracking: For major SaaS like Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Adobe Creative Cloud, etc., integrate with their admin portals via APIs. FlexNet Manager Suite has capabilities or adapters for some of these (Microsoft 365 integration was mentioned​; Flexera also has a Salesforce integration in its SaaS Manager product). By pulling subscription data, you can see how many licenses are allocated vs used. Optimize SaaS spending by reclaiming inactive accounts or rightsizing plans. For example, FNMS can show that a user has an Office 365 E5 license but only uses E3-level features – you might downgrade that license and save on subscription cost​.
• Cloud Infrastructure Management: If you bring your licenses (BYOL) to cloud VMs, ensure FNMS covers those environments. Deploy the Flexera agent on cloud VMs or use cloud connectors so that those VMs report in. This way, software on AWS/Azure VMs is counted just like on-prem. Additionally, track licenses enabled for cloud elasticity: for instance, if you have a pool of licenses that can float between on-prem and cloud, monitor the total consumption. Some licenses (like certain IBM or Oracle cloud ones) have specific rules in the cloud (like counted per vCPU); FNMS’s connectors combined with license models can handle that, as long as the environment is inventoried.
• Handling SaaS Renewals: Use FNMS contract features for SaaS too. A SaaS subscription often has an annual renewal – treat that like a license contract. Well before renewal, check usage: e.g., you have 500 Salesforce licenses but only 400 active users – you might downgrade your contract tier. Conversely, maybe you have more demand than anticipated – plan to adjust. The data from SaaS usage monitoring in FNMS will inform this.
• Governance of SaaS Requests: Similar to on-premises software requests, there is a process for SaaS access requests. For example, if someone wants a Slack or Box account, route that request so you can allocate from existing subscriptions or decide to purchase more, don’t let every manager buy SaaS directly without informing the SAM team. Although business units often do, you can at least try to set policies. Some organizations set up an “SaaS registration” policy where any new SaaS contract must be reported to ITAM within X days.
• Monitor Cloud Spend and Usage: While FNMS primarily focuses on licensing, cloud cost optimization overlaps with SAM. Flexera’s solutions (Flexera One, etc.) include cloud cost management. Even without that, SAM managers should be aware of cloud usage trends because they impact license needs. For example, if many workloads move to AWS with Linux, you might reduce Windows Server license consumption but increase Red Hat subscriptions or vice versa. If you move Oracle databases to Oracle Cloud, the licensing might shift to a different model. Being involved in cloud strategy ensures you manage those transitions and avoid compliance gaps.
• Combine Hardware and SaaS Asset Views: Strive for a unified asset view: an employee’s hardware (laptop), the software installed, and the SaaS they have access to. FlexNet Manager Suite (with IT Visibility or SaaS Manager in Flexera One) can help compile this. This holistic view is useful for onboarding/offboarding. For example, when an employee leaves, you reclaim installed software licenses via FNMS and deactivate their SaaS accounts (freeing those licenses). This centralization makes offboarding more efficient and less likely to miss something (which could save money and mitigate security risks).

Managing SaaS and cloud assets is an evolving discipline often called “Cloud Asset Management” or “Hybrid ITAM.” The best practice is to extend your SAM processes to the cloud with the same rigor:

• Track entitlements (cloud subscriptions, reserved instances, etc.) similar to on-prem licenses.
• Track consumption (users, actual usage metrics) and compare against entitlements for optimization.
• Engage with cloud governance or FinOps teams. SAM and FinOps converge in some organizations because both aim to optimize spending—one for software and one for cloud infrastructure. Flexera notes that Hybrid ITAM is merging ITAM and FinOps to manage cloud software blind spots​.
• Don’t ignore small SaaS apps – many $5 or $10 monthly apps scattered across hundreds of users can add up. FNMS data plus maybe expense report scans can shed light on these.

In summary, SaaS and cloud can be incorporated into the SAM program by leveraging tools and integration to gain visibility into usage and enforce the same optimization mindset. Organizations that do this effectively can prevent cloud sprawl and subscription waste, which is a growing part of IT spend.

Reporting and Dashboards for Cost Optimization

Good data is only as useful as it can be communicated. FlexNet Manager Suite offers extensive reporting and dashboarding capabilities that IT asset managers should use to inform stakeholders and drive cost optimization initiatives.

Best practices include:

• Tailor Reports to Audience: Different stakeholders care about different metrics:
  • CIO/IT Directors: likely interested in high-level metrics like total software spend, compliance risk (in dollar value), cost savings achieved, and trends. An executive dashboard might show key KPIs (e.g., compliance rate, reclaimed licenses count, software spend vs budget).
  • IT Finance/Procurement: interested in spend details, renewal calendars, and savings opportunities. Reports like “Software Spend by Vendor” or “True-up Costs Avoided This Quarter” are valuable. Show them where you have shelfware that could be canceled to save money.
  • Department or Application Owners: They want to see usage vs. allocation for their area. Provide reports like “Licenses used by your team vs. licenses allocated” or “Top 10 software products your team uses and their costs.” This can drive accountability (e.g., a business unit seeing they spend $500k on software X might be motivated to eliminate unused copies).
  • SAM Team Internal: The SAM team itself should have dashboards to manage operations, such as data quality reports, inventory coverage (how much of the environment is inventoried vs. not), an upcoming audit list, etc., so they can prioritize tasks.
• Use Dashboards for Visibility: FlexNet Manager’s web UI and Flexera Analytics (Cognos-based) allow the creation of dashboards with charts and tables. You can have charts showing, for example, software compliance status by publisher (pie or bar chart of compliant vs non-compliant licenses), trends over time (license consumption trendline to see if usage is growing or shrinking), or savings (bar chart of how many licenses reclaimed each month). These visualizations help maintain management support for SAM by highlighting achievements and areas of need. A well-set dashboard can quickly identify red flags and optimization opportunities​.
• Cost Optimization Reports: Specifically target reports that identify cost-saving opportunities:
  • Unused Software: A report listing installations not used in 90 days, with their license cost, effectively shows “potential savings if removed.” Sum that up to a dollar figure.
  • Under-deployed licenses: If you bought 100 of something and only 10 are used, that might indicate you can negotiate a lower renewal. A report that pairs entitlements vs. usage and highlights low-utilization products can prompt action.
  • Renewal Forecast: For upcoming renewals, create a report that lists each product, current usage, current entitlements, and recommendation (renew the full amount, reduce, or if short, then need to true-up). This is hugely valuable in budget planning.
  • Enterprise Agreement Optimization: For vendors like Microsoft or Adob with whom you have enterprise agreements, run reports before true-up to optimize. For example, if Office 365 E5 usage is low, plan to shift some users to E3 in the next EA.
  • Rightsizing Infrastructure: License metrics like Oracle’s or IBM’s are tied to hardware. If you find some servers are over-provisioned and causing high license consumption, coordinate with infrastructure teams to possibly reduce cores or consolidate instances to fewer servers to cut license needs. Use FNMS to simulate “what if we reduce this server’s cores?” (Flexera’s “What-If” analysis allows some simulation of hardware changes on license consumption for certain vendors)​​.
• Benchmarking and Trend Analysis: Over time, track SAM program performance: total number of licenses managed, compliance rate trend (hopefully improving), and cumulative savings. This could be presented in quarterly business reviews. For instance, show that since implementing FNMS and following best practices, compliance went from 70% to 98%, and $X million in unnecessary spending was avoided. These concrete figures, supported by FNMS data, underscore the value of SAM to the organization.
• Interactive Use: Encourage stakeholders to use FNMS’s reporting interface directly if they can. Rather than static Excel reports, they could have access to a live dashboard that they can filter (e.g., filter to their cost center). With proper role-based permissions, FNMS can be a self-service reporting tool for managers to get insight anytime, reducing ad-hoc report requests to the SAM team.
• Integrate with BI if needed: Some organizations export FNMS data to their enterprise BI tools (like PowerBI or Tableau) to combine with other data (like financial). That can be useful for correlating software usage with business metrics. However, be cautious to maintain the context; often, FNMS’s built-in analytics are sufficient for SAM-specific needs.

By leveraging these reporting practices, IT asset managers can ensure that SAM is not just an internal exercise but one that visibly informs decision-making across IT and finance. Optimizing costs is a continuous effort; the reports and dashboards act as the feedback mechanism and early warning system for that effort.

They help answer key questions like:

• Where are we overspending on software?
• What unused licenses can we eliminate?
• Are our optimization efforts yielding results (e.g., is the number of unused installs going down month by month)?
• How much risk (in dollar terms) do we have if an audit comes tomorrow?
• How effectively are we utilizing our investments in software?

Ultimately, what gets measured gets managed. FNMS provides the measurement; it’s up to the SAM team to present those measurements meaningfully and drive action. When done well, organizations see compliance improvement, significant cost reductions, and better alignment of software usage with business needs – hallmarks of a mature SAM program.

7. Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Implementing FlexNet Manager Suite and running a SAM program is beneficial but not without challenges. Organizations often encounter hurdles like data quality issues, managing vendor audits, and scaling solutions for large, complex environments. This section identifies common challenges and provides strategies to overcome them.

Data Quality Issues and Remediation

Challenge: Data quality is the foundation of SAM, and issues here are very common. These include incomplete inventory (missing devices or software evidence), inconsistent data (naming mismatches, duplicate records), inaccurate purchase information, or obsolete data (old machines still showing as active).

As one FlexNet Manager user pointed out, “It can be challenging to set up all the data feeds… all those feeds will need to be set up, which can be challenging depending on data quality.”​. Poor data can lead to incorrect compliance results, undermining trust in the system.

How to Overcome:

• Establish Data Owners: Identify who owns each type of data. For example, IT operations might own device inventory, procurement owns purchase data, HR/AD owns user data. Collaborate with them to ensure feed accuracy. If SCCM is missing data for certain subnets, work with the SCCM team to expand coverage.
• Reconciliation of Data Sources: Cross-verify FNMS data against other sources periodically. For instance, compare the count of active computers in FNMS vs Active Directory vs SCCM. If AD says 1000 devices but FNMS only has 800, find out why (maybe 200 laptops haven’t reported inventory). Reconcile purchase data by comparing FNMS’s list of processed POs with an export from the finance system to ensure none were missed.
• Use Flexera Data Analytics: FlexNet Manager provides tools to check data integrity. There are built-in queries or reports for things like “unrecognized software evidence” or “inventory devices with no user,” etc. Monitor these to catch anomalies. Also, verify if the ARL is properly classifying software – if not, submit a request to Flexera to update the recognition or create a local recognition rule.
• Normalize and Enrich Data: Leverage FNMS’s normalization as much as possible (ARL for software, SKU library for purchases). This reduces errors like using different names for the same thing. For enrichment, consider importing additional attributes that can help data quality – e.g., import a list of authorized software titles to flag unauthorized ones, or import hardware warranties to know which devices are old.
• Routine Data Maintenance: Make data scrubbing a routine. Some tasks:
  • Remove or archive records of decommissioned assets (set status to retired so they don’t count).
  • Merge duplicate entries (FNMS allows merging if the same machine is reported from two sources with slightly different names).
  • Update misclassified licenses or contracts (if a license was set as the wrong type and causing weird results).
  • Check for “empty” license records – those with entitlements but no installations or vice versa – to clean up or investigate.
• Garbage In, Garbage Out—Address at Source: Where possible, fix data issues at the source. If usernames in AD are wrong (like placeholder accounts), fix them in AD rather than just in FNMS. If purchase records don’t have clear descriptions, work with procurement to improve how they log software buys (e.g., always include part numbers or SKUs).
• Documentation: Document any assumptions or manual adjustments. For example, note how it’s managed if some software cannot be auto-discovered (maybe a homegrown app). If some licenses aren’t tracked due to complexity, keep a manual log but try to bring them into FNMS later by enhancing data.

Remember, data quality is an ongoing battle. Set aside time (like a monthly data review meeting) to discuss quality metrics. Celebrate improvements (e.g., “this month we recognized 98% of software, up from 95% last month”) and address regressions quickly (like if a connector failed and missed a week of data).

Managing Vendor Audits Effectively

Challenge: Vendor audits are a significant concern that often motivates SAM efforts. Even with FNMS, handling an audit requires care. Challenges include communicating data to auditors in their required format, addressing compliance gaps under pressure, and ensuring the vendor accepts your usage data.

Different vendors have different approaches: Some may not directly accept FNMS reports and might insist on running their scripts (Oracle’s audit scripts, IBM’s ILMT data if they haven’t formally approved FNMS for you, etc.). Additionally, audits can be time-consuming and disruptive if poorly managed (DBS Bank experienced year-long audits that were very resource-intensive before they improved their SAM)​.

How to Overcome:

• Preparation (Pre-Audit): The best defense is being proactive. Use FNMS to simulate audit conditions (as discussed in Section 4 compliance). Keep documentation of entitlements and deployments well-organized in FNMS. If you suspect a certain vendor might audit, do an internal audit using FNMS data and remedy any problems first. In the DBS case, they moved from reacting to audits to a proactive stance where they could “know exactly what software we have and what we use,” deterring vendors from aggressive audit tactics​.
• Engage Vendor Early: If an audit notice comes, engage with the vendor’s audit team and discuss the use of FNMS data. Highlight that you have a robust SAM tool. Some vendors (like Microsoft or Adobe) might be satisfied with FNMS-generated effective license position reports. Others (Oracle, IBM) might still want raw data outputs or have special verification. For IBM, ensure you have IBM’s consent if using FNMS instead of ILMT – IBM recognizes FlexNet Manager as an alternative metering tool provided certain conditions are met​. That might involve signing an agreement or providing FNMS and ILMT data for a period. For Oracle, FlexNet Manager for Oracle is “verified by Oracle”​, which can give you confidence in its data. However, Oracle auditors may still run their scripts – you can run the same via FNMS integration and give them the results.
• Audit Project Management: Treat an audit like a project with clear owners and a timeline. Use FNMS as the central repository for evidence. If auditors ask for deployment details, export from FNMS. If they want proof of purchase, pull from FNMS contracts (since you attached documents). This centralized approach saves time hunting for files. Allocate a team to interface with auditors and answer their questions; the SAM manager is often the point person, supported by IT ops and finance as needed. Having FNMS data means many queries can be answered with a quick report rather than a manual data-gathering exercise.
• Addressing Shortfalls: If the audit finds shortfalls (and FNMS concurs), ensure you’re not over-penalized. Sometimes auditors calculate usage with less nuance than FNMS (for example, not considering some downgrade rights). Use FNMS data to negotiate – show them evidence that some installs may not count (with FNMS backing reasoning via PURL). If you are clearly under, work with procurement to true-up properly, ideally at best possible pricing (maybe tying it to a future purchase or discount). FNMS can quantify exactly how much you need to buy, preventing over-purchase as an overreaction.
• Learning and Improving: After an audit, review the lessons learned. Feed any new entitlements from true-up back into FNMS. Update processes to prevent any compliance drift that was discovered. Often, audits reveal some process gap (like “we didn’t know about that test server that accidentally had production license software”). Close those gaps by expanding the scope of FNMS or implementing new policies.
• Build Audit Defense in Policies: Use FNMS to maintain an “audit file” for each major vendor. At any time, you should be able to produce a report and documentation for that vendor that would satisfy an audit. This readiness can even dissuade vendors from auditing as frequently or intensely if you demonstrate control. Some companies even share regular license position summaries with the vendor during annual meetings – turning audits into non-events.
• Audit Simulations and Drills: Consider doing a mock audit internally, especially for the trickier vendors. Have an internal team act as auditors to request data and see if the SAM team can produce it quickly via FNMS. This can highlight any data retrieval issues or areas needing more training.

Managing audits effectively thus hinges on good data, FNMS reporting, and communication. With FNMS, one company reported that vendor auditors would “think twice about scaring or bullying us during an audit” because they now had the data and confidence to know their position​. That’s the position you want to be in – where your thorough knowledge of your license usage (thanks to FNMS) shifts the power balance in audits to you.

Scaling FlexNet Manager Suite for Large Enterprises

Challenge: Large enterprises may have hundreds of thousands of devices, dozens of business units and geographies, and a huge variety of software. Scaling FNMS to handle this volume and complexity can be challenging.

Performance issues might arise (slow imports, reconciliation taking too long), data volume can swell the databases, and coordinating SAM across a federated organization (with many stakeholders) is difficult. Additionally, large enterprises often have many siloed systems that all need to feed into FNMS, making the integration web complex.

How to Overcome:

• Architecture Scaling: For the technical part, ensure your FNMS architecture is appropriately scaled:
  • Use multiple Inventory Beacons distributed strategically (e.g., one per major region or data center) to balance load and reduce network latency. Beacons can reduce the load on the central server by pre-processing and ensure inventory can continue if one goes down.
  • Consider scaling out the processing servers. FNMS supports separating the web app, batch processing, and inventory processing. In a large environment, a dedicated batch server is recommended so that heavy reconciliation doesn’t slow down the user interface.
  • Increase resources (CPU, RAM, SQL performance) as needed and monitor them. If the reconciliation is taking more than the available maintenance window (say, 20 hours, which overlaps with business hours), you might need to tune it or beef up hardware. Flexera documentation often guides scaling for certain environment sizes (like X devices = Y CPU cores recommended, etc.).
  • Clean up historical data if not needed. For example, a 5-year inventory history may not be necessary to keep at a detailed level; archiving or summarizing old data can keep the DB nimble.
• Modular Implementation: Large enterprises might roll out FNMS in phases, e.g., starting with one region or a subset of vendors. This phased approach is sensible; just plan how to integrate each phase into one system. Use Enterprise Groups (FNMS constructs for Company, Business Units, Locations, etc.) to logically partition data. Each business unit can see only their data if needed. This way, the tool can accommodate a multi-tenant style usage where different teams manage different segments in the same instance.
• Governance Model: Scaling is not just tech but also a process. Establish a governance model for SAM in a large org:
  • Perhaps a central SAM team owns the tool and standards, and regional or business unit SAM managers use it for their scope. Define roles clearly (who can create licenses, approve changes, etc., possibly via role-based permissions).
  • Have regular syncs between these teams to share tips and ensure consistency in using FNMS (e.g., all use the same naming conventions, all update ARL on schedule).
  • Use FNMS to enforce some consistency—for instance, a global applications list. But also allow flexibility where needed (e.g., a specific business unit might have niche software only they use; they can manage those licenses within FNMS without cluttering everyone’s view).
• Dealing with Acquisitions/Divestitures: Large enterprises often acquire companies or spin off units. FNMS should be part of M&A IT due diligence. When acquiring, plan to import the new company’s inventory and licenses into FNMS (maybe run a separate temporary FNMS instance to capture their data and then merge it), for divestiture, be ready to extract data relevant to the spun-off entity (like all assets tagged to a business unit) and possibly remove it or transfer it if needed. The flexibility of grouping in FNMS can aid this (just filter by BU and export).
• Performance Tuning: Flexera’s community and documentation may have specific suggestions if performance lags, such as indexing the database or splitting certain tasks (like using separate threads for inventory vs. license imports). Upgrading to the latest version can also bring performance improvements, as each release often fine-tunes for larger data sets.
• User Training at Scale: With a large user base (many managers log into FNMS for reports), provide training materials, perhaps a quick reference guide for running reports or interpreting dashboards. You don’t want the central team handling every query manually.
• Leverage Cloud if Possible: Some large organizations use the SaaS version to offload the infrastructure scaling to Flexera. Flexera will ensure the cloud environment can handle the scale, and you will benefit from their expertise. If on-prem, ensure you have support from Flexera or a partner to do environment sizing.

A case study hinted at a successfully scaled FNMS deployment: a financial organization chose FNMS over a competitor because of its maturity and capability in handling IBM, Oracle, and Microsoft metrics at scale​. Later, they even moved to Flexera One (cloud) to ease further scaling​. They integrated various modules and saw improved confidence in audits​. That kind of outcome is achievable by paying attention to scalability both in system setup and organizational process.

In summary, scale introduces complexity, but FlexNet Manager Suite can handle very large environments with proper planning, architecture, and governance. Fortune 500 companies use it across tens of thousands of devices and vendors. Regularly evaluate the system’s performance and the SAM process throughput, and adjust as needed (more computing resources, automation, training) to keep things running smoothly as you grow.

8. Case Studies and Real-World Examples

To illustrate the concepts covered in this white paper, here are several real-world examples of organizations that implemented FlexNet Manager Suite and the outcomes they achieved. These case studies span different industries and highlight key success factors, challenges overcome, and lessons learned.

Example 1: Global Bank Achieves Audit Readiness and Cost Savings (Financial Services)

Background: A large multinational bank (such as DBS Bank in Asia) had historically managed software reactively. They faced two painful software vendor audits that disrupted operations for months, leading to hefty true-up demands​. The bank lacked a unified software inventory and relied on manual processes, making audit defense weak and time-consuming.

Implementation: The bank invested in FlexNet Manager Suite for Enterprises to gain control. Key steps in their project:

• They deployed FNMS on-premises, integrating with all major data sources (Active Directory for users, SCCM for inventory, etc.), and importing purchase records for their major software vendors.
• They set three primary goals: (1) achieve a solution approved by Oracle and IBM for audit data (since those were high-risk vendors for them), (2) get expert services to configure license metrics correctly, and (3) make the system usable by all relevant IT units for visibility​.
• First, they focused on top-tier vendors: They configured FlexNet Manager to manage entitlements and consumption for Oracle Database, IBM middleware, Microsoft products, Adobe, and other big-ticket software​. They leveraged Flexera’s Application Recognition Library of 230,000+ applications to discover all software installed across the bank—this revealed many previously unknown installs.
• They established new SAM processes: monthly compliance reviews, strict software request approvals, and policies requiring each IT unit to use the FNMS data for license tracking​.

Results: After implementation:

• The bank moved to a proactive audit stance. They now had a comprehensive, normalized software inventory and could generate an audit report for any major vendor on demand. The next audits were handled much more smoothly. In one instance, when a major vendor audit occurred, the IT/SAM team used FNMS data to demonstrate compliance and could avoid significant audit penalties that had been threatened​​. The vendor’s initial $18 million compliance claim was negotiated to zero additional fees because the bank’s data (from FNMS) proved they were licensed appropriately or quickly identified exactly what was needed​​.
• Cost Savings: With better visibility, the bank identified areas of overspending. For example, they found many devices with software that wasn’t used or needed at the edition level provided. By reclaiming and downgrading where possible, they reduced maintenance costs. One anecdote from their implementation: They achieved a “zero-dollar true-up” with a key vendor, whereas before FNMS, true-ups cost millions annually​. This indicated huge savings by not overbuying licenses blindly.
• Cultural Change: The mindset shifted from firefighting to planning. Different technology units within the bank started using FNMS dashboards to manage their software portion, increasing accountability​. Also, vendor management improved – armed with actual usage data, the procurement team negotiated better enterprise agreements since they knew exactly how much was needed.
• Lessons Learned: The bank learned the importance of having reliable data before an audit. They also saw the value of involving procurement and IT early – they mapped out all new SAM processes from installation to procurement, segmenting suppliers by risk tier​. One takeaway was that tools and data alone aren’t enough; you need processes and policies (like how they let employees install what they want from top-tier vendors but then use FNMS monthly to check and allocate licenses accordingly​). In retrospect, they would advise others to secure executive support (their CPO was involved, highlighting the importance of SAM to procurement) and to invest in expert help for the initial setup of complex licenses.

Conclusion: This banking case shows that with FlexNet Manager Suite, an organization can transform its SAM practice. They went from audit anxiety to audit preparedness and from overspending to optimized usage. Key success factors were executive support, focusing on major vendors first, and integrating SAM into IT processes.

Example 2: Pharmaceutical Company Streamlines Software Delivery (Pharma Industry)

Background: AstraZeneca, a global pharmaceutical company, needed to streamline software delivery to employees and reduce manual effort in software fulfillment. They have thousands of end-users requesting various scientific and business applications, and historically, software delivery and license tracking were labor-intensive.

Implementation: AstraZeneca combined a solution with Flexera’s FlexNet Manager Suite and App Broker (App Portal), which were integrated with their software distribution tools and service catalog​.

• App Broker Integration: App Broker acted as a front-end portal (branded “AZ SoftwareStore”) where users could request software, while FNMS provided the back-end license availability and compliance check.
• Automation: The process was fully automated. When a user requests an application, the App Broker checks FNMS to see if a license is available. If yes (and the user is entitled), it automatically triggers deployment via SCCM (or another deployment tool), and FNMS is updated. If no license is available, the request or routes to purchase approval are prevented.
• License Optimization: FNMS tracked all the licenses, so they ensured compliance wasn’t compromised even as they automated delivery. They also set up reclamation via the portal; if certain software wasn’t used, App Broker could prompt the user to surrender it, and then uninstall via SCCM with FNMS updating the license pool.

Results:

• Efficiency Gains: The new SoftwareStore delivered huge labor savings – nearly $2 million in annual labor savings due to automation and simplification of the software request process​. This came from eliminating manual steps (no more IT hand-holding each install or juggling spreadsheets to see if a license is available).
• User Satisfaction: Employees got software faster through self-service, often with one-click requests and automated installation within hours, as opposed to days or weeks with the old process.
• License Compliance Maintained: Despite speeding up delivery, they did not run into compliance issues because FNMS enforced the rules in the background. In fact, by integrating license checks, they prevented installs when licenses weren’t available, which previously might have happened and caused compliance gaps.
• Time Redeemed for Value Work: The SAM and IT teams could reallocate their time from rote fulfillment to more strategic tasks, like analyzing usage patterns for further optimization or supporting new business projects. The quote from their SAM lead underscores that “simplification has driven results and delivered valuable time and cost savings back to the business”​.
• Lesson Learned: One lesson was that SAM tools can drive digital transformation in IT service delivery. By treating software delivery as a use case for automation (not just compliance), they achieved happier end users and better SAM. They also realized the importance of cross-team collaboration: the project involved SAM experts, the packaging/SCCM team, and the ServiceNow team (if ServiceNow was part of their catalog) all working together. Another takeaway was the power of showcasing savings – the $2M/year labor savings was a big win to keep executives engaged in SAM efforts.

Conclusion: The AstraZeneca case demonstrates that FlexNet Manager Suite can significantly optimize IT operations, especially when combined with request automation tools. It shows that SAM isn’t only about compliance and audits; it can also improve service delivery and operational efficiency. The key was leveraging FNMS data in real time to guide automation (i.e., making license availability a trigger for workflow), ensuring that agility and governance went hand in hand.

Example 3: Financial Services Firm Unifies License Compliance Management (Large Enterprise IT)

Background: A large financial services organization (unnamed case study) was struggling to get a complete picture of software license compliance across its data centers. It used various discovery tools and spreadsheet-based tracking, which left gaps, especially for server software like IBM and Oracle​. The organization was evaluating solutions and did a proof-of-concept between FlexNet Manager Suite and ServiceNow’s SAM module.

Implementation: They chose FlexNet Manager Suite, largely because of its maturity in handling complex license metrics for IBM, Oracle, and Microsoft in an integrated way​. They deployed FNMS (and later migrated to Flexera One SaaS):

• Holistic License Repository: They used FNMS to create a single repository of all licenses tied to purchase order data​. This unified view replaced the siloed databases and spreadsheets. They heavily used the SKU library to auto-generate license records from procurement data, saving time.
• IBM and Oracle Focus: Special attention was paid to IBM PVU sub-capacity and Oracle processor licenses configured in FNMS. They ensured all required inventory (Flexera agent on VMs, etc.) was in place so FNMS calculations would be audit-acceptable. They ran ILMT in parallel initially to validate FNMS’s numbers, then fully switched to FNMS’s sub-capacity reporting once confident (since IBM approved their use of FlexNet Manager).
• Integrations: They integrated FNMS with their ServiceNow CMDB to keep asset info in sync (they realized they didn’t need ServiceNow’s SAM but still used SN CMDB for other asset data – integration meant no double data entry). They also integrated with a cloud management process as they started using Azure and wanted those VMs in FNMS, too.
• Scaling via Flexera One: As the company evolved, they moved from FNMS on-prem to Flexera One ITAM, shifting the same functions to the cloud for easier maintenance​. This allowed them to link with Flexera’s IT Visibility and SaaS Manager for a broader view, but the core license management practices remained similar.

Results:

• Compliance Confidence: For the first time, the organization could see a consolidated compliance status for all critical software in one place. They found previously unknown compliance gaps, which they addressed ahead of vendor audits. Subsequently, when an audit from a major vendor occurred, they successfully defended their license position using FNMS data and avoided significant fees​​. This was a major validation of their choice of tool and process.
• Streamlined Audit Response: With FNMS, what used to take weeks of gathering data for an audit could be done in days or hours. One highlight: they had a recent audit where they simply pulled the needed info from FNMS, and the auditors were satisfied, leading to no penalty. The team noted that linking FNMS with procurement records was key to quickly showing proof of entitlements​.
• Optimized Usage: By having all licenses in FNMS, they started regularly identifying and reclaiming surplus licenses. For example, they noticed some IBM tools installed that nobody was using and could re-harvest those licenses to avoid buying more for a new project. Over a year, these optimizations provided considerable cost avoidance.
• Scalability and Feature Adoption: Moving to the SaaS version allowed them to adopt new features faster (e.g., when Flexera introduced new analytics dashboards, they got them without a complex upgrade). It also eased the IT burden and ensured they were always on the latest version, which was important as software license rules changed (IBM, Microsoft updates, etc.). They commented that having a cloud platform also made integrating globally and linking with other Flexera modules easier, improving their overall IT asset visibility​.
• Lessons Learned: One lesson was the importance of executive sponsorship and cross-department communication. Initially, some teams were wary of the new system; they overcame this by demonstrating quick wins (like finding immediate compliance issues and fixing them, thus avoiding a cost). Also, the PoC comparing tools taught them to look beyond surface features and evaluate depth in license management – FNMS’s stronger capabilities for enterprise software won out, which was crucial in the long run when handling complex scenarios. Another insight was continuously updating and maintaining the system (they instituted a SAM governance board to oversee data quality and process compliance across IT and finance).

Conclusion: This example underscores that for large enterprises with complex licensing, choosing a robust SAM tool like FlexNet Manager Suite pays dividends in audit risk reduction and cost control. The firm unified its asset data, automated compliance calculations for tough metrics, and scaled the solution with the business (even moving to SaaS as needed). The outcome was a more confident stance in vendor audits and tangible financial benefits from optimization. The key takeaway is that success came from installing a tool and integrating it into procurement and IT processes and keeping the SAM practice evolving (e.g., leveraging new SaaS management when SaaS usage grew).

---

Key Takeaways from the Case Studies:

• Early Investment, Lasting Returns: Organizations that invested in proper SAM technology and processes (like DBS, AstraZeneca, and the financial firm) reaped significant benefits: audit fees avoided, labor savings, and software cost reductions that often far exceeded the tool cost. For example, one company saved millions in true-up costs​, and another saved $2M/year in IT effort through automation​.
• Executive Sponsorship is Crucial: All examples had management buy-in (e.g., a Chief Procurement Officer at DBS supporting the initiative​or IT leadership at AstraZeneca driving the SoftwareStore project). This helped secure resources and cross-team collaboration.
• Leverage the Tool’s Full Capabilities: The successful implementations used FlexNet Manager’s strengths—huge recognition libraries, complex license logic, integration APIs—rather than manual implementations. They also coupled it with process changes (like monthly compliance meetings and integrated request workflows) to maximize impact.
• Data and Process Integration: A common thread is integrating FNMS with other systems (ServiceNow, SCCM, procurement databases). This made SAM part of the daily IT fabric, ensuring data stayed current and actions (like installs or removals) were tightly managed. A siloed operation would not have achieved the same results.
• Continuous Improvement: After initial wins, these organizations didn’t stop. They updated their SAM practices as their business changed (e.g., moving to cloud, handling new vendor models, expanding scope to more apps). The lesson is to treat SAM as a continuous journey – keep refining data and processes and using new features to handle emerging challenges (like SaaS, cloud, new audits, etc.).

By studying these examples, IT asset managers can gain insight into how to approach their own FlexNet Manager Suite projects: start with clear goals (audit compliance, cost saving, automation), ensure cross-functional alignment, configure the tool to tackle the most valuable areas first, and then build on success incrementally. With diligence and the right use of technology, organizations across industries have turned software asset management from a headache into a strategic advantage.

Do you want to know more about our Advisory Services?